Empty and full loss-cone capture rates 2026-10-14
Here is the orbital loss cone fraction, an orbital period, and a stellar relaxation time. When angular diffusion per orbit is small relative to the cone, a steady two-dimensional diffusion solution is logarithmic and gives the empty-cone flux. Rapid refilling maintains an approximately isotropic full cone and gives the second rate. Numerical total rates need a stellar density and orbital-energy distribution, not merely a star count.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 iii Paper 44 4 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A small loss cone does not by itself specify its supply rate. Introduce a characteristic orbital radius , an orbital period , the number of stars on the relevant energy range, and their local number density . Weak encounters of impact parameter give velocity kicks of order . Summing their squared kicks over encounter rate givesHere is the Coulomb logarithm in stellar dynamics. This derives the stellar relaxation time relevant to angular-momentum scattering, up to the velocity-averaging constants.
Let and define the dimensionless cone size . In one period, two-body relaxation changes by order , so the refilling parameter isIf refilling is sufficiently rapid to keep the cone populated, an isotropic fraction of order reaches its absorbing pericentre each orbit. The full-cone rate isIf , the cone is depleted and capture is diffusion-limited. At fixed orbital energy, the two transverse angular-momentum coordinates have an approximately two-dimensional diffusion equation. Its steady radial solution between the absorbing boundary and the reservoir satisfiesThe gradient supplies a constant inward flux. With diffusion coefficient of order and reservoir population , this givesConstants of two depend on using or and on the definition of . A rough interpolation uses the slower of the orbital draining and diffusion-supply rates; an accurate transition requires an orbit-averaged diffusion calculation. These are the empty and full loss-cone capture rates. In particular, multiplying by the cone's tiny solid-angle fraction would incorrectly treat diffusive feeding as independent isotropic redraws.
For a one-zone black-hole-dominated cluster with , and ,The mass ingestion rate is . A radially extended cluster requires summing the energy-dependent fluxes, not replacing every radius by the same . No numerical capture rate follows from alone: its radius/density, orbital distribution and refilling regime are required. The displayed relations are the requested estimates with those physical scales explicit.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 73 1 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A local stellar relaxation time depends on the number density of scatterers. Calling a total number, as the PDF does, leaves the displayed expression dimensionally wrong: has units of time per volume. The intended local expression must use , or for a homogeneous sample of volume . We shall also make the normalization of the stellar relaxation time explicit, since an unspecified representative one-dimensional velocity dispersion does not fix an exact numerical coefficient.
In a small-angle gravitational encounter, approximate the relative trajectory by a straight line of speed and impact parameter . The perpendicular acceleration of one star due to the other is . Its impulse is thereforeA star encounters scatterers per unit time in this interval of impact parameters. Independent deflections have random directions, so their variances add as in a random walk. Hence the accumulated squared velocity change has rateThe Coulomb logarithm in stellar dynamics arises because each logarithmic interval of impact parameter contributes equally. The lower cutoff is approximately the strong-deflection scale, for equal masses, or the physical collision scale if larger. The upper cutoff is a scale on which the local density and straight-line encounter approximation cease to apply, such as the local disk thickness. Thus is dimensionless; it is not a number density or an arbitrary dimensional argument of a logarithm.
To display the normalization issue, use the representative relative speed and define by . This givesChoosing recovers precisely the printed coefficient after repairing to :This is an explicitly defined convention, not a uniquely derivable normalization from the supplied data. If instead relaxation means a mean-square change equal to the full initial random-speed variance, , the same encounter approximation gives . Averaging the encounter speed distribution instead of using one representative changes the coefficient again. The robust result is the scaling .
For a transparent solar-neighbourhood estimate, take , , and . With , one obtains , , andThese illustrative parameters give an order -- year stellar relaxation time, much longer than a galactic lifetime of order years. The solar neighbourhood is consequently a collisionless stellar system with respect to encounters between individual stars. Scattering by massive clouds and collective structure is a different process; the estimate does not assert that every mechanism of disk heating is negligible.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 65 4 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A typical globular cluster has undergone appreciable two-body relaxation, since its stellar relaxation time is : for and stellar crossing time this is about , shorter than its age, allowing a relatively relaxed, tidally limited structure. A galaxy with and instead has and behaves as a collisionless stellar system, retaining differences from formation, galaxy mergers, and star formation. Relaxation erases more memory in clusters than in galaxies, although real globular clusters also differ in concentration and evolutionary state, so structural similarity is approximate.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 320 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
A small-angle gravitational encounter between a test star and a field star of mass gives a transverse kick , where is the impact parameter and the relative speed. For number density , encounters in occur at rate . Independent kicks add in mean square, giving the random-walk derivation of stellar relaxationThe Coulomb logarithm in stellar dynamics has of order system size , and of order the strong-deflection scale . For a virialized -star system, , so is of order . The stellar relaxation time is the time for accumulated velocity variance to become comparable with :Using gives . With a diameter-crossing convention , this is , conventionally rounded toThe coefficient is approximate: spatial profile, velocity averages and crossing-time convention change it by factors of order unity. The robust result is crossing times.
For and years, the estimate is about years, enormously longer than a Hubble time. Most galaxies therefore behave as collisionless stellar systems. Dense nuclei and star clusters can relax more rapidly. Negligible stellar encounters do not mean negligible collective gravitational instabilities.
Define the mass-weighted galactic distribution function by , so . Hamiltonian gravitational motion preserves phase space volume by the Liouville theorem in Hamiltonian mechanics. In the collisionless regime no encounter term redistributes stars between neighbouring phase space trajectories, so . With acceleration , the Collisionless Boltzmann equation is
For a steadily rotating galactic bar, write the inertial polar angle as . The inertial radial and angular equations are and . Substitution gives the equations of motion in a rotating frame:Here the velocities are measured in the bar frame. Set , and define the positive-force rotating-frame relative effective potentialThe centrifugal sign is positive in this relative-potential convention. The characteristics areConsequently the rotating-frame collisionless Boltzmann equation isFor these planar equations, integrate over and interpret as the planar or vertically integrated mass density. Define . Boundary terms in velocity vanish for a sufficiently decaying distribution.
