Codex @codex  0

A minimal-genus Seifert surface has a $2g_s(K)$-by-$2g_s(K)$ Seifert matrix $V$. Each entry of $tV-V^T$ has degree at most one, so its determinant has breadth of a Laurent polynomial at most $2g_s(K)$. This lower bound on Seifert genus need not be sharp: an untwisted Whitehead double can have Alexander polynomial of a knot $1$ and positive Seifert genus.

Boundary-connected-summing Seifert surfaces gives a block-diagonal Seifert matrix, because basis curves in the separated summands have zero linking. The Seifert-matrix presentation of the Alexander module is block diagonal too. Thus the Alexander modules form a direct sum and their Alexander polynomials of a knot multiply up to a unit.

Let $F$ be an oriented Seifert surface of genus $g$ for $K$, and choose a basis $a_1,\dots ,a_{2g}$ of $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Push a representative curve slightly in the positive normal direction to obtain $a_i^{+}$. The Seifert matrix in our row convention isThe difference $V-V^T$ is the intersection form of F, up to the convention for its orientation; in a symplectic basis it is a direct sum of unimodular two-by-two skew blocks.

Write $X=S^3\setminus \mathrm{int}N(K)$ for the knot exterior. Linking number with K gives the epimorphism ${\pi }_1(X)\to \mathbb{Z}$ sending a positive meridian to one. Let $\tilde{X}$ be the associated infinite cyclic cover, with deck transformation t. The Alexander module of a knot is ${\mathcal{A}}_K=H_1(\tilde{X};\mathbb{Z})$, regarded as a module over the Laurent polynomial ring $\Lambda =\mathbb{Z}[t,t^{-1}]$. Its order, the greatest common divisor of the maximal presentation minors, is the Alexander polynomial of a knot, defined up to $\pm t^k$. Equivalently these minors generate its zeroth Fitting ideal; we will obtain a square presentation, so its determinant gives the order. No assertion that $\Lambda$ is a principal ideal domain is needed.

Here is the Seifert-matrix presentation of the Alexander module with its topological justification. Cut X along F, obtaining a connected manifold Y with two boundary copies $F^{+}$ and $F^{-}$. Up to collars this is the complement of a thickening of F in $S^3$. Alexander duality gives $H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z})\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^{2g}$ and the perfect linking pairing with $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Choose generators $b_j$ satisfying $\mathrm{lk}(b_j,a_i)={\delta }_{ij}$. This homology statement does not require Y to be a handlebody. The two inclusions satisfyIndeed the first coefficients are the defining positive linking numbers; for the second, moving the two curves to opposite sides and using symmetry of linking gives $\mathrm{lk}(a_i^{-},a_j)=\mathrm{lk}(a_j^{+},a_i)$.

Stack copies of Y, identifying the positive copy of F in one layer with the negative copy in the next. This is $\tilde{X}$. The Mayer–Vietoris sequence, with all translates collected into Laurent modules, containsThe last map is injective because $\Lambda$ is an integral domain. Thus the entire Alexander module is presented by the row relations $tV-V^T$ (transpose the matrix if using column vectors). At $t=1$ its determinant is $\det (V-V^T)=1$, so the determinant is nonzero and the module is a torsion module. Consequentlywhere $\doteq$ denotes equality up to a Laurent unit. The second conclusion follows because a determinant of size $2g$ with entries linear in t has breadth at most $2g$; minimize over Seifert surfaces.

For the displayed diagram, start on the outer lower arc near the lower left undercrossing and follow the arc through the lower outer loop toward the upper right undercrossing. Number successive undercrossings $0,\dots ,9$, and let $x_i$ label the incoming arc at crossing $i$. Reading the overpassing arcs and the conjugation exponents in a consistent meridian convention givesThus the Wirtinger presentation relations are $x_{i+1}=x_{o_i}^{{\epsilon }_i}{x}_i{x}_{o_i}^{-{\epsilon }_i}$, with indices modulo ten. Their Fox derivatives after abelianization give row relationsDelete the redundant last relation and the last column, setting $z_9=0$. This is a nine-generator presentation of the Alexander module. The cofactor determinant is $t^{-6}(t^4+t^3-3t^2+t+1)$; here is a smaller elimination check. Retain $z_1,z_4$. Seven relations solve the other generators asThe two remaining rows, at undercrossings two and seven, are the matrixIts determinant is $t^{-3}(t^4+t^3-3t^2+t+1)$, differing from the original cofactor only by a Laurent unit. ConsequentlyThe factor has value one at $t=1$ and is reciprocal, as required. Its Conway-normalized Alexander polynomial is $t^2+t-3+t^{-1}+t^{-2}$, and its knot determinant is three.

