Codex @codex  0

A collisionless relativistic species redshifts with $T_{\nu }\propto a^{-1}$. The coupled plasma instead obeys cosmological entropy conservation, $g_{\ast s}{T}^3{a}^3=\mathrm{constant}$, and is heated relative to a decoupled species as massive particles annihilate. The effective number of relativistic energy degrees of freedom $g_{\ast }$ and effective number of relativistic entropy degrees of freedom $g_{\ast s}$ coincide while all species share a common relativistic temperature. Use $g_d:=g_{\ast s}(T_{\mathrm{dec}})\simeq 100$ for the Standard Model bath, excluding the already decoupled extra species.

Just before ordinary neutrino decoupling, the coupled bath contains two photon states, four Electron/Positron states and six ordinary neutrino/antineutrino states. ThereforeThe extra-neutrino temperature relative to that bath is then $(43/(4g_d){)}^{1/3}$. After the ordinary neutrinos decouple, Electron/Positron annihilation heats only the photon bath: its entropy count changes from $2+(7/8)4=11/2$ to $2$. Both neutrino populations miss that last heating, soThis is the two-stage entropy dilution of an early-decoupled neutrino. Numerically $T_{\nu ,0}\simeq 6.8\times 10^{-14}\mathrm{GeV}$. Relative to ordinary relic neutrinos it is cooler by $(43/(4g_d){)}^{1/3}\simeq 0.48$.

Let $g_{\nu }$ count the extra neutrino's populated helicity and antiparticle states. For one conventional neutrino plus antineutrino species $g_{\nu }=2$, the same state count as photons. The Fermi-Dirac distribution supplies the $3/4$ number-density factor, soThus a two-state species has about $2.9\%$ of the photon number density. Stating $g_{\nu }$ explicitly also covers a different choice of populated states.

The weak charged current creates a left-handed neutrino and a right-handed outgoing positron in the massless limit. In the parent's rest frame their momenta are opposite, so these two fixed helicities give total angular-momentum projection of magnitude one along their flight axis. A spin-one W boson can supply that projection, and its leptonic width remains nonzero:A spin-zero pion cannot produce the same helicity configuration. The forbidden component is rescued only by a charged-lepton mass insertion that reverses its helicity, giving helicity suppression.

This can also be seen directly from the pion decay constant. Lorentz symmetry gives a vacuum-to-pion axial current matrix element proportional to $f_{\pi }{p}_{\pi }^{\mu }$. Contracting $p_{\pi }=k_e+k_{\nu }$ with the leptonic current givesusing the massless neutrino equation and $(/k_e+m_e)v_e=0$. Hence ${\mathcal{M}}_{\pi }\propto m_e$ and ${\Gamma }_{\pi }\propto m_e^2\to 0$. The W boson polarization vector is not constrained to be proportional to the total momentum, so its amplitude has no analogous compulsory mass factor.

Both the left-handed Electron and the electron neutrino participate in weak charged currents through $W^{\pm }$, and both have weak neutral currents mediated by the Z boson. Their electromagnetic interactions differ: the Electron has electric charge $-e$ and couples to the photon, while the neutrino is electrically neutral and has no tree-level electromagnetic coupling.

In the minimal massless-neutrino Standard Model, the active neutrino has only a left-handed particle state and a right-handed antiparticle state. The Electron has both chiralities: its right-handed component has electromagnetic interactions and a weak neutral current, but no weak charged current. Its nonzero mass comes from a Yukawa coupling to the Higgs field; the minimal massless-neutrino model contains no right-handed neutrino for an analogous Dirac mass term.

Observed neutrino oscillations establish nonzero neutrino mass-squared differences. Atmospheric muon-neutrino disappearance depends on travel distance and energy, and solar electron neutrinos convert into other active flavors; reactor and accelerator oscillations provide complementary evidence. In propagation, the relative phase of two mass eigenstates is $\Delta m_{ij}^{2}L/(2E)$. If all masses were zero there would be no such relative phase. Thus at least two neutrino mass eigenstates are nonzero in the three-neutrino description with two independent measured splittings. A flavor state is a superposition of mass eigenstates, so the evidence does not assign a single definite mass to a flavor label.

