Hamiltonian (quantum mechanics)

The Hamiltonian operator represents the total energy and generates unitary time evolution through the Schrödinger equation.

Reordering an orthonormal basis changes its matrix by a permutation similarity transformation. The off-diagonal block can move to different row and column indices without changing any energy eigenvalue. Matrix entries must therefore be compared in the same declared basis order, not only by their visual positions.

For a positive self-adjoint Hamiltonian operator, finite energy means that a normalized state lies in $D(H^{1/2})$, its form domain, and has expectation value $q_H(\psi )$. This domain can be larger than $D(H)$. With a complete orthonormal basis of energy eigenstates, $\psi ={\sum }_n{c}_n{e}_n$ and $H{e}_n=E_n{e}_n$ give $q_H(\psi )={\sum }_n{E}_n|c_n{|}^2$ by applying $H^{1/2}$ and taking its squared norm. Membership in $D(H)$ instead requires ${\sum }_n{E}_n^2|c_n{|}^2<\infty$. For a Dirichlet free-particle Hamiltonian operator on an interval, the energy form is ${\hslash }^2\int |{\psi }^{\prime }{|}^2/(2m)$ on functions with square-integrable weak derivative and zero endpoint values.

The Morse potential models an anharmonic molecular bond with dissociation energy $D_e>0$, equilibrium separation $x_e$, and inverse length $a>0$. Unlike a quantum harmonic oscillator, it has finitely many bound levels and a dissociation continuum.

The quantum Hamiltonian with kinetic energy $p^2/(2\mu )$ and Morse potential has bound energies of the displayed form, where $A=\hslash {\omega }_e$, $B=A^2/(4D_e)>0$ and ${\omega }_e=a\sqrt{2D_e/\mu }$. Adjacent energy differences are $A-2B(n+1)$, distinct and positive over the physical bound-level range. A finite truncation with nonzero adjacent dipole couplings therefore satisfies connected nondegenerate transition chain generates special unitary control. Controllability of such a truncation does not by itself prove controllability on the full space including dissociation states.

A plot of successive vibrational spacings against a vibrational index. Extrapolation toward zero spacing estimates a dissociation limit under an assumed spacing law. The integration bounds and whether the energy is measured from the potential minimum or vibrational ground state must be specified.

For $Q=\hat{p}-isA(x)$ with real $A$ and positive $s$, the factorization gives potential $(s^2{A}^2-s\hslash A^{\prime })/(2m)$ and a nonnegative energy form. Its zero mode is proportional to $\exp [-s\int Adx/\hslash ]$. Taking $A=x$ and optimizing positivity over $s$ gives the Heisenberg uncertainty principle for states with finite second moments.

For $Q=p-if(x)$, $H=Q^{†}Q/(2m)$ and $Q{\psi }_0=0$, the trial state ${\psi }_1=Q^{†}{\psi }_0$ obeys the displayed identity. It follows from $[Q,Q^{†}]=2\hslash f^{\prime }$ and $[p,f^{\prime }]=-i\hslash f^{\prime \prime }$. The coefficients are generally position-dependent multiplication functions, not constants. For linear positive $f$, the first term vanishes and the second becomes the harmonic-oscillator level spacing.

For real polynomial $f(x)=c{x}^n+\cdots$, $c\ne 0$, the zero mode of $H=(p+if)(p-if)/(2m)$ is normalizable on $\mathbb{R}$ exactly when $n$ is odd and $c>0$. Its squared modulus has leading exponential $\exp [-2c{x}^{n+1}/((n+1)\hslash )]$. Odd $n$ gives the same tail sign at both ends; positivity of $c$ makes both tails decay. This kernel is one-dimensional because $(p-if)\psi =0$ is a first-order differential equation. On the operator domain where integration by parts is valid, the energy form is $\Vert (p-if)\psi {\Vert }^2/(2m)\ge 0$.

A unitary operator $U$ is a symmetry of a time-independent Hamiltonian $H$ whenequivalently $[U,H]=0$. A differentiable one-parameter symmetry $U(s)=e^{-isQ/\hslash }$ has a self-adjoint generator $Q$ satisfying $[Q,H]=0$, so $Q$ is conserved.

