Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 63 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Write for the direction cosine and for the radiative transfer source function. Integrating the radiative transfer equation over solid angle givesRadiative equilibrium makes the radiative flux constant, so .
For , the radiation-field moments areConsequently the Eddington closure approximation holds. Substituting into the radiative transfer equation, with , gives . Equality for every requires and , with . The stipulated inward hemispheric radiative flux at the surface isPutting this equal to zero fixes , hence . Using and the effective temperature definition gives the grey atmosphere lawThe positivity limitation of a linear Eddington intensity matters here: the formal surface intensity is negative for . Thus this angular ansatz gives the requested Eddington surface boundary condition for approximate moments; vanishing integrated inward flux is not an exact, nonnegative, pointwise no-incoming radiation field.
Neglecting radiation pressure, the stellar hydrostatic equation and the definition of optical depth give hydrostatic equilibrium in optical depth, . Since , putting givesTaking and , the grey-atmosphere pressure with power-law opacity is thereforeThe pressure formula printed in the PDF is missing the factor . Differentiating its right-hand side would otherwise give . For the correct limit is .
At the specified matching location, the luminosity relation makes , hence , and . Multiplying the corrected pressure relation by givesThis agrees with the PDF's final surface boundary condition for a power-law-opacity grey atmosphere. It also extends to negative wherever the model applies; at , its continuous limit is .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 63 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Write , and use axial symmetry. The radiative flux is . Integrating the radiative transfer equation over directions givesThere are no energy sources in the atmosphere, so radiative equilibrium makes constant. Consequently
For the linear angular approximation , the radiation-field moments areThus it satisfies the Eddington closure approximation, andSince is constant, . Substitution in the radiative transfer equation, using , gives , hence .
In this moment approximation, the inward hemispheric flux at the surface isSetting this boundary moment to zero gives . ThereforeCombining it with the thermal source function and gives the grey atmosphere temperature law:
The surface condition is an approximate angular-moment condition. If the affine intensity were interpreted as an exact nonnegative boundary radiation field, no incident radiation would require for every ; a linear polynomial vanishing on that interval would have and no outward flux either. The derived formal profile indeed has . This positivity limitation of a linear Eddington intensity is why one uses the Eddington surface boundary condition as a moment closure, not the affine ansatz as an exact emergent angular intensity. An outward direction-independent intensity with no inward intensity gives the same boundary moments.
For the gas-pressure-dominated atmosphere, combine with . Thus the hydrostatic equilibrium in optical depth is . Let . The grey atmosphere law implies . With the specified power-law opacity,At the outer vacuum limit take and . Since , integration givesThis is the grey-atmosphere pressure with power-law opacity relation.
At the matching radius the local radiative flux is . In the thin plane-parallel atmosphere approximation this equals , so and . Multiplying the pressure relation by yields the required surface pressure-opacity relationHere is a product, not a pressure subscript.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 317 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
At the stellar surface boundary condition, match the interior to a stellar atmosphere, rather than setting the temperature and pressure to zero at an arbitrary radius. At a photosphere of radius , the enclosed mass is , the luminosity is , and the outward radiative flux defines the effective temperature through . With no external illumination the incoming specific intensity satisfies for . A deeper boundary is matched to the nearly isotropic radiative diffusion field. A grey atmosphere commonly matches near ; under the Eddington surface boundary condition this gives . For roughly constant gravity and opacity, the total pressure rises by relative to its outer boundary value; if radiation supplies appreciable support, the gas-pressure gradient uses the effective gravity instead.
Take increasing outward and the outward direction cosine. If is emission per unit path length and solid angle, the radiative transfer equation isDefine inward-increasing optical depth by and the source function by . Then . This states the emission-coefficient convention; if is defined per unit mass instead, the emission term is .
