For a finite extension of number fields, the inverse different is the fractional ideal
The different ideal is its inverse. The trace pairing is nondegenerate because extensions of number fields are separable, so this definition gives a full fractional ideal. The inclusion shows that is integral.
Write its prime ideal factorization as . For above , with ramification index and residue characteristic , the different exponent and tame ramification theorem says
The equivalence uses the separability of finite residue-field extensions. In particular, precisely at unramified prime ideals; in the wild case . This theorem does not require a Galois extension. The relative discriminant is the norm of the different ideal:
For , this gives .
Now take and . For any prime number , the square-free integer hypothesis makes an Eisenstein polynomial at . It is therefore irreducible, and is a pure cubic number field of degree . Since is an algebraic integer, is an order in a number field. The discriminant of elements of a number field for its basis is
For example, the resultant of and is , and the degree-three sign in the polynomial discriminant is negative. If , the discriminant-index formula for an integral lattice gives
Only prime numbers dividing can therefore divide .
For , the Eisenstein polynomial gives a totally ramified extension of of degree . Thus has a unique prime ideal above , with ramification index and residue-field degree . Since , this is tame ramification, and the different exponent and tame ramification theorem gives . Hence . Comparing with in the discriminant-index formula for an integral lattice yields .
At , use the shifted Eisenstein polynomial of :
Because , the constant term is divisible by . Moreover,
when : the factors and cannot both be divisible by . The hypotheses therefore give , so the translated polynomial is an Eisenstein polynomial at . The resulting completion is a totally ramified extension of degree , with residue-field degree , and its ramification index is divisible by the residue characteristic. Thus its different exponent is at least .
It follows that . But , so
forces and . No prime number divides . We have proved the integral basis of a nonexceptional pure cubic field:
Using local Eisenstein polynomials here only establishes the local ramification indices; it does not assume that is already the full ring of integers of a number field.
Let be a finite Galois extension of non-Archimedean local fields, let , and normalize the discrete valuation by . The lower ramification numbering is
Here is the inertia group and is the wild inertia group. For real , put ; thus for . Define the Herbrand function and its inverse by
extending on . The upper ramification numbering is for .
Let over , with its uniformizer. The Artin–Schreier polynomial has derivative in characteristic , so all its roots are distinct. If is one root and another, then , so . Conversely every , , is a root. Thus contains all roots and is a splitting field of a separable polynomial; it is Galois. Every automorphism has the form , and its Galois group embeds in the additive group of .
There is no root in . If , then cannot have negative valuation. If , the ultrametric inequality gives , divisible by , whereas is not. The Galois group is consequently nontrivial. Its order divides the prime , so
Let be the ramification index. The equation forces , and hence
As , . Since , we get , residue-field degree one, and . Thus this is a totally ramified extension, and
This is a uniformizer. The uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups states that for a totally ramified Galois extension, exactly when . Here every nonidentity automorphism satisfies
Therefore the ramification break of an Artin–Schreier pole occurs at , and the lower groups are
This includes , where the break is one. There is no off-by-one shift: the condition is .
For the upper groups, compute the Herbrand function explicitly:
Hence the upper break is also and, with the stated real-index convention,
As a consistency check, satisfies the Eisenstein polynomial . Its derivative in characteristic is , giving different exponent , equal to from the different exponent from ramification groups.
Set . Its complex gradient is , never zero on : simultaneous zero would give , which is not on the curve. The complex implicit function theorem therefore gives a one-dimensional complex manifold, hence a Riemann surface. Where use as coordinate, and where use ; the transition maps and both projections are holomorphic.
For , a ramification point of a holomorphic map has and with . In the coordinate , , giving ramification index . Thus there are such points, and their branch points are the th roots of unity.
For , a ramification point of a holomorphic map has . In the coordinate , , giving ramification index at both points and branch points .
Write . At infinity set , ; then . At there are two smooth points, , and is a local coordinate. The extended has a simple pole at each, so neither is ramified. The degree-two Riemann-Hurwitz formula for the map to the Riemann sphere gives , hence
The list for above concerns the original affine Riemann surface; on the compactification its poles at the two added points have order and are additionally ramified if .
The completion of a number field at a prime ideal does not change either invariant. More precisely, is the valuation ring of , its maximal ideal is , and
Thus the completed extension has the same ramification index and the same residue-field extension, hence the same residue-field degree . This is completion preserves ramification and residue data.
A finite extension of non-Archimedean local fields is an unramified extension when its ramification index is one and its residue-field degree equals . Equivalently, its maximal ideal is generated by a uniformizer of and its residue-field extension is separable.
