Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 1 14D d Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
For ,The stationary Schrodinger equation becomesHence, choosing the positive root and a positive normalization constant,The state is even, so . The Gaussian integrals giveand therefore . These values are collected in gaussian eigenstate for a quadratic potential.
Finally, equality in the derivation of the uncertainty relation requires the centred vectors to be linearly dependent with a purely imaginary proportionality constant. Thus for some ,In position space this sayswhose normalizable solutions areThus every saturating state is Gaussian up to translation, a plane-wave factor, and an overall phase, as in the equality case of the Heisenberg uncertainty relation.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 2 15D a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
The Schrodinger equation and its complex conjugate areBecause the potential is real, its two contributions cancel when differentiating the probability density . ThereforeThe expression in square brackets is the probability current , soThis probability continuity equation says that probability can leave a region only through the current across its boundary.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 3 6D c Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Suppose and are two bound-state solutions with the same energy. Their Wronskiansatisfies because the Schrodinger equation contains no first-derivative term. Hence is constant. Both wavefunctions and their derivatives decay at infinity, so there and therefore . The two solutions are linearly dependent. Thus every one-dimensional bound-state energy is nondegenerate.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 ib Paper 4 4D a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Write the expectation value asDifferentiating and retaining the possible explicit time dependence of the observable givesThe Schrodinger equation and its adjoint arewhere the Hamiltonian operator is Hermitian. Substitution yieldsThis is the proof of Ehrenfest theorem from the Schrodinger equation.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 ib Paper 2 15A iii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 ib Paper 2 15A ii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 ib Paper 4 15A i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
For ,Substitution into the Schrodinger equation and comparison of the constant and coefficients gives
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 ib Paper 4 4A Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-10-03
The time-independent Schrodinger equation isIntegrating it over and letting shows that has no jump because is finite. A jump in would create a delta term in and hence a derivative of a delta in , so is also continuous.
For a bound state , defineThen the proposed even wavefunction solves the equation away from the interfaces, andContinuity at gives , while continuity of the derivative gives . Dividing yields the second required relationThus the lowest even state of the finite square well is the first-quadrant intersection, with , of the circle and the curve .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 iii Paper 325 3 b Solution 2026-09-28
For a neutron in the Earth's Newtonian gravitational potential , the Schrodinger equation isNear the surface, up to an additive constant.
The Colella–Overhauser–Werner experiment uses crystal slabs as coherent beam splitters and mirrors in a neutron interferometer. The two paths contain horizontal segments of length separated vertically by , then recombine. The gravitational potential energy difference is . A neutron of speed spends time on a horizontal segment, so the gravitationally induced relative quantum phase isUsing the de Broglie wavelength and givesRotating the apparatus changes the vertical projection of its enclosed area from zero to . The number of full interference oscillations is thereforeHere , soThe expected change is therefore oscillations to the nearest integer.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 iii Paper 325 4 Solution 2026-09-28
For particle positions , the two-particle Schrodinger equation isWrite for the localized wave packet and . Neglecting packet spreading and branch overlap, the initial product state evolves branchwise asup to phases generated independently on the two particles. These branch-dependent phases generally cannot be separated into one phase depending only on and one depending only on , so the Newtonian gravitational potential energy creates gravitationally induced entanglement.
If is much smaller than the other separations, remove their nearly common phase and retain onlyThe state is approximatelyIts concurrence is , so it becomes maximally entangled first at . For ,Thus the near-maximal entanglement time is about within the stated approximation.
A single prescribed classical gravitational potential gives a Hamiltonian of the form . Its evolution factorizes as and preserves every initial product state, so it cannot generate this entanglement. A semiclassical mean field sourced only by expectation values likewise gives each particle a local one-body potential and does not provide a quantum mediator carrying branch correlations.
An entanglement witness is a Hermitian operator whose expectation is nonnegative on every separable state but negative on at least one entangled state. At , defineThe largest Schmidt coefficient of is , so every product state in the four-dimensional branch subspace satisfies . By closure under convex combinations, for every separable mixture, whereasA negative measured value therefore certifies entanglement. Under the assumptions that the masses began unentangled and interacted only through gravity, such certification would show that the mediator can transmit quantum coherence; it would be evidence against a purely classical gravitational channel and for the quantum nature of gravity.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 iii Paper 341 5 a Solution 2026-09-28
Write . The real potential and periodic boundary conditions make a self-adjoint operator. Since ,because the expectation of a self-adjoint operator is real. Equivalently, integrating the kinetic term by parts leaves and the periodic boundary term cancels. Thus the continuous Schrodinger equation preserves its norm.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 iii Paper 341 7 Solution 2026-09-28
Suppose a semidiscrete linear PDE is . Direct evaluation of may be expensive, while and can be cheap, parallelizable, or exactly structure-preserving. Splitting is especially effective when and represent different spatial directions, kinetic and potential energy, diffusion and reaction, or linear and nonlinear pieces.