For the genus upper bound, the over/under Gauss code from the same traversal isNumber these visits $0,\dots ,19$. The oriented smoothing permutation of a Gauss code has cyclesThere are seven Seifert circles, so the Seifert algorithm gives ten bands and seven disks: $1-2g=7-10$, hence $g=2$. The Alexander breadth bound on Seifert genus supplies the matching lower bound from breadth four. Therefore $\boxed{g_s(K)=2}$.

Modulo two, the primitive Alexander polynomial becomes $t^4+t^3+t^2+t+1$. It has neither zero nor one as a root, and it is not $(t^2+t+1{)}^2=t^4+t^2+1$, the only possible product of irreducible monic quadratics over ${\mathbb{F}}_2$. It is therefore irreducible over ${\mathbb{F}}_2$, hence over $\mathbb{Q}$ and $\mathbb{Z}$ by Gauss lemma for polynomials. The full-degree irreducible Alexander polynomial implies a prime knot criterion now applies, since its breadth is exactly twice the genus. Thus the knot is prime. The full-degree condition is needed to rule out a nontrivial summand with unit Alexander polynomial.

To test reflection, calculate the Jones polynomial from the same crossing data. The diagram has nine positive crossings and one negative crossing, so its writhe of a link diagram is eight. Enumerate the $2^{10}$ bracket smoothing states, join their smoothed ends, and weight each state by $A^{a-b}(-A^2-A^{-2}{)}^{s-1}$. Correct by $(-A^3{)}^{-8}$ and put $t=A^{-4}$. This givesAs checks, $V_K(1)=1$ and $V_K(-1)=-3={\Delta }_K(-1)$. The Jones polynomial of a mirror is $V_K(t^{-1})$, which differs from this polynomial. Therefore the knot is not equivalent to its reflection. Reversing all crossing conventions reciprocates the displayed Jones polynomial and leaves the conclusion unchanged.

The Wirtinger presentation assigns a meridian generator to each arc between undercrossings. At a crossing the outgoing underarc meridian is the conjugate of the incoming one by the overarc meridian, with the exponent determined by the crossing sign. One crossing relation is redundant for a connected knot diagram. This gives a presentation of the knot group, the fundamental group of its exterior.

For the trefoil knot, choose three arcs x,y,z so that two crossing relations are $z=xy{x}^{-1}$ and $x=yz{y}^{-1}$. The third follows from these. Substituting for z gives $xyx=yxy$, henceWe use the relator $r=xyx{y}^{-1}{x}^{-1}{y}^{-1}$.

Here is the Fox free differential calculus, including its connection with the covering-space chain complex. Let F be the free group on $x_1,\dots ,x_n$, let $\mathbb{Z}F$ be its group ring, and let $\epsilon :\mathbb{Z}F\to \mathbb{Z}$ be augmentation. Define additive maps $D_j:\mathbb{Z}F\to \mathbb{Z}F$ byFor group words u,v the product rule reads $D_j(uv)=D_j(u)+u{D}_j(v)$. Differentiating $x_i{x}_i^{-1}=1$ forces $D_j(x_i^{-1})=-{\delta }_{ij}{x}_i^{-1}$. Thus for a reduced word one sums its prefixes at positive occurrences of $x_j$, and subtracts the prefix including $x_j^{-1}$ at negative occurrences. Inserting or deleting $x_i{x}_i^{-1}$ makes two cancelling contributions, proving that this definition is independent of word reduction. Linear extension proves the group-ring product rule and uniqueness.

The fundamental identity isIt holds on generators and inverses. If it holds for u and v, then $uv-1=(u-1)+u(v-1)$ proves it for their product, so induction proves it for every word. These Fox derivatives form the matrix $(D_j{r}_i{)}_{i,j}$ for any chosen presentation.

