The Dirichlet Laplacian eigenfunctions and positive Dirichlet Laplacian eigenvalues on the interval of length two are
A Sturm-Liouville eigenfunction expansion gives , with . Thus all normal modes oscillate precisely when .
To justify a spatially uniform bound for arbitrary appropriate data, assume the usual wave equation energy class and , or smoother compatible data. The energy method conserves
The sharp Poincare inequality is . For , this makes coercive with constant ; for , coercivity is immediate. The one-dimensional Sobolev representative satisfies by the fundamental theorem of calculus and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Hence the conserved energy bounds uniformly in both variables.
At , the smooth solution is unbounded. At , is unbounded. Therefore
The bound depends on the initial data; it is not a single bound for all arbitrarily rescaled solutions. The energy-class hypothesis supplies pointwise meaning and excludes undefined rough-data interpretations.
The all-time conclusion in the original PDF is false. The expanding-flow transformation of a wave equation makes both the correct forward statement and a counterexample transparent. Put
For , the expanded operator from part (i) is . In the new variables and , hence
Thus it is the ordinary wave equation on the half-plane . By the D'Alembert formula, any solution has the form
At , differentiating the zero displacement with respect to and using the zero velocity gives, for ,
Subtracting times the first equation from the second gives , and then . Thus on and on . If and , both arguments remain in those intervals. Consequently the valid forward result is
For negative time the arguments need not stay in the initial intervals. Take and , where . Then
is a global solution, has the prescribed zero initial displacement and velocity on , but . This directly disproves the assertion for .
The connection with part (i) is directional finite propagation speed. At a future point in the strip, the two characteristics traced back to meet it at and , both in . For negative time these intersections can lie outside that interval. The lines are characteristic barriers for this forward domain of dependence, not barriers in both time directions.
In conformal gauge, . The Weyl invariance of the Polyakov action removes , leaving
Its complete variation is
Fix the string embedding map on the initial and final time slices. The interior Euler-Lagrange field equation is the wave equation
At each spatial endpoint the remaining variation vanishes under either Dirichlet boundary conditions, , or Neumann boundary conditions, , independently for each target-space component. Thus a fixed endpoint or a free endpoint makes the boundary contribution vanish. Fixing a spatial point throughout time imposes Dirichlet boundary conditions on its spatial coordinates, while the time coordinate may retain Neumann boundary conditions.
The independent metric tensor equation must also be retained after gauge fixing. Its Virasoro constraints are
Together with the wave equation, these ensure equivalence to the Nambu–Goto action; varying only the already fixed metric would lose these Virasoro constraints.
Let , with , and let . Direct differentiation gives , while the time coordinate also satisfies the wave equation. Using the Minkowski metric,
Thus both Virasoro constraints hold, and the induced worldsheet metric is . The configuration solves the Nambu–Goto action equations in its interior.
Place the fixed end at . The first free endpoint has at . For the usual single unfolded rotating Nambu–Goto string,
This parameter interval need not equal the earlier interval , since that interval was a coordinate convention. The proper length is measured on a constant- slice; the local motion is perpendicular to the string, so there is no longitudinal Lorentz contraction.
All points have the same phase , hence the segment rotates rigidly with angular velocity . At radius , its speed is . Therefore the free tip moves at the speed of light. This is consistent with its Neumann boundary condition: and the Virasoro constraints imply at the free tip. The null endpoint is a boundary limit, not a nondegenerate interior point.
In this conformal gauge, , so the energy density per is . Equivalently, the energy density per proper length is . Thus
and the rotational kinetic energy is
The angular momentum about the fixed point is
Therefore the Regge trajectory is
The endpoint conditions alone also admit folded extensions with parameter length , . Their proper length, energy and angular momentum are times the values above, and . The displayed answer uses the implicit unfolded-segment convention.
Write the density and pressure as and , and let the small fluid velocity be the gradient of an acoustic velocity potential, . The linear homentropic acoustic equations are
where the adiabatic sound speed of a perfect gas is . Absorbing a function of time into , the momentum equation gives
Eliminating and gives the acoustic wave equation
Let the shell displacement be and put , . The spherically symmetric solution regular at the centre is
The kinematic boundary condition gives
Since , the pressure amplitude on the shell is therefore
The radial Newton's second law per unit area is
so its complex amplitude satisfies
For a nonzero mode, cancellation of and multiplication by yield the frequency equation for spherically symmetric vibration of a gas-filled elastic shell:
The spectrum is discrete and contains infinitely many positive solutions. Indeed, for sufficiently large , runs from to on , forcing at least one root there. These high modes are predominantly standing acoustic modes of the gas, while the lowest mode is predominantly the shell's radial breathing mode; the coupling shifts both families.
The outgoing solution obtained from the retarded fundamental solution of the wave equation is
In the radiation zone, put , , and retain the leading term at retarded time . The trace term disappears after applying the transverse-traceless projector
so
Twice using stress-energy conservation, , and integrating by parts gives
The projector removes the trace, so in terms of the mass quadrupole moment
the far field is
The gravitational-wave energy flux is
For a trace-free symmetric tensor , the isotropic tensor integral over the observation direction gives
Consequently the standard quadrupole formula, in the units used by the paper, is
Thus the printed coefficient is inconsistent with the stated definition of and the standard wave-energy normalization; it appears to be a typographical error.
