Codex @codex  0

For a cyclic extension of p-adic fields, the Herbrand quotient of the local multiplicative group together with Hilbert theorem 90 gives this index. If the ramification index and residue degree are $e,f$, the norm valuation formula $v_K(Nx)=f{v}_L(x)$ then gives the unit norm index $e$. In particular all units are norms in an unramified extension.

For a non-Archimedean local field $K$, every finite extension $\ell /k_K$ of its residue field is realized by an unramified extension of $K$, unique up to $K$-isomorphism. Lift the irreducible polynomial of a residue generator to a monic integral polynomial and adjoin a root. Its residue degree equals its field degree, forcing ramification index one. In any other such extension the Hensel lemma lifts the same simple residue root, giving an isomorphism.

A p-adic field has only finitely many extensions of a fixed degree up to isomorphism. There are finitely many possible residue degrees and a unique unramified extension of each such degree. Over each maximal unramified subfield, a totally ramified extension is generated by a root of an Eisenstein polynomial. The coefficient space of these polynomials of fixed degree is compact. Hensel lemma and Krasner's lemma show that sufficiently close polynomials generate isomorphic extensions, giving a finite cover by neighborhoods of a constant extension type.

For a number field and finite subgroup $\Delta \subset K^{\ast }/K^{\ast n}$, adjoining all the indicated nth roots gives an extension unramified outside the displayed finite set. The valuations modulo $n$ are independent of representatives. At a finite place outside $S$, divide each radicand by a local nth power of a uniformizer to obtain a unit. Its polynomial has separable reduction because $n$ is invertible. A finite unramified extension containing all residue roots contains all lifted roots by Hensel's lemma. This proof does not require ${\mu }_n\subset K$.

In the square-class group of a p-adic field, the unit subgroup consists of classes of even valuation. The unramified subgroup consists of the trivial class and the unique nonsquare class defining an unramified extension of degree two. For odd $p$, the two subgroups coincide with $\{1,u\}$ for a nonsquare unit $u$. For $p=2$, they are $\{1,-1,5,-5\}$ and $\{1,5\}$. Norms from an unramified quadratic local field extension have even valuation, and every unit is a norm. The norm characterization of the quadratic Hilbert symbol therefore gives both displayed annihilator identities. Over ${\mathbb{Q}}_2$, the unramified class is $5$ because $(1+\sqrt{5})/2$ satisfies $T^2-T-1$, whose reduction modulo two is irreducible and separable.

For an unramified extension $L/K$ of non-Archimedean local fields and any finite extension $M/K$, reduction is a bijection between $K$-field homomorphisms $L\to M$ and $k_K$-field homomorphisms $k_L\to k_M$. Choose an integral generator with separable irreducible reduction. Each specified residue image lifts uniquely to a root in $M$ by Hensel lemma. Conversely a $K$-embedding preserves the unique extended valuation and therefore induces the residue embedding. The same argument applies when $M$ is any non-Archimedean local extension with the given compatible embedding of $K$.

For a finite Galois extension $L/K$ of non-Archimedean local fields, its relative Brauer group is the kernel of restriction $\mathrm{Br}(K)\to \mathrm{Br}(L)$ and identifies with $H^2(\mathrm{Gal}(L/K),L^{\times })$. Restriction multiplies the local Brauer invariant by $[L:K]$. This kernel is therefore cyclic of order $[L:K]$, and the indicated class is its distinguished generator. In an unramified extension with arithmetic Frobenius generator it is represented by the cyclic algebra with parameter a uniformizer.

Only the prime two can ramify. More precisely, every field $\mathbb{Q}(P_n)$ is unramified at every odd prime; actual ramification at two depends on $P$ and the chosen division point. Use $[2^n]P_n=P$, as printed in the original PDF.

Fix an odd prime $p$ and put $N=2^n$. The elliptic-curve discriminant $-2^8$ gives good reduction at $p$, and $N$ is a unit in ${\mathbb{Z}}_p$. The unramified division torsors at good primes imply that all division points of an elliptic curve above $P$ are defined over finite unramified extensions of ${\mathbb{Q}}_p$. Here is a direct lifting proof, which does not require $P$ to have integral affine coordinates.