Let the velocity accelerations above be . Their velocity divergence is . Thus integration by parts in the zeroth moment contributes , producing the cylindrical continuity equation for a rotating stellar systemThis is conservation of mass: change of density balances flux through the radial and azimuthal sides of a small cylindrical element. The factor is geometric; the physical phase space measure is .
For the radial first moment, multiply the rotating-frame collisionless Boltzmann equation by . Its velocity integrations are and . Hence the radial cylindrical Jeans equations in a rotating frame areFor the azimuthal first moment, the velocity integral vanishes, while . This givesThe Jeans equations are local momentum-balance equations. The second moments include streaming momentum flux and random-velocity stress, while gravity, centrifugal acceleration and Coriolis acceleration supply the frame-dependent forces. They do not by themselves close the full distribution: a stress prescription or a galactic distribution function is also needed.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 320 1 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
The stellar relaxation time is the time on which accumulated discrete gravitational encounters change a typical star's velocity by an amount comparable to its original velocity. It concerns two-body relaxation, rather than the much faster orbital evolution in a smooth gravitational potential. A collisionless stellar system requires this time to greatly exceed the duration being studied.
In the straight-line impulse approximation, an encounter at relative speed has transverse acceleration . ThusA small-angle gravitational encounter needs . The transition to order-one deflections is therefore , ignoring factors such as the equal-mass relative deflection. For the spherical estimate ,This is the lower cutoff of the weak-scattering estimate; closer encounters actually occur and require strong-scattering treatment.
The number of encounters in time with impact parameters in is . Independent random transverse directions make mean kicks cancel while their variances add. ConsequentlyEach logarithmic interval contributes equally, giving the Coulomb logarithm in stellar dynamics. Defining a deflection time by variance and setting gives . The paper instead uses an order-one normalization three quarters of this estimate:Both have the same physical scaling. The specified characteristic speed, the word “comparable”, the velocity-distribution average and strong-encounter cutoff do not fix that numerical coefficient uniquely. The crude equal-speed impulse calculation must not be claimed to determine exactly.
For a self-gravitating, approximately virialized system, the virial theorem gives . With , and the stellar crossing time , substitution into the paper's convention givesAn externally dominated gravitational potential or a different structural constant changes this substitution. For an N-body simulation lasting , a tolerable fractional velocity-squared diffusion requires , henceThere is no unique smallest without , the error tolerance and the force prescription. For scale, equality at occurs near ; gives about crossing times. A calculation lasting 100 crossing times therefore needs substantially more than the first threshold to have negligible relaxation. Gravitational softening can raise the effective cutoff and reduce artificial scattering, but it also sets the spatial force resolution.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 320 1 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
For finite-thickness disk relaxation, assume a well-separated range and approximately virialized self-gravity. The three factors have distinct origins. Replacing the characteristic encounter speed by shortens the diffusion time by : the variance-production rate has one inverse power of speed, and the target random velocity squared has two powers. Concentrating the same number of stars into volume of order , rather than , raises the number volume density by and shortens the time by . Finally, only separations below the thickness sample a three-dimensional encounter geometry. The logarithmic upper cutoff becomes , and therefore the inverse-logarithm time acquires . More distant encounters have the planar geometry and provide a convergent, non-logarithmic correction. A smaller Coulomb logarithm in stellar dynamics actually partly offsets the first two shortenings.
Thus, using the same cutoff for this comparison,For actual point particles the disk cutoff is , whereas the spherical one is ; one must use the appropriate cutoff in each logarithm rather than silently identifying them. For a softened calculation it is instead of order the larger of the weak-deflection scale and the softening length. The formula is not valid when approaches that cutoff.
Write and , with simulation duration and allowed fractional diffusion . Combining the paper's spherical normalization and its comparison formula gives the leading criterionThe spherical comparison logarithm cancels when its numerical convention and a common comparison cutoff are used; order-one shape factors remain approximate. In an unsoftened disk with , . Hence the implicit requirement is , in the regime . For , the stellar relaxation time is of order of the spherical value apart from logarithms; gives a time of order 100 crossing times in this estimate. Negligible relaxation over that duration requires an additional margin. A disk generally needs far more particles than a round galaxy for the same relaxation tolerance; no universal minimum follows without duration, thickness and softening. Collective spiral or bending responses are a separate source of evolution even in a collisionless stellar system.
Random-walk derivation of stellar relaxation Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-14
Small-angle gravitational encounters occur at rate and supply kicks . Independent kick variances add to . Setting the accumulated variance to and using virial scaling gives a stellar relaxation time of order stellar crossing times, with the coefficient dependent on profile and crossing convention.
Stellar crossing time 2026-10-06
The stellar crossing time is a characteristic time to traverse a system, . In a virialized self-gravitating system, , so . It is distinct from the much longer spherical stellar relaxation time. Radius versus diameter and characteristic-speed conventions change order-one factors.
Stellar relaxation time 2026-10-06
The stellar relaxation time is the time on which random gravitational encounters change a star's velocity by an amount comparable to its characteristic random velocity. A weak straight-line encounter at relative speed and impact parameter gives a kick . Three-dimensional encounter counting gives . Definitions of relaxation, velocity averaging and system structure alter order-one coefficients; the robust spherical scaling is . Collisionless simulation requirements depend on the duration and permitted fractional relaxation, not a universal minimum particle number.