Complete the square in the Fourier transform exponent:
The supplied shifted Gaussian integral therefore gives
This is the Fourier transform of a Gaussian, with angular-wavenumber convention .
Take the spatial Fourier transform of the heat equation. Two integrations by parts, with decaying fields and first derivatives at infinity, give . Thus each mode satisfies the ordinary differential equation
Inserting the transformed initial condition and integrating the time equation gives
Finally set . The inverse Fourier transform, evaluated by the same Gaussian identity, gives
Equivalently the Gaussian initial data for the heat equation evolve as
The profile broadens and its peak decreases, while its total integral remains , as required by diffusion without loss on the whole line. Direct differentiation verifies the equation and the initial limit.
The homogeneous equation is a Cauchy-Euler equation. Trying gives the repeated indicial root
Hence, for ,
Both independent solutions diverge at the origin, so no nonzero homogeneous combination satisfies the zero-origin conditions by continuous extension.
For a source point , finiteness on forces the Green function to vanish on that side. On , continuity and the unit first-derivative jump require
Using the homogeneous solutions gives the causal Green function for a repeated-root Euler operator
Indeed, the Wronskian of and is , and direct differentiation gives . Since is continuous, its second derivative produces precisely a unit Dirac delta, with no derivative of a delta. For each positive source it is identically zero near the origin, so both required origin values vanish. The differential operator itself is interpreted on ; no value of its singular coefficients at zero is needed.
Integrating against the forcing yields
The last integral equals , by integration by parts or differentiating . Consequently
Substitution gives , while . The divergent homogeneous solutions prove uniqueness in the regular class. No boundary condition at infinity was imposed or required.
For a spherically symmetric number density, the radial Laplacian is . Applying separation of variables and choosing the separation constant gives
so the ordinary differential equations are
The radial problem is an eigenvalue problem for with Dirichlet boundary conditions, hence : multiplying the radial equation by and integrating gives for a nonzero regular mode vanishing at .
To solve it explicitly, set , corresponding to the suggested power . The equation reduces to , so
Finiteness at the origin forces , and the Dirichlet boundary condition at requires for an integer . The absence of interior zeros excludes , selecting the fundamental normal mode. If denotes the initial central density, the result is
where the sine ratio is defined as at the origin. It is strictly positive in the interior for every finite time. The arbitrary positive scale cannot be fixed without additional initial data.
The spatial factor is time independent, so the density and the total neutron population have the same exponential growth rate. Thus the spherical reaction-diffusion growth threshold is
At equality the fundamental mode is stationary; below it the mode decays. For fixed , the equivalent critical-radius condition is . This is the competition between multiplication in the bulk and diffusion loss at the surface in the stated dimensionless model.
Using Cartesian coordinates, the Levi-Civita symbol and the Einstein summation convention, the constant-vector assumption gives
Recognizing the divergence and directional derivative proves
Here the contractions use the Kronecker delta.
For an oriented piecewise smooth surface with boundary , Stokes theorem states
where the orientations obey the right-hand rule and is continuously differentiable near . Apply it to . The scalar triple product gives
The last integrand is , as the component formula
shows. Since is arbitrary, the cross-product form of Stokes theorem follows:
The derivatives in the surface expression act on , not on the surface element.
For the specified square, the path is clockwise when viewed from positive , so the compatible unit normal is . On the first and fourth edges, and are parallel, giving zero cross product. On the second edge, and runs from to , so contributes . On the third edge, and runs from to , so the contribution is . Thus the line integral is .
For an independent surface integral, and for the position vector field. Its integrand is therefore . The square has unit area and downward orientation, giving
The intersection contains the identity element. If , then belongs to both and , so it belongs to their intersection. The subgroup test proves that is a subgroup of , with the inherited operation. Explicitly, closure and inverses come from this test, and associativity is inherited from .
Label the vertices of the equilateral triangle counterclockwise. For the dihedral group of order six, let be the counterclockwise rotation by , and let be reflection in the line through vertex 1 and the opposite side's midpoint. Choose
Then rotates by . The three Euclidean reflections fix vertices respectively. Products act on a vertex from right to left. The relations and give
where exponents of are reduced modulo three and those of modulo two. This constructs the entire Cayley table:
For example whereas , so the group is nonabelian.
A subgroup of order two is generated by its unique nonidentity element, which must have order two. The rotations have order three, and each reflection has order two. Thus there are exactly
None is a normal subgroup. Conjugation by sends the reflection to , cycling the three reflections. For example . Each of the other two subgroups fails the same conjugation test.
