Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 iii Paper 8 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For fixed , Gaussian decay of gives locally uniform convergence of the theta function series and all its -derivatives. It is therefore entire. Shifting the series argument and reindexing givesSince , the corresponding second multiplier for has the opposite sign:Thus obeys and . These give candidate period lattices; to show they are exact, first locate every zero.
At ,because the terms with indices and cancel. The absolute convergence justifies that pairing. Quasi-periodicity propagates this zero to every .
For exhaustiveness and simplicity, let . It satisfies and . Take a fundamental parallelogram for , translated so its boundary has no zero. The two sloping edges cancel by the first identity; the bottom and reversed top giveThe argument principle therefore counts one zero with multiplicity in every cell. Since a known zero class already exists, all zeros are simple and exactlyThe denominator's simple zeros are instead . These two cosets are disjoint: cannot lie in because . Thus there are no cancelled zeros or poles in the quotient.
Any period of or must translate its zero set onto itself, so must belong to . A translation multiplies by ; the quotient is nonconstant, so an odd cannot be a period of . Squaring removes precisely that sign. This proves the period lattice of theta3 over theta4 and its squared counterpart:The second lattice is for the squared function; no additional translation can preserve its zero set.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 1 2F ii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
For each integer , put . Every derivative is an entire function and cannot be identically zero: otherwise repeated integration would make a polynomial. By the identity theorem for holomorphic functions, its zero set has empty interior, and continuity makes a closed set. Thus is nowhere dense.
The complex plane with its usual metric is a complete metric space, so the Baire category theorem gives . The Taylor series there has coefficients
Period lattice of theta3 over theta4 2026-10-14
Use the radian spatial convention and . Their ratio is unchanged by and changes sign under . The numerator has simple zeros at , while the denominator has simple zeros at . The two sets are disjoint, so any period must lie in , by translating the zero set. The sign rule then gives the displayed exact lattice. Squaring the ratio removes that sign and has precisely the smaller lattice .
Preimage 2026-10-14
For a function and a subset , its preimage isIt is a subset of the original domain of a function. The notation does not require an inverse function: the preimage of a singleton set can have no members, one member, or many members. In the finite example, , and . The preimage of a singleton set is also its fiber of a function.
For subsets , preimages preserve both unions and intersections:For the intersection, the same input belongs precisely when its single output belongs to both and . There is no opportunity to choose different witnesses, which is what made the image counterexample fail. The identities also hold for arbitrary families of output subsets.
In the finite example, choose and . ThenThe intersection of the two preimages is exactly the same set . Complements are preserved with respect to the appropriate source and target sets:For example, the unused output three contributes no extra input: with , both sides of the complement identity are . See Lebl, Proposition 0.3.15: preimages of unions, intersections and complements.
This makes preimages useful for transporting conditions. The solution set of is , and a zero set is a preimage of zero. Requiring two output conditions takes the intersection of their preimages. In topology, a continuous function pulls every open set back to an open set; a measurable function pulls the specified measurable sets in its codomain back to measurable sets in its domain of a function. These definitions use preimages because their set operations remain consistent even when the function is noninjective.