Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 202 1 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Use a filtered probability space , and put . The predictable sigma-algebra on isEquivalently it is generated by left-continuous adapted processes. A real-valued previsible process is a function that is measurable for and the Borel sigma-algebra of .
A simple predictable process has the formwhere is bounded and -measurable, and each is bounded and -measurable. Set after ; allowing a final infinite interval gives an equivalent dense class. The values may be restricted to finitely many values if desired, by approximating bounded measurable functions by simple functions. The initial-time term matters for arbitrary finite measures on : a measure can charge time zero, even though the stochastic integral against a continuous martingale does not.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 202 1 d Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
For the simple predictable process from part (a), define its stochastic integral byThe time-zero value contributes nothing. Write . If and , then is -measurable and . If , then . Boundedness ensures integrability, so all off-diagonal terms vanish by conditional expectation. ConsequentlyThe quadratic variation theorem says is a local martingale. A bounded continuous martingale is square-integrable, and localization gives the conditional second-moment identityMultiplication by and summation therefore give the Itô isometryFor Brownian motion, . More generally the Itô isometry holds for every predictable process with finite right-hand side, against a continuous square-integrable martingale. Indeed, on a fixed horizon the quadratic-variation measure is finite. Part (c) approximates the integrand by simple predictable processes; the displayed equality makes the elementary integrals Cauchy in and defines their unique limit. The finite sum is exactly the elementary case of the Itô isometry.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 202 3 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Fix and a finite horizon . Begin under Wiener measure with , and let bound . The bounded progressively measurable process is an admissible Itô integral integrand. PutThe Novikov condition follows from . With , the Girsanov theorem says that is Brownian motion. Therefore a weak stochastic solution exists, sinceConsistent finite-horizon densities on canonical continuous path space give a solution for all finite times. No uniform integrability at infinite time is needed for this extension.
For uniqueness in law, take any weak stochastic solution under a measure and reverse the change of measure:Again the Novikov condition holds. Under , is Brownian motion, so the law of is the fixed shifted Wiener measure. Substitution of givesUnder shifted Wiener measure, the stochastic integral on the right has a fixed measurable version as a functional of the canonical path. It can be defined by simple predictable processes converging in the integrand norm and an almost surely convergent subsequence of their integrals. Equivalence of the two finite-horizon measures preserves that version. Thus for every bounded measurable path functional ,The right-hand side depends only on , not on the chosen solution. This proves uniqueness in law on every finite horizon, and hence on the whole continuous path space. This is Weak existence and uniqueness in law for an additive-noise SDE with bounded drift. For merely measurable , one should not assume that naive deterministic left-endpoint samples of converge; the predictable approximation is the appropriate definition.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 202 5 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
For a harmonic function on , the Itô formula givesStop on leaving increasing discs and at increasing deterministic times. On each such interval the gradient is bounded, so the stochastic integral is a martingale. This proves that is a continuous local martingale.
If , this is a bounded local martingale and hence a true martingale. Start Brownian motion at an arbitrary . Its Gaussian heat kernel givesFor a unit vector , , so . Integrating the directional derivative along the segment from to yieldsLetting gives the harmonic Liouville theorem:This Gaussian heat-kernel proof of the harmonic Liouville theorem uses the bounded martingale identity established above.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 202 6 d Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Work before the first zero of , with . For the Bessel process equation, the Itô formula applied to givesIts quadratic variation isThis clock is strictly increasing on the positive-state interval. For before its terminal clock value, let and let . The Dambis-Dubins-Schwarz theorem makes a Brownian motion there. Since , the drift changes toConsequently the Power time change of a Bessel process givesThe initial value is , and this equation identifies a Bessel process of dimension until its first zero. Localize both equations on compact subintervals of to justify the inverse and all stochastic integrals for arbitrary .
For completeness, the inverse-clock lifetime really is the positive Bessel process lifetime: the map is a homeomorphism of , and exits from nested compact intervals correspond under the clock. There is no finite explosion at infinity for a positive Bessel process, since the Itô formula for gives ; stopping at zero or level yields a probability of hitting before a fixed bounded by . If the transformed lifetime were finite while stayed in a compact positive interval, the inverse clock and the original solution could both be continued. Thus a finite lifetime is approach to zero. For , also and the positive-state Bessel process hits zero; for the transformed lifetime is infinite. No continuation through zero is needed.
If the initial value is already zero, the interval before its first zero is empty; the positive-state argument concerns starts .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 211 6 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Differentiate the backward equation for with respect to the stock state, and put . The product derivative of is , givingThe assumed smoothness and bounded derivatives put in the uniqueness class for the equation defining . Therefore , and is the option delta. Substituting in the Itô integral from part (a) and using gives the self-financing representationThe boundedness hypotheses justify both stochastic integrals. This derivation does not divide by and remains valid even at states with zero diffusion amplitude.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 202 1 iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
For deterministic step functions, define directly from Brownian motion incrementswith the left endpoint of the first interval and outside the listed intervals. The printed endpoint list omits ; the intended convention is , usually .
