Past exam of the relativity course of the University of Cambridge / 2014 / Paper 1 / 2

inertial mass sets the response to force, $\mathbf{F}=m_i\mathbf{a}$. Passive gravitational mass sets the response to a given gravitational potential, ${\mathbf{F}}_g=-m_g\nabla \Phi$; active gravitational mass describes a body's gravitational sourcing. Universality of the passive-to-inertial mass ratio makes freely falling trajectories independent of composition. torsion balance comparisons and differential free-fall experiments test this weak equivalence principle by searching for composition-dependent acceleration, with environmental forces and instrumental asymmetries controlled.

The Einstein equivalence principle further says that local nongravitational experiments in a freely falling laboratory obey special relativity, independent of the laboratory's location and velocity. A local inertial coordinate system can remove Christoffel symbols at one event, but cannot remove a nonzero Riemann tensor throughout a finite region. Relative acceleration of separated freely falling particles reveals tidal gravity. Thus a uniformly accelerating laboratory in flat spacetime can mimic a local gravitational field, while extended tidal measurements distinguish genuine curvature. Equality of the measured mass responses does not make every gravitational field globally equivalent to acceleration.

Use coordinates $x^{\mu }=(ct,\mathbf{x})$, signature $(+---)$, and the convention $F^{0i}=-E_i/c$, $F^{ij}=-{ϵ}_{ijk}{B}_k$. The antisymmetric electromagnetic field tensor combines six field components:It transforms as $F^{\prime \mu \nu }={\Lambda }^{\mu }{}_{\alpha }{\Lambda }^{\nu }{}_{\beta }{F}^{\alpha \beta }$. Lowering indices changes the time–space signs: $F_{0i}=E_i/c$, while $F_{ij}=F^{ij}$. The covariant tensor instead uses the inverse coordinate Jacobian on each lower index.

For a frame moving with velocity $\mathbf{v}$ relative to the original one,Electric and magnetic fields therefore mix under a boost; they are frame-dependent parts of one tensor. For example, a purely transverse electric field acquires a magnetic field in a boosted frame. The electromagnetic field invariants $B^2-E^2/c^2$ and $\mathbf{E}\cdot \mathbf{B}$ restrict which fields can be eliminated by a frame change. The covariant force law $d{p}^{\mu }/d\tau =q{F}^{\mu }{}_{\nu }{U}^{\nu }$ guarantees consistent particle dynamics in all inertial frames.

The strongest pre-2014 evidence combines large gravitating mass with extreme compactness. In an X-ray binary, companion-star radial velocities determine a binary mass function; orbital inclination, donor properties and distance complete the mass inference. An unseen component above conventional neutron-star masses is a black-hole candidate. For example, a 2011 Cygnus X-1 analysis combined optical photometry, spectroscopy and distance information to infer a compact-object mass about $14.8M_{\odot }$, with model and observational uncertainties.^[ref]

Near Sagittarius A*, infrared stellar astrometry and radial velocities trace nearly Keplerian orbits around a dark compact mass. The concentration of several million solar masses in a small volume strongly challenges an extended cluster of ordinary remnants; source confusion, reference-frame errors, distance and possible extended mass must be fitted.^[ref] Gas and maser dynamics provide related compact-mass tests in other nuclei.

accretion explains luminous X-rays, rapid variability and broad relativistic disk features. These constrain size and the strong-field environment, but emission alone is not unique to an event horizon. Lack of surface-like signatures is supporting, model-dependent evidence. Mass, compactness and consistent accretion phenomenology together support the black-hole interpretation; large-radius mass measurements alone do not directly demonstrate a horizon.