Write . If , the claimed identity has both sides zero. Otherwise let . Applying the Euler criterion gives
Both sides are in , which are distinct residue classes because is odd. Therefore the modular congruence is an equality:
Take and let be the residue class of . Division with remainder represents every class by a polynomial of degree less than , so every element is a polynomial in and . A nonzero class represented by has because is irreducible. Bézout's identity gives , making the class of its inverse. Thus is a field, containing through its constant classes.
A splitting field of a nonconstant polynomial is an extension in which it factors into linear factors and which is generated over the original field by its roots. To construct one, choose an irreducible factor and use the preceding quotient construction to adjoin a root. Divide off a linear factor in that extension and repeat on the remaining polynomial. Each stage lowers the remaining degree, so finitely many stages suffice. The field generated by all roots in the resulting field is the required splitting field. This induction works with repeated roots and does not assume separability. The two roman clauses in the source specify properties of this one construction; they are not separate questions.
Euler's totient function counts the integers coprime to , equivalently the invertible residue classes modulo . Among , exactly the multiples of are not coprime to the prime power. Hence
Factor . Its distinct prime-power factors are pairwise coprime, so the permitted multiplicativity gives
For , the empty product is one and agrees with .
Since , its factorial is even, so is odd and its prime divisor is odd. Also cannot divide , since it would then divide1. Modulo ,
Raise this equation to the integer power . Fermat's little theorem gives
As is odd, and are distinct residues. Thus the exponent is even, and
Milne-Thomson's circle theorem inserts an impermeable circular boundary into a two-dimensional irrotational incompressible flow. If is analytic in a neighborhood of the closed disc and its flow singularities lie outside, the new complex potential outside is
Reflection and coefficient conjugation make the second term analytic outside the circle, with its image singularities inside. On , , so the two terms sum to : the streamfunction is constant there. Thus no velocity crosses the circle. At infinity the image term tends to the constant , which has no effect on velocity, and the far-field flow is retained. This proves the construction, with an additive potential constant immaterial.
Put , . For the dipole the reflected potential is , giving
Its image pole is , inside the cylinder. The complex velocity is
Near , the second term is with , while is analytic there. The square of the pole term has no residue, nor does . The cross term has residue , so
Take the contour counterclockwise around the cylinder, as in the supplied Blasius force theorem. The residue theorem gives . Therefore
The force points toward the dipole. Its independence of dipole orientation follows from the product in the sole residue contribution.
Wilson's theorem states that for a prime , . For odd , pair each nonzero residue with its multiplicative inverse. Only the self-inverse residues remain unpaired; in a field gives . Their product is , proving the result. For the assertion is immediate.
If composite is not the square of a prime, choose a prime divisor such that and are distinct. Both occur among the factors of , so their product divides it. In the remaining case , , and the two distinct factors both occur in the factorial and have product divisible by . Thus the factorial is zero modulo every such composite .
For prime , Wilson's congruence makes the numerator sine squared equal , so its ratio is one. For composite , the numerator vanishes. The only exceptional composite in the sum is four; its ratio is . Therefore for the sum counts the primes plus two, and subtracting two gives exactly the required prime count. All statements concern the integers .
The distinct powers all solve . By the allowed root bound they are all its solutions. A residue of order must therefore equal ; conversely , because characterizes the exponents with . This proves the equivalence with and gives exactly elements of order whenever any such element exists.
To establish existence at the full order too, put and let count elements of order . By Lagrange's theorem for finite groups, these orders divide . The first result gives or . Therefore
using the standard divisor-sum identity for Euler's function. Equality forces every deficit to vanish, so .
Finally let , which has order eight. Its fourth power is the unique nonidentity square root of one, namely . Since ,
because . This proves the stated residue squares to two.
Put , and . The circle theorem gives, up to an additive constant,
Thus an image source lies at and an image sink at zero. With a counterclockwise contour around the cylinder, Blasius' force theorem is
If locally, the residue of is . The enclosed poles are zero and , with residues
Their sum is . The residue theorem therefore yields
The force points towards the source. For the moment formula the double poles also contribute: . Hence
It follows that and
The zero torque agrees with pressure acting normally to a circle, hence radially through its centre.
