Classical vacuum 2026-10-06
A spatially homogeneous field value minimizing the potential energy. For a finite-energy field configuration on an infinite domain, the potential is normally shifted so the relevant vacuum energy density is zero. Disconnected components of the vacuum manifold allow a scalar-field kink to connect distinct vacuum values.
Dirichlet scalar vacuum energy density 2026-10-25
On a one-dimensional interval with Dirichlet boundary conditions, and . The massive-field vacuum energy density can depend on position even though its integral is the oscillator sum . All terms require a common ultraviolet regulator when vacuum energies in different geometries are compared.
For finitely many free physical degrees of freedom with nonnegative masses, assign positive weights to bosons and negative weights to fermions. With a common spherical ultraviolet cutoff, the unsubtracted vacuum energy density is finite precisely when the three displayed supertraces vanish. Expanding proves that they cancel the quartic, quadratic and logarithmic ultraviolet divergences. The remaining radial integral converges as . Equal-mass boson–fermion pairing is sufficient but stronger than the three conditions; a renormalized vacuum energy with a free counterterm need not satisfy them.
Past exam of the advanced quantum physics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 Paper 1 1 c 2026-10-20
Using a spherical Bohr-radius volume for the atom, the calculations below give a cutoff electromagnetic vacuum energy density of about , compared with a hydrogen binding-energy density of about . The cutoff vacuum estimate is about times larger. Alternative reasonable definitions of atomic volume change this ratio by a factor of a few, not the main order-of-magnitude conclusion.
The cutoff result is a bare zero-point mode sum. It is not a classical radiation bath incident on the atom, nor a calculation of an observable absolute vacuum energy without a subtraction or renormalization prescription.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 50 3 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The same Super-Poincaré algebra gives the operator identityFor a normalized physical state in a positive-norm Hilbert space,An unbroken supersymmetric vacuum must be annihilated by every supercharge and its adjoint, hence has zero energy. Conversely, zero expectation of this positive sum forces each norm separately to vanish. Therefore a vacuum with strictly positive energy necessarily breaks supersymmetry. For an infinite-volume field theory the corresponding statement is about vacuum energy density, obtained with an appropriate finite-volume regulator. The zero of energy is fixed by the algebra; it cannot be arbitrarily shifted while preserving this identity. This is the global-supersymmetry result and does not assert positivity of the general local-supergravity scalar potential.
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2020 1 d Solution 2026-10-25
For a connected amputated Feynman diagram, write for the number of independent loop momenta. Each loop momentum integration scales as , each internal scalar propagator as , and each internal Dirac propagator as when both four-momenta and mass are scaled. The Yukawa coupling has mass dimension zero. ThusCounting the two fermion ends and one scalar end at each interaction vertex, and using connectedness, givesConsequently , , andThe requested exponent requires amputation and removal of the overall momentum delta function. An ordinary unamputated connected Green function has an additional external scalar propagators, giving mass dimension after stripping that delta function, or if it is retained. For a concrete check, the free two-point scalar propagator scales as , not . The exponent is the engineering result for the amputated object. A fixed renormalization scale introduces logarithms; the displayed homogeneity is a naive power counting statement rather than an exact quantum scaling law at fixed subtraction scale.
More generally, with external scalar ends and external fermion ends, the same counting gives the superficial degree of divergenceThis is an upper bound on the overall ultraviolet divergence. Numerator cancellations and Lorentz invariance may lower it; an apparently convergent whole Feynman diagram can still have ultraviolet subdivergences. Local subtraction of those ultraviolet subdivergences is required first.
For pure scalar ends, can require counterterms. Lorentz invariance reduces the two-point terms to a mass counterterm and wave-function renormalization; derivatives of a single scalar field are total derivatives, and a one-derivative cubic scalar term cannot be a Lorentz scalar. With two external fermions, requires their kinetic term and mass counterterm, while requires Yukawa coupling renormalization. Four external fermions give , so no independent four-fermion counterterm is required.
A complete counterterm Lagrangian consistent with the species symmetry can therefore be writtenThe vacuum energy density term matters for an unnormalized vacuum functional and cancels from normalized Green functions. The tadpole counterterm can impose . There is no symmetry of the massive Yukawa interaction, so linear, cubic and quartic scalar terms cannot be excluded. For instance, in a constant background the divergent fermion loop contribution contains , exhibiting all these powers. This is counterterm closure of a massive Yukawa theory.
The two species have identical couplings, so their common unitary flavour rotations preserve the Lagrangian density and their counterterms can be chosen species independent. Equality of the scalar and fermion masses, however, is not protected: and are independent. Including the displayed finite set of operators yields a renormalizable quantum field theory. Restricting the bare Lagrangian density to the terms printed in the question is not closed under renormalization.