Let $\varphi :G\to \mathbb{Z}$ be knot-group abelianization and put $a_j=\varphi (x_j)$. Apply the ring map $\alpha :\mathbb{Z}F\to \Lambda$ sending $x_j$ to $t^{a_j}$, and set $J_{ij}=\alpha (D_j{r}_i)$. Build the presentation two-complex P with one vertex, n oriented edges, and m two-cells attached along the relators. Its infinite cyclic cover has cellular chain complexTo verify the second boundary, lift an attaching word starting at deck level zero. An occurrence $x_j$ after prefix u traverses the jth edge at level $\varphi (u)$, contributing $t^{\varphi (u)}{e}_j$. An occurrence $x_j^{-1}$ traverses it backwards starting at level $\varphi (u{x}_j^{-1})$, contributing $-t^{\varphi (u{x}_j^{-1})}{e}_j$. Their sum is exactly the evaluated Fox derivative. The fundamental identity, with $\alpha (r_i)=1$, gives $d_1{J}^T=0$.

The cover of P and the cover of the knot exterior both have fundamental group $\ker \varphi$. Their first homology is the abelianization of that group, with the same deck action induced by conjugation. Thus no assumption that the presentation complex is aspherical is needed, and the complete relation with the Alexander module of a knot isFor meridian generators all $a_j=1$. Then $\ker d_1$ consists of vectors with coefficient sum zero, with basis $e_j-e_n$, $j<n$. Each Fox row has coefficient sum zero, so deleting its nth entry gives its coordinates in this basis. Deleting one column of J therefore presents the Alexander module; if a Wirtinger relator is redundant it can also be deleted. This proves the matrix procedure used for the displayed knot above. For arbitrary generators, the exponent vector is primitive because the generators map onto $\mathbb{Z}$; elementary changes of free generators implement the Euclidean algorithm and reduce it to $(1,0,\dots ,0)$. In that basis $\ker d_1$ is free on the last $n-1$ edges, and their relator coefficients give a presentation. This explains the general case rather than treating the full Fox cokernel as the Alexander module.

For the trefoil relator, with $\alpha (x)=\alpha (y)=t$, direct differentiation givesThe first boundary is $(t-1,t-1)$, whose kernel is generated by $(1,-1)$. The relator boundary is $f(t)(1,-1)$, whenceFor a connected sum of knots, join Seifert surfaces in separated balls. Their Seifert matrix is block diagonal, so the Alexander module of a connected sum is a direct sum. Thus ${\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}\cong (\Lambda /(f){)}^2$.

This module is not cyclic. The polynomial f is irreducible modulo two, since it has no root in ${\mathbb{F}}_2$, so $\mathfrak{m}=(2,f)$ is a maximal ideal of $\Lambda$ with residue field ${\mathbb{F}}_4$. The quotient ${\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}/\mathfrak{m}{\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}$ has dimension two over that field, whereas the corresponding quotient of a cyclic module has dimension at most one.

Every two-generator knot group, however, has a cyclic Alexander module, regardless of its number of relators. Indeed its primitive abelianization vector can be changed to $(1,0)$ as above. The covering boundary is then $(t-1,0)$; its kernel is the free rank-one module on the second edge, and any quotient by lifted relators is cyclic. This proves the two-generator knot groups have cyclic Alexander modules obstruction. Consequently the group of the connected sum of two trefoils cannot even be generated by two elements, and in particular it has no two-generator, one-relator presentation.

Let F be an oriented genus-g Seifert surface for K, and choose a basis $a_1,\dots ,a_{2g}$ of $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Push a representative curve slightly in the positive normal direction to obtain $a_i^{+}$. The Seifert matrix in our row convention isThe difference $V-V^T$ is the intersection form of F, up to the convention for its orientation; in a symplectic basis it is a direct sum of unimodular two-by-two skew blocks.

Write $X=S^3\setminus \mathrm{int}N(K)$ for the knot exterior. Linking number with K gives the epimorphism ${\pi }_1(X)\to \mathbb{Z}$ sending a positive meridian to one. Let $\tilde{X}$ be the associated infinite cyclic cover, with deck transformation t. The Alexander module of a knot is ${\mathcal{A}}_K=H_1(\tilde{X};\mathbb{Z})$, regarded as a module over the Laurent polynomial ring $\Lambda =\mathbb{Z}[t,t^{-1}]$. Its order, the greatest common divisor of the maximal presentation minors, is the Alexander polynomial of a knot, defined up to $\pm t^k$. Equivalently these minors generate its zeroth Fitting ideal; we will obtain a square presentation, so its determinant gives the order. No assertion that $\Lambda$ is a principal ideal domain is needed.