If $U(s)=e^{-isQ/\hslash }$ and $U(s{)}^{†}HU(s)=H$, differentiation at $s=0$ givesIn the Heisenberg picture,

A time-independent Hamiltonian evolves a state by the unitary operator $U(t)=e^{-iHt/\hslash }$.

For a closed quantum system, unitary time evolution changes a quantum state through a unitary operator, preserving norms and inner products. For a time-independent self-adjoint Hamiltonian operator $H$, choose the initial time as zero:Here $\hslash =h/(2\pi )$ is the reduced Planck constant. The same $U(t)$ acts on every initial quantum state; it depends on the Hamiltonian operator and elapsed time, rather than the chosen preparation.^[ref]

The self-adjointness of $H$ makes the exponential a unitary operator. In finite dimension, conjugating its matrix exponential givesThe two exponents commute because both are multiples of $H$. Hence, for any two initial vectors,This short proof explains why normalization survives, why orthogonality of initial vectors survives, and why the transition probability between two states evolved by the same $U$ is unchanged. It does not require that a fixed measurement in quantum mechanics have time-independent probabilities: its measurement basis need not move with the quantum states.

For an unbounded self-adjoint operator, define the exponential through the spectral theorem, rather than assuming that its power series acts on every vector. It is a unitary operator on the entire Hilbert space; the strong Schrödinger equation holds for initial vectors in the operator domain $D(H)$. For a density operator, unitary time evolution reads $\rho (t)=U(t)\rho (0)U(t{)}^{†}$. It preserves eigenvalues and purity of a density operator, but can change its entries in a fixed basis.

The useful distinction is between conserving total probability and conserving each measurement's probabilities. A fixed energy spectrum supplies different ticking rates for different probability amplitudes. Their relative quantum phases can move the Bloch vector and create quantum interference even while every energy eigenstate population stays fixed. Qubit precession under a constant Hamiltonian makes this visible; Ramsey interferometry converts the accumulated relative quantum phase into a population difference that a simple readout can detect.

For a normalized quantum state $\psi$ and a self-adjoint operator $H$ on a finite-dimensional Hilbert space, expand its unitary time evolution:Multiplying by its complex conjugate gives the survival probabilityThe function is even in $t$, so its odd coefficients vanish. The coefficient $(\Delta H{)}^2=⟨H^2⟩-⟨H{⟩}^2$ is the variance of the energy. This quadratic departure yields the quantum Zeno effect when ideal projective measurements repeatedly reset the quantum state.

A Hamiltonian operator has perfect transfer between basis states $|a⟩,|b⟩$ at time $t_{\ast }$ if $e^{-iH{t}_{\ast }}|a⟩=e^{i\chi }|b⟩$ for a known global phase $\chi$. In an excitation-conserving qubit network whose vacuum is fixed, the initial product state with $\alpha |0⟩+\beta |1⟩$ at site $a$ and zeros elsewhere evolves to $\alpha |\mathrm{vac}⟩+\beta e^{i\chi }|b⟩$. A local phase gate at $b$ removing $\chi$ restores the unknown qubit there. This explains why transfer of the single-excitation basis state suffices for qubit transfer when the vacuum phase is also accounted for.

In the Schrödinger picture, states evolve with the Hamiltonian operator while observables without explicit time dependence are fixed. For time-independent $H$, the corresponding Heisenberg picture operator is $O_H(t)=e^{iHt/\hslash }{O}_S{e}^{-iHt/\hslash }$.

The time-evolution operator maps an initial quantum state to its state at a later time. For a time-independent Hamiltonian operator $H$, it is the unitary operator $U(t)=e^{-iHt/\hslash }$.

More generally, write $|\psi (t)⟩=U(t,t_0)|\psi (t_0)⟩$. The time-evolution operator obeysFor a constant self-adjoint Hamiltonian operator, $U(t,t_0)=\exp [-iH(t-t_0)/\hslash ]$. With zero as the initial time, this gives the group law $U(t+s)=U(t)U(s)$. Successive evolution is reversible; a measurement followed by conditioning on an outcome is a separate operation described by projective measurement.