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2021 3 b Solution 2026-10-25
Let be the number of independent loop momenta in a connected Feynman diagram. Every scalar propagator falls as , and every loop momentum integration contributes three powers, so . Counting line ends and using connectedness givesEliminating and yieldsThus increasing the sextic interaction vertex count does not worsen the superficial degree of divergence; adding a quartic interaction vertex improves it. Only finitely many external-line structures can have an overall ultraviolet divergence, even though arbitrarily high loop order is possible.
After subtracting ultraviolet subdivergences, locality and Lorentz invariance restrict the divergent counterterms to a constant vacuum energy density, a mass counterterm, a wave-function renormalization, and quartic and sextic field interaction terms. Odd powers are forbidden by the Z2 symmetry. In particular, permits a constant and , permits only a constant, and permits only a constant. This is perturbative renormalizability, not a guarantee that every superficially allowed divergence actually occurs or that every unrenormalized graph with lacks divergent subgraphs.
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2022 1 c Solution 2026-10-25
Set and . The superficial degree of divergence is then , independently of the number of cubic interaction vertices. After subtracting ultraviolet subdivergences, the divergent part of a one-particle irreducible Feynman diagram is a local polynomial in external momenta of degree at most . Lorentz invariance and momentum conservation leave the following possibilities:
- : a constant vacuum energy density.
- : a linear tadpole counterterm. The single external momentum is zero, so derivatives cannot generate further independent terms.
- : a mass counterterm and a wave-function renormalization, since the polynomial has the form .
- : a constant cubic interaction vertex.
- : no overall ultraviolet divergence, although ultraviolet subdivergences still require their lower-point counterterms.
Thus a finite set of counterterms closes under perturbation theory. In terms of renormalized coefficients, writeHere is a coefficient of squared mass, rather than a correction to itself. The tadpole counterterm fixes the chosen expansion point, for example ; it cannot be omitted merely because the original Lagrangian density lacks a linear term. The vacuum energy density term cancels out of normalized Green functions, but is required if the unnormalized vacuum functional is also to be renormalized. This establishes perturbative renormalizability; the unbounded scalar potential of a real cubic scalar field theory does not by itself define a stable nonperturbative vacuum state.
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2022 1 d Solution 2026-10-25
Continue with the cubic scalar field theory of c, and use precisely its counterterm signs. Take to separate ultraviolet divergences from infrared divergences. Make a Wick rotation and impose the rotationally invariant cutoff regularization . PutFor example, spherical coordinates give . Polynomial division and then differentiation with respect to give the divergent partsThe derivative relations are and ; differentiation also generates finite terms, which are irrelevant here. The first supplied integral identity is consistent with these divergent parts after Wick rotation.
The second supplied expansion is incorrect. Write . Direct multiplication of the two denominators gives , so the correct Taylor expansion isA concrete counterexample is , , : the exact expression is , whereas the printed expansion gives . We therefore compute the self-energy without that identity.
For Euclidean external momentum , define the scalar bubble integralA Feynman parameter combines its denominators into one squared denominator with . Applying the radial result above and integrating yieldsOne can instead expand with the ultraviolet cutoff fixed on the unshifted loop momentum: the coefficient of the integrand is , using rotational averaging in six dimensions. Its leading radial term is , giving the same logarithm. Shifting a sharp integration boundary changes finite terms in this scalar bubble integral, and does not change the displayed divergent coefficients.
To fix all signs and symmetry factors together, expand the one-loop Euclidean effective action around a background scalar field:These terms are the tadpole diagram, the two-point bubble diagram, and the triangle Feynman diagram. The tadpole diagram has factor ; the two-point bubble diagram also has factor after two differentiations with respect to the background scalar field. The local three-point interaction vertex is . Thus their divergent contributions to the one-, two-, and three-point Euclidean one-particle irreducible vertices are respectivelyThe Euclidean counterterm Lagrangian is . Cancelling each divergent one-particle irreducible vertex therefore givesFor example, the two-point sum is and its divergent coefficients cancel separately. Finite counterterms depend on the chosen renormalization conditions. The zero-mass limit can use a positive subtraction scale in the logarithms after infrared regularization.
If unnormalized vacuum functionals are retained, specify the determinant measure byExpanding its radial integrand at large fixes the additional vacuum energy density counterterm:The purely mass-independent terms depend on the determinant normalization. Normalized Green functions eliminate this entire constant.
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2024 3 c Solution 2026-10-25
Use one-particle-irreducible correlation functions to identify independent local counterterms. The exact internal symmetry excludes odd , and Dirac fermion number conservation requires equal numbers of and , so is even. From b, the complete list of potentially overall divergent vertices with external legs is:
- : , , potentially divergent for .
