Past exam of the gauge field theory course of the University of Cambridge / 2014 / Paper 1 / 3

A relativistic quantum field describes both creation and annihilation of excitations; a one-particle wavefunction alone is insufficient when interactions can change particle number. For a free complex scalar field, one conventional mode expansion of a free field isThe apparently negative-frequency term creates a positive-energy antiparticle; it is not a physical particle of unbounded negative energy. The normal-ordered Hamiltonian and conserved global phase charge have the formsParticles and antiparticles have equal mass and opposite additive internal charges. Including both frequency sectors is also essential to the local field commutator: the positive- and negative-frequency terms combine so that spacelike-separated scalar observables commute, respecting microcausality.

A Dirac field similarly contains particle annihilation operators multiplying $u$ spinors and antiparticle creation operators multiplying $v$ spinors. Its canonical anticommutation relations implement Fermi-Dirac statistics, whereas scalar modes use commutators and Bose-Einstein statistics. These assignments are tied to the Spin-statistics theorem under the usual relativistic locality and positivity assumptions. Conserved charge constrains particle creation and annihilation, but particle and antiparticle numbers need not be separately conserved in an interacting theory.

An antiparticle need not be a distinct species. A neutral real scalar field is self-conjugate; the photon is also its own antiparticle. A Majorana fermion obeys a self-conjugacy condition and cannot carry an unbroken additive charge that distinguishes it from its antiparticle. Electric neutrality alone does not force self-conjugacy when other conserved quantum numbers distinguish the states.

Loop corrections in perturbative quantum field theory integrate over unbounded internal four-momentum. For example, after a Wick rotation, a four-dimensional integral with large-momentum behaviorhas a logarithmic ultraviolet divergence. This is sensitivity to short distances, distinct from a possible low-momentum infrared divergence.

Regularization in quantum field theory first makes the expression mathematically well defined, for example with a cutoff $\Lambda$ or dimensional regularization in $d=4-2ϵ$. A regulator is an intermediate prescription rather than a measured physical parameter; a hard momentum cutoff can obscure gauge identities, so their preservation or restoration must be checked. Introduce bare fields and parameters, such as ${\varphi }_0=Z_{\varphi }^{1/2}\varphi$, and split the regulated Lagrangian density into a renormalized part and local counterterms. For instance, wavefunction, mass and coupling counterterms cancel the corresponding divergent parts of Green functions order by order.

Renormalization conditions fix finite parameters through specified observables or a subtraction prescription. Once these physical inputs are held fixed, predictions must not depend on the arbitrary regulator. In a renormalizable quantum field theory, a finite set of operator coefficients suffices to absorb ultraviolet divergences at every perturbative order, with the allowed structures constrained by the theory's symmetries. Gauge theories impose relations among counterterms through identities such as the Ward-Takahashi identity; one cannot choose every diagram's subtraction independently.

The remaining dependence on a chosen renormalization scale describes running couplings and is organized by the renormalization group. An effective field theory can instead include higher-dimension operators suppressed by a high scale. Infinitely many are allowed in principle, but only finitely many contribute at a fixed accuracy in the low-energy expansion. Renormalization is therefore a controlled relation between parameters and predictions at different scales, rather than an instruction to discard every infinity without fixing physical inputs.

The left- and right-chiral components of a charged Standard Model fermion transform in different electroweak group representations. A bare Dirac mass term $-m{\bar{f}}_L{f}_R+h.c.$ is therefore not invariant under the full electroweak gauge group. The Higgs doublet supplies the missing transformation properties. With $\tilde{H}=i{\sigma }_2{H}^{\ast }$, the gauge-invariant Yukawa interactions arewhere each $Y_f$ is a flavor-space Yukawa matrix. For example, hypercharges in the down-quark term add to $-1/6+1/2-1/3=0$, while those in the up-quark term add to $-1/6-1/2+2/3=0$. Thus the Higgs and conjugate Higgs are required in different terms.

After electroweak symmetry breaking, choose unitary gauge with $H=(0,(v+h)/\sqrt{2}{)}^T$. The fermion mass matrices becomeA singular value decomposition $U_{fL}^{†}{M}_f{U}_{fR}=\mathrm{diag}(m_{f,1},m_{f,2},m_{f,3})$ defines nonnegative physical tree-level masses. The mismatch $U_{uL}^{†}{U}_{dL}$ is the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix in the weak charged current. The corresponding physical Higgs boson couples diagonally as $-(m_f/v)h\bar{f}f$ in the minimal one-doublet theory. This relates its coupling strength to each mass, but the measured Yukawa couplings remain independent input parameters: the minimal theory does not predict their hierarchy.

The minimal renormalizable Standard Model contains no right-handed neutrino, so it has neither a neutrino Dirac Yukawa term nor a gauge-invariant renormalizable left-handed Majorana mass term. Its neutrinos are massless. Observed neutrino oscillations require going beyond that minimal field content or operator set: adding right-handed singlets permits Dirac masses, while the dimension-five Weinberg operator gives a Majorana neutrino mass of order $v^2/\Lambda$ after symmetry breaking. These alternatives should be distinguished from the charged-fermion Yukawa mechanism.