For probability measures on with finite second moments, the Knott–Smith optimality criterion states that a transport plan minimizes the quadratic cost if and only if there is a proper convex function that is sequentially lower semicontinuous and satisfies
The subdifferential is characterized by
with . Thus the transport plan is concentrated on the graph of the subdifferential. No absolute continuity of measures assumption on is needed. Multiplying the cost by leaves the criterion unchanged. The original quadratic optimal mapping result is Knott and Smith, On the optimal mapping of distributions.
A standard sufficient form of Brenier theorem assumes have finite second moments and , that is, absolute continuity of measures with respect to Lebesgue measure. For the cost , there exists a unique optimal transport plan, and it is induced by a transport map:
Here is a proper convex function, which may be chosen sequentially lower semicontinuous, and its gradient exists -almost everywhere. The map is unique -almost everywhere and is the unique minimizer of the Monge optimal transport problem; its cost equals the Kantorovich optimal transport problem minimum. Equivalently, it is the unique gradient of a convex function transporting to .
The uniqueness claim concerns the map and the transport plan, not a globally unique potential. The potential may be shifted by a constant, and additional nonuniqueness away from the source can occur. No density assumption is required on . A primary reference is Brenier's Polar factorization and monotone rearrangement of vector-valued functions.
Let and let denote its convex conjugate. Its Fenchel–Young gap
is nonnegative by the Fenchel–Young inequality, and the hypothesis says .
First justify the integrability needed for the certificate. Finite second moments and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality imply, for every transport plan ,
Since and , the identity proves by the marginal distribution property. In particular, no subtraction of infinite integrals is being used.
Set
These are integrable Kantorovich potentials. The Fenchel–Young inequality gives . More precisely, for every transport plan ,
Taking the infimum in the first inequality therefore proves
The factor in the quadratic cost is essential for this exact gap identity.
Define ; the printed quotient is undefined at the origin, but this continuous extension changes no transport cost because . In polar coordinates, the two probability density functions give
Both angular distributions are uniform, with independence of angle and radius. The proposed transport map preserves the angle and sends to . Therefore
and preservation of the angle proves . As a local check using the Jacobian determinant, its radial and tangential derivatives for are and , respectively, so and .
Now use the convex function
It is convex because the Euclidean norm is convex and is increasing and convex on . It is differentiable, including at zero, and
Its graph transport plan lies in the graph of , so the Knott–Smith optimality criterion proves quadratic optimality. Since that plan is induced by a map, part 1(b) proves optimality for the Monge optimal transport problem as well. The minimum provides a useful independent check:
For , define the probability measures with finite th absolute moment by
where is any fixed reference point. The condition is independent of the choice of . The p-Wasserstein distance is
The infimum is over all transport plans, rather than only transport maps. The product measure gives a finite upper bound using
For this is the Wasserstein distance with the metric of Euclidean space; for it is the second Wasserstein distance. “Bounded moment” here means a finite integral, and does not require to be bounded.
Let , and first suppose . On any transport plan , which has total mass one, the Holder inequality gives
Also, gives
Taking infima, or using arbitrarily close competitors if an infimum is not attained, yields
For the two distances coincide, and if there is only one probability measure, so the conclusion is immediate. For and , the displayed bounds imply both directions of
For , exchange the exponents. Thus all finite-order p-Wasserstein distances induce the same convergence on a bounded subset of . Closedness of is not required for these estimates.
Write . The assumed equality of the Monge optimal transport problem and Kantorovich optimal transport problem values gives
Each interpolated pushforward measure has a finite th absolute moment, since and .
For any , the common-source transport plan
provides the upper bound
For the reverse bound assume . Since and , the triangle inequality for the p-Wasserstein distance and the upper bounds already established give
Hence . Combining the bounds and using symmetry proves
This is the constant speed property of displacement interpolation. The given invertibility of also lets one realize the competitor as the map , assuming its inverse is measurable, but the transport plan argument proves the result without invertibility.
Let . For any transport plan and any Borel set ,
Both rectangles are contained in , so
Thus .
To attain this bound, use the dominating measure and Radon-Nikodym derivatives , . Define the common measure and residual mass by
Since , the positive and negative parts have equal mass. Taking gives
If , then and the diagonal transport plan has zero cost. If , put , and define
The residual measures each have mass , so the marginal distributions of are and , and its total mass is . They are mutually singular measures, concentrated respectively on and . Their product measure therefore gives no mass to , and . This is a maximal coupling.
In the paper's convention for the zero-mass signed measure , the answer is
The repository's total variation distance uses the supremum itself. The paper's formula agrees with the usual total variation norm when has total mass zero, as here; it is not the usual norm for an arbitrary positive measure. All suprema above are over Borel sets.
p-Wasserstein distance 2026-10-05
For and probability measures with finite th absolute moments,
where is the ground metric and ranges over transport plans. For this is the second Wasserstein distance.
Transport map 2026-10-05
A transport map from to is a measurable function satisfying . Its graph defines the transport plan .