The Lie-Trotter splitting commutator error follows from multiplying the exponential series:It therefore has local error and global order one. Reversing the factors changes the sign of the leading commutator. The symmetric average in composition form is Strang splitting,whose symmetry removes even powers from the modified generator. Its local error is , involving nested commutators such as and , and its global order is two.
For multidimensional diffusion, directional splitting replaces one large elliptic solve by successive one-dimensional tridiagonal solves; alternating-direction implicit methods are standard examples. For the Schrodinger equation, take and . The kinetic subflow is diagonal in Fourier space, the potential subflow is pointwise multiplication, and Strang splitting is both second order and exactly norm-preserving.
A symmetric method has even global order. If its leading modified-flow defect is , a symmetric composition raises the order when and , together with the required higher commutator conditions. In particular, the higher-order composition of a symmetric splittingis fourth order because and . Its negative middle step is harmless for reversible unitary problems but can be ill-posed or strongly unstable for parabolic semigroups. Higher-order parabolic splittings therefore use more specialized complex coefficients, commutator corrections, or extrapolation.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 ii Paper 3 34E a i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
For two solutions of the Schrodinger equation, their Wronskian is constant because the equation has no first-derivative term. The determinant of the Floquet matrix is the ratio of the Wronskian at to that at , hence
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 ii Paper 4 34E b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Writing , the current isThe two covariant factors acquire opposite phases under a gauge transformation, so is invariant.
Multiply the Schrodinger equation by , subtract its complex conjugate multiplied by , and useThe real scalar-potential terms cancel, leaving
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 iii Paper 325 3 Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
For positions , the two-particle Schrodinger equation isNeglecting packet spreading and writing for , branchwise evolution givesup to local kinetic phases. This branch-dependent Newtonian gravitational potential energy produces gravitationally induced entanglement.
Under the stated distance approximation, only the three branches acquire an appreciable common phaseThe coefficient matrix iswhere is the all-ones matrix. The reduced density matrix isIt equals when , so the first maximally entangled state occurs at . Therefore
The state does not remain entangled for every . Whenever , all branch phases again agree and the state returns to its initial product state. The revival period is
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 ii Paper 1 35B a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
PutAway from , this satisfies . Its first derivative has jump , so, distributionally,Applying to the proposed integral equation therefore givesSince , this is precisely the stated Schrodinger equation. The term is the incident wave and the choice gives outgoing waves on both sides of each source point.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2026 ib Paper 4 4B Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Direct differentiation verifies the free-particle Schrodinger equation, so . At , normalisation of gives . Symmetry gives , while Gaussian integration givesIts growth shows wave-packet spreading and therefore a nonstationary state.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2026 iii Paper 325 3 Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
For equal masses with positions , the two-body Schrodinger equation isNeglecting wave-packet spreading and overlap, write for the packet . The initial state and its branchwise gravitational evolution areup to local kinetic phases. The branch dependence of the Newtonian gravitational potential energy is the source of gravitationally induced entanglement.
Under the approximation stated in the question, only the matching pairs acquire an appreciable common phaseThe coefficient matrix of the resulting bipartite state iswhere is the all-ones matrix. ThereforeA maximally entangled state would require . This demandsThat equation has no solution for . Thus the requested large- conclusion does not follow from the assumptions printed in the paper: within the stated approximation, the system never becomes maximally entangled in the large- limit. For completeness, maximal entanglement is possible for at and for at ; for it occurs at or . The time would bebut it is not a large- answer.
The system also does not remain entangled for every . Whenever , the phase matrix again factorizes and the state returns to its initial product state. The revival period isFor it is entangled at all intervening times; for there is the additional product-state revival at .
Probability continuity equation Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
For a wavefunction satisfying the Schrodinger equation with a real potential,This continuity equation expresses local conservation of probability.