For a time-dependent Hamiltonian operator, the defining equation is $i\hslash {\partial }_{t}U(t,t_0)=H(t)U(t,t_0)$. In finite dimension, a continuous Hermitian $H(t)$ still gives unitary time evolution, sinceThe solution is a time-ordered exponential, with later factors acting on the left. One may replace it by $\exp [-i{\int }_{t_0}^{t}H(s)ds/\hslash ]$ when $[H(s),H(s^{\prime })]=0$ at all times; independently changing pulse axes generally requires time ordering.^[ref]

The position-space kernel of the time-evolution operator propagates a wave function by $\psi (x,t)=\int K_U(x,t;x^{\prime },t^{\prime })\psi (x^{\prime },t^{\prime })d{x}^{\prime }$. It tends to $\delta (x-x^{\prime })$ as $t\to t^{\prime }$. A retarded convention multiplies it by the Heaviside step function: $K_R=\Theta (t-t^{\prime })K_U$. This convention obeys $(i\hslash {\partial }_t-H)K_R=i\hslash \delta (t-t^{\prime })\delta (x-x^{\prime })$; dividing by $i\hslash$ gives the Green function with a unit delta source. The time phase for an energy eigenstate is always $e^{-iE(t-t^{\prime })/\hslash }$.

Insert a complete resolution of identity in energy eigenstates on either side of the time-evolution operator. Each state evolves by its scalar energy phase, yielding the displayed quantum propagator. Its spectral sum includes an integral over any continuous spectrum, with the measure fixed by the continuum normalization. Omitting the scattering states when bound states are also present destroys completeness and the delta-function short-time limit.

For a periodic Hamiltonian $H(t+T)=H(t)$, the Floquet operator is the unitary operator evolving a quantum state through one complete period, at a fixed starting phase of the drive. The composition law gives $U(NT,0)=U_F^N$. Choosing a different starting phase conjugates $U_F$ by a unitary operator, so its eigenvalues are unchanged.

For an instantaneous rotation about $x$ followed by free precession about $z$, the just-before-kick one-period operator is $U=e^{-i\Omega T{S}^z}{e}^{-i\Phi S^x}$. Sampling just after kicks reverses the displayed order. The spin generators are dimensionless and the pulse area $\Phi$ is an angle.

Multiplying the two matrix exponentials with the Pauli matrix multiplication law givesOne has $C^2+|\mathbf{v}{|}^2=1$. If $|\mathbf{v}|\ne 0$, put $\theta =2\arccos C$ and $\mathbf{n}=\mathbf{v}/|\mathbf{v}|$. The exponential of a Pauli vector gives $U_F^N=I\cos (N\theta /2)-i\mathbf{n}\cdot \mathbf{\sigma }\sin (N\theta /2)$. Its action on a Bloch vector is a rotation through $N\theta$ about $\mathbf{n}$, and its quasienergies are $\pm \hslash \theta /(2T)$ modulo $2\pi \hslash /T$. When $U_F=\pm I$, its axis is arbitrary and the Bloch vector is unchanged.

A quasienergy is defined by an eigenvalue of the Floquet operator. It is determined modulo $2\pi \hslash /T$, because adding an integer multiple of that quantity leaves the complex exponential unchanged. A time-independent effective Hamiltonian can be defined by a branch of the matrix logarithm; its eigenvalues are the corresponding chosen quasienergies.

Suppose a constant Hamiltonian operator has a complete discrete orthonormal basis of energy eigenstates, $H|n⟩=E_n|n⟩$. Expanding an initial pure state and applying the time-evolution operator term by term givesA projective measurement resolving these basis vectors therefore assigns the same Born rule probability $|c_n{|}^2$ to each label $n$ at every time. An energy measurement groups labels sharing the same energy eigenvalue: $P(E)={\sum }_{n:E_n=E}|c_n{|}^2$ is also constant. If $c_m,c_n\ne 0$, their probability amplitude ratio instead evolves asOnly energy differences enter this relative quantum phase. Adding a constant $\epsilon I$ to the Hamiltonian operator multiplies the entire pure state by $e^{-i\epsilon t/\hslash }$, a global phase, and leaves the density operator unchanged.

For a fixed observable $A$, the expectation value can nevertheless vary:Terms joining distinct energy eigenvalues can oscillate; diagonal terms cannot. If $[A,H]=0$, these terms between different energies vanish, so the expectation value is constant. This distinguishes conservation of energy from the stronger claim that every observable is stationary.