For frequency-integrated intensity, introduce the radiation-field momentsThe first angular approximation writes . Its odd part does not contribute to , soThis is the Eddington closure approximation, not an exact description of the escaping angular distribution. An approximate surface condition takes the outgoing hemisphere to have direction-independent intensity and the incoming hemisphere to be dark. Its moments give and . Integrating the moment equations with the closure then gives ; in thermal equilibrium, gives . This derives the usual approximate photospheric matching condition rather than imposing a zero surface temperature. For conservative coherent isotropic scattering, . Integrating the transfer equation gives and , the moment conditions for radiative equilibrium.
The exponential ansatz in the PDF has a genuine consistency problem. Compute its moments before making any approximation. For a nonsingular real intensity on all , take and defineThe continuous zero limits are , , . Direct integration yieldsFor a decaying nontrivial correction, and . Exact constant flux then requires . But for every nonzero real , so forces . Thus exact radiative equilibrium cannot imply a small nonzero for this ansatz.
Substitution into the full transfer equation makes the obstruction sharper. The exponential coefficient must satisfy, for every ,Comparing the constant and linear coefficients gives and . Hence regular real coefficients require , eliminating any decaying correction. This is the obstruction to a single smooth exponential mode in conservative grey transfer. There is no exact nontrivial real solution of the stipulated form with a small nonzero decay parameter. Choosing, for example, and supplies an explicit counterexample to the claimed exact flux constancy, because .
Several requested conclusions remain useful as formal approximations, provided they are identified as such. If , the large-depth exponential vanishes, giving , hence for the asymptotic physical flux. It also gives . Since , neglecting second-order angular errors yields the formal relation . However , so the finite-depth flux still varies at first order. The formal relation is not an exact transfer or constant-flux solution.
There is also a flux-normalization mismatch in the PDF's last displayed relation. With the same physical used above, the Hopf function of a grey atmosphere is defined byThe PDF's coefficient would require redefining its as physical flux divided by ; it cannot simultaneously use the earlier for the same physical flux. With the consistent physical-flux normalization, formal moment matching givesIn the intended small- approximation this isThe approximate outgoing surface ansatz then gives the limb darkening ratioFor finite , gives a parameter-dependent ratio, not a unique exact value. The two Hopf endpoint values alone do not determine the exact emergent intensity: the formal solution of the radiative transfer equation uses the entire source profile, for . Nor does the simple linear-plus-exponential ansatz satisfy the exact no-incoming-radiation condition for every negative . Thus is a clearly labelled approximate disk-centre-to-limb result, not an exact consequence of inconsistent premises.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 iii Paper 315 3 a Solution 2026-09-28
For a plane-parallel atmosphere with optical depth increasing downward, the radiative transfer equation isIntegrating over solid angle gives the first radiation-field momentIn radiative equilibrium, matter has no net local radiative heating, so the opacity-weighted frequency integral of vanishes. After converting each optical-depth derivative to physical depth and integrating over frequency,Thus the bolometric internal flux is constant with depth, as stated by constant flux in a plane-parallel radiative-equilibrium atmosphere.
In local thermal equilibrium . Define the planet's internal effective temperature of a planet by the constant outward flux. The standard Planck law integral givesThe corresponding intrinsic luminosity is .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 iii Paper 315 1 a Solution 2026-09-28
For the plane-parallel radiative transfer equationangular integration gives the zeroth radiation-field moment equationThe net radiative heating per unit volume is thereforeRadiative equilibrium requires it to vanish, equivalently that the frequency-integrated radiative flux be independent of depth:In local thermodynamic equilibrium with coherent isotropic scattering,where is the single-scattering albedo. Since , the condition becomesConservative scattering redistributes directions but contributes no net material heating.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2026 iii Paper 315 4 e Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Consider a ray bundle from projected source area into solid angle . In empty space its power is conserved, while geometric propagation preserves the étendueSince specific intensity is power divided by this étendue and by frequency interval,In a static medium with no redshift, frequency is unchanged and itself is independent of distance. The apparent solid angle shrinks as distance squared while the physical beam area grows by the same factor.