Properness gives a reduction $\tilde{P}$. Choose a point $\overline{Q}$ with $[N]\overline{Q}=\tilde{P}$ over the algebraic closure of the residue field, and a finite residue extension containing it. Pass to the corresponding finite unramified extension $K/{\mathbb{Q}}_p$. The surjectivity of good reduction over a local field lifts $\overline{Q}$ to $Q_0\in E(K)$. Its error $[N]Q_0-P$ lies in the kernel of reduction of an elliptic curve. The prime-to-residue-characteristic multiplication on a formal group makes $[N]$ bijective on that kernel. Choose the unique kernel point $R$ with $[N]R=[N]Q_0-P$; then $Q=Q_0-R$ satisfies $[N]Q=P$ and has reduction $\overline{Q}$.

Every algebraic division point has some such reduction and is the unique lift in its division fibre: the difference of two lifts lies in the reduction kernel, which has no $N$-torsion. Thus every chosen $P_n$ lies in an unramified local extension. For every prime of its possibly non-Galois coordinate field above $p$, the ramification index is one. Globally,One cannot universally assert that two actually ramifies: $P=O$ and $P_n=O$ give the field $\mathbb{Q}$. It can ramify. For example, a half of $T=(-1,0)$ isThe elliptic curve group law verifies this by doubling. Its coordinate field contains $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2})$, which has ramification in the quadratic extension generated by the square root of two, so the only possible bad prime does occur for this choice.

Let ${\zeta }_n$ be a primitive nth root of unity. The cyclotomic polynomial isInduction on $n$ shows that ${\Phi }_n$ is monic with integer coefficients. Here is the essential irreducibility of cyclotomic polynomials argument. Let $f$ be the minimal polynomial of ${\zeta }_n$ and let $\ell \nmid n$ be a prime. If ${\zeta }_n^{\ell }$ had a different monic irreducible polynomial $g$, then $f\mid g(X^{\ell })$. Reducing modulo $\ell$ gives $\bar{f}\mid {\bar{g}}^{\ell }$, so $\bar{f}$ and $\bar{g}$ have a common factor. As $fg\mid {\Phi }_n$, this would give a repeated factor of $X^n-1$ modulo $\ell$, impossible because its derivative is $n{X}^{n-1}$. Thus ${\zeta }_n^{\ell }$ is conjugate to ${\zeta }_n$. Every positive integer prime to $n$ is a product of such primes, so all primitive nth roots of unity are conjugate. ConsequentlyIn particular the cyclotomic field is an abelian extension. Complex conjugation corresponds to $-1$; for $n>2$ its fixed field is $\mathbb{Q}({\zeta }_n+{\zeta }_n^{-1})$, the maximal real subfield, of degree $\phi (n)/2$.

The ring of integers is $\mathbb{Z}[{\zeta }_n]$. One way to see that there is no missing index is to work at each prime $p$. Write $n=p^{a}m$ with $p\nmid m$. The prime-to-$p$ roots of unity have separable reduction; their local factors generate unramified extensions with full integer rings. Over each such factor, adjoining ${\zeta }_{p^a}$ is generated by the Eisenstein polynomial ${\Phi }_{p^a}(1+T)$, with uniformizer ${\zeta }_{p^a}-1$, and hence gives the full integer ring of that totally ramified factor. The coprimality of $p^a$ and $m$ means that ${\zeta }_n$ generates both sets of roots of unity. Thus ${\mathbb{Z}}_p[{\zeta }_n]$ is maximal at every $p$, proving the integral assertion.

The same local description computes ramification and splitting. For $p\nmid n$, the ramification index is one, the residue degree is the multiplicative order of $p$ modulo $n$, and there are $\phi (n)/f$ primes above $p$. If $p\mid n$, put $m=n/p^a$; thenwhere ${\mathrm{ord}}_1(p)=1$. Indeed, the prime-to-$p$ part is unramified, and the $p$-power part is totally ramified by the preceding Eisenstein polynomial. Notice the exception $p=2,a=1$: its ramification index is one, consistently with $\mathbb{Q}({\zeta }_{2m})=\mathbb{Q}({\zeta }_m)$ for odd $m$. Thus finite ramification occurs only at the indicated conductor primes, with that exception.

We now prove cyclotomic Artin reciprocity over the rational numbers, using arithmetic Frobenius automorphisms. If $\ell \nmid n$ and $\mathfrak{L}$ lies over $\ell$, then Frobenius sends the reduction of ${\zeta }_n$ to its $\ell$th power. Distinct nth roots of unity remain distinct modulo $\mathfrak{L}$, since $X^n-1$ has separable reduction. Hence the Artin symbol is exactlyExtend multiplicatively to the group $I(n)$ of rational fractional ideals prime to $n$. Such an ideal has a unique positive rational generator $q$ whose numerator and denominator are prime to $n$. The formula isEvery unit residue modulo $n$ has a positive integer representative prime to $n$, so this Artin map is surjective. Its kernel is precisely the subgroup $P_{n\infty }$ generated by positive $q\equiv 1(\mathrm{mod}n)$. ThereforeThis proves the Artin reciprocity law for this extension, including its principal-ray kernel. The infinite component of the modulus records positivity and therefore the possible action of complex conjugation.