An energy eigenstate has only a global phase evolution and is a stationary state. A quantum superposition entirely within one degenerate energy eigenspace is also an energy eigenstate and is stationary. For a general density operator in finite dimension, stationarity under a constant Hamiltonian operator means $[H,\rho ]=0$: differentiating $U\rho U^{†}$ proves necessity, and commuting $\rho$ through the exponential proves sufficiency. Merely fixing the diagonal energy populations does not fix the off-diagonal quantum coherence.

Choose the Pauli matrices with ${\sigma }_z=\mathrm{diag}(1,-1)$, and let $\omega >0$ be an angular frequency. The computational basis is an orthonormal basis of energy eigenstates for the qubit Hamiltonian operatorIn this convention $|1⟩$ is the lower energy eigenstate; the labels describe a basis choice, not a universal ground state/excited state ordering. Start in the Hadamard basis pure state $|+⟩=(|0⟩+|1⟩)/\sqrt{2}$. ThenThe first factor in the second expression is a global phase. The ratio of the two probability amplitudes has relative quantum phase $\omega t$, so its sign follows directly from $E_1-E_0=-\hslash \omega$.

Multiplying this density matrix by each Pauli matrix and taking its trace gives the Bloch vector:The Bloch vector travels counterclockwise around the equator of the Bloch sphere, from $+x$ toward $+y$ when viewed from $+z$. A computational-basis measurement always has $P_Z(0)=P_Z(1)=1/2$, while the Hadamard basis and ${\sigma }_y$ eigenbasis measurements giveAt $\omega t=\pi /2$, the quantum state is $|+i⟩=(|0⟩+i|1⟩)/\sqrt{2}$ up to a global phase, giving $P_Y(+)=1$. At $\omega t=\pi$, it is $|-⟩$ up to a global phase, giving $P_X(+)=0$. Both retain equal energy measurement probabilities.

At $t=2\pi /\omega$, the time-evolution operator is $U(t)=-I$, so $|\psi (t)⟩=-|+⟩$. The physical quantum state ray, its density operator, and every measurement's probabilities have returned. The representative vector returns exactly only at $t=4\pi /\omega$, when $U(t)=I$. The minus sign is a global phase for this isolated evolution; comparing an evolved branch with an unevolved branch through a controlled unitary gate can make it a relative quantum phase, as explained in global phase of an uncontrolled quantum gate is unobservable.

Ramsey interferometry uses two coherent pulses with a free interval between them: the first creates a quantum superposition, the interval accumulates relative quantum phase, and the second converts that quantum phase into measurement probabilities. Its attraction is that an ordinary population readout can reveal the quantum coherence hidden from an energy measurement during the free interval.

Here is an ideal qubit model with an explicit pulse convention. Let $R_y(\theta )=\exp (-i\theta {\sigma }_y/2)$, prepare $|0⟩$, apply $R_y(\pi /2)$, evolve freely with $U_{\varphi }=\exp (-i\varphi {\sigma }_z/2)$, and apply the inverse pulse $R_y(-\pi /2)$ before a computational-basis measurement. The first pulse gives $|+⟩$. Direct matrix multiplication givesThus the Born rule gives $P(0)={\cos }^2(\varphi /2)$ and $P(1)={\sin }^2(\varphi /2)$. Before the second pulse, the same computational-basis measurement would give $1/2$ for both outcomes for every $\varphi$. At $\varphi =2\pi /3$, the second pulse changes these probabilities to $1/4$ and $3/4$. If the two pulses have the same sign instead, the output labels interchange: the pulse convention is part of the prediction.

In a pulse experiment the phase is measured relative to the oscillator supplying the coherent pulses. In a rotating frame, write the free Hamiltonian operator as $H_{\mathrm{rot}}=\hslash \delta {\sigma }_z/2$ with signed angular frequency difference $\delta$ in the chosen labeling convention. A free interval $T$ then accumulates $\varphi =\delta T$; changing the second pulse's phase changes the analysis direction. This comparison makes Ramsey interferometry useful for measuring frequency differences and diagnosing loss of quantum coherence.

