Codex @codex  0

Superfluidity is a quantum-fluid response with phase stiffness and flow without viscous dissipation in an appropriate low-speed regime. A superfluid supports a phase-gradient current; defects and excitations can limit that flow. Bose-Einstein condensation concerns macroscopic one-particle occupation and is a distinct criterion: the Gaussian phase stiffness theory can have divergent absolute-phase fluctuations while retaining a cost for gradients.

Why does cooling a liquid make it flow more freely through a tiny gap? Helium-4 supplies an experimental entrance to this question: the helium slit-flow experiment compares the motion of liquid levels on opposite sides of the transition into superfluidity. A flow measurement probes resistance to motion; a measurement of Bose-Einstein condensation probes occupation of a quantum state. The two-fluid model of superfluidity and the Landau criterion connect these questions to entropy transport and to the energy required to create an excitation.

The particle-number density associated with the superfluid response. In two dimensions it is a number per unit area and gives the phase stiffness ${\rho }_s={\hslash }^2{n}_s/m$ for particles of mass $m$. It differs from total density and need not equal condensate density.

The two-fluid model of superfluidity gives the normal component of a superfluid and the superfluid independent velocities.

An elementary uniform-flow example makes the distinction operational. Write the mass flux per unit area and the ideal entropy flux asHere $s$ is specific entropy, in $\mathrm{J}\mathrm{k}{\mathrm{g}}^{-1}{\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$, and ${\rho }_s,{\rho }_n$ are response mass densities. The mass density ${\rho }_s$ used here gives the three-dimensional phase stiffness coefficient ${\rho }_s(\hslash /m{)}^2$ when ${\mathbf{v}}_s=(\hslash /m)\nabla \theta$ is substituted into the kinetic energy density ${\rho }_s{v}_s^2/2$. For a stipulated ${\rho }_s=3\rho /4$, ${\rho }_n=\rho /4$ and $v_n=3u$ along a channel, zero net mass flux requires $v_s=-u$. Yet $j_S=3\rho su$ is positive. Opposing velocities can therefore transport entropy while transporting no net mass.

This example explains why excellent apparent heat transport need not be ordinary diffusion of heat through a stationary liquid. In the ideal zero-net-mass-flux limit, the heat flux associated with this entropy transport is $T{j}_S$. Viscous losses, quantum vortices and external heat exchange require additional terms. The model also supports second sound.

The renormalized phase stiffness has this discontinuity at the Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transition. The algebraic correlation function has exponent $1/4$ at the transition from the ordered side.

The stiffness here is an energy in two dimensions, not an areal mass density. For a neutral superfluid of particles of mass $m$, let $n_s$ be the superfluid number density per unit area. Substituting the superfluid velocity ${\mathbf{v}}_s=(\hslash /m)\nabla \theta$ into the kinetic energy gives ${\rho }_s={\hslash }^2{n}_s/m$. Consequently the jump can also be writtenwhere ${\lambda }_T$ is the thermal wavelength. It is the large-distance superfluid number density, rather than the total density or a locally inferred condensate density, that enters this relation.

Within the vortex-pair renormalization flow, $y$ changes from irrelevant to relevant at $\pi K_R=2$, with $K_R$ the large-distance dimensionless phase stiffness. Combining this with the spin wave result $\eta =1/(2\pi K_R)$ gives $\eta =1/4$. Above the transition the homogeneous equilibrium phase stiffness vanishes at infinite observation scale. A discontinuous response coefficient is compatible with a diverging correlation length; it does not imply a latent heat.^[ref]

In the phase with quasi-long-range order, vortex defects of opposite winding remain bound in pairs. Their unbinding produces the disordered phase with a finite correlation length.

For two unit vortices of opposite charge separated by $R$, the vortex Coulomb gas gives $E_{+-}(R)\simeq 2E_c+2\pi {\rho }_s\log (R/a)$ before screening. At distances much greater than $R$, their phase gradients cancel at leading order: the pair field decays as $R/r^2$, whereas a lone phase vortex has a $1/r$ gradient. A neutral pair therefore has finite energy as $L\to \infty$ at fixed $R$. Bound does not mean absent: small pairs remain thermally excited and reduce the phase stiffness through their response to a twist.

In 2006, Zoran Hadzibabic, Peter Krüger, Marc Cheneau, Baptiste Battelier and Jean Dalibard split a cooled rubidium-87 cloud into two independent planar gases using an optical lattice. After release, the expanding sheets overlapped; absorption imaging recorded their matter-wave interference. Smooth fringe waviness revealed thermal phase fluctuations, while sharp dislocations indicated isolated vortices. The initial evaporative-cooling endpoint controlled the preparation; central fringe contrast served as a degeneracy proxy because direct thermometry in the lattice was difficult.^[ref]

Loss of extended coherence coincided with increased vortex signatures. The optical trap and finite cloud produced a crossover; tightly bound pairs were unresolved, and short-wavelength modes could contaminate high-temperature counts. These were observations of the vortex-unbinding mechanism, not a direct measurement of phase stiffness or a sharp homogeneous universal stiffness jump. The authors left the sample's superfluidity open.^[ref]