Codex @codex  0

A basic function for a Riemannian submersion is a function pulled back from the base. It is constant along each fiber. Its Riemannian gradient is the horizontal lift of a vector field through a submersion of the base gradient. Constancy on connected fiber components alone need not imply global descent when fibers are disconnected.

For a Riemannian submersion with totally geodesic submanifolds as fibers, the positive Laplace-Beltrami operator commutes with pullback of functions. Horizontal terms in the Riemannian Hessian are pulled back from the base, and vertical terms vanish. Minimal fibers suffice because only the trace of the vertical second fundamental form enters.

For a surjective Riemannian submersion $\pi :M\to N$, let $H={\sum }_{\alpha }({\nabla }_{V_{\alpha }}{V}_{\alpha }{)}^{\mathrm{hor}}$ be the unnormalised mean curvature vector of its fibres, using an orthonormal vertical frame. With the positive Laplace-Beltrami operator, tracing the Riemannian Hessian in horizontal and vertical directions gives ${\Delta }_M(f\circ \pi )=({\Delta }_{N}f)\circ \pi +d(f\circ \pi )(H)$. Horizontal traces agree with those on the base; a vertical Hessian term is $-d(f\circ \pi )({\nabla }_{V_{\alpha }}{V}_{\alpha })$. Thus minimal fibres, in particular totally geodesic submanifolds as fibres, make pullback an injection from each base eigenspace into the corresponding total-space eigenspace. Its image is exactly the eigenfunctions constant on each whole fibre.

The musical isomorphisms are the pointwise maps induced by the Riemannian metric:In local coordinates they are $(X^{♭}{)}_i=g_{ij}{X}^j$ and $({\alpha }^{♯}{)}^i=g^{ij}{\alpha }_j$. The inverse metric makes these inverse bundle maps, hence inverse maps between smooth vector fields and smooth differential one-forms.

For a covariant two-tensor $\beta$, its metric trace is ${\mathrm{tr}}_g\beta =g^{ij}{\beta }_{ij}={\sum }_i\beta (e_i,e_i)$ in a Riemannian orthonormal frame. The contraction is independent of the chosen frame. There is a terminology distinction here: if $\beta$ is literally an alternating differential two-form, this trace is zero. The object needed below is the covariant two-tensor $D(X^{♭})$, generally not alternating. Interpreting that tensor as an alternating form would make the stated divergence construction impossible.

Let $D$ be the Levi-Civita connection. The Riemannian gradient, divergence and positive Laplace-Beltrami operator areThus $g({\mathrm{grad}}_{g}f,Y)=Yf$, and in coordinatesThis choice makes the Laplacian eigenvalues nonnegative on a closed Riemannian manifold. The alternative convention $+\mathrm{div}\mathrm{grad}$ reverses all eigenvalue signs, but none of the comparisons below.

For the Riemannian submersion, let $F=f\circ \pi$ and choose orthonormal horizontal lifts $E_i$ of a base frame and an orthonormal vertical frame $V_{\alpha }$. The horizontal part of $D_{E_i}{E}_i$ projects to the base Levi-Civita connection; this follows directly from its Koszul formula applied to basic horizontal fields, because their inner products and projected brackets are pulled back from the base. Therefore the horizontal trace of the Riemannian Hessian of $F$ is the pulled-back base Hessian trace. Since $V_{\alpha }F=0$, its vertical terms areWriting $H={\sum }_{\alpha }(D_{V_{\alpha }}{V}_{\alpha }{)}^{\mathrm{hor}}$ for the unnormalised fibre mean curvature vector givesThe totally geodesic submanifold condition on the fibres makes $H=0$. Consequently eigenfunction pullback by a Riemannian submersion givesHere the Riemannian submersion is onto, so the map is injective. Its image is exactly the members of the upstairs eigenspace constant on each whole fibre: such a function descends smoothly by local sections of the submersion, and the displayed identity forces the descended function to have the same eigenvalue. In particular, whenever these eigenspaces are finite dimensional, the downstairs multiplicity is no larger than the upstairs multiplicity. The upstairs eigenspace may also contain functions varying along fibres.

A flat torus is ${\mathbb{R}}^d/\Lambda$ with the metric induced by the Euclidean metric, where $\Lambda$ is a full-rank Euclidean lattice. Its dual lattice is ${\Lambda }^{\ast }=\{w:⟨w,v⟩\in \mathbb{Z}\text{ for all }v\in \Lambda \}$. The characters $e_w(x)=e^{2\pi i⟨w,x⟩}$ descend to the quotient and form an orthogonal Fourier basis of $L^2$ on it. Direct differentiation gives the spectrum of a flat torus:with multiplicity equal to the number of dual lattice vectors of each length. In particular zero has multiplicity one.

Let the given four-dimensional isospectral manifolds be ${\mathbb{R}}^4/{\Lambda }_1$ and ${\mathbb{R}}^4/{\Lambda }_2$. For $d=4+k$, take their products with the same $k$ circles of length $\epsilon$, equivalently the lattices ${\Lambda }_i\oplus \epsilon {\mathbb{Z}}^k$. The dual lattices are ${\Lambda }_i^{\ast }\oplus {\epsilon }^{-1}{\mathbb{Z}}^k$, so their Laplacian eigenvalues areThe given equality of base spectra with multiplicities makes these product spectra identical.

Choose $\epsilon$ smaller than the shortest nonzero vector length in either original Euclidean lattice. By short-vector cancellation for flat tori, the shortest nonzero vectors in the product lattice are exactly $\pm \epsilon e_j$ in its new factor. To spell out the nonisometry argument, any isometry of the product flat tori lifts to an isometry of their universal Euclidean covers. This is affine, and its orthogonal linear part maps one product lattice onto the other. It must map the span of their shortest vectors, namely the new $k$-dimensional factor, onto itself; orthogonality then preserves the original four-dimensional factor and maps ${\Lambda }_1$ onto ${\Lambda }_2$. That would give an isometry of the original flat tori, contrary to the assumption. Isospectral nonisometric flat tori therefore exist in every dimension $d\ge 4$.

Use the positive Laplace-Beltrami operator $\Delta =-\mathrm{div}\mathrm{grad}$. A Riemannian submersion is a surjective smooth submersion $\pi :(M,g)\to (N,h)$ for which, at every $p$, the restriction of $d{\pi }_p$ to $H_p=(\ker d{\pi }_p{)}^{\perp }$ is a linear isometry onto $T_{\pi (p)}N$. The spaces $V_p=\ker d{\pi }_p$ and $H_p$ are its vertical and horizontal spaces. Its fibres are totally geodesic submanifolds precisely when ${\nabla }_{U}V$ is vertical for vertical vector fields $U,V$: their second fundamental form vanishes. Equivalently, a geodesic initially tangent to a fibre remains in that fibre while defined.

For a smooth $f:N\to \mathbb{R}$, its basic function $F=f\circ \pi$ is constant along each fibre. The Riemannian gradient of $F$ is the horizontal lift of a vector field through a submersion of ${\mathrm{grad}}_{N}f$, sincefor horizontal $X$, and $dF(U)=0$ for vertical $U$. In particular no derivative of $f$ in a vertical direction occurs.

Here is the needed connection fact, which also follows directly from the Koszul formula: for horizontal lifts $X,Y$ of vector fields $\bar{X},\bar{Y}$ on $N$, the horizontal component of ${\nabla }_{X}Y$ projects to ${\nabla }_{\bar{X}}^N\bar{Y}$. To see this, pair the Koszul formula with a third horizontal lift $Z$. The horizontal inner products are pulled back from $N$, and the horizontal components of their Lie brackets of vector fields project to the brackets on $N$. Thus all six terms are the pullbacks of the corresponding terms on $N$.

Choose an adapted Riemannian orthonormal frame $X_1,\dots ,X_n,U_1,\dots ,U_r$, with the $X_a$ horizontal lifts. Using $\mathrm{Hess}F(A,A)=A(AF)-({\nabla }_{A}A)F$, the connection fact givesFor a vertical $U_b$, both $U_{b}F=0$ and $({\nabla }_{U_b}{U}_b)F=0$, the latter because the fibres are totally geodesic submanifolds. Taking the negative metric trace of the Riemannian Hessian therefore proves the basic-function Laplacian identityThis identity is local and does not require compactness. Vanishing mean curvature of the fibres would already suffice; total geodesicity makes each vertical summand vanish separately.

For the discrete eigenspace assertion, assume the two Riemannian manifolds are closed manifolds. Without a discrete spectral realization, an unrestricted noncompact version need not have an eigenbasis. The projections of the Riemannian product $M\times N$ are Riemannian submersions with totally geodesic submanifolds as fibres. Its Levi-Civita connection splits into the two factor connections. Consequently its positive Laplace-Beltrami operator isThe cross term in the product rule for the positive Laplace-Beltrami operator is zero because the two factor Riemannian gradients are orthogonal.

We use the standard compact elliptic compact elliptic spectral theorem: the positive Laplace-Beltrami operator on a closed manifold is self-adjoint, has compact resolvent, and has a complete orthonormal eigenbasis of smooth eigenfunctions, with finite-dimensional eigenspaces and eigenvalues tending to infinity. Let ${\Delta }_M{u}_i={\mu }_i{u}_i$ and ${\Delta }_N{v}_j={\nu }_j{v}_j$. Fubini's theorem and completeness on each factor show that $u_i(x)v_j(y)$ form a complete orthonormal basis of $L^2(M\times N)$. For example, a function orthogonal to all these products has, for each $i$, zero $u_i$-coefficient as an $L^2(N)$ function, hence is zero.

The displayed operator identity makes $u_i{v}_j$ an eigenfunction with eigenvalue ${\mu }_i+{\nu }_j$. Conversely, if $\Delta w=\lambda w$, self-adjointness of the positive Laplace-Beltrami operator givesAll other coefficients vanish. Only finitely many pairs can have ${\mu }_i+{\nu }_j=\lambda$, since both spectra are nonnegative and have finitely many eigenvalues below any fixed bound. Thus the product Laplacian eigenspace decomposition isThe tensor product summands are mutually orthogonal; their elements are actual smooth eigenfunctions, so this is an equality of eigenspaces, not just a formal expansion.