For example, suppose the first pulse has prepared a density matrix with equal populations and transverse Bloch vector length $0\le V\le 1$:The same inverse analysis pulse yields $P(0)=(1+V\cos \varphi )/2$. The pure state case $V=1$ gives the full ideal fringe; the mixed state $I/2$ gives the flat result $1/2$. This is a controlled mathematical comparison, not a fit to an experiment. Experimental contrast alone does not identify quantum decoherence: imperfect preparation, pulse errors and readout errors can also reduce it.

For ideal identical $R_x(\pi /2)$ pulses separated by $R_z(-\delta T)$, multiply the unitary operators to obtain $U=-i[\cos (\delta T/2)X-\sin (\delta T/2)Z]$. An input at either pole of the Bloch sphere returns to that same pole with probability ${\sin }^2(\delta T/2)$. In particular zero delay gives a full NOT, so its return probability is zero. Opposite-sign pulses instead give ${\cos }^2(\delta T/2)$. The distinction matters when identifying the measured quantum state population.

The contrast of a phase-sensitive pulse sequence depends on the state during phase accumulation. Coherent preparation can create two populated paths whose relative quantum phase is converted to a population by readout; preparation into one path gives no such signal. For the Hadamard-phase-Hadamard qubit rotation, a pure $z$-polarized input yields full contrast, a pure $x$-polarized input yields none, and an unpolarized input also yields none. The last two cases have different purity despite identical measured populations. Purity alone is therefore not a phase-sensitivity criterion.

For an ensemble with static detunings $\delta +\eta$, ideal same-phase quarter-turn pulses give ${\overline{p}}_2(T)=[1+\mathrm{Re}(e^{i\delta T}\chi (T))]/2$. Here $\chi$ is the characteristic function of the offset distribution. A mean-zero Gaussian of RMS width $\sigma$ gives $\chi =e^{-{\sigma }^2{T}^2/2}$; a symmetric uniform interval gives a sinc function. A width alone does not uniquely specify the envelope.

The 2002 experiment described in Manipulating the Quantum State of an Electrical Circuit demonstrates Ramsey interferometry in a circuit using superconductivity. An aluminum island between two small Josephson junctions and a larger readout Josephson junction formed the loop; a dilution refrigerator cooled it. Manipulation used the charge/flux bias point least sensitive to first-order fluctuations. Microwave pulse amplitude and duration were calibrated using Rabi oscillations. Two phase-coherent $\pi /2$ pulses then enclosed a variable free interval. A current pulse switched the large Josephson junction to finite voltage with state-dependent probability; a preamplifier and threshold discriminator counted repeated trials.^[ref]

As a readout control, switching was tested against pulse height at thermal equilibrium. The Ramsey interferometry oscillation period agreed with inverse frequency detuning, supporting relative quantum phase accumulation against the external oscillator. The decaying envelope indicated finite quantum coherence, while reduced contrast was attributed provisionally to population relaxation during readout. This supports controlled coherent evolution over a finite interval, without establishing perfect isolation or identifying one exclusive noise mechanism.^[ref]

A moving chemical atom or molecule can experience the two pulses of Ramsey interferometry by flying through two short oscillatory-field regions. Their common oscillator supplies the reference quantum phase; the flight between them supplies the interrogation time. The long interval need not contain a driving field. This turns a spatial apparatus into a coherent pulse sequence and makes narrow spectral lines possible without filling the entire flight path with a uniform oscillatory field.

Norman Foster Ramsey, Jr.'s 1950 paper calculates the two-state transition probability and averages it over molecular velocities. It is a theoretical investigation, rather than a report of an atomic clock's measured accuracy.^[ref]

His 1989 lecture contrasts an electric-resonance apparatus photograph with a magnetic-resonance schematic. Coherent drive regions bracket a static-field flight region; state-dependent deflection converts transitions into detector changes, while differing flight times suppress side fringes.^[ref]

The readout infers a change of internal quantum state through state-dependent transmission, as in the Rabi molecular beam magnetic resonance experiment. A useful control is to block one drive region: a narrow fringe requiring both interactions must disappear. Changing the second region's oscillation phase should move the fringe, whereas an incoherent background need not move. These are consequences of the model below, not additional historical measurements. A detector dip alone neither proves perfect preparation nor determines all apparatus-induced frequency shifts; cesium-beam clock procedure adds the controls needed for a practical atomic clock.