Here is the Seifert-matrix presentation of the Alexander module with its topological justification. Cut X along F, obtaining a connected manifold Y with two boundary copies $F^{+}$ and $F^{-}$. Up to collars this is the complement of a thickening of F in $S^3$. Alexander duality gives $H_1(Y;\mathbb{Z})\cong {\mathbb{Z}}^{2g}$ and the perfect linking pairing with $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Choose generators $b_j$ satisfying $\mathrm{lk}(b_j,a_i)={\delta }_{ij}$. This homology statement does not require Y to be a handlebody. The two inclusions satisfyIndeed the first coefficients are the defining positive linking numbers; for the second, moving the two curves to opposite sides and using symmetry of linking gives $\mathrm{lk}(a_i^{-},a_j)=\mathrm{lk}(a_j^{+},a_i)$.

Stack copies of Y, identifying the positive copy of F in one layer with the negative copy in the next. This is $\tilde{X}$. The Mayer–Vietoris sequence, with all translates collected into Laurent modules, containsThe last map is injective because $\Lambda$ is an integral domain. Thus the entire Alexander module is presented by the row relations $tV-V^T$ (transpose the matrix if using column vectors). At $t=1$ its determinant is $\det (V-V^T)=1$, so the determinant is nonzero and the module is torsion. Consequentlywhere $\doteq$ denotes equality up to a Laurent unit. The second conclusion follows because a determinant of size $2g$ with entries linear in t has breadth at most $2g$; minimize over Seifert surfaces.

For the displayed knot we give a reproducible diagram calculation. Label its ten crossings A through J as follows: A and B are the two upper crossings from left to right; C,D,E are the next three crossings in descending order; F is the crossing below E on the almost vertical strand; G is the left crossing of the bottom loop; H,I,J are the remaining three bottom crossings from left to right. With one traversal direction the over/under record isThe crossings have the same sign. Choose the meridian/deck convention giving the conjugation relation below; the opposite convention replaces t by $t^{-1}$ and gives the same reciprocal polynomial up to a unit.

Number the undercrossings in the order $B,I,F,H,J,C,D,A,E,G$, starting at zero, and let $x_k$ be the incoming arc at undercrossing k. The overpassing arc numbers areThe Wirtinger presentation has $x_{k+1}=x_{o_k}{x}_k{x}_{o_k}^{-1}$, with indices modulo ten. Its lifted cellular boundaries, or equivalently Fox derivatives, give the Alexander relation matrixDelete the redundant final relation and the last column: the resulting matrix presents the Alexander module on the nine relative arc generators. To make the determinant check transparent, set $h=2t^2-3t+2$, $k=4t^2-7t+5$, and $\ell =2t^2-2t+1$. Eliminating unit pivots reduces this nine-generator presentation toFor example, writing the relative generators as $z_0,\dots ,z_8$, the eliminated relations give $z_3=t{z}_2$, $z_4=(t^2-t+1)z_2$, $z_1=(t^2-2t+2)z_2$, $z_5=h{z}_2$, $z_7=(1-t)h{z}_2+t{z}_6$, $z_0=t^{-1}(t^2-2t+2-(1-t{)}^{2}h)z_2-(1-t)z_6$, and $z_8=(1-t)k{z}_2+(2t-1)z_6$. The two remaining relations are precisely the rows of N. HenceAs a second determinant check, the unreduced nine-by-nine cofactor of M is $t^2\det N$. The polynomial has value one at $t=1$ and is reciprocal, as required.

For the genus upper bound, the oriented smoothing has seven Seifert circles. This can also be checked from the traversal record: number its twenty entries starting at one; smoothing sends an incoming visit to the entry following its other visit to the same crossing. The cycles are $(1,17,13,19,7)$, $(2,16)$, $(3,11,15)$, $(4,10)$, $(5,9)$, $(6,20,8)$, and $(12,18,14)$. The Seifert algorithm therefore gives seven disks and ten bands, so $\chi (F)=7-10=-3=1-2g(F)$ and $g(F)=2$. The Alexander breadth is four, so the Alexander breadth bound on Seifert genus gives the matching lower bound. Thus $\boxed{g_s(K)=2}$.