Write $\mathcal{O}$ for the valuation ring of $K$, $\pi$ for a uniformizer, $v(\pi )=1$, and $k={\mathbb{F}}_q$ for the residue field. A useful strong form of Hensel lemma is the following: if $f\in \mathcal{O}[X]$ and $a_0\in \mathcal{O}$ satisfythen there is a root $a\in \mathcal{O}$ with $v(a-a_0)>v(f^{\prime }(a_0))$, unique among roots in that ball. If $f(a_0)\ne 0$, its distance satisfies $v(a-a_0)=v(f(a_0))-v(f^{\prime }(a_0))$.

Here is a proof by successive correction. Put $s=v(f^{\prime }(a_0))$, $d_j=v(f(a_j))$, andStop if a root has already been reached. Otherwise the correction has valuation $d_j-s>s$. Integral Taylor expansions show that $v(f^{\prime }(a_{j+1}))=s$ andThus $d_j-2s$ grows at least geometrically, the corrections tend to zero, and completeness gives a limit $a$ with $f(a)=0$. The first correction has strictly smaller valuation than every later nonzero correction, proving the asserted distance. If $x,y$ are in the ball $v(x-a_0),v(y-a_0)>s$, thenThe second factor cannot vanish. Two roots in the ball must therefore coincide. This proves Hensel lemma; in particular a simple root modulo $\pi$ has a unique lift with that residue.

We use this to establish existence and uniqueness of unramified local extensions. For each integer $d\ge 1$, choose a monic irreducible polynomial $\bar{f}\in k[X]$ of degree $d$ and lift it to a monic $f\in \mathcal{O}[X]$. Reduction and Gauss lemma show that $f$ remains irreducible over $K$. LetThe ring $A$ is finite free and complete over $\mathcal{O}$, and $A/\pi A\cong {\mathbb{F}}_{q^d}$. An element outside $\pi A$ is invertible: lift an inverse from the residue field and invert the remaining $1+\pi z$ by a convergent geometric series. Every nonzero element of $A$ is ${\pi }^t$ times such a unit, since ${\bigcap }_t{\pi }^{t}A=0$ in a finite free module. Thus $A$ is a discrete valuation ring, its fraction field is $L$, andThis constructs an unramified extension of each degree.

Conversely, let $M/K$ be an unramified extension of degree $d$. Its residue field is the unique degree-$d$ finite field extension ${\mathbb{F}}_{q^d}/{\mathbb{F}}_q$. Choose a residue root of $\bar{f}$ in it. The root is simple, so Hensel lemma lifts it to a root of $f$ in $M$. This embeds $L$ into $M$, and equality of degrees makes it an isomorphism. All $d$ residue conjugates lift in $L$ itself; hence $L/K$ is Galois, and reduction identifies its Galois group with the cyclic Galois group of the residue field extension. Its distinguished Frobenius automorphism reduces to $x\mapsto x^q$.

There is exactly one unramified extension $K_d$ of each degree inside a fixed algebraic closure, andFor the middle equality, every nonzero element of ${\mathbb{F}}_{q^d}$ lifts uniquely to a $(q^d-1)$st root of unity, because that exponent is prime to $p$. A primitive such residue generates the finite field extension, so its lift generates $K_d$. Taking the union gives the maximal unramified extension, with Galois group $\hat{\mathbb{Z}}$.

We give the full local-field norm-index argument. Let $G=⟨\sigma ⟩$ be cyclic of order $n$. On an additive $G$-module set $D=\sigma -1$ and $N=1+\sigma +\cdots +{\sigma }^{n-1}$. The two cyclic Tate cohomology groups areWhen these are finite, the Herbrand quotient is $h_G(M)=|{\hat{H}}^0(G,M)|/|{\hat{H}}^{-1}(G,M)|$. The periodic complex alternating $D$ and $N$ yields a six-term periodic exact sequence from a short exact sequence of modules. Taking alternating products of orders in that exact sequence provesFor a finite module, $|NM|=|M|/|\ker N|$ and $|DM|=|M|/|\ker D|$ show that the two Tate cohomology groups have equal order. Thus the Herbrand quotient of a finite module is one. For the trivial integral module $\mathbb{Z}$, the two groups are $\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}$ and zero, giving $h_G(\mathbb{Z})=n$.