The publication sequence begins with Norman Foster Ramsey, Jr.'s 1949 article A New Molecular Beam Resonance Method, Physical Review 76, p. 996, published 1 October; the fuller theoretical paper followed in 1950.^[ref]

NIST-7 supplied a practical realization: optical pumping moved caesium populations into the $F=3$ manifold, without isolating $m_F=0$. Two separated microwave interactions probed the clock transition; fluorescence detected transferred $F=4$ atoms. A synthesized reference, tied to a hydrogen maser, sampled opposite sides of resonance for feedback control. Beam reversal tested cavity quantum phase bias; independent velocity determinations checked motion corrections. The observed central fringe resolved the transition, but power-dependent velocity weighting and light shifts still required evaluation.^[ref]

Ramsey spectroscopy measures a transition frequency by comparing the relative quantum phase acquired between two coherent interactions with the reference oscillator. In a beam, a state selector and apertures admit particular internal quantum states and trajectories; an analyzer and detector measure state-dependent transmission. In an optically prepared atomic clock, optical pumping and fluorescence can perform those functions. The preparation and readout determine which part of the beam contributes; they are not themselves the two coherent interactions.

For an ideal accepted particle, the first resonant half-duration Rabi pi pulse splits the probability amplitude between $|g⟩$ and $|e⟩$. The second combines two indistinguishable alternatives: a transition in the first region followed by no transition in the second, or the reverse. Their relative quantum phase depends on the dark flight and the drive oscillation phases. Adding probability amplitudes gives quantum interference; adding only the two alternatives' probabilities would erase the fringe. “Dark” means that the transverse drive is absent: a static magnetic field and the internal Hamiltonian operator can still act.

The useful separation is between pulse duration and phase-accumulation time. Short regions can share one coherent oscillator while a long drive-free interval resolves small frequency differences. A scan over reference frequency locates a fringe pattern; controlled changes of the second pulse's oscillation phase distinguish that coherent signal from phase-insensitive background. A reference scan must also identify the central fringe before atomic clock frequency lock, because neighboring fringes provide competing lock points.

For two coherent square pulses of equal duration $\tau$, pulse-start separation $T\ge \tau$, resonant Rabi angular frequency $\Omega$, and Rabi detuning $\delta$, the initially lower-state transition probability has the displayed leading weak-excitation form when $|\Omega |\tau \ll 1$. Integrating the first-order probability amplitude over both windows gives a sum of two equal Fourier transforms, with relative quantum phase $\delta T$. The factor four from coherent addition makes the central value $(\Omega \tau {)}^2$. The rotating-wave approximation additionally requires many carrier cycles per pulse and near-resonant weak driving.

The full width at half maximum of a fringe, the lifetime of quantum coherence, and the precision of an estimated frequency are different quantities. In the ideal short-pulse limit, write the transfer probability with contrast $0<V\le 1$ and second-pulse oscillation phase $\phi$ asAt quadrature, $P=1/2$ and $|\partial P/\partial \nu |=\pi VT$. For $N$ independent, equally prepared particles with ideal binary readout, the binomial distribution gives ${\sigma }_P=\sqrt{P(1-P)/N}=1/(2\sqrt{N})$. Local propagation of uncertainty therefore yields the displayed ${\sigma }_{\nu }$. For chosen $T=5\mathrm{ms}$, $V=0.8$ and $N=10^4$, it is approximately $0.398\mathrm{Hz}$, although the ideal fringe width is $100\mathrm{Hz}$. This is an original counting-noise estimate at a known quadrature, not the accuracy of a historical clock or a guarantee of finding the correct fringe.

For the illustrative dephasing model $V(T)=e^{-T/T_2}$ with fixed $N$, minimizing ${\sigma }_{\nu }$ maximizes $T{e}^{-T/T_2}$ and gives $T=T_2$: its derivative is $e^{-T/T_2}(1-T/T_2)$. This conclusion changes if longer interrogation reduces the number of accepted particles or the repetition rate. Quantum decoherence, a distribution of flight times, reference oscillator noise and readout errors can reduce contrast; a fitted decay time need not identify one microscopic mechanism. More counting can improve precision while a reproducible cavity quantum phase offset still biases the frequency, as in atomic clock frequency shifts.