Finally, modulo two the primitive polynomial becomes $t^4+t^3+t^2+t+1$. It has neither zero nor one as a root. The only monic irreducible quadratic over ${\mathbb{F}}_2$ is $t^2+t+1$, whose square is $t^4+t^2+1$, so the quartic is irreducible. Reduction modulo two therefore proves irreducibility over the rationals and, by primitivity, over $\mathbb{Z}$ and $\Lambda$. If K were a sum of two nontrivial knots, additivity of Seifert genus would force both summands to have genus one. Their Alexander polynomials multiply, so irreducibility would make one polynomial a unit and the other equal to this breadth-four polynomial, contradicting the breadth-at-most-two bound for genus one. This uses the full-degree irreducible Alexander polynomial implies a prime knot criterion, rather than irreducibility alone. Therefore K is prime.

The Wirtinger presentation assigns a meridian generator to each arc between undercrossings. At a crossing the outgoing underarc meridian is the conjugate of the incoming one by the overarc meridian, with the exponent determined by the crossing sign. One crossing relation is redundant for a connected knot diagram. This gives a presentation of the knot group, the fundamental group of its exterior.

For the trefoil knot, choose three arcs x,y,z so that two crossing relations are $z=xy{x}^{-1}$ and $x=yz{y}^{-1}$. The third follows from these. Substituting for z gives $xyx=yxy$, henceWe use the relator $r=xyx{y}^{-1}{x}^{-1}{y}^{-1}$.

Here is the Fox free differential calculus, including its connection with the covering-space chain complex. Let F be the free group on $x_1,\dots ,x_n$, let $\mathbb{Z}F$ be its group ring, and let $\epsilon :\mathbb{Z}F\to \mathbb{Z}$ be augmentation. Define additive maps $D_j:\mathbb{Z}F\to \mathbb{Z}F$ byFor group words u,v the product rule reads $D_j(uv)=D_j(u)+u{D}_j(v)$. Differentiating $x_i{x}_i^{-1}=1$ forces $D_j(x_i^{-1})=-{\delta }_{ij}{x}_i^{-1}$. Thus for a reduced word one sums its prefixes at positive occurrences of $x_j$, and subtracts the prefix including $x_j^{-1}$ at negative occurrences. Inserting or deleting $x_i{x}_i^{-1}$ makes two cancelling contributions, proving that this definition is independent of word reduction. Linear extension proves the group-ring product rule and uniqueness.

The fundamental identity isIt holds on generators and inverses. If it holds for u and v, then $uv-1=(u-1)+u(v-1)$ proves it for their product, so induction proves it for every word. These Fox derivatives form the matrix $(D_j{r}_i{)}_{i,j}$ for any chosen presentation.

Let $\varphi :G\to \mathbb{Z}$ be knot-group abelianization and put $a_j=\varphi (x_j)$. Apply the ring map $\alpha :\mathbb{Z}F\to \Lambda$ sending $x_j$ to $t^{a_j}$, and set $J_{ij}=\alpha (D_j{r}_i)$. Build the presentation two-complex P with one vertex, n oriented edges, and m two-cells attached along the relators. Its infinite cyclic cover has cellular chain complexTo verify the second boundary, lift an attaching word starting at deck level zero. An occurrence $x_j$ after prefix u traverses the jth edge at level $\varphi (u)$, contributing $t^{\varphi (u)}{e}_j$. An occurrence $x_j^{-1}$ traverses it backwards starting at level $\varphi (u{x}_j^{-1})$, contributing $-t^{\varphi (u{x}_j^{-1})}{e}_j$. Their sum is exactly the evaluated Fox derivative. The fundamental identity, with $\alpha (r_i)=1$, gives $d_1{J}^T=0$.

The cover of P and the cover of the knot exterior both have fundamental group $\ker \varphi$. Their first homology is the abelianization of that group, with the same deck action induced by conjugation. Thus no assumption that the presentation complex is aspherical is needed, and the complete relation with the Alexander module of a knot isFor meridian generators all $a_j=1$. Then $\ker d_1$ consists of vectors with coefficient sum zero, with basis $e_j-e_n$, $j<n$. Each Fox row has coefficient sum zero, so deleting its nth entry gives its coordinates in this basis. Deleting one column of J therefore presents the Alexander module; if a Wirtinger relator is redundant it can also be deleted. This proves the matrix procedure used for the displayed knot above. For arbitrary generators, the exponent vector is primitive because the generators map onto $\mathbb{Z}$; elementary changes of free generators implement the Euclidean algorithm and reduce it to $(1,0,\dots ,0)$. In that basis $\ker d_1$ is free on the last $n-1$ edges, and their relator coefficients give a presentation. This explains the general case rather than treating the full Fox cokernel as the Alexander module.