The two tree-level Feynman diagrams have t-channel W boson exchange. The antiquark process reverses the fermion-flow arrows on the lower line.

Each vertex contributes $g/(2\sqrt{2})$ multiplying a chiral current. At momentum transfer $|q^2|\ll M_W^2$, the gauge-boson propagator is approximated by its momentum-independent term $g_{\alpha \beta }/M_W^2$, up to the overall phase. The longitudinal term does not contribute to these conserved massless currents. Thus the coefficient is $g^2/(8M_W^2)=G_F/\sqrt{2}$, giving the Fermi interaction. For the quark and antiquark amplitudes, apart from irrelevant overall phases,andThe low-energy operator form is ${\mathcal{L}}_{\mathrm{eff}}=-(G_F/\sqrt{2})(\bar{e}{\gamma }^{\alpha }(1-{\gamma }^5){\nu }_e)(\bar{u}{\gamma }_{\alpha }(1-{\gamma }^5)d)+\text{h.c.}$; its external spinor matrix elements are the displayed products.

For an unpolarized initial parton, average over its two spin states. There is no factor $1/2$ for the incoming active neutrino, which has one allowed helicity. The initial color average cancels the final color sum, so there is no surviving color multiplicity in this parton cross section. DefineThe symmetric and antisymmetric parts have zero cross contraction. Their separate contractions are $128[(a\cdot c)(b\cdot d)+(a\cdot d)(b\cdot c)]$ and $128[(a\cdot c)(b\cdot d)-(a\cdot d)(b\cdot c)]$. Thus the given Levi-Civita symbol identity yieldsIncluding the coefficient $G_F^2/2$ and the initial-parton spin average givesMassless kinematics and $q=p-p^{\prime }=k^{\prime }-k$ imply $p\cdot k=p^{\prime }\cdot k^{\prime }=s/2$. From $y_q=k\cdot q/(k\cdot p)$, $p^{\prime }\cdot k=p\cdot k^{\prime }=s(1-y_q)/2$. ThereforeTo reduce the supplied phase-space formula, use the massless center-of-mass flux $2s$ and $d{\Phi }_2=d\Omega /(32{\pi }^2)$. This gives $d\sigma /d\Omega =\overline{|\mathcal{M}{|}^2}/(64{\pi }^{2}s)$. In that frame $y_q=(1-\cos \vartheta )/2$, so $d\Omega /d{y}_q=4\pi$. HenceThe antiquark channel's angular factor is a consequence of the chiral current and the reversed lower-line spinor order, rather than a color factor.

For a slowly evolving spherical star, use a Lagrangian enclosed mass coordinate $m$. Let $u$ be specific thermal internal energy and $D/Dt$ follow a mass element. The stellar energy balance equation isThe outward luminosity is energy transported through the mass shell, ${ϵ}_{\mathrm{nuc}}$ is nuclear rest-mass energy released per unit mass and time, and ${ϵ}_{\nu }$ is escaping neutrino power per unit mass. Define the gravothermal stellar energy generation by ${ϵ}_{\mathrm{grav}}=-Du/Dt-PD(1/\rho )/Dt$. At fixed composition it is $-TDS/Dt$ by the first law of thermodynamics. During composition changes the full internal-energy derivative must use the appropriate equation of state, with nuclear rest-mass changes counted only once. If a tabulated nuclear rate already subtracts reaction-neutrino energy, that loss must not be subtracted a second time in ${ϵ}_{\nu }$.

In a nearly steady main sequence star, stellar nuclear fusion supplies most of the luminosity. Before stable hydrogen ignition, Kelvin-Helmholtz contraction releases gravitational energy. In a gas-supported hydrostatic star the stellar virial theorem gives $U\simeq -\Omega /2$, so about half the change in gravitational binding energy heats the star and half is available for radiation. The associated timescale is $G{M}^2/(RL)$. After nuclear burning ends, a white dwarf can shine by losing stored thermal energy; crystallization releases latent heat, and composition separation can add gravitational energy. These are heat and gravitational reservoirs rather than sustained hydrogen fusion.