Use the Driven two-level Rabi model in the ordered basis $(|e⟩,|g⟩)$, with Pauli matrices satisfying ${\sigma }_z=\mathrm{diag}(1,-1)$. Let the Rabi detuning be $\delta ={\omega }_0-\omega =2\pi ({\nu }_0-\nu )$, in angular frequency, while ${\nu }_0$ and $\nu$ are ordinary frequencies in hertz. Assume two identical square pulses, equal drive oscillation phases, constant positive Rabi angular frequency $\Omega$, constant $\delta$ during pulses and flight, and no quantum decoherence or loss. The rotating-wave approximation and isolation of the chosen two-level system are required, just as for the Driven two-level Rabi model. Free flight means no transverse drive; the reference oscillator continues running.

The pulse and free-flight Hamiltonian operators in the rotating frame areThe Pauli matrix multiplication law gives $(\delta {\sigma }_z+\Omega {\sigma }_x{)}^2=q^{2}I$. Thus the exact special unitary group $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ pulse matrix for this effective Hamiltonian operator, and the flight matrix, areThe sequence is $U_p{U}_f{U}_p$. Starting in $|g⟩$, matrix multiplication and the Born rule giveThis retains the tilted rotation axis and quantum phase accumulated during each finite pulse. At resonance it gives $P_{g\to e}(0)={\sin }^2(\Omega \tau )$; with no flight it reduces to the single square-pulse response for duration $2\tau$. Both checks would fail if arbitrary ideal $\pi /2$ rotations were silently substituted at nonzero Rabi detuning.

For resonant pulse area $\Omega \tau =\pi /2$, $|\delta |/\Omega \ll 1$ and $\tau \ll T$, the central fringe approachesIts half-height points are $|\nu -{\nu }_0|=1/(4T)$, so the central peak's full width at half maximum is $1/(2T)$ in hertz, or $\pi /T$ in angular frequency. This width assumes an effectively flat pulse envelope across that central peak, one flight time and unit contrast; it is neither a universal finite-pulse width nor a frequency uncertainty. Longer flight lets a smaller frequency difference accumulate the same observable quantum phase.

The two pulses here have the same sign and the plotted outcome is transfer to $|e⟩$. The earlier Ramsey interferometry example uses an inverse analysis pulse and reports return to its initial label. Specifying the measured outcome and pulse oscillation phases reconciles the two conventions. In a beam the lengths and speed determine $\tau$ and $T$; in the Quantronium Ramsey interference experiment electronics set the pulse times for a stationary circuit.

The exact finite-pulse Ramsey transition probability separates a slowly varying pulse response from rapid quantum interference. Define the single-zone transfer probability $p$ and a pulse-induced quantum phase $\theta$ bySince $c_p^2+b^2=1-p$, factorizing the real bracket in the original formula givesWhere $c_p=b=0$, the probability is zero and $\theta$ need not be defined. Elsewhere this identity proves the envelope bound without a weak-drive assumption. The envelope $4p(1-p)$ is not the single-zone response $p$: two equal coherent interactions have different transfer weights. A contiguous resonant Rabi pi pulse of duration $2\tau$ provides another useful comparison with the same total drive duration, but no dark interval. Its line is broad because it has no long flight phase.

Keep the first pulse's oscillation phase zero and give the second phase $\phi$ in the Driven two-level Rabi model. Its upper off-diagonal Hamiltonian operator entry is $\hslash \Omega e^{-i\phi }/2$. Multiplying the two pulse unitary operators and the free-flight unitary operator givesThe Born rule gives the displayed phase-dependent form using the $p,b,\theta$ of the Ramsey fringe envelope. Thus $\phi =0$ reproduces the existing expression, while $\phi =\pi$ turns a resonant transfer maximum into zero transfer. A single pulse's population is insensitive to its drive phase; the second coherent interaction makes their difference observable. An uncontrolled, uniformly random $\phi$ instead averages this probability to $2p(1-p)$, leaving the broad pulse response but removing the dark-flight fringes.

