Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 315 3 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
The two relevant categories are strongly irradiated, often transiting hot Jupiters, and young directly imaged exoplanets with large residual-entropy radii. The young objects are inflated relative to an old cold mass-radius sequence; a large young radius is not automatically anomalous relative to an age-appropriate formation model.
For a transit, the depth gives after geometric and limb darkening corrections; an independently estimated stellar radius sets . A measured planet mass then tests its location on the planetary mass-radius relation. For a directly imaged object, distance and integrated spectral flux give luminosity; a fitted effective temperature suppliesThe imaged radius is model-dependent because temperature, gravity and exoplanet clouds are inferred from its spectrum; its mass may also depend on age and evolutionary models unless dynamically measured.
Two broad explanatory classes are slower loss of existing heat and addition of heat to the deep interior. Specific delayed-cooling proposals are enhanced atmospheric opacity, which restricts radiative loss, and composition gradients producing layered convection in a giant planet. Specific heating proposals are tidal heating and Ohmic heating from currents induced by magnetized atmospheric winds, the proposed Ohmic heating of a giant planet. Heating must reach or influence sufficiently deep layers to maintain the interior specific entropy; merely heating the optically thin upper atmosphere is not equivalent. For young distant objects, retention of formation heat, described by hot and cold starts of a giant planet, itself explains much of the large radius without requiring the hot-Jupiter heating mechanisms.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 315 4 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
- Bulk composition and material compressibility. A larger iron-core fraction usually makes an exoplanet interior denser and smaller, whereas silicate or water-rich interiors are larger. The planetary mass-radius relation therefore differs among compositions; mass and radius alone retain an exoplanet interior-composition degeneracy.
- A gaseous envelope and its retention. Even a modest hydrogen-helium mass fraction can substantially increase radius through the transit-radius contribution of a gaseous envelope. Its mean molecular weight, total atmospheric mass and opacity determine how far the slant-optical-depth surface lies above the condensed interior. Atmospheric escape can strip that envelope, producing a much smaller object without a comparable loss of core mass.
- Thermal and irradiation history. Higher interior entropy, youth and stellar heating tend to expand an envelope; Kelvin-Helmholtz contraction reduces its size over time. Stellar high-energy exposure affects the envelope through atmospheric escape. Exoplanet clouds and wavelength-dependent opacity shift the measured transit radius even when the deep interior is unchanged.
Bulk composition, envelope fraction/composition, and thermal/irradiation history are three independent controls. If mass is not fixed, the mass itself is an additional major variable. The label super-Earth does not ensure a rocky composition or an Earth-like atmosphere, and a radius alone does not determine which of these effects dominates.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 315 4 d Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A mass-radius curve of solar-composition substellar objects must specify age, irradiation and composition. For a mature, weakly irradiated hydrogen–helium sequence, the qualitative mass-radius relation has three main trends:
- At low giant-planet masses, weak compression allows a rough scaling at nearly fixed mean mass density. Radius rises toward a broad maximum around one to a few Jupiter masses.
- Through massive gas giants and brown dwarfs, radii remain near Jupiter's and eventually decline as compression and electron degeneracy pressure become important. A nonrelativistic degenerate stellar polytrope gives the approximate polytropic mass-radius relation ; finite thermal pressure and real equations of state flatten and modify this idealized scaling.
- Above the hydrogen-burning minimum mass, sustained hydrogen burning supplies the energy that supports a rising low-mass main-sequence branch. For near-solar composition, the threshold is around Jupiter masses (about solar masses), with composition-dependent variation. Red dwarfs then have radii increasing with mass, approximately linearly over part of the low-mass sequence.
The conventional deuterium-burning mass near Jupiter masses marks a commonly used giant-planet/brown dwarf classification scale, not a sharp discontinuity in radius or a universal formation boundary. Young brown dwarfs are larger and cool by contraction; irradiation, a heavy-element core and hot-Jupiter radius inflation shift planets away from a single solar-composition curve.
The drawing is a qualitative mature sequence, not an interpolation of a specified evolutionary model grid. Three relevant observations, using representative historical measurements, are:
- Inflated radii: HD 209458 b has a radius around at a mass around , illustrating hot-Jupiter radius inflation relative to a simple mature unirradiated sequence. Early transit photometry measured its unusually large radius.