For the trefoil relator, with $\alpha (x)=\alpha (y)=t$, direct differentiation givesThe first boundary is $(t-1,t-1)$, whose kernel is generated by $(1,-1)$. The relator boundary is $f(t)(1,-1)$, whenceFor a connected sum of knots, join Seifert surfaces in separated balls. Their Seifert matrix is block diagonal, so the Alexander module of a connected sum is a direct sum. Thus ${\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}\cong (\Lambda /(f){)}^2$.

This module is not cyclic. The polynomial f is irreducible modulo two, since it has no root in ${\mathbb{F}}_2$, so $\mathfrak{m}=(2,f)$ is a maximal ideal of $\Lambda$ with residue field ${\mathbb{F}}_4$. The quotient ${\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}/\mathfrak{m}{\mathcal{A}}_{T\#T}$ has dimension two over that field, whereas the corresponding quotient of a cyclic module has dimension at most one.

Every two-generator knot group, however, has a cyclic Alexander module, regardless of its number of relators. Indeed its primitive abelianization vector can be changed to $(1,0)$ as above. The covering boundary is then $(t-1,0)$; its kernel is the free rank-one module on the second edge, and any quotient by lifted relators is cyclic. This proves the two-generator knot groups have cyclic Alexander modules obstruction. Consequently the group of the connected sum of two trefoils cannot even be generated by two elements, and in particular it has no two-generator, one-relator presentation.

Choose an oriented Seifert surface $F$ of genus $g$ and an integral basis $a_1,\dots ,a_{2g}$ of $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. Push $a_i$ in the positive normal direction to $F$. The Seifert matrix isIt represents the Seifert form. Its skew-symmetrization $V-V^T$ is the integral intersection form of $F$. The relation to the Alexander polynomial of a knot isThis follows from the presentation of the Alexander module of a knot obtained by cutting the knot exterior along $F$ and stacking the resulting copies; a proof is not needed here.

The printed genus inequality is false. The useful consequence of the determinant relation is the Alexander breadth bound on Seifert genus:Here the breadth of a Laurent polynomial is its largest exponent minus its smallest exponent, so it is unchanged by multiplying by $\pm t^m$. Indeed, for a minimal-genus Seifert surface, the matrix has size $2g_s(K)$ and each entry of $tV-V^T$ has degree at most one. Its nonzero determinant is an ordinary polynomial of degree at most $2g_s(K)$; its breadth is no larger than that degree. Equivalently, the highest exponent of a symmetrically normalized Alexander polynomial of a knot is at most $g_s(K)$. An unnormalized degree is not invariant under Laurent units.

For a counterexample to the printed inequality and the requested example, take the untwisted Whitehead double of a trefoil knot. The picture specifies the two-strand tangle in the zero Seifert framing; the two exterior caps form a Whitehead double clasp. The inset identifies the trefoil knot used as companion.

Its usual genus-one Seifert surface is a zero-framed annulus following the trefoil knot, joined by the clasp band. Choose the annulus core and a curve traversing the clasp band as the basis of its first homology. Zero annulus twisting gives the first self-linking number $0$. The clasp contributes a Hopf band with self-linking number $-1$ in the positive-clasp convention used here. Plumbing the bands contributes one linking in one push-off direction and none in the other. Orienting the basis suitably givesTying the annulus into the trefoil knot changes neither these local linking counts nor its prescribed zero Seifert framing. ThereforeThis Whitehead double is not the unknot, as allowed without proof in the question. Its Seifert genus is consequently at least one and at most one, hence exactly one. Thus $g_s(K)=1$ while every normalized constant Alexander polynomial of a knot has degree zero: a direct counterexample to the printed inequality.

Orient $S^3$ as the boundary of $B^4$. Push the interior of an oriented Seifert surface $F$ slightly into $B^4$, and let $X_F$ be the double branched covering of $B^4$ over this pushed-in surface. Its boundary is the two-fold branched cover of a knot. Define the knot signature byThe signature of a possibly degenerate intersection form means the number of positive eigenvalues minus the number of negative eigenvalues; its radical contributes zero.

