For a cell in a Young diagram, its hook of a Young diagram consists of , all cells to its right in row , and all cells below it in column . If is the conjugate partition, its hook length is
The hook-length formula is
In the Greene–Nijenhuis–Wilf hook walk, a walk at a noncorner cell chooses uniformly one of the other cells in its hook, and stops at a corner. Moves are strictly rightwards or downwards, so termination is certain. A terminal cell must be a Removable node of a Young diagram. For a chosen corner , its probability is zero unless the start satisfies and .
For a start in that northwest rectangle, define
The corner conditions are and , so , and all earlier are positive. Define
and
Then the closed conditional probability is
In particular, if both inequalities are strict, this is
The separate definitions of handle starts in the terminal row, in the terminal column, or at the corner itself without division by zero.
To prove the formula, the product definitions give the identities
with the terminal zero identities interpreted as empty sums. For example, summing the recurrence backwards gives . Also
The first-step equation for the hook walk terminal probability is
Jumps beyond the target rectangle contribute zero. Substituting proves this equation, and gives its boundary value. Since every step increases a coordinate, backward recursion determines the probability uniquely. This proves the claimed expression.
For , the product is empty and equals the identity, the only -cycle in . Suppose the cycle-sum identity for Young–Jucys–Murphy elements holds at :
Multiplication by gives terms . With permutation products acting right to left, this inserts immediately after in the cycle of : the arrows become , with the other arrows unchanged.
Conversely, in any -cycle there is a unique predecessor of . Delete and join that predecessor to the successor of ; this uniquely recovers and the factor . Hence every -cycle occurs exactly once, and no other permutation occurs. Induction proves
Thus is a conjugacy-class sum in , although it need not be central in when .
Let be a standard Young tableau of shape , and let be the shape formed by its entries . Since Young–Jucys–Murphy elements act by contents, the eigenvalue of on its Gelfand–Tsetlin basis vector is
If is not a hook partition, it contains , whose content is zero, so this product is zero. If with , its nonzero contents are and . Their product is independent of the order of the labels. Therefore the eigenvalue is
The empty product at gives . When , , giving exactly the hook-versus-nonhook distinction suggested by the hint. For , it is the intermediate shape , rather than the final shape , that controls the answer.
There are -cycles in , and each has the same character value of a representation on . Taking traces in the cycle-sum identity for Young–Jucys–Murphy elements yields
Only tableaux whose first entries form a hook partition contribute.
Write such a shape as , for . There are ways to fill it: choose which of the labels go below the first box. There are ways to fill the remaining skew diagram with the labels , in standard order. The eigenvalue from part (ii) is , so the factor
is . Therefore the general character value is
Here counts standard skew Young tableaux, and is zero when is not contained in . In particular, for a full -cycle,
For , the general formula gives , the character value at the identity, as it should.
Set , for . These are distinct nonnegative integers with . Using the falling factorial, the matrix entry can be written
When , the falling factorial vanishes, agreeing with the stipulated convention for a negative factorial argument.
The column polynomials are monic of successive descending degrees. Subtracting lower-degree combinations of columns turns them into without changing the determinant. The Vandermonde determinant therefore gives
The positive sign comes from reversing the usual increasing-degree Vandermonde columns at the same time as writing the differences as .
We now match this denominator with the hook-length formula. The hook lengths in row are precisely
To verify the claim, the first hook in the row has length . As the column index passes from to , its hook length drops by plus the number of lower rows ending at column . The skipped lengths are exactly for those rows: if , then . At the right-hand end, lower rows having the same length as row account for the missing smallest lengths by the same formula. This describes all omitted values, and the remaining count is .
Consequently
Combining the two identities with the hook-length formula proves the determinantal dimension formula

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.