The distinct powers all solve . By the allowed root bound they are all its solutions. A residue of order must therefore equal ; conversely , because characterizes the exponents with . This proves the equivalence with and gives exactly elements of order whenever any such element exists.
To establish existence at the full order too, put and let count elements of order . By Lagrange's theorem for finite groups, these orders divide . The first result gives or . Therefore
using the standard divisor-sum identity for Euler's function. Equality forces every deficit to vanish, so .
Finally let , which has order eight. Its fourth power is the unique nonidentity square root of one, namely . Since ,
because . This proves the stated residue squares to two.
Put , and . The circle theorem gives, up to an additive constant,
Thus an image source lies at and an image sink at zero. With a counterclockwise contour around the cylinder, Blasius' force theorem is
If locally, the residue of is . The enclosed poles are zero and , with residues
Their sum is . The residue theorem therefore yields
The force points towards the source. For the moment formula the double poles also contribute: . Hence
It follows that and
The zero torque agrees with pressure acting normally to a circle, hence radially through its centre.
For , the zero residue contributes zero. Write . Multiplication by any nonzero permutes these residues, so in . If , choose a primitive root ; then , and forces .
If , every nonzero has , so . Therefore
The source also lists , although its premise assumes . For that separate case, the integer sum has terms each equal to one, so it is zero modulo .
A primitive root modulo is a residue class generating the cyclic multiplicative group , so its order is . If is one generator, all generators are with . Thus the number is
where is Euler's totient function. This includes , with .
The Milne-Thomson circle theorem says that if a complex potential has no singularities on or inside , then a circular impermeable boundary can be introduced by taking
The new singularities are the reflected ones inside the circle. On , , so is real; the stream function is constant and there is no normal velocity. At infinity the added term tends to , a harmless potential constant, so it preserves the far-field flow. This proves the theorem with zero added net circulation about the cylinder. A logarithmic term may then specify a different cylinder circulation.
For , put . The reflected term is
with locally consistent logarithm branches. The circle-theorem solution has zero cylinder circulation: its image vortex at and its central vortex cancel. To impose circulation , add . The result is
It consists of the physical vortex and an opposite image vortex inside the obstacle. On the circle, , so its stream function is indeed constant.
The complex velocity is
Inside the positively oriented obstacle contour, has only the double pole at . Its residue is
The residue theorem and the supplied Blasius force theorem therefore give
Consequently
The force points toward the held vortex, independent of the sign of its circulation.
In the analytic continuation inside the circle, only the image location is singular; lies outside. Squaring the velocity gives
The last term has no residue, and the middle term has residue
because and . The residue theorem and part (a) therefore yield
Thus and . The force points towards the planar potential doublet and is independent of its orientation, since the factors and cancel in .
Orient and label its left side plus and its right side minus. Assume the density is Hölder continuity near the point in question, or has sufficient regularity for the boundary limits below. The source does not explicitly state this regularity assumption. Parametrize locally by oriented arclength , with . Define the Cauchy principal value by removing equal arclengths on the two sides:
Subtract from the numerator near . The Hölder continuity remainder is locally bounded in absolute value by a constant times for some , so its integral has the same limit from the two sides. The constant part contributes half the residue, with sign determined by the side of the small semicircle. This proves the Sokhotski–Plemelj theorem
In particular and the Cauchy principal value term with coefficient equals . Substituting these two identities into the singular integral equation gives
Choose a canonical homogeneous solution whose boundary values do not vanish, and account for any permitted zeros or poles when forming a quotient. The assumptions alone do not ensure that an arbitrary homogeneous solution has this property. Its jump relation is
Dividing the inhomogeneous relation by therefore gives
The Cauchy integral solves this additive jump. More generally every solution in the chosen analytic class has
where has no jump across and obeys the applicable growth, endpoint and divisor conditions. Setting gives exactly the intermediate formula printed in the source.
