Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ia Paper 2 3F a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Since the natural logarithm is increasing, comparison with an integral givesThe lower bound is . Dividing all three expressions by and applying the squeeze theorem gives
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 4 11I b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Let be the complete quotient after . Part (a) writes the irrational number asso lies between the adjacent continued fraction convergents and . Their separation isBecause all are positive integers, the recurrence implies . Hence this separation tends to zero, and the squeeze theorem gives
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 ia Paper 1 10F b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Put , so . By Bernoulli's inequality, , and henceMore explicitly, for choose an integer . For , the right-hand side is less than . Thus the geometric sequence has limit of a sequence zero, either directly by the definition or by the squeeze theorem.
Given , the two assumed limits of sequences supply thresholds such that for and for . For ,Thus eventually, proving the squeeze theorem:
On , the product rule and chain rule give . On , the function is constant and has derivative zero. At zero,Its absolute value is at most , so the squeeze theorem gives . ThereforeFor , we have but for every . This differs from , so is not continuous at zero. Indeed, gives , so the right-hand limit of a function does not exist. Thus is differentiable everywhere on , while is discontinuous at zero.
Use the polar radius as the parameter of the Archimedean spiral. Its angle in polar coordinates is . The radial and angular contributions to its arc length are orthogonal, soThere is no need to evaluate this integral. The simple bounds implyThe squeeze theorem therefore gives the scaled length of an Archimedean spiral:Geometrically, the radial contribution becomes negligible after multiplying the arc length by ; the remaining contribution is the area under the function graph on .
For the first sequence, . The squeeze theorem gives , and every subsequence of a convergent sequence has the same limit of a sequence. Thus its set of subsequential limits is .
For the second sequence, the four possible sine values giveThe even-indexed subsequence is constantly one, and , so both zero and one occur as subsequential limits. A convergent subsequence is bounded, so it contains only finitely many terms with . Of the remaining three residue classes, at least one occurs infinitely often. The corresponding further subsequence has limit of a sequence zero or one; the subsequence rule forces the original convergent subsequence to have that same limit of a sequence. Therefore the exact answer is . Divergence to along is not a finite subsequential limit.
Put for . The factorial givesThe logarithm identityfollows from continuity of the logarithm at one and . The product rule for limits of sequences therefore makes the displayed ratio tend to zero. In particular, some satisfies for all . By mathematical induction, . A geometric sequence with ratio in tends to zero, so the squeeze theorem proves
In level , each group isand there are such groups. The partial sums at completed groups are therefore zero. Inside a group of level , the only other partial sums are and . Every level contains finitely many terms, so the level containing the th term tends to infinity with . Thus all partial sums lie between zero and a bound tending to zero. By the squeeze theorem, the series has sum .
Although oscillates without a limit, its magnitude is at most one. Therefore . The squeeze theorem givesThe shrinking factor suppresses the oscillation from either side of zero.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the year 1 of the natural sciences course of the University of Cambridge 2005 Paper 2 10 c Solution Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
For fixed , the partial sums are increasing and bounded above by . The monotone convergence theorem for sequences therefore proves convergence to a finite sum . Passing to the limit in the two bounds givesThe squeeze theorem now yieldsSince , this is the real-axis singular limit of the Riemann zeta function at one. The limiting sum is taken at fixed before sending to zero; setting inside the convergent-series argument would instead give the divergent harmonic series.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the year 1 of the natural sciences course of the University of Cambridge 2008 Paper 1 19 a iii Solution Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
For , the difference quotient at zero is . It oscillates without a limit for , while the squeeze theorem gives limit zero for . The other two cases fail continuity and therefore cannot be differentiable. Hence
Past exam of the mathematics course of the year 1 of the natural sciences course of the University of Cambridge 2008 Paper 1 19 a i Solution Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-10-20
For every , , so the squeeze theorem gives limit zero. For , sequences and give function values and , so no limit exists. HenceThe value assigned at zero when does not affect this punctured limit.
For , split the interval into equal widths . Since increases on this interval, the left and right rectangles give lower and upper Riemann sums:Using the finite sum of squares,The rectangle bounds differ by . The squeeze theorem therefore gives, directly from elementary areas,For the result is zero. If negative is allowed, reverse the integration limits and use the reflection ; the same signed formula holds. No antiderivative is needed for this first-principles calculation.
The binomial series gives . ThereforeTo justify the limiting approximation over the infinite interval, also use the right-endpoint sum. It is , and monotonicity gives . Both bounds have the same limit. The geometric partition bounds for a power-law improper integral and the squeeze theorem thus proveThis bounding argument matters because the geometric partition has unbounded widths far along the half-line; a finite-interval maximum-mesh argument cannot simply be applied to the entire infinite partition at fixed .
For , continuity fails. Take and . Both tend to zero, but the corresponding function values are and . Thus there is no limit, and the function is not differentiable either, since differentiability would imply continuity.
For , the bound and the squeeze theorem give continuity at zero. Its difference quotient is , however, which has no limit by the same two sequences. It is therefore not differentiable there.
For , the bound proves continuity. Its difference quotient is , whose absolute value is bounded by , so the derivative exists and equals zero. The complete classification is
Use the root limit of a finite sum of powers. Put . For every , at least one of the three terms is and none is larger, soTaking the positive th root givesSince , the squeeze theorem givesIndeed, for both remaining bases are at most ; for , ; and for , . The endpoint cases are included in the same bound.
The original PDF has the absolute-value hypothesis , which is missing from the local OCR. From the Green's function formula and ,Because , the upper bound tends to zero. The squeeze theorem proves .
The answers, in the order completeness, sequential compactness, connectedness, and path connectedness, areDefine and for . The estimate proves continuity at zero by the squeeze theorem; elsewhere it follows from the usual continuous functions. Thus is the graph of a function on the closed set .
To check closedness directly, if in the Euclidean plane, then and continuity gives . Therefore is a closed subset of the complete metric space , hence is a complete metric space. The sequence has no convergent subsequence, since its first Cartesian coordinates tends to infinity, so sequential compactness fails.
For any two points , the mapis a continuous path in joining them. Thus is path-connected, and consequently connected. The factor is crucial: the oscillations shrink to the single point .