We also need cyclic cohomology of a regular lattice. In $R[G]$, fixed coefficient vectors are constant, and every such vector is a norm of a basis vector times its coefficient. The kernel of $N$ consists of vectors whose coefficient sum is zero. For such a vector $(a_i)$, solve $b_{i-1}-b_i=a_i$ successively around the cycle; the final equation holds precisely because ${\sum }_i{a}_i=0$. Thus $\ker N=DR[G]$. Both Tate cohomology groups vanish, so $h_G(R[G])=1$, for $R=\mathbb{Z}$ or ${\mathbb{Z}}_p$, and likewise for finite direct sums.

Now take a cyclic extension $L/K$ of p-adic fields of degree $n$. Write $U_L^r=1+{\mathfrak{p}}_L^r$. For $r>v_L(p)/(p-1)$, the convergent p-adic logarithm and p-adic exponential give mutually inverse $G$-equivariant group isomorphismswhere the right side is additive. The convergence assertion follows from the estimates $v_L(x^j/j)\ge j{v}_L(x)-v_L(p)v_p(j)$ and $v_L(x^j/j!)\ge j{v}_L(x)-v_L(p)j/(p-1)$; formal inverse identities therefore hold on this ball.

By the normal basis theorem, choose $\theta$ so that $\{{\sigma }^i\theta \}$ is a $K$-basis of $L$. The lattice $A={\sum }_i{\mathcal{O}}_K{\sigma }^i\theta$ is a regular ${\mathcal{O}}_K[G]$-module. It is a finite direct sum of regular ${\mathbb{Z}}_p[G]$-modules, hence its Tate cohomology vanishes. The lattices $A$ and ${\mathfrak{p}}_L^r$ are commensurable: their intersection has finite index in both. The exact sequences with these finite quotients establish finiteness of the Tate cohomology groups and show $h_G({\mathfrak{p}}_L^r)=1$. Thus $h_G(U_L^r)=1$. Since ${\mathcal{O}}_L^{\times }/U_L^r$ is finite, $h_G({\mathcal{O}}_L^{\times })=1$ as well.

The $G$-equivariant valuation exact sequence isIts last term has trivial $G$-action. The multiplication rule gives the Herbrand quotient of the local multiplicative group:All the Tate cohomology groups here are finite by the lattice argument and the exact sequence; finiteness of the norm index has not been assumed.

For completeness we prove the needed Hilbert theorem 90. If $a\in L^{\times }$ has field norm one, put $A_0=1$ and $A_i={\prod }_{j=0}^{i-1}{\sigma }^j(a)$. The linear map $c\mapsto b={\sum }_{i=0}^{n-1}{A}_i{\sigma }^i(c)$ is not zero by linear independence of distinct field embeddings. Choose $c$ with $b\ne 0$. The relation $A_n=1$ gives $a\sigma (b)=b$, so $a=b/\sigma (b)$. This proves ${\hat{H}}^{-1}(G,L^{\times })=0$. The zeroth Tate cohomology group is $K^{\times }/N_{L/K}{L}^{\times }$. Consequently the cyclic local norm index isWriting $n=ef$, the valuation of a field norm is $v_K(Nx)=f{v}_L(x)$. The valuation quotient has order $f$, and a norm with valuation zero comes from a unit. ThereforeIn particular every unit is a norm in an unramified extension. These results give the norm assertions used in the quadratic Hilbert symbol computation.

We finish with the Hasse norm theorem: for a cyclic extension of number fields, an element is a global norm if and only if it is a norm at every place. More precisely the local norm is the norm from the product $L{\otimes }_K{K}_v$; in a Galois extension its factors have the same norm subgroup. The forward implication is immediate. For the converse associate to $a\in K^{\times }$ the cyclic algebra $(L/K,\sigma ,a)$. The splitting criterion for a cyclic algebra, proved below, identifies its splitting with $a\in N_{L/K}{L}^{\times }$. At a place where the tensor product of fields has several factors, this algebra is a matrix algebra over the cyclic algebra of one decomposition-field factor, with the generator restricted to its cyclic decomposition subgroup. Thus the local norm assumption makes its Brauer class zero at every place. Injectivity in the Albert-Brauer-Hasse-Noether theorem makes the global Brauer class zero, giving the desired global norm. This is the required proof outline; cyclicity is essential to this reduction.