Given finitely many observation times, refine the deterministic partition of an interval to include all observation times and all . Every is a linear combination of the same finite family of independent centered normal Brownian motion increments. Thus every linear combination of is normal, including possibly a degenerate constant: is a Gaussian process. By independence, only increments in the common interval contribute to the covariance, givingThe same calculation for two step functions proves, rather than assumes, the Itô isometryFor , choose deterministic step functions in the L2 space. This identity makes a Cauchy sequence in the L2 space; the Riesz-Fischer theorem defines by mean-square convergence, independently of the approximation. The covariance formula passes to the limit by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. For finitely many times and coefficients , the characteristic functions converge toso the extension remains a Gaussian process.
For completeness, the construction has a continuous version. Each approximating is a martingale, directly by the centered independent increments of Brownian motion; the Doob L2 maximal inequality givesTo prove the inequality used here without assuming Itô integral properties, a continuous martingale satisfies , by conditioning at the first crossing on finite deterministic grids and then using continuity; integrating in and using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality yields . A sufficiently fast subsequence therefore converges uniformly almost surely on every compact time interval, giving the continuous version of the stochastic integral.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 202 1 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Use the standard convention that the finite-variation process has càdlàg paths and that the stochastic integral starts from zero. Write for its total-variation process. The necessary admissibility condition is almost surely for each finite ; it holds, for example, for locally bounded . Define the pathwise Lebesgue-Stieltjes integralAn atom at contributes , so this convention also fixes the treatment of jumps.
Fix . For a generator of the predictable sigma-algebra, with , the Lebesgue-Stieltjes integral isIt vanishes when and is -measurable otherwise. The total-variation process is adapted: for a càdlàg path its value at is the supremum over a countable collection of partitions of an interval using rational interior points and endpoint . Thus the positive and negative Lebesgue-Stieltjes measures have -measurable masses on the generator intervals.
The Monotone class theorem, applied separately to these positive random measures on , extends this measurability from the generators of the predictable sigma-algebra to all nonnegative predictable processes. Truncation and positive/negative decomposition then cover every admissible . Consequently is adapted.
The integrability condition is essential. Taken literally, an arbitrary previsible process cannot always be integrated against a finite-variation process: with and deterministic for , , the proposed value at every diverges. The usual càdlàg convention is also what identifies by .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 iii Paper 202 1 f Solution Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-10-03
Each is continuous, adapted, and increasing. From ucp convergence one can choose a subsequence that converges uniformly almost surely on every compact interval. Its limit is therefore also continuous and increasing, hence a finite-variation process. The stochastic integral is a continuous local martingale, and part e gives the semimartingale decompositionConsequently is a semimartingale. In fact, comparison with the Tanaka formula identifies as the local time of a semimartingale .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 iii Paper 202 2 b i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Apply the realized absolute covariation theorem to each dyadic partition of an interval. More explicitly, use the continuous increasing clock and the Radon-Nikodym theorem to writeFor each time, let have the centered bivariate normal distribution with covariance matrix , and defineThis process is continuous and increasing. To prove convergence, localize , represent the pair as stochastic integrals against a two-dimensional Brownian motion, and approximate the integrands in by bounded step previsible processes. For step integrands, the result is the weak law of large numbers applied on each block to independent Gaussian random variables. The Burkholder-Davis-Gundy inequality and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality make the error uniform on each compact interval in probability. Consequentlyin the sense of uniform convergence on compacts in probability.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 iii Paper 202 2 c i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
The martingale product identity says that is a martingale. Passing to the terminal values of the square-integrable martingales and using givesThe quadratic covariation identity for a stochastic integral isApplying the same product identity to and therefore gives
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2026 iii Paper 202 1 b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Set and define the stochastic integralStrict positivity and predictability of make the integrand locally admissible. The process is a continuous local martingale starting from zero, and the quadratic variation of a stochastic integral givesBy the Lévy characterization of Brownian motion, is a Brownian motion. The associativity of stochastic integration then yieldswhich is the required representation.
Realized absolute covariation 2026-09-24
For continuous local martingales and a sequence in which each term is a partition of an interval whose mesh tends to zero, the sumsconverge in the sense of uniform convergence on compacts in probability to a continuous increasing process. To identify the limit, put and choose Radon-Nikodym derivativesIf is a centered bivariate normal distribution with covariance matrix , thenLocalizing, representing the pair as stochastic integrals against a two-dimensional Brownian motion, and approximating the integrands by bounded predictable step processes proves the convergence. The step-process case follows from the weak law of large numbers for independent Gaussian increments; the Burkholder-Davis-Gundy inequality controls the approximation error. Since ,
For this stochastic integral solves . The Itô product rule also gives . The process is centered Gaussian, with covariance , and has a continuous extension . Time reversal of a Brownian bridge proves endpoint continuity without assuming it at the start.
For a nonnegative classical solution of a finite-horizon Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation with nonnegative running reward , the process is a local supermartingale under every admissible control. The Itô formula gives nonpositive drift because the chosen control cannot exceed the supremum in the equation. Stop where the stochastic integral becomes a true martingale, take expectations and apply the Fatou lemma. Nonnegativity prevents loss of a lower bound when removing the stops, giving the verification upper bound. A maximizing control attains the bound when its stopped reward processes are uniformly integrable.
Zero-start Ornstein-Uhlenbeck covariance 2026-10-14
For with , the explicit stochastic integral is . The Itô isometry on the overlap of the two integration intervals gives the displayed covariance. The second exponential records the zero initial condition; removing it gives the stationary Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process covariance.