Codex @codex  0

Bed Poudel is the first-listed author of High-Thermoelectric Performance of Nanostructured Bismuth Antimony Telluride Bulk Alloys by Bed Poudel and others. The work connects nanostructure and phonon scattering at grain boundaries and defects to reduced thermal conductivity. This provides an experimental example of improving performance measured by the thermoelectric figure of merit by changing the microstructure of a bulk material.^[ref]

A researcher in materials for the thermoelectric effect who coauthored a review with G. Jeffrey Snyder. Their account explains the competing requirements for a high thermoelectric figure of merit: useful electrical transport must coexist with weak heat transport. Complex crystal structures and nanoscale design offer ways to suppress the phonon contribution to thermal conductivity while retaining useful electronic behavior.^[ref]

A researcher who studies materials and devices using the thermoelectric effect. With Eric S. Toberer, he reviewed strategies for improving the thermoelectric figure of merit by controlling carrier concentration and reducing thermal conductivity. The central challenge is coupled transport: improving one property can worsen another. The material therefore has to be designed as a complete heat-and-charge transport system.^[ref]

Olga Bubnova is the first-listed author of Optimization of the thermoelectric figure of merit in PEDOT by Olga Bubnova and others. The work studies a conducting polymer as a material exhibiting the thermoelectric effect, connecting its electrical transport, Seebeck coefficient and thermal conductivity. It makes organic conductors part of the materials question expressed by the thermoelectric figure of merit.^[ref]

A thermoelectric generator maintains hot and cold junctions of two materials with different Seebeck coefficients. Mobile charge carriers redistribute in the temperature gradient, producing an open-circuit voltage of magnitude $|V|=|S_p-S_n|\Delta T$ for constant coefficients. A load permits electric current; pairs of p-type and n-type legs are commonly connected electrically in series and thermally in parallel. Maintaining the output requires continuous heat transfer from the hot reservoir and rejection of heat to the cold reservoir. The thermoelectric figure of merit $ZT=S^2\sigma T/\kappa$ expresses the favorable combination of large Seebeck coefficient, large electrical conductivity and small thermal conductivity. Contact losses, Joule heating and parasitic heat leaks reduce practical efficiency.

A pyroelectric generator instead exploits a change of spontaneous electric polarization with temperature. If the relevant component of the pyroelectric coefficient is $p=d{P}_s/dT$, an electrode of area $A$ receives a short-circuit electric current approximately $I=pAdT/dt$. A heating stroke and a cooling stroke produce opposite charge changes. Rectification or a synchronized electrical cycle can transfer energy to storage. A spatial temperature difference drives the thermoelectric device; a temporal temperature change drives the pyroelectric device. Uniform, constant temperature gives no continuing current from pyroelectricity even if the material is hot. Reported nanowire generators deliberately use changing temperature, rather than infer continuous generation from a static hot specimen.^[ref]

Both approaches can be compact, silent and free of macroscopic moving parts. The thermoelectric generator gives continuous output under a sustained gradient, but needs two effective thermal contacts and sufficient heat flow; very small $\Delta T$ gives a small voltage and thermal contacts can consume much of the available gradient. Thin films exhibiting pyroelectricity can respond to intermittent heating without a permanently maintained hot/cold separation across their thickness, but require repeated thermal cycling, low electrical leakage and suitable charge extraction. Their thermal time constant limits useful cycling frequency, and sensible heating/cooling can dominate the heat budget. A steady hot pipe with an available cold sink favors a thermoelectric generator; periodic radiative heating can favor a pyroelectric generator. Neither converts equilibrium thermal motion at a single fixed temperature into sustained useful work.

A thermoelectric generator uses the Seebeck effect and needs a spatial temperature gradient: a couple develops $V\simeq (S_p-S_n)\Delta T$ between hot and cold junctions. It can deliver continuous power under a steady thermal gradient and has no moving parts, but requires sustained heat flow and adequate hot- and cold-side thermal contacts. Thermal conduction, internal electrical resistance and the material's thermoelectric figure of merit limit conversion.

A pyroelectric generator responds to a time-dependent spontaneous electric polarization. Under approximately uniform heating or cooling, $I=pAdT/dt$ when the electrical boundary condition allows charge flow. It can harvest temporal thermal fluctuations without a persistent spatial gradient. However, at a constant uniform temperature its ordinary pyroelectric current stops; practical extraction needs cycling, low-leakage electronics and a suitable load. A large open-circuit voltage is not evidence of a large available average power. Temperature-driven nanowire measurements provide a primary experimental example of this distinction.^[ref]

The Seebeck effect produces an open-circuit voltage when a material has a temperature gradient: $S=-dV/dT$ for the stated sign convention. A circuit containing dissimilar thermoelectric legs converts this into useful voltage and current. The intrinsic thermoelectric figure of merit isHere $\sigma$ is electrical conductivity and $\kappa ={\kappa }_e+{\kappa }_L$ total thermal conductivity. $Z$ has units ${\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$; $ZT$ is dimensionless. A large Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity, together with low thermal conductivity, favour efficient conversion.

