Rotate the polar axis to . Since is a finite sphere measure, its Fourier transform is
with value at . Fourier transforming the wave equation gives with initial displacement zero and velocity . Its solution is this multiplier times , so inversion gives . Thus the Kirchhoff formula is
This extends to arbitrary smooth , without any growth restriction: for each finite spacetime neighborhood, multiply by a compactly supported smooth cutoff equal to one on every sphere occurring in that neighborhood. The formula is unchanged there, so its verified differential equation remains valid locally. Its initial values follow from and differentiation under the sphere integral. Since the neighborhood was arbitrary, it is a smooth solution everywhere for .
Choose the Fourier transform convention
It maps the Schwartz space to itself. For a tempered distribution , define the transform by bilinear distributional duality:
For an ordinary integrable function this agrees with the first formula by interchanging its integrals. The absence of complex conjugation is the distribution-pairing convention.
Use the Runge exhaustion of a slit disk, with the principal argument :
These are nested compact subsets of . Their complements are connected: the inner disk and exterior region join through the omitted sector around the negative real radius. Every compact subset of has positive distance from zero, the unit circle and the slit, so it is contained in for all sufficiently large .
Since is holomorphic on , it is holomorphic on a neighborhood of each . The polynomial Runge theorem gives with . Given any compact , eventually , so the same estimate holds on . Therefore
The nested exhaustion makes this one sequence work simultaneously on all compact subsets.
The polynomial Runge theorem states that, for a compact set with connected complement and a function holomorphic on a neighborhood of , for every there is a polynomial such that
The connected-complement hypothesis permits polynomial approximation rather than approximation by rational functions with poles in bounded complementary components.
Assume the riskless gross return , as required by the positive-wealth model, and a finite moment . Define
This maximum exists: the control interval is compact and dominated convergence gives continuity, using the integrable bound for .
The terminal value is . If , the Bellman equation and independence of the next return give
Backward induction therefore proves
Any maximizing proportion can be used each day; allowing adapted choices cannot exceed the Bellman bound. For , , exactly agreeing with part (b). If and at least one day remains, the allowed choice already gives infinite expected utility, so the value is infinite rather than a finite coefficient. This is the necessary moment qualification to the finite optimization formula.
Put and . Homogeneity of the constant relative risk aversion utility gives . Thus
As before this is an extended-valued conditional expectation if the required moment is infinite and days remain.
The product uses only past multipliers, so all are independent of it. With , independence gives
The formula is finite when ; since the variables are positive, it also has the extended value for and . At , it simply reads .
For equilibrium, let in part (e). Monotone convergence of the tail integral and the finite mean give
and consequently
This limiting argument uses the equilibrium age and residual-service distribution produced by the queue, not just a fresh independent copy of for each mosquito present. Replacing their residual service by fresh service would generally be wrong unless the service law is memoryless.
After closing, the count can only decrease. Thus is the event that at least one mosquito remains at . The zero probability of a Poisson count yields the clearance time after closing an infinite-server queue:
The clearance time has an atom at zero of mass , corresponding to an empty room when the window closes.
Only arrivals at times remain after the window closes. Such an arrival survives until exactly when its service time exceeds . The same independent Poisson thinning gives
At this agrees with part (b), while for large the parameter tends to zero.
The tail integral identity gives . Therefore the limiting and stationary occupancy distribution is
It is finite under the stated finite-mean assumption.
An arrival at time is still present at exactly when its independent service time exceeds . Thinning the marked Poisson process with this retention probability gives a Poisson count with parameter
Thus
This reasoning allows atoms in the service-time distribution; the strict survival inequality correctly treats a customer whose service has ended.
The model is a general-service infinite-server queue, usually denoted : arrivals form a Poisson process, each wandering time is a service time with distribution that of , and trapping ends service. Infinitely many servers mean that mosquitoes wander concurrently without waiting or delaying one another. General service times are not necessarily exponential, so the count alone need not be a Markov chain.
Choose a step function with , by part (i). The Fourier transform satisfies
By part (ii), . Since is arbitrary,
This proves the Riemann-Lebesgue lemma with the transform convention in the question.
For , direct integration of each interval in the Fourier transform gives
Hence , and
The finite value at zero is and does not affect this limit.
Work in the real space, consistent with the specified real step coefficients. First approximate an integrable function by a finite-valued measurable function with bounded support. Truncate its domain to and its values to ; the error tends to zero by integrability. Quantize those remaining values in intervals of mesh , producing a simple function with finite-measure Borel sets and error at most on the truncated domain. Thus can be made arbitrarily small.
For each , use the allowed approximation by a finite union of intervals , choosing the symmetric-difference errors so
These unions can be written as finite disjoint bounded intervals, and changing endpoints to the required half-open convention changes only a null set. The function is therefore a step function of the specified form, and
Combining the two approximations proves the step functions are dense in . In the complex version of , the same argument applies to real and imaginary parts when complex step coefficients are allowed.
The assertion is false without further global hypotheses. For a concrete non-spherical surface of constant Gaussian curvature one, fix and set
Here , and , so this is a connected regular embedded surface of revolution with unit-speed meridian. Its metric is , whose Gaussian curvature is . This formula also follows by multiplying its principal curvatures and .
At these principal curvatures are and . Every point of a radius-one sphere is umbilical with both principal curvature magnitudes one. The displayed surface therefore cannot lie in any such sphere, despite having everywhere.
A simple closed curve on the sphere bounds two topological disks. Equal areas give area for each, since the unit sphere has area . Apply Gauss-Bonnet theorem to either disk , with and :
A continuous geodesic curvature that were strictly positive everywhere, or strictly negative everywhere, would have a correspondingly strict sign for this integral. Therefore neither everywhere strictly positive nor everywhere strictly negative geodesic curvature is possible. Orientation reversal changes its sign but not this conclusion.
Parametrize a regular curve by arclength , write its unit tangent as , and choose an oriented surface unit normal . Its signed geodesic curvature is
It vanishes exactly when the acceleration of the unit-speed curve is normal to the surface, equivalently when the curve is a geodesic with arclength parametrization. For an arbitrary regular parametrization, this means the curve becomes a geodesic after reparametrization.
The global Gauss-Bonnet theorem for a compact oriented surface with smooth boundary, positively oriented with the surface on the left, is
For piecewise smooth boundary, add the signed exterior turning angles at its corners to the left side.
For a compact triangulated surface, the Euler characteristic is , independent of the triangulation. For a connected closed orientable surface, the genus is its number of handles, characterized by
A connected compact orientable surface with boundary components instead has . For multiple connected components the Euler characteristics add, with genus specified for each component. A compact boundaryless surface embedded in is orientable, so the usual closed-surface formula applies to each connected component.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact