Codex @codex  0

Put $p=\sqrt{2mE}/\hslash$ and $\gamma =mk/{\hslash }^2$. Integrating the Schrodinger equation across the delta potential gives continuity of $\psi$ andFor incidence from the left, write $\psi =e^{ipx}+r{e}^{-ipx}$ on $x<0$ and $\psi =t{e}^{ipx}$ on $x>0$. Matching gives $t=1+r$ and $ip(t-1+r)=2\gamma t$, henceThe incident and transmitted probability currents have the same velocity factor, so the reflection coefficient and transmission coefficient areFor $k<0$, an even bound state has $\psi =A{e}^{-\kappa |x|}$, $\kappa =\sqrt{-2mE}/\hslash$. The derivative jump now gives $-2\kappa A=2\gamma A$, so $\kappa =-\gamma >0$ andThere is exactly one positive value of $\kappa$, hence exactly one even bound state. Its normalized amplitude is $A=\sqrt{\kappa }$. An odd decaying solution would have to vanish at zero and is therefore trivial.

In the shrinking finite square well, its integrated potential is $k=-2Ul$, not $-Ul$: the full width is $2l$. With $Ul$ fixed and $l\to 0$, $0\le (\alpha l{)}^2\le 2mU{l}^2/{\hslash }^2\to 0$. The matching condition then bounds $\beta$ by $(2mUl/{\hslash }^2)(1+o(1))$, so $E$ remains bounded. Consequently $El\to 0$, and the previous matching condition givesUsing $E=-{\hslash }^2{\beta }^2/(2m)$ recovers the same bound-state energy. All other even levels disappear as the width shrinks.

The time-independent Schrodinger equation gives the even interior wavefunction $\psi =A\cos (\alpha x)$, with ${\alpha }^2=2m(U+E)/{\hslash }^2$. Outside, normalizability of a bound state requires $\psi =C{e}^{-\beta (|x|-l)}$, with ${\beta }^2=-2mE/{\hslash }^2$.

Continuity of the wavefunction and its derivative at $x=l$ gives $C=A\cos (\alpha l)$ and $-\beta C=-\alpha A\sin (\alpha l)$. A nonzero solution cannot have $\cos (\alpha l)=0$, so division givesAt the formally allowed endpoint $E=-U$, the even interior solution is constant; derivative matching would force the exterior amplitude to vanish, leaving the zero solution. Nontrivial bound states therefore have $-U<E<0$. The matching formula is the even-state condition for a finite square well.

Use $x^{\pm }=(x^0\pm x^{D-1})/\sqrt{2}$, transverse coordinates $x^i$, $i=1,\dots ,d=D-2$, and the Minkowski metricThe relativistic particle phase-space action becomesIn the light-cone gauge $x^{+}=t$, solve the mass-shell condition for $p_{+}$, assuming $p_{-}\ne 0$. The reduced phase-space action is $\int dt({\dot{x}}^{-}{p}_{-}+{\dot{x}}^i{p}_i-H)$, withThe last equality selects the future-directed momentum sector and makes positivity transparent. With $\hslash =1$ and $p_a=-i{\partial }_a$, the Schrodinger equation isThe inverse acts only on Fourier modes with nonzero $p_{-}$. Multiplication by $2p_{-}$ gives $2{\partial }_{-}{\partial }_{+}\Psi =({\Delta }_{\perp }-{\mu }^2)\Psi$. ThereforeThe light-cone Hamiltonian thus gives the same Klein-Gordon equation as covariant quantization.

For the massive two-form field, take $\mu \ne 0$. Apply ${\partial }^n$ to its field equation. Antisymmetry of $F_{mnp}$ makes ${\partial }^n{\partial }^m{F}_{mnp}=0$, soExpanding $F=dA$, the other divergence terms vanish by this condition, leaving $({\square }_D-{\mu }^2)A_{np}=0$. The light-cone decomposition of a massive two-form makes its dependent components explicit. The divergence equation isTaking $n=-$ and $n=i$, respectively, givesThe $n=+$ equation follows from these expressions: the two terms containing ${\partial }_{+}{\partial }_i{A}_{-i}$ cancel and ${\partial }_i{\partial }_j{A}_{ji}=0$. Consequently $A_{-i}$ and $A_{ij}$ are independent, each satisfying the Klein-Gordon equation with mass $\mu$. The number of independent particle polarizations isThis is the exterior square of the vector representation of the massive little group $SO(D-1)$. In the analogous Proca equation, ${\partial }^m{A}_m=0$ determines $A_{+}$ from $A_{-}$ and $A_i$, leaving $D-1$ components. A massive field has no gauge freedom that would justify setting these longitudinal components to zero. If $\mu =0$, instead use the two-form gauge field symmetry $A\mapsto A+d\Lambda$: the light-cone gauge for a two-form removes $A_{-m}$, leaving $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{D-2}{2}\right)$ transverse particle polarizations. The massive and massless counts are different.

