Write for the cross-sectional area, and use consistently for the longitudinal coordinate: the paper's later is the same coordinate. The canonical momentum is a density per reference length,The Legendre transform gives the Hamiltonian density in its proper canonical variables:The Euler-Lagrange equation isFor a twice-differentiable wave packet , the derivatives are and . Thus the nontrivial packet solves the wave equation whenThe negative sign gives the opposite propagation direction. Here has units , has units , and has units . The result follows from the supplied axial stiffness in the Lagrangian. For a freely contracting thin elastic rod the relevant longitudinal modulus is normally Young's modulus, rather than the bulk modulus; the question's given Lagrangian fixes which coefficient is being used.
Both Noether charges require boundary conditions that admit the stated transformations and no net boundary-current flux. Take a sufficiently localized field on the whole rod, with the weighted integrals below finite. Fixed endpoints at finite positions generally spoil the waveform-dilation symmetry.
The transformation leaves both derivatives unchanged, so the Lagrangian density and action are invariant. For infinitesimal unit field variation, the Noether current for a first-derivative scalar field is the shift current of an elastic rod,Its divergence vanishes by the equation of motion. The charge is the total longitudinal mechanical momentum to this order in the displacement field.
For , put . Each derivative gains a factor , so . Changing integration variables to contributes , proving exact invariance of the full-space action.
Set . At fixed coordinates, with . Since the density is quadratic in derivatives,The variation is a divergence, so subtract its boundary term in the Noether current:Thus the dilatation charge of a one-dimensional elastic wave isAn overall sign change would give the same conservation law. Unlike , this charge has units of action, . Its explicit factor of is balanced by transport of the weighted momentum density; an explicitly time-dependent charge can still be conserved.
For a rightgoing wave packet, put and assume decays sufficiently rapidly. ThenThe shift charge becomesIt is time independent. It vanishes for a localized displacement packet that returns to the same displacement at both ends, but need not vanish for a localized strain pulse joining different asymptotic displacements.
For the dilation charge, substitute :The change of variables removes all time dependence. This charge also need not vanish; choosing an origin at the packet's energy centroid can make it zero. Conservation assumes the integral exists and there is no boundary flux, rather than merely assuming that the energy is finite.
Position-dependent density. The density remains independent of itself, so the shift Noether charge survives with its altered canonical momentum:A prescribed generic function supplies a fixed spatial scale and breaks scale invariance. For the dilation-current candidate with the corresponding and , the scale-breaking sources in derivative field theories giveThus is generally not conserved. Constant density recovers the earlier case; specially scale-invariant profiles and suitably invariant domains would require separate treatment.
Quartic strain. The extra term in again preserves a uniform field shift. Its time momentum is unchanged, while its spatial current becomes . ThereforeThe new Hamiltonian density is . Under waveform dilation, the quartic term scales with rather than , andHence there is no corresponding conserved for nonzero generic , even if the energy in its candidate expression is updated.
Field-dependent quadratic stiffness. In , the term breaks the uniform field shift:when spatial flux vanishes. Thus is not generally conserved. However all terms still contain exactly two derivatives in total, with a field of zero dilation weight. The factor gains no extra power of , so waveform dilation remains an action symmetry. Its charge isHere as before. Relative to the original charge, the energy term changes; the symmetry survives despite the nonlinear field dependence. These statements concern symmetry conservation, separately from any restrictions on parameters needed for positive elastic energy.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.