A central simple algebra over $K$ is a finite-dimensional associative $K$-algebra with no nonzero proper two-sided ideals and with center $K$. The Artin–Wedderburn theorem writes it uniquely as $M_r(D)$ with $D$ a central division algebra. After a finite separable splitting field extension it becomes $M_d$, so its dimension is $d^2$, and $d$ is its degree of a central simple algebra. Passing from $D$ to a matrix algebra over $D$ does not change its Brauer class.

The Brauer group consists of these classes, with product induced by tensor product. Extending to a common splitting field shows that a tensor product of central simple algebras is again central simple; its two-sided ideals and center descend from the corresponding full matrix algebra. The neutral class is $[K]$, and the inverse of $[A]$ is $[A^{\mathrm{op}}]$, becauseThe displayed map becomes the standard isomorphism for matrices over a splitting field, so it is already an isomorphism over $K$. Thus Brauer classes measure precisely the obstruction to being a split matrix algebra.

An explicit family is supplied by cyclic algebras. Let $L/K$ be cyclic of degree $n$, with generator $\sigma$, and let $a\in K^{\times }$. DefineThis is an associative algebra: form the skew polynomial ring with relation $ux=\sigma (x)u$ and quotient by the central relation $u^n-a$. Reduction of powers gives the displayed $n^2$-dimensional $K$-basis. An element commuting with every $x\in L$ has no $u^i$ coefficient for $i\ne 0$, since ${\sigma }^i$ is not the identity. Commuting also with $u$ forces the remaining coefficient into $K$. Hence the center is $K$.

Here is an explicit splitting construction. On $L^n$, with basis $e_0,\dots ,e_{n-1}$, putThen $UD(x)=D(\sigma x)U$ and $U^n=aI$. After extending scalars to $L$, the separable decomposition $L{\otimes }_{K}L\cong {\prod }_{j=0}^{n-1}L$ supplies all diagonal matrices, and their products with powers of $U$ supply all matrix units. ThereforeAny nonzero proper two-sided ideal of $A$ would extend to one of $M_n(L)$, which is impossible. Thus this construction really gives a central simple algebra, with splitting field $L$.

Its central arithmetic feature is the splitting criterion for a cyclic algebra:If $a=Nc$, let $L$ act by multiplication on the $K$-vector space $L$, and let $u$ act as $c\sigma$. Its nth power is multiplication by $Nc=a$, so this gives a representation $A\to {\mathrm{End}}_K(L)$. It is injective by simplicity and an isomorphism by equal dimension. Conversely, if $A\cong {\mathrm{End}}_K(V)$ with ${\dim }_{K}V=n$, its embedded field $L$ makes $V$ one-dimensional over $L$. The relation for $u$ says that $u$ is $\sigma$-semilinear. In an $L$-basis it must have the form $c\sigma$, whose nth power is $Nc$. The relation $u^n=a$ forces $a=Nc$.

More generally the crossed-product algebra of a Galois extension attaches an algebra to a multiplicative two-cocycle. Changing the cocycle by a coboundary rescales its basis and preserves the Brauer class. Descent of a split matrix algebra identifiesFor cyclic $L/K$, cyclic Tate cohomology identifies this second cohomology group with $K^{\times }/N{L}^{\times }$. In a crossed product, rescale successive cyclic basis elements to powers of a single $u$; the remaining datum is $u^n=a$, changed by a field norm when $u$ is rescaled. This explains why cyclic algebras give every class split by a cyclic extension, and why multiplication of their parameters is addition of their Brauer classes.

For a finite field $K={\mathbb{F}}_q$, every finite splitting field $L={\mathbb{F}}_{q^n}$ is cyclic over $K$. The field norm is the power map $x\mapsto x^{(q^n-1)/(q-1)}$ on its cyclic multiplicative group, and is onto ${\mathbb{F}}_q^{\times }$. Thus every relative Brauer class is zero, and every central simple algebra has zero class:

For a non-Archimedean local field $K$, the valuation classification of central division algebras shows that every Brauer class splits over a finite unramified extension. For the degree-$n$ unramified extension $L/K$ with arithmetic Frobenius $\sigma$, units are norms and norm valuations are multiples of $n$. Hence the cyclic relative Brauer group is $\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}$, represented by $a={\pi }^r$. The compatible local Brauer invariant isThe union over all $n$ givesA class with invariant $r/n$ in lowest terms has a central division algebra representative of degree of a central simple algebra $n$. This is the local valuation classification used above; the explicit cyclic algebras exhibit all of its invariants. At the Archimedean places, $\mathrm{Br}(\mathbb{C})=0$, while $\mathrm{Br}(\mathbb{R})=\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$: its nontrivial class is the quaternion algebra $(\mathbb{C}/\mathbb{R},\text{conjugation},-1)$, since complex norms are positive.