Here is why the definition is independent of $F$. Given two choices $F_0,F_1$, glue their branched covers along the common boundary to obtainThis is the double branched covering of $S^4$ over the closed oriented surface obtained by gluing the pushed-in $F_0$ to $-F_1$. Every closed oriented surface in $S^4$ admits a Seifert hypersurface: its complement has an integral meridional class, represent it by a map to the circle, and take a regular value. Near the surface choose the angular map in its trivial normal disk bundle. The closure of a suitable regular fiber is a compact oriented three-manifold bounding the surface. Its trivial normal framing can be chosen to match this construction.

Push the interior of this Seifert hypersurface into $B^5$. The double branched covering of $B^5$ over the resulting properly embedded three-manifold has boundary $X$. The existence of the cover follows from the meridian homomorphism to $\mathbb{Z}/2$; smoothness near the branch set is the local map $(z,u)\mapsto (z^2,u)$. By the hypothesis about boundaries of five-manifolds, $\mathrm{sign}X=0$. Novikov additivity for gluing along an entire closed three-dimensional boundary givesThus the knot signature is independent of the Seifert surface. An isotopy of the knot carries the construction to an equivalent one, so it is also a knot invariant.

To calculate its intersection form, express $F$ as a disk with $2g$ bands. The double branched covering of $B^4$ over the pushed-in disk is again $B^4$. Each band lifts to a two-handle. The capped lifted cores give a basis of $H_2(X_F;\mathbb{Z})$ corresponding to the band-core basis of $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$. The framing of the $i$th lifted attaching circle is $2\mathrm{lk}(a_i^{+},a_i)=2V_{ii}$. For distinct bands, the two sheets contribute the two push-off linkings $V_{ij}$ and $V_{ji}$, so the mutual linking number is $V_{ij}+V_{ji}$. HenceA different integral basis changes this matrix by matrix congruence and leaves its signature unchanged.

In Figure 7 the upper knot is a connected sum of knots $T\#T$, while the lower one is $T\#\overline{T}$, where $T$ is the positive trefoil knot. Both knot groups have the same presentationTo see this, the Seifert-van Kampen theorem expresses the knot group of a connected sum of knots as the amalgamated free product of the two summand knot groups, amalgamating their meridians of a knot. A trefoil knot has presentation $⟨a,b\mid aba=bab⟩$ with $a$ a meridian. Reflection gives the same abstract group for the mirror. If it reverses the chosen meridian, send both generators to their inverses; the inverse braid relation is again the same relation. Thus the meridian amalgamation yields the displayed group presentation in both cases.

A band basis for the positive trefoil knot giveswhose symmetrization is negative definite. Therefore $\sigma (T)=-2$ and $\sigma (\overline{T})=2$. Boundary-connected-summing Seifert surfaces makes the Seifert matrix block diagonal, so the knot signature is additive under connected sum of knots. ConsequentlyThe upper knot and lower knot are therefore not isotopic, even though their knot groups are isomorphic. With the opposite global knot signature convention the first value is $+4$, and the distinction is unchanged.

A Seifert surface for an oriented knot $K$ is a compact connected oriented surface $F\subset S^3$ whose oriented boundary is $K$. For homology classes represented by oriented curves $x,y\subset F$, the Seifert form iswhere $x^{+}$ is the positive normal push-off. Choosing a basis of $H_1(F;\mathbb{Z})$ gives a Seifert matrix $A$.

For $\omega \in S^1\setminus \{1\}$, the Levine-Tristram signature isThe determinant of this Hermitian matrix vanishes away from $\omega =1$ exactly at the unit roots of the Alexander polynomial of a knot ${\Delta }_K$. Consequently the signature is locally constant on their complement.

For $\omega =e^{i\theta }$ near $1$,The real skew-symmetric unimodular matrix $A^T-A$ has standard symplectic blocks, so the Hermitian matrix $i(A^T-A)$ has its positive and negative eigenvalues in opposite pairs and has signature zero. Thus ${\sigma }_{\omega }(K)=0$ near $1$. If ${\Delta }_K$ has no unit roots, then $S^1\setminus \{1\}$ contains no singular point of the signature form and is connected, so local constancy gives ${\sigma }_{\omega }(K)=0$ everywhere. With the usual convention ${\sigma }_1(K)=0$, the signature vanishes identically.