- Compact metal-enriched planets: HD 149026 b was measured near and . Its small radius for its mass and irradiation implies substantial heavy-element enrichment in interior models, showing the importance of composition in the planetary mass-radius relation; see the discovery analysis.
- Jupiter-like sizes at substellar masses: CoRoT-3b was measured near but only , supporting the broad near-constant-radius region extending into brown dwarf masses. Its measured mass and radius also illustrate why mass alone does not establish a formation history.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 315 4 e Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Three major research directions, appropriate to the scientific questions posed in 2018, are:
- Characterizing small-planet atmospheres and habitability. Measure an exoplanet transmission spectrum and an exoplanet emission spectrum to establish whether rocky planets retain atmospheres, determine their composition and climate, and test exoplanet habitability. Interpreting an exoplanet biosignature requires a planetary and stellar context: photochemical false positives, exoplanet cloud obscuration and atmospheric escape can all affect apparently promising molecules.
- Connecting atmospheres and interiors to planet formation. Combine planetary mass-radius relations with ages, host-star abundances, atmospheric metallicity of a giant planet and atmospheric carbon-to-oxygen ratio to test growth and migration histories. Exoplanet interior-composition degeneracy, chemical processing and atmospheric condensate rainout prevent a molecular abundance or bulk radius from being a unique record of birth conditions.
- Understanding atmospheric circulation and thermal evolution across populations. Combine exoplanet thermal phase curves, Doppler spectroscopy and pressure-dependent spectra to test day-night heat redistribution, exoplanet cloud formation and disequilibrium chemistry in an exoplanet atmosphere. Relate these measurements to hot-Jupiter radius inflation, internal cooling and atmospheric escape, using comparative observations to distinguish mechanisms instead of fitting each planet in isolation.
These are research goals rather than claims that the relevant mechanisms or habitable atmospheres have already been established.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 iii Paper 315 3 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Exoplanet transit photometry discovers a giant planet through a periodic flux decrement and measures . Stellar-radius estimates turn this into a planetary radius. The radial-velocity method discovers the stellar orbital reflex motion and constrains . Follow-up exoplanet transit photometry is required to measure a geometric radius when such a planet also transits; a radial-velocity detection alone gives no direct size. Alternatively, exoplanet direct imaging finds young luminous giants, whose sizes are inferred less directly from luminosity, temperature, distance, and a planetary mass-radius relation or atmosphere model.
The two broad explanations for hot-Jupiter radius inflation are retention of primordial heat and addition of new interior power.
Delayed cooling of an inflated giant planet can arise from enhanced atmospheric opacity, which slows radiative escape; an irradiation-maintained radiative blanket, which insulates the convective interior; or compositional stratification and inefficient layered convection, which inhibit the outward transport of heat. These alter the rate of Kelvin-Helmholtz contraction.
Heating of an inflated giant planet can arise from tidal heating maintained by eccentricity or obliquity; Joule heating of currents driven by atmospheric winds through a magnetic field; or downward transport and dissipation of atmospheric mechanical energy generated by irradiation. To affect radius, the energy must be deposited at a depth and rate that changes the interior cooling balance. Simply absorbing starlight high in the atmosphere does not automatically supply deep heating. These are proposed mechanisms with different efficiencies, not six universally established contributions in every inflated planet.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 iii Paper 315 4 d Solution 2026-09-28
On a planetary mass-radius relation, compressed rocky planets grow sublinearly, approximately . Adding a hydrogen-helium envelope produces a rapid radius increase toward sub-Neptunes and gas giants. Around a few Jupiter masses the radius is nearly constant and then decreases as electron degeneracy pressure becomes important, approximately approaching the nonrelativistic degenerate scaling .
Brown dwarfs occupy roughly to -- Jupiter masses, with deuterium burning near the lower conventional boundary and sustained hydrogen burning beginning at the hydrogen-burning minimum mass. Low-mass main-sequence stars then have radii that increase with mass. Thus an isolated-body sketch has a rising rocky branch, a broad giant-planet/brown-dwarf radius maximum and decline, followed by a rising stellar branch.
Hot-Jupiter radius inflation places strongly irradiated hot Jupiters above the isolated giant-planet sequence. Irradiation retards cooling and contraction; additional proposed contributions include tidal heating, Ohmic dissipation, atmospheric circulation depositing energy at depth, enhanced opacity, and residual youth.