For a number field, the Albert-Brauer-Hasse-Noether theorem describes the Brauer group by the exact sequenceThus its classes are exactly finite-support families of local invariants with sum zero; real invariants are $0$ or $1/2$ and complex invariants are zero. Every global Brauer class has a cyclic splitting extension, so cyclic algebras also realize all global classes. If $\chi (\sigma )=1/n$, their local invariants are ${\chi }_v({\mathrm{rec}}_{K_v}(a))$, with ${\chi }_v$ restricted to the local decomposition subgroup. The sum-zero relation for a principal parameter is the invariant form of Artin reciprocity. Injectivity supplies the local-to-global splitting test, which yields the Hasse norm theorem for cyclic extensions as explained in the preceding solution. Here the local valuation classification and the global invariant theorem are the structural theorems used to describe the Brauer groups; the construction and norm-splitting calculation have been proved explicitly.

Fix a prime $\mathfrak{q}$ of $E$ over $\mathfrak{p}$, and a prime $\mathfrak{r}$ of $LE$ over $\mathfrak{q}$. Let $\mathfrak{P}$ be its restriction to $L$. Inside the completed compositum, putThe assumption means $U/F$ is an unramified extension. Its residue degree is some $f$; the completed extension $(LE{)}_{\mathfrak{r}}/J$ is the corresponding compositum $UJ/J$. It suffices to prove that this is unramified, regardless of the ramification of $J/F$.

Here is a proof of unramified extensions remain unramified under base change using the classification already established. Choose an integral generator $\alpha$ of $U/F$ whose monic minimal polynomial $g\in {\mathcal{O}}_F[X]$ has irreducible separable reduction of degree $f$. Write $k_F={\mathbb{F}}_q$ and $k_J={\mathbb{F}}_{q^r}$. Let $J_f/J$ be the degree-$f$ unramified extension. Its residue field ${\mathbb{F}}_{q^{rf}}$ contains ${\mathbb{F}}_{q^f}$, so $\bar{g}$ has a simple root there. Hensel lemma lifts this root to a root of $g$ in $J_f$. This gives an $F$-embedding $U\hookrightarrow J_f$.

An unramified extension of a local field is Galois, so all $F$-embeddings of $U$ into a fixed algebraic closure have the same image. The original $U$ therefore lies in $J_f$, and $UJ$ is an intermediate field of the unramified extension $J_f/J$. Its ramification index is one. Since $\mathfrak{q}$ and $\mathfrak{r}$ were arbitrary,This proof also explains why no linear-disjointness assumption on $L$ and $E$, and no assumption that $E/K$ is unramified, is needed.

Normalize each finite-place valuation to have image $\mathbb{Z}$. For a radical class $[a]$, the residue of $v(a)$ modulo $n$ is well-defined, because replacing $a$ by $a{b}^n$ adds $nv(b)$. A suitable finite set isOne can compute the last union from any finite generating set of $\Delta$. Each representative has only finitely many nonzero valuations, so this indeed defines a finite set depending only on $n$ and the classes, not on a choice of representatives. Including all infinite places safely allows possible real-to-complex ramification.

Fix $v\notin S$ and work over the completion $K_v$. A representative has $v(a)=nk$, so $a={\pi }^{nk}u$ with $u$ a unit. Adjoining an $n$th root of $a$ is the same as adjoining an $n$th root of $u$. Since $n$ is invertible in the residue field, $X^n-\bar{u}$ is separable: its derivative $n{X}^{n-1}$ has no common zero with it.

Take a finite extension of the finite residue field containing all roots of all these finitely many reduced polynomials. The corresponding finite unramified extension of $K_v$ exists by the classification proved in Question 2. Hensel's lemma lifts each simple residue root to a root of the original polynomial in that unramified extension. Thus all the required radicals, and every conjugate root, lie in an unramified local extension. Every completion of the radical field at $v$ is therefore unramified. This proves finite ramification support for radical extensions.

The local argument does not assume ${\mu }_n\subset K$: adjoining all roots proves the stronger unramified assertion for the splitting field, and hence for any field obtained by choosing the radicals. For $n=1$ the radical extension is trivial; the displayed set is still valid.