For the planet, choose its circular orbit in the -plane and write . With the star treated as fixed,
and hence
Direct differentiation gives
so
Restoring units multiplies this by . If the printed coefficient is followed literally, the answer is instead times larger,
For two bodies of comparable mass, is replaced by the reduced mass and by their separation.
Write the density and pressure as and , and let be the small fluid velocity. The linear homentropic acoustic equations are
where the adiabatic sound speed is
If the flow is irrotational, write . The momentum equation integrates spatially to
a purely time-dependent integration term having been absorbed into . Substitution into continuity gives the wave equation
so the wave speed is .
To obtain energy conservation, dot the momentum equation with and use the product rule:
The continuity and pressure-density relations give
Therefore the acoustic energy conservation law is
with acoustic energy density and intensity
Take
and define the positive normal decay rate
The decaying solutions of the acoustic wave equation that satisfy the kinematic conditions are
Their pressures at the membrane are
Substitution into the dynamic boundary condition gives
and hence the acoustic wave on a tensioned massive membrane dispersion relation
Writing the phase speed as , the positive added-inertia term gives
Physically, each evanescent acoustic surface wave accelerates a layer of fluid on both sides of the membrane, so the inertia per unit area exceeds . Moreover,
and the added mass of an evanescent fluid layer diverges as . In that limit , so and
The string is initially at rest, so . Taking the Laplace transform in converts the wave equation into
For , the solution that decays as is . The transformed boundary condition fixes , and therefore
With and , the chain rule gives
Hence
so the wave equation is equivalent to . Integrating in each variable gives
The initial conditions imply
Solving and integrating yields the D'Alembert formula with initial velocity
If , then both and lie outside the support interval , and every point between them does as well. All three terms therefore vanish. Thus
which is finite propagation speed.
For the finite string, differentiate its energy and use :
The fixed-end conditions hold for every , so differentiation gives . The boundary term vanishes and
With and ,
so the wave equation becomes
Thus . At the initial data give
Solving for and and integrating gives d'Alembert's formula>
For the wave operator , use the symbol
and complexify . Its roots are real for every real , so the single horizontal step
never meets a root and is an explicit Hörmander staircase.
Write , , and let be small. Linearized mass and momentum conservation are
The linearized equation of state is
. Differentiate the first equation in time and eliminate the velocity with the second to obtain the wave equation
Take the spatial Fourier transform of the wave equation. The transformed initial-value problem is
and hence
Part (c) and the convolution theorem turn the first term into
For the second term, choose with . Part (b) says , so
Part (c) now makes its inverse transform
Combining the two terms gives the D'Alembert formula
Let and . Part (c) makes and independent identically distributed exponential variables of rate . The change of variables has Jacobian , and integrating over gives density one for . Therefore the uniform ratio of independent exponential variables gives
Take the Fourier transform in . The wave equation becomes the ordinary differential equation
with initial data and . Therefore
Part (c) and the Translation property of the Fourier transform invert the first term to
For the second term choose an antiderivative of . By part (b), , and hence
Its inverse transform is
Combining the terms gives the D'Alembert formula
For a smooth function define its spherical mean
The Kirchhoff formula
defines a smooth solution of the three-dimensional wave equation for all positive and negative and has the prescribed data at .
For uniqueness, apply the local energy estimate to the difference of two solutions on a backward light cone. Its energy at the cone tip is bounded by the zero initial energy on the cone base, so the difference and its derivatives vanish. Covering spacetime by such cones proves uniqueness among solutions.
Compact support is unnecessary for existence or uniqueness: the sphere in the Kirchhoff formula is compact for each , so arbitrary smooth data suffice, and the cone-energy proof is local.
The Euler-Lagrange equation of each component of the string embedding map is the wave equation . Its left- and right-moving solutions are identified by the endpoint Neumann boundary conditions, so the resulting open-string mode expansion is
Indeed, the Fourier cosine series makes vanish at . The canonical momentum density is . Imposing the equal-time canonical commutation relations gives the covariant quantization of the bosonic string
with .
Here
so the Euler-Lagrange field equation is the variable-coefficient wave equation
At leading order, has
and hence
The leading part of the modulated-wave first integral is
A nonconstant periodic wave therefore requires the local dispersion relation
This is usually called the eikonal equation, or equivalently the leading geometric-optics dispersion relation.
Let be the group parameter. The infinitesimal generator of a Lie point symmetry
has flow equations
Therefore it generates the scaling group
Here , , and . The total-derivative formulas for the second prolongation of a Lie point symmetry give
and
Thus
For the wave equation expression ,
It therefore vanishes whenever , proving that generates the simultaneous spacetime scaling symmetry of the wave equation.
The independent invariant of the scaling orbits is the similarity variable
while itself is invariant. Seek a group-invariant solution . Direct partial differentiation gives
The wave equation reduces to
Hence, on any interval avoiding ,