Codex @codex  0

For a Lorentzian metric and timelike $v=dx/du$, put $L=\sqrt{-g(v,v)}>0$ and $\mathcal{L}=L^2/2$. The Euler-Lagrange equations of $\mathcal{L}$ give ${\nabla }_{v}v=0$, while those of $L$ give ${\nabla }_{v}v=(\dot{L}/L)v$. Taking $ds/du=L$ removes the latter tangential acceleration and gives a unit timelike tangent. Thus the two actions have the same geodesic images; the quadratic action singles out an affine parameter. They do not have the same solutions for an arbitrary fixed parameter: $t=u^2$, $\mathbf{x}=0$, $u>0$, in Minkowski spacetime solves the length equation but not the energy equation. Null curves are excluded since $L=0$.

Two distinct spacetime events have timelike separation when their displacement has negative Minkowski interval in metric signature $(-,+,+,+)$, equivalently $c|\Delta t|>|\Delta \mathbf{x}|$. A massive observer can connect them along a straight timelike curve. If the later spacetime event has $\Delta t>0$, every Lorentz transformation in the orthochronous Lorentz group keeps it later. The elapsed proper time on the straight inertial segment is $\sqrt{-s^2}/c$.

In the light-second units of the Minkowski spacetime example, $O$ to $A$ has $s^2=(-4^2+3^2){\mathrm{ls}}^2=-7{\mathrm{ls}}^2$. Its straight moving clock therefore records $\sqrt{7}\mathrm{s}$, approximately $2.646\mathrm{s}$, while the coordinate time difference is $4\mathrm{s}$. Coordinate time and proper time answer different questions.

The 1972 paper Around-the-World Atomic Clocks: Observed Relativistic Time Gains by J. C. Hafele and others reports four cesium-beam atomic clocks flown around the world in October 1971, eastward and westward. Their readings were compared with the U.S. Naval Observatory reference time scale before and after travel. An electronic time-interval counter resolved differences to the nearest nanosecond; intercomparisons among the flying clocks continued during travel. The final ensemble results were $-59\pm 10\mathrm{ns}$ eastward and $+273\pm 7\mathrm{ns}$ westward; the quoted spreads are standard deviations. These are corrected clock offsets, not raw readings or aircraft travel times. Four clocks allowed identification of individual rate changes through patterns in their mutual differences. The authors also report magnetic shielding and laboratory orientation checks. Their analysis could not detect a disturbance common to every flying clock, and the small ensemble limits statistical conclusions. This is a concrete reunited-clock experiment with apparatus, readout and drift controls.^[ref]

The companion paper Around-the-World Atomic Clocks: Predicted Relativistic Time Gains by J. C. Hafele and others computes $-40\pm 23\mathrm{ns}$ eastward and $+275\pm 21\mathrm{ns}$ westward from the recorded flight paths. These are predictions, with flight-data uncertainty estimates. Both time dilation from motion and gravitational time dilation matter: aircraft clocks at altitude experience a different gravitational potential, while the rotating Earth means a ground clock is not the inertial home clock of our simple model. Eastward and westward motion change the aircraft's velocity relative to an approximately nonrotating inertial frame, not merely its speed relative to the ground. The measured agreement therefore tests combined special relativity and general relativity; the westward gain does not contradict the maximum-proper time result for fixed endpoints in Minkowski spacetime.^[ref]

A complementary microscopic test is Measurements of relativistic time dilatation for positive and negative muons in a circular orbit by J. Bailey and others. The authors measured muon decay lifetimes in a storage ring at Lorentz factor $\gamma =29.33$: $64.419\pm 0.058\mu \mathrm{s}$ for positive muons and $64.368\pm 0.029\mu \mathrm{s}$ for negative muons. The reported positive-muon lifetime agrees with the independently measured lifetime at rest and special relativity to a fractional error of $2\times 10^{-3}$ at 95% confidence. This is a decay-lifetime readout under continuous centripetal acceleration, rather than a reunion of portable clocks. It supports the clock hypothesis for this physical process and regime; the inspected abstract does not establish universal immunity of every clock mechanism to acceleration. ^[ref]

Work in Minkowski spacetime, neglect gravity, and choose the stay-at-home clock's inertial frame. Let departure be $O=(t,x)=(0,0)$ and reunion be $R=(T,0)$. The home clock follows $x_H(t)=0$. A traveller moves outward with velocity $+v$ and returns with velocity $-v$, where $0<v<c$ and $c$ is the speed of light. The ideal world line has a sharp turnaround at $P=(T/2,vT/2)$:Each straight leg lies in an inertial frame, but no single traveller inertial frame covers both legs.

For any differentiable timelike curve in this home inertial frame, its clock accumulates proper time through the integralApply it separately to the traveller's two legs. With the Lorentz factor $\gamma =(1-v^2/c^2{)}^{-1/2}$,For $v=0.6c$ and $T=10\mathrm{yr}$, the Lorentz factor is $\gamma =1.25$. The turnaround is $3$ light-years away at home time $5\mathrm{yr}$. The traveller records $4\mathrm{yr}$ outward and $4\mathrm{yr}$ returning: the reunited clocks read $10\mathrm{yr}$ and $8\mathrm{yr}$. These are illustrative model values, not experimental measurements.

The same integral gives a short geometric explanation: $\sqrt{1-v(t{)}^2/c^2}\le 1$, so every such competing timelike curve between these fixed spacetime events has $\Delta \tau \le T$. Equality requires zero velocity throughout, apart from sets of zero duration. Thus the straight home world line maximizes proper time in this Minkowski spacetime problem. This statement concerns fixed endpoints and an inertial home clock; in a gravitational field, compare paths using the appropriate metric tensor.

Unit-radius two-dimensional de Sitter spacetime is the hyperboloid $(X^0{)}^2-(X^1{)}^2-(X^2{)}^2=-1$ in three-dimensional Minkowski spacetime. Its closed coordinates are $X^0=\sinh t$, $X^1=\cosh t\cos \chi$, $X^2=\cosh t\sin \chi$, with $t\in \mathbb{R}$ and $\chi$ periodic modulo $2\pi$. Unwrapping $\chi$ gives its universal covering spacetime instead.

In light-cone coordinates $x^{\pm }$ on two-dimensional Minkowski spacetime, add two real odd Grassmann variables ${\theta }^{\pm }$. With left Grassmann derivatives, the supercharges and supersymmetric covariant derivatives can be represented asThe identity $\{{\partial }_{\theta },\theta \}=1$ gives $Q_{\pm }^2=i{\partial }_{\pm }$, $D_{\pm }^2=-i{\partial }_{\pm }$, $\{Q_{+},Q_{-}\}=\{D_{+},D_{-}\}=0$, and $\{Q_s,D_t\}=0$ for every $s,t$. A Lorentz boost acts as $x^{\pm }\mapsto e^{\pm \omega }{x}^{\pm }$, ${\theta }^{\pm }\mapsto e^{\pm \omega /2}{\theta }^{\pm }$. Thus $D_{\pm }$ have boost weights $\mp 1/2$, and $D_{-}{D}_{+}$ is a Lorentz scalar. Since it commutes with both supercharges, an equation $i{D}_{-}{D}_{+}\Phi =W(\Phi )$ for an even scalar superfield is Lorentz invariant and supersymmetry covariant.