For one homogeneous thermoelectric material, the dimensional thermoelectric figure of merit isThe dimensionless quantity is $ZT$. The Seebeck coefficient $S$ measures the open-circuit voltage response to a temperature difference and reflects the energy asymmetry of charge-carrier transport. The electrical conductivity $\sigma$ depends on carrier density and mobility and sets electrical loss; $\rho =1/\sigma$. The thermal conductivity is $\kappa ={\kappa }_e+{\kappa }_l$, with contributions from carriers and phonons, and represents unwanted heat leakage.

Increasing carrier concentration usually raises $\sigma$ while reducing $|S|$ once transport becomes strongly degenerate. The electronic part of $\kappa$ also tends to rise, approximately through the Wiedemann-Franz law where applicable. This competition produces an intermediate optimum, commonly in heavily doped semiconductors, rather than in a very resistive insulator or an ordinary high-carrier-density metal. The optimum depends on band structure and scattering; the schematic is not a universal measured concentration curve.

For a constant-property thermoelectric module consisting of two material legs, let ${\alpha }_{np}=S_p-S_n$ be their Seebeck coefficient difference, $R$ their total series electrical resistance, and $K$ their total parallel thermal conductance. The couple's thermoelectric figure of merit isIts units are ${\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$; multiply by an absolute temperature to form a dimensionless figure. This expression assumes that contact losses are absent or consistently included in $R$ and $K$.

For equal leg lengths $l$ and areas $A$, with equal electrical resistivity $\rho$ and thermal conductivity $\kappa$, one has $R=2\rho l/A$ and $K=2\kappa A/l$. Consequently $Z_{\mathrm{pair}}={\alpha }_{np}^2/(4\rho \kappa )$. The factor four follows from combining two series resistances and two parallel conductances; it disappears only if the symbols have already been defined as pair properties. With opposite equal Seebeck coefficients $S_p=-S_n=S$, the result reduces to $S^2/(\rho \kappa )$.

The dimensionless thermoelectric figure of merit compares electrical conversion with thermal leakage in a material:Here $S$ is the Seebeck coefficient, $\sigma$ the electrical conductivity, $T$ the absolute temperature, and ${\kappa }_e,{\kappa }_l$ the electronic and lattice contributions to thermal conductivity. The thermoelectric power factor $S^2\sigma$ measures only the numerator's electrical combination. A material with large $S$ can still have poor performance if its electrical conductivity is too small or its thermal conductivity too large.^[ref]

For stipulated $S=200\mu \mathrm{V}{\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$, $\sigma =10^5\mathrm{S}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$, $T=300\mathrm{K}$ and ${\kappa }_e+{\kappa }_l=1.5\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}{\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$, the calculated thermoelectric power factor is $0.004\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}{\mathrm{K}}^{-2}$ and $ZT=0.8$. Doubling the electrical conductivity alone would double this calculated value, but real changes in charge carrier concentration also change the Seebeck coefficient and electronic thermal conductivity. A device's thermal efficiency additionally depends on properties across its operating temperature range and on contact and other parasitic losses.

A thermoelectric generator converts part of a heat flow driven by a temperature difference into electrical output through the Seebeck effect. Thermoelectric legs connect hot and cold sides; their electrical arrangement combines the generated voltages while their thermal paths carry heat between the sides.

A load draws electric current, so delivered power depends on both open-circuit voltage and internal resistance. Shorting the output gives current but zero terminal voltage, while an open circuit gives voltage but no useful delivered power. Thermal contacts and heat leakage alter the actual leg temperatures, so a material's thermoelectric figure of merit alone does not specify the complete generator's efficiency.

The thermoelectric power factor is the product $S^2\sigma$ of the squared Seebeck coefficient and electrical conductivity, with units $\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}{\mathrm{K}}^{-2}$. It combines a material's voltage response to a temperature gradient with its ability to carry electric current. For example, $S=200\mu \mathrm{V}{\mathrm{K}}^{-1}$ and $\sigma =10^5\mathrm{S}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}$ give $S^2\sigma =0.004\mathrm{W}{\mathrm{m}}^{-1}{\mathrm{K}}^{-2}$.

At fixed geometry and imposed temperature difference, a constant-property thermoelectric generator behaves as a voltage source with internal electrical resistance. Matching the external electrical resistance to it maximizes output power; the material dependence of that maximum is proportional to the thermoelectric power factor. Maximizing thermal efficiency also requires controlling thermal conductivity, which is why the thermoelectric figure of merit includes the thermal denominator.^[ref]

Yanzhong Pei is the first-listed author of Convergence of electronic bands for high performance bulk thermoelectrics by Yanzhong Pei and others. The study uses convergence of electronic bands in lead telluride-based alloys to improve performance measured by the thermoelectric figure of merit. It illustrates how electronic structure can be engineered alongside heat transport when optimizing the thermoelectric figure of merit.^[ref]