A finite extension of number fields is an everywhere unramified extension of number fields when every nonzero prime ideal of is unramified in . Under the convention that includes infinite places, one also requires every real embedding of to remain real.
For a finite extension of local fields, let be its ramification index and its residue-field degree. An unramified extension has . A totally ramified extension has , equivalently . A tamely ramified extension has separable residue extension and ramification index coprime to the residue characteristic.
Let generate the finite extension , and let be its minimal polynomial. Lift to a monic and choose any lift of . Since finite fields are perfect fields, . The simple-root form of Hensel lemma, applied inside , gives with
Set . Its residue field contains , so
The equation gives the reverse inequality. Thus , its residue-field degree is , and ; hence is unramified. Since , the extension has residue-field degree one and is totally ramified. This constructs the maximal unramified subextension of a local field extension.
Suppose first that is a totally ramified extension of degree , and let be a uniformizer of . If the valuation on is normalized by , then . The value group of already contains both and , so its ramification index over is at least . Hence , and therefore .
Let
be the minimal polynomial of . Every conjugate of has positive valuation, so each lies in the maximal ideal of . Moreover
which means . Thus is an Eisenstein polynomial.
Conversely, if is a root of an Eisenstein polynomial of degree , the Eisenstein criterion makes that polynomial irreducible and its Newton polygon gives when is normalized. Consequently ; equality with the field degree forces and residue-field degree one. Thus is totally ramified.
Let be a number field. Its places consist of its real embeddings, conjugate pairs of complex embeddings, and the finite places associated with nonzero prime ideals of its ring of integers of a number field. At a real or complex place use the usual absolute value. If lies over the prime number with ramification index , normalize its absolute value by
These normalizations extend the standard absolute values on .
Write for the local degree of a place. Thus is at a real place, at a complex place, and at a finite place. The Absolute multiplicative Weil height is
The product formula shows that this is unchanged when is replaced by a larger number field containing .
For arbitrary positive integers , the displayed extension has degree , ramification index , and residue degree . If , its unique extended absolute value on a field is . A basis consists of , where the form an basis of and . Regrouping a Laurent series by its exponent modulo proves the basis assertion. When divides the extension can be inseparable; the valuation calculation still applies.
In characteristic zero with algebraically closed constants, a local unit has a square root. Thus near a point is equivalent to adjoining the square root of the local parameter to the power . Even order is unramified; odd order gives ramification index two. For a polynomial , its order at infinity is minus its degree, so infinity branches exactly for odd degree.
Suppose in a number field and lies above . Its normalized integral valuation satisfies . If and are coprime, then . In a degree- field the fundamental identity for prime decomposition forces a unique prime, ramification index , and residue degree one. This detects total ramification of a prime even when the displayed defining polynomial is not Eisenstein at .
// Target: algebra.bigb
For an odd prime , this Eisenstein polynomial generates a totally ramified cubic root field. Its discriminant is . For the unit part is a square exactly when . The splitting field then has cyclic Galois group of order three; otherwise it has symmetric group , with an unramified extension of degree two and inertia group . Both cases are tamely ramified, so all positive ramification groups are trivial.
At , adjoining gives a ramified quadratic subfield, and the splitting field has total ramification index six. A root has normalized valuation two, while has valuation three, so is a uniformizer. The derivative has valuation six, and all distinct root differences have valuation three. A three-cycle fixes , giving . A transposition fixing negates , giving valuation one; conjugation handles the other transpositions. Hence , , and for . The different exponent is seven.
Residue degree 2026-10-07
The degree of the residue field extension induced by a finite extension of complete discretely valued fields. Along with the ramification index, it satisfies . An unramified extension additionally has separable residue extension; a totally ramified extension has residue degree one.
Restriction and corestriction of local Brauer invariants Created 2026-10-07 Updated 2026-10-14
For a finite extension of local fields , restriction multiplies the local Brauer invariant by and corestriction preserves it. For restriction, the residue-character value multiplies by the residue degree and the parameter valuation by the ramification index. For corestriction, lift the residue character using divisibility of and use the norm projection formula for cyclic Brauer pairings.
Tamely ramified extension Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
A finite extension of local fields is tamely ramified when its residue-field extension is separable and its ramification index is coprime to the residue characteristic. For a finite Galois extension this is equivalent to trivial wild inertia group .
Totally ramified extension Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
A finite extension of local fields is totally ramified when its residue-field degree is one, equivalently when its ramification index equals its field degree.