Finite pulses also contribute to the near-resonant frequency slope. For $\Omega \tau =\pi /2$, differentiating $\theta$ at $\delta =0$ gives ${\theta }^{\prime }(0)=1/\Omega$. Consequently the phase near resonance isAt $\phi =\pi /2$ the exact resonant slope is $\partial P/\partial \nu =-\pi T_{\mathrm{eff}}$. For the plotted parameters $T_{\mathrm{eff}}\simeq 5.637\mathrm{ms}$; the near-resonant estimate $1/(2T_{\mathrm{eff}})\simeq 88.71\mathrm{Hz}$ explains why the exact finite-pulse width below differs from $100\mathrm{Hz}$. The slope is exact at resonance under these assumptions, while this width estimate uses the local phase expansion. A velocity distribution requires averaging the full response, not substituting one effective flight time.

Let each drive region have length $\ell$ and the drive-free gap have length $L$, measured edge to edge. A particle of constant speed $v>0$ experiences $\tau (v)=\ell /v$ and $T(v)=L/v$. For a normalized detected-beam speed probability density function $f(v)$, sum the transition probabilities, not the probability amplitudes of different particles:The displayed $f$ is an ideal effusion flux distribution, with speed scale $u$, uniform transmission and speed-independent detection efficiency. It is not a claim about any particular clock's selected beam. The substitution $x=(v/u{)}^2$ gives $f(v)dv=x{e}^{-x}dx$, proving normalization. Actual apertures, state selection and readout can change the effective weights.

For an original example choose $\ell =0.10\mathrm{m}$, $L=1.00\mathrm{m}$, $u=v_{\ast }=200\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ and $\Omega =2\pi \times 500\mathrm{rad}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. The reference particle has ${\tau }_{\ast }=0.500\mathrm{ms}$, $T_{\ast }=5.00\mathrm{ms}$ and resonant $\pi /2$ pulses. The instantaneous-pulse width would be $100\mathrm{Hz}$. The exact finite-pulse width for that single speed is about $88.7\mathrm{Hz}$; the chosen distribution also reduces the on-resonance average to approximately $0.738$ because not every particle receives a $\pi /2$ pulse.

Different velocities smear side fringes because $\delta L/v$ varies across the beam. Nevertheless every term is even in $\delta$, so this symmetric ideal-model average has no odd line asymmetry that could displace the central lock point. Reduced contrast or altered width alone is not evidence of a shifted line center. A speed-dependent transition shift or unequal drive quantum phases changes that conclusion; atomic clock frequency shifts explains why these distinctions matter experimentally.

A quantum-mechanical propagator is the position-space kernel $K(q_f,t_f;q_i,t_i)=⟨q_f|U(t_f,t_i)|q_i⟩$ of the time-evolution operator. It is the amplitude to evolve between the specified endpoint configurations.

In units $\hslash =1$, a particle of mass $m$ with potential $V(q)=-Fq$ has classical path $q_c(t)=q_0+[(q_1-q_0)/T-FT/(2m)]t+F{t}^2/(2m)$. Its action and exact quantum-mechanical propagator areThe fluctuation operator is the free one because the potential is linear. This is a special case of classical-path factorization of a quadratic path integral.

For potential $V(x)=\alpha x$, momentum follows a characteristic with $\dot{p}=-\alpha$. The retarded quantum-mechanical propagator translates its momentum argument and accumulates the kinetic action along that characteristic. Its apparent division by $\alpha$ is removable on the delta-function support; at zero force it becomes the free diagonal momentum kernel. Fourier transform gives the usual constant-force position kernel with a cubic-time action term.

For unit mass and $\hslash =1$, this prepoint kernel tends to the identity and generates the Time-dependent Schrödinger equation. The square-root branch follows the damped Fresnel integral. Its normalized moments are $1$, $0$, and $i\Delta t$ at orders zero, one and two; these fix both the normalization and the kinetic sign.

Expand a smooth wavefunction and potential in the normalized short-time Schrödinger kernel. Its odd moment vanishes and its second moment is $i\Delta t$, so one step changes the wavefunction by $i\Delta t{\psi }^{\prime \prime }/2-i\Delta tV\psi +O(\Delta t^2)$. Division by the time step gives the Time-dependent Schrödinger equation.

For a free particle of mass $m$ on the line,