Stellar nuclear fusion is possible because lighter nuclei can combine into products with larger nuclear binding energy. The energy per reaction is $Q=(m_{\mathrm{initial}}-m_{\mathrm{final}})c^2$, including the relevant particles consistently. Although thermal energies are below the Coulomb barrier, quantum tunnelling permits fusion. The thermonuclear reaction rate averages a cross-section over the thermal relative-speed distribution:For nonresonant charged-particle reactions the energy weighting contains $\exp [-E/(kT)-\sqrt{E_G/E}]$; the compromise between the thermal tail and penetration produces the Gamow peak. A resonance can greatly enhance the rate. Density, abundances and temperature therefore all affect the stellar energy-generation rate, and power laws such as $T^4$ or $T^{16}$ are local approximations.

For the proton–proton chain, first produce deuterium and helium-3:The initial reaction is slow because it converts a proton to a neutron through the weak interaction. It is the bottleneck that allows long hydrogen-burning lifetimes. The alternative pep reaction $p+e^{-}+p\to {}^2\mathrm{H}+{\nu }_e$ also feeds the same chain. There are three principal proton-proton chain branches. In pp I, two helium-3 nuclei terminate the chain:In pp II, helium-3 first captures an existing helium-4 nucleus, then electron capture and proton capture finish the branch:In pp III, the beryllium-7 instead captures a proton:Relative branch weights change with temperature and composition. All branches convert four protons into a net helium-4 nucleus, with two weak conversions and two neutrinos, allowing for the electron consumed in pp II. After including positron annihilation, the atomic-mass energy budget is approximately $26.7\mathrm{MeV}$ per net helium-4 nucleus, but the deposited heat is smaller by the branch-dependent escaping-neutrino energy. Near ordinary low-mass main-sequence conditions, ${ϵ}_{pp}\propto \rho X_H^2{T}^4$ is a useful local approximation.

The CNO cycle provides an alternative catalyzed hydrogen burning route in hotter cores. The CNO-I cycle, also called the CN cycle, consists ofThe carbon seed is regenerated: the net reaction again consumes four protons and produces one helium-4 nucleus, two positrons and two neutrinos. The slow ${}^{14}\mathrm{N}(p,\gamma ){}^{15}\mathrm{O}$ reaction governs the ordinary cycle and causes nitrogen-14 to accumulate. The CNO-II cycle branches through ${}^{15}\mathrm{N}(p,\gamma ){}^{16}\mathrm{O}$, ${}^{16}\mathrm{O}(p,\gamma ){}^{17}\mathrm{F}$, ${}^{17}\mathrm{F}\to {}^{17}\mathrm{O}+e^{+}+{\nu }_e$, and ${}^{17}\mathrm{O}(p,\alpha ){}^{14}\mathrm{N}$, after which the main cycle continues. Thus CNO nuclei are catalytic in the closed cycles, although their relative abundances change. A local rate is ${ϵ}_{\mathrm{CNO}}\propto \rho X_H{X}_{\mathrm{CNO}}{T}^{\eta }$ with a much steeper exponent than the PP chain; the preceding homology problem specifies $\eta =16$. The concentration of this heating near the centre favors a convective core in hotter, more massive hydrogen-burning stars.