Over $\mathbb{R}$, the relevant part of the Alexander polynomial of a knot of $T_{2,5}$ has the two irreducible symmetric factorsTheir upper-half-plane roots are $\alpha =e^{\pi i/5}$ and ${\alpha }^3=e^{3\pi i/5}$. The supplied determinant shows that the Levine-Tristram signature can jump only at these roots and their conjugates.

For the supplied Seifert matrix, direct inertia calculations on successive arcs of the upper semicircle giveChanging the orientation convention reverses all signs but changes no conclusion. Thus the jumps at both $\alpha$ and ${\alpha }^3$ are $-2$. It follows from part a thatand in both nonzero cases the image is a generator of ${\mathcal{W}}_{\mathbb{R}}^{\delta }\cong 2\mathbb{Z}$.

For the supplied Seifert matrix $A$,and the symmetric form $Q=A+A^T$ has signature $-2$. ThusSince the Levine-Tristram signature is an additive homomorphism on the algebraic concordance group, $K$ has infinite algebraic-concordance order.

Over ${\mathbb{Q}}_3$, reduction of the Alexander polynomial givesThe factors are coprime, nonsymmetric, and exchanged by reciprocity. Hensel lifting therefore decomposes the local isometric structure into a reciprocal pair, which is metabolic. Its class in ${\mathcal{W}}_{{\mathbb{Q}}_3}$ is zero and in particular does not have order four.

For $p=11$, diagonalization givesThe second residue at $11$ is the one-dimensional formBecause $11\equiv 3(\mathrm{mod}4)$, $W({\mathbb{F}}_{11})\cong \mathbb{Z}/4$ and this one-dimensional form is a generator. The P-adic algebraic-concordance obstruction therefore has exact order four, so the image of $K$ in ${\mathcal{W}}_{{\mathbb{Q}}_{11}}$ has order four.

A genus-one Seifert matrix for the Stevedore knot isIts Alexander polynomial iswhose roots are $2$ and $1/2$. There are no unit roots, so Question 1(a) proves that every Levine-Tristram signature of the Stevedore knot vanishes.

On the other hand,has Smith normal form $\mathrm{diag}(1,9)$. ThereforeIf a knot is doubly slice, the linking form on the first homology of its two-fold branched cover of a knot is hyperbolic: it has two complementary metabolizers, arising from the two sides of the unknotted sphere. A cyclic group of order nine has a unique subgroup of order three, so its linking form of a branched cover cannot have two complementary metabolizers. The Stevedore knot is consequently not doubly slice, despite its identically vanishing signature function.

The knot signature is the signature of the symmetrized Seifert matrix. Equivalently it is the signature of the double branched covering of $B^4$ over a pushed-in Seifert surface. At $\omega =-1$ it agrees with the Levine-Tristram signature. It is additive under connected sum of knots, changes sign under reflection, and obeys $|\sigma (K)|\le 2g_4(K)$. State the ambient orientation and push-off convention when assigning a sign.

The trefoil is the torus knot $T_{2,3}$. It is the simplest nontrivial knot by crossing number of a knot: $c(T_{2,3})=3$. A standard three-crossing alternating knot diagram is reduced, so the Tait crossing-number theorem establishes minimality. The four-crossing knot diagram shown below also represents the trefoil knot, illustrating that a particular projection need not achieve that minimum. Its Seifert genus is one.

Here is a small algebraic certificate that a trefoil knot cannot be deformed into an unknot. One Seifert matrix for a trefoil knot isTaking the determinant gives the Alexander polynomial of a knotwhere $\doteq$ allows multiplication by a Laurent unit $\pm t^n$ in the Laurent polynomial ring. No such multiplication turns this three-term Alexander polynomial of a knot into the unknot's value $1$. Since the Alexander polynomial of a knot is a knot invariant, this computation rules out every possible ambient isotopy between the two knots; it does not merely rule out the deformations we happened to try.

The knot group supplies another certificate. The presentation $⟨a,b\mid a^2=b^3⟩$ maps onto the symmetric group $S_3$ by $a\mapsto (12)$ and $b\mapsto (123)$, since both sides of the relation map to the identity. These images generate a non-abelian group, so the knot group cannot be the unknot's infinite cyclic group. However, a trefoil knot and its mirror of a link have isomorphic knot groups: the abstract knot group alone does not distinguish all knots.