- : , , potentially divergent for .
- : , , potentially divergent only for .
- : , , potentially divergent for .
- : , , potentially divergent only for .
The zero-leg vacuum diagrams, with , may also require a vacuum energy density subtraction. Four-fermion vertices have and do not require a new four-fermion counterterm. These are superficial bounds: a particular allowed diagram can vanish or be convergent.
Locality and Lorentz invariance restrict the divergent parts to a finite basis. The scalar two-point vertex can contain a constant and ; there is no Lorentz scalar linear in a single momentum. The fermion two-point vertex can contain and . The remaining listed vertices have no allowed derivative divergence. A complete counterterm Lagrangian, up to total derivatives, is thereforeThe coefficients supply wavefunction renormalization, mass counterterms and renormalizations of the three interactions already present. Recursive subtraction of ultraviolet subdivergences then leaves only these local overall divergences. This finite counterterm closure is why the complete theory is expected to have perturbative renormalizability. It does not mean every listed coefficient first becomes nonzero at one loop, or that setting an allowed coupling to zero is stable under renormalization.
Past exam of the quantum field theory course of the University of Oxford 2025 1 b Solution 2026-10-25
The mass dimensions are , , . Up to total derivatives, power counting allows local counterterms of mass dimension at most four. A convenient basis for the counterterm Lagrangian compatible with the actual parity symmetry in quantum field theory and Dirac fermion number conservation isThe optional constant renormalizes the vacuum energy density. The wavefunction renormalization, mass counterterms and Yukawa coupling renormalization correct the terms already present. The quartic interaction must also be included: the fermion loop with four external bosonic legs is logarithmically divergent, even if the renormalized quartic coupling is set to zero at one chosen renormalization scale. The displayed original interactions alone do not form a closed set of counterterms.
If “most general” is interpreted before imposing the parity symmetry in quantum field theory examined in d, Lorentz invariance, a Hermitian action and Dirac fermion number conservation also allowHere all coefficients can be real in the paper's gamma matrix convention; the last term is Hermitian in the action up to a total derivative. It is an axial kinetic normalization, which could alternatively be removed by a suitable perturbative field redefinition. Every term in is odd under the actual parity symmetry in quantum field theory, so its coefficient vanishes in a symmetry-preserving renormalization scheme. Listing these terms makes explicit which assumption excludes a tadpole counterterm, a cubic scalar term, a scalar Yukawa interaction, a pseudoscalar Dirac mass term and an axial kinetic term.
Promote the mode expansion of a free field coefficients to annihilation operators and creation operators, replacing by . The canonical commutation relations areTogether with the normalization in part a, they give and vanishing equal-time commutators between two fields or two conjugate momenta.
Insert the mode expansion of a free field in the Hamiltonian. The spatial integral produces . The and coefficients cancel because . The remaining terms giveThis is a continuum of quantum harmonic oscillators. In a finite periodic volume , . The Fock vacuum satisfies , so its vacuum energy density isNormal ordering would subtract this constant; here it must be retained because it is the quantity being calculated.[ref]
Quantum Field Theory by David Tong. Section 2, canonical quantization of the real scalar field and its zero-point Hamiltonian
Six-dimensional cubic scalar counterterms 2026-10-25
For a real scalar field in six spacetime dimensions with interaction , the mass dimension of is zero. With Euclidean sharp cutoff regularization, and , choose the Minkowski counterterm Lagrangian . Its one-loop divergent coefficients areThe proof uses the Euclidean effective action . Its first three background derivatives have divergent parts , , . Radial integration gives , , and modulo finite terms. Subtraction proves the coefficients. The tadpole counterterm is essential despite the absence of a linear term in the original Lagrangian density. A separate constant handles the vacuum energy density.
Vacuum energy density Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-10-25
The vacuum energy density is the bulk limit , with boundary effects removed and a fixed convention for the Hamiltonian. In an effective field theory at a homogeneous vacuum it is the value of the renormalized scalar potential. A global supersymmetry algebra expresses the regulated vacuum energy as a sum of supercharge norms, giving nonnegative density; the scalar potential of supergravity instead includes a negative gravitational term.
Vacuum functional 2026-10-25
The zero-source generating functional is the vacuum state persistence amplitude, conventionally written with a suitable Feynman i-epsilon prescription. Dividing by removes disconnected Vacuum Feynman diagrams from normalized Green functions. Adding a constant vacuum energy density to the Lagrangian density changes by a spacetime-volume phase but leaves these normalized Green functions unchanged.