Let . Applying Sokhotski–Plemelj theorem to the displayed solution and subtracting boundary values yields
Use
The normalized particular solution is consequently
and the full solution is
Thus the printed expression is a particular solution; homogeneous terms need separate normalization. To see why “general” cannot hold without qualification, take the positively oriented unit circle, , , and . Then and are nonzero on the contour. The analytic pair , satisfies the homogeneous jump and decays on the exterior side. Its nonzero density has these very Cauchy boundary values and solves the original homogeneous equation, whereas the source formula with gives zero. This is homogeneous freedom in a scalar singular integral equation; endpoint and index conditions determine which jump-free additions are permitted.
Orient the smooth contour so the plus side is to its left. Assume the density is Hölder continuous near the observation point and the integrals converge at any other endpoints. The Cauchy principal value is
Subtract from the numerator. The resulting quotient is locally integrable, so its limits from the two sides coincide. For the remaining constant density, straightening the contour gives a half-circle contribution . Division by yields the Sokhotski–Plemelj formula
For the requested real integral assume and , ensuring integrable endpoints and an interior principal-value pole. Put . Choose analytic off , positive for , and at infinity. Its two boundary values are .
The jump is . The Cauchy representation for this decaying analytic function is therefore . Taking the mean of its two boundary values removes the half-residue terms and gives
Use the Fourier convention . Transforming the differential equation gives
Define analytic above the downward cut from zero, and analytic below the upward cut from . More explicitly take and . In the strip , put . Then and ; at , , fixing the choice throughout the strip. The decaying mode is .
The positive-half-line boundary value has transform for . Thus and . The transformed boundary relation is
Let . Splitting off the pole at zero gives
The left side is analytic in the lower domain up to : its apparent pole at zero is removable. The right side is analytic for . By the supplied boundedness of and , both sides tend to zero at infinity in their half-planes. The gluing and Liouville theorem argument therefore makes their common value zero. Consequently
Choose the inversion contour oriented left to right, with any fixed . It passes above the pole at zero and below the branch point at . Fourier inversion gives exactly
Thus the appropriate value is . The other proposed value reverses the residue of the boundary step and violates its prescribed positive value.
There is also a far-field qualification in the source. The formula is the intended bounded mixed-boundary solution, but it does not tend to zero along every path to infinity. This can be checked explicitly: in parabolic coordinates , , with , the mixed-boundary convection-diffusion solution in parabolic coordinates is
Indeed and ; the identity proves the differential equation. At the boundary value is one, and at its normal derivative is zero. Its traces are for and for , whose one-sided transforms are the expressions derived above.
At a fixed angle away from the positive axis, and . But at fixed and , and . Hence the radial decay statement cannot hold uniformly as printed; the intended decay is away from the downstream boundary layer. The exact expression also identifies its thickness as .
Figure 1.
The exact mixed-boundary solution decays away from the downstream boundary layer
. Details.
The distinct powers all satisfy . The supplied root bound says they exhaust those roots. Thus every element of order has the form . If , the least positive with is , so
This proves both directions of the first assertion.
For existence of a primitive root one may apply the finite-field cyclicity criterion proved in the preceding section. There is also a direct counting proof: for each divisor of , either no elements have order , or the preceding argument shows there are exactly . Lagrange's theorem partitions all nonzero residue classes by such orders, while . Every count is at most its corresponding , so equality of the totals forces equality at every divisor. In particular there are primitive roots.
Put . It has order eight, so and . The specified element is . Since , squaring gives .
Take source strength to mean total two-dimensional flux, so an isolated source has potential . Let , , and put . The circle theorem gives, up to an additive constant,
The derivative is single valued, which is what the force integrals require. With a positively oriented contour around the cylinder, the force form of Blasius' theorem is
Only the poles at zero and are enclosed; the physical source at lies outside. The residues of are at zero and at . Their sum is . Therefore
For the second integral, the residue of at zero is one. At it is . Their sum is . Using precisely the supplied complex-moment convention gives
The vanishing physical moment is also consistent with pressure acting normally to a circle, hence radially about its centre. If strength is instead defined as the coefficient of , replace by that strength throughout; stating the flux convention fixes all factors of .
For an odd prime , the Legendre symbol is if , if is a nonzero square modulo , and otherwise. It depends only on the residue class of .