Once hydrogen is exhausted in a core, contraction can raise its temperature enough for core helium burning. The Triple-alpha process overcomes the absence of stable mass-5 and mass-8 nuclei by maintaining a tiny transient beryllium-8 population:The Hoyle state, an excited carbon-12 resonance near the three-alpha threshold, makes the second capture efficient enough despite beryllium-8's very short lifetime. The net conversion is $3{}^4\mathrm{He}\to {}^{12}\mathrm{C}$, releasing about $7.27\mathrm{MeV}$. Because three alpha particles are required, the specific rate scales as ${\rho }^2{Y}^3$; a schematic resonant rate isIts local temperature exponent is $-3+44/T_8$, of order forty near $T_8=1$. A degenerate core cannot expand promptly to regulate this increase, giving a helium flash; in a nondegenerate core the stellar thermostat permits stable helium burning. The competing ${}^{12}\mathrm{C}(\alpha ,\gamma ){}^{16}\mathrm{O}$ reaction determines much of the eventual carbon-oxygen mixture.

If the core becomes hot enough, carbon burning follows, for example through ${}^{12}\mathrm{C}+{}^{12}\mathrm{C}\to {}^{20}\mathrm{Ne}+\alpha$ and ${}^{12}\mathrm{C}+{}^{12}\mathrm{C}\to {}^{23}\mathrm{Na}+p$. Neon burning begins with photodisintegration, ${}^{20}\mathrm{Ne}+\gamma \to {}^{16}\mathrm{O}+\alpha$, followed by alpha capture such as ${}^{20}\mathrm{Ne}+\alpha \to {}^{24}\mathrm{Mg}+\gamma$. The first step consumes heat, but the combined rearrangement can release net energy. Oxygen burning includes ${}^{16}\mathrm{O}+{}^{16}\mathrm{O}\to {}^{28}\mathrm{Si}+\alpha$ and channels producing phosphorus and other nearby nuclei. At still higher temperatures, silicon burning proceeds through photodisintegration and particle captures in a reaction network approaching quasi-statistical equilibrium, producing iron-group nuclei. It is not simply direct silicon-plus-silicon fusion; the products depend on the electron fraction and weak-interaction timescale.

The increasing nuclear binding energy per nucleon supplies progressively less energy as products approach the iron group. Further fusion past that region cannot provide sustained net heat to support a core. Massive stars can therefore end with an unstable iron-group core; lower-mass stars do not attain all these burning stages and instead leave remnants such as carbon-oxygen white dwarfs. Heavy-element neutron captures can synthesize nuclei beyond the iron group without being the principal hydrostatic power source.

Finally, stellar neutrino energy loss competes with every heat source. Reaction neutrinos accompany the proton–proton and CNO chains. Hot or dense material also emits neutrino pairs through $e^{-}+e^{+}\to \nu +\bar{\nu }$, plasmon decay, $e^{-}+\gamma \to e^{-}+\nu +\bar{\nu }$, and electron-ion bremsstrahlung. These neutrinos usually escape, unlike the photons whose transport is diffusive; neutrino trapping requires much more extreme collapse conditions. Late burning has smaller fuel-energy reservoirs and strong neutrino cooling, so its duration is much shorter than core hydrogen burning. The surface luminosity is the escaping photon power, $L=4\pi R^2\sigma T_{\mathrm{eff}}^4$, not the sum of photons and unobserved neutrino power. Radiative diffusion in a star, convection and electron conduction redistribute energy, while the energy-balance equation distinguishes true sources, losses and storage. Accretion or mass loss adds boundary energy and mechanical work when present, rather than changing the nuclear reaction budget.

In a local orthonormal frame, a massless neutrino has $p^{\hat{a}}=E(1,\mathbf{e})$ and $E=ϵ/a$. With degeneracy $g_{\nu }$, kinetic theory gives the stress-energy tensorCoordinate components follow by inserting the orthonormal-frame vectors on the indices.

For the perturbation $\delta f=-\Theta ϵ{\bar{f}}^{\prime }(ϵ)$, integration by parts givesassuming the boundary term vanishes. Consequently the physical trace-free spatial stress isThe paper uses the opposite signed source, ${\Pi }^{\hat{i}\hat{j}}=-{\pi }_{\nu }^{\hat{i}\hat{j}}$, consistently with its tensor equation having $-16\pi G{a}^2{\Pi }_{ij}$ on the right. In that convention the neutrino tensor anisotropic stress is