In the closed-string mode expansion, $x^m,p_m$ are center-of-mass canonical variables, while ${\alpha }_k^i,{\tilde{\alpha }}_k^i$ are independent left- and right-moving transverse string oscillators. Their complex conjugates are ${\alpha }_{-k}^i,{\tilde{\alpha }}_{-k}^i$. The two zero-mode Lagrange multipliers impose the remaining mass-shell condition and closed-string level matching. The string level operators areTheir quantum definitions use normal ordering. The symplectic terms in the phase-space action givewith all brackets between distinct sectors zero. The nonzero-index string oscillators obey ${\alpha }_n^{i†}={\alpha }_{-n}^i$ and similarly for the right-moving sector. Define the momentum-labelled oscillator vacuum byFor $k>0$, $a_k^i={\alpha }_k^i/\sqrt{k}$ has $[a_k^i,a_l^{j†}]={\delta }_{kl}{\delta }^{ij}$. HenceStarting with $N|0;p⟩=0$, a finite product with $r_{ki}$ creation operators of mode $k$ has eigenvalue ${\sum }_{k,i}k{r}_{ki}$. The Fock space is generated by these products; both level operators have nonnegative integer eigenvalues. This establishes the integer string oscillator level property. Subtracting their physical zero-mode constraints enforces $N=\tilde{N}$.

There is a distinction between the displayed classical zero modes and their quantum constraints. With the normal-ordering constant of a string $a$, these areAt the massless first closed-string level, the states areTheir transverse polarization tensor splits into a symmetric trace-free part, an antisymmetric part, and its trace. These are the graviton, Kalb–Ramond field, and dilaton, with respective particle polarization counts $d(d+1)/2-1$, $d(d-1)/2$, and one. They have the transverse little group representations of massless particles. In a Lorentz-consistent bosonic string theory, the first chiral level is a massless vector, not a massive vector with one missing physical polarization; the closed-string products are therefore massless. This fixes $a=1$. Equivalently, regularized transverse zero-point energy gives $a=(D-2)/24$, and Lorentz consistency fixes the critical dimension of the bosonic string $D=26$.

It follows that the bosonic string mass spectrum isThe ground state has $M_0^2=-8\pi T$ and is a tachyon; level one is massless; for $N\ge 2$ the mass is $M_N=\sqrt{8\pi T(N-1)}$. The masslessness claim uses the consistent quantum theory, rather than an unshifted reading of the classical $L_0$.

A massive two-form at closed-string level two is present. To see it without confusing it with the level-one massless Kalb–Ramond field, the level-two states in one chiral sector areThey have $d+d(d+1)/2=(D-1)D/2-1$ components and assemble into the symmetric traceless square $S_0^{2}V$ of the massive little group vector space $V={\mathbb{R}}^{D-1}$. The full closed-string level is $S_0^{2}V\otimes S_0^{2}V$. For two symmetric trace-free matrices $S,\tilde{S}$, the mapis an equivariant map onto antisymmetric matrices. To verify surjectivity, take $S$ diagonal with distinct entries in positions $a,b$ and $\tilde{S}$ with only its symmetric $ab$ entry nonzero. Their commutator gives the $ab$ antisymmetric basis element. Finite-dimensional representations of the compact little group are completely reducible, so this quotient representation is also a subrepresentation. It has exactly $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{D-1}{2}\right)$ particle polarizations and is described by the massive field equation with ${\mu }^2=8\pi T$. At $D=26$ this gives 300 particle polarizations, consisting in light-cone coordinates of 24 components $A_{-i}$ and 276 components $A_{ij}$.

The GRW model takes a normalized wave function in $L^2({\mathbb{R}}^{3N})$. Between jumps it obeys the Schrodinger equation, $i\hslash {\partial }_t\Psi =H\Psi$, with the usual many-particle Hamiltonian operator, for example $H={\sum }_i[-{\hslash }^2{\nabla }_i^2/(2m_i)]+V({\mathbf{x}}_1,\dots ,{\mathbf{x}}_N)$. Each particle has an independent Poisson process of collapse times with rate $1/\tau$. Thus the total jump rate is $N/\tau$, the mean wait is $\tau /N$, and the jumping label is uniform on $\{1,\dots ,N\}$.

At a jump of particle $i$, use the GRW localization operatorIts centre has probability density function $p_i(\mathbf{c})=\Vert L_i(\mathbf{c})\Psi {\Vert }^2$. The post-jump quantum state is $L_i(\mathbf{c})\Psi /\Vert L_i(\mathbf{c})\Psi \Vert$. The normalization is consistent because $\int d^3\mathbf{c}{L}_i(\mathbf{c}{)}^2=I$. The collapse times and labels have these state-independent rates; the centres depend on the wave function through the Born rule-like squared norm.

For precision about the stated spatial event, let $B=Y_{10a}=\{\mathbf{c}:\mathrm{dist}(\mathbf{c},Y)\le 10a\}$. With $H=0$, the GRW collapse-centre event probabilities are exactlyThe last expression is defined only for $p_1(B)>0$. It includes the possibility that the next jump hits the same particle.

Write $f_i^Y(\mathbf{x})=|\varphi (\mathbf{x}-{\mathbf{y}}_i){|}^2$, and similarly $f_i^Z$. Putwith the same definitions for $Z$. The macroscopic separation and negligible packet tails make the two branches essentially orthogonal, so their interference contribution can be neglected. The first-event probability is thereforeThe $Z$ contribution is extremely small: its actual positions are within $r$ of $Z$, whereas centres in $B$ are within $10a$ of $Y$, leaving a distance much larger than $a$ in the Gaussian. Packet-tail errors add to this Gaussian-tail error.

For the next-event calculation, two distinct labels have independent position densities within either product branch, giving factors ${\eta }_i{\eta }_j$. A repeated label instead gives $R_i$, since both localization Gaussians multiply the same position variable. ConsequentlyThese formulas, with $p_{2\mid 1}=p_{12}/p_1$, answer the spatial questions without an extra containment assumption. If the first event is dominated by the $Y$ branch, they simplify toNeglecting the $Z$ term in this conditional expression requires it to be small relative to the retained first-event probability, not merely small in absolute value. The exact operator formulas above cover rare-event exceptions as well.

The intended GRW branch persistence versus geometric containment approximation is obtained if $Y$ and $Z$ contain essentially all the position mass of their corresponding branches. Then positions in $Y$ have a Gaussian-centre margin of $10a$ inside $B$, so ${\eta }_i^Y\simeq R_i^Y\simeq 1$, while ${\eta }_i^Z,R_i^Z\simeq 0$. This givesFor the Gaussian convention used here, the three-dimensional probability of a displacement exceeding $10a$ is $\mathrm{erfc}(10)+20e^{-100}/\sqrt{\pi }$, an extremely small number. A first centre near $Y$ also suppresses the $Z$ branch relative to the $Y$ branch by the very small ratio $|\beta {|}^2{q}_i^Z(\mathbf{c})/(|\alpha {|}^2{q}_i^Y(\mathbf{c}))$ when the latter branch has appreciable weight. All particles are correlated with the same pointer alternative, so one localization selects the macroscopic branch even when the next particle label differs.

The literal PDF, however, only places the packet centres ${\mathbf{y}}_i$ in $Y$; it does not say that the packets themselves fit inside $Y$. Since it permits $r>a$, the two numerical approximations just displayed do not follow for every allowed packet and region. For example, take all ${\mathbf{y}}_i=0$, let $Y$ be a very small ball, and let $|\varphi {|}^2$ be uniform on a ball of radius $r\gg 10a$. Translate the other branch to a similarly small region $Z$ at distance much larger than $100r$. ThenIf these equal packet probabilities are denoted by $\eta$ and their repeated-label integral by $R$, the next probability iswhich approaches $\eta$, not one, for large $N$. Thus packet containment is needed for the stated near-region event to have the usual branch probabilities. The literal general answer is given by the integrals above.

The physical GRW amplification mechanism remains intact: with properly chosen macroscopic branch regions, spontaneous localization selects the alternatives with approximately the squared branch amplitudes and stabilizes the selected record, on a time scale $\tau /N$. Gaussian tails are not exactly eliminated, so the persistence is approximate. The containment qualification concerns how the region is defined, rather than whether the dynamics selects a macroscopically separated branch.