Finally, take two distinct such subgroups. For instance their union is , but lies outside it. Thus it is not closed under the inherited group operation and is not a group. The distinctness is necessary: the union of a subgroup with itself is that subgroup.
The group order of a finite group is its number of elements, . The order of a group element is the least positive integer with . Such an exists in a finite group because two powers must coincide, and cancellation then gives a positive power equal to the identity element.
For the direct product of groups, the componentwise operation is closed because each factor is closed. Associativity holds in each coordinate:
The identity element is , and the inverse element of is . Thus all group axioms hold. For finite factors, the multiplication principle gives
For , write , , , , with . Its Cayley table, with the row element multiplying the column element, is
This is the Klein four-group: every nonidentity element has order two.
In the cyclic group , the set is closed because , and both elements have inverses in the set. It is therefore a proper subgroup of order two. By Lagrange's theorem, a proper subgroup has order one or two. An order-two subgroup must be generated by an element of order two. Neither nor has order two, whereas does. Hence
The PDF's claim needs “nontrivial”: is the only nontrivial proper subgroup, but is also a proper subgroup under the usual definition.
A group isomorphism preserves element orders: if and only if , using the homomorphism property and injectivity. Since has elements of order four and the Klein four-group does not,
The Lagrangian is , and the Euler-Lagrange equations are
At a rest equilibrium , for all three coordinates. The Taylor expansion therefore starts as
The symmetric Hessian matrix is the matrix of the quadratic potential energy. If a quadratic coefficient vanishes along a direction, higher-order terms can be the first nonconstant terms there; equilibrium by itself does not imply strict stability.
Write . Terms involving the variation of are cubic in small displacements and velocities, so the quadratic small oscillation Lagrangian is
A normal mode has fixed displacement ratios, . Its angular frequency is an eigenfrequency, or normal frequency, and satisfies the generalized eigenvalue problem for small oscillations
Here is positive definite for independent physical coordinates and positive masses. A stable quadratic minimum makes ; a negative value would describe exponential instability rather than oscillation.
For the suspended bar, let and denote the actual incremental spring constants of the upper and each lower spring. The physical displacement of the bar is , while the lower spring extensions change by and . Consequently
The linear gravitational and elastic terms cancel at the loaded equilibrium. Expanding the remaining squares gives the small-oscillation mass and stiffness matrices
Thus
Source convention: the printed matrix is obtained by setting and . Although the PDF prose calls spring constants, that matrix treats them as elastic parameters whose ratios to the stated lengths are the incremental stiffnesses. If they are read literally as Hooke-law spring constants, the divisions by should instead be omitted. The numerical case has , so this discrepancy does not affect its results.
With the numerical parameters, and
Use the exchange symmetry of the lower masses to find the vertical modes of a horizontally constrained suspended bar. The antisymmetric vector obeys , giving . In the symmetric sector put and . The two independent equations are
Their determinant gives , so . Taking , the full set is
In the lowest normal mode, all three masses move in phase, with the lower masses moving about times as far as the bar. In the antisymmetric normal mode, the bar stays still and the lower masses move equally in opposite directions; their changing forces on the bar cancel. In the highest normal mode, the lower masses move together against the bar, with magnitude about of its displacement. Any small motion is a superposition of these three modes.
Figure 1.
Relative vertical displacements in the three normal modes, with the bar constrained to remain horizontal
. Details.
Let be the orthogonal matrix taking old components to new ones, so . With repeated indices summed, the tensor component transformation law is
An isotropic tensor has the same components after every proper rotation. Since , the Kronecker delta is invariant. Applying this identity to each factor shows that and every linear combination are invariant as well.
To show that an isotropic second-rank tensor must be scalar, start with any matrix , without assuming symmetry. Invariance under quarter-turns about axes 1 and 2 implies invariance under their squares, the half-turns
The first forces to vanish. The second also forces to vanish. The matrix is therefore diagonal. A quarter-turn about axis 1 interchanges its 22 and 33 entries; one about axis 2 interchanges its 11 and 33 entries. All three must agree, giving .
A rotation preserves the ball , and the volume element. Changing integration variables by that rotation shows that and are isotropic tensors. Write . Taking its tensor contraction gives
so . Every permutation of the indices of leaves its integrand unchanged. Its complete symmetry therefore makes all three isotropic coefficients equal, say :
Double contraction gives . Thus the isotropic fourth moment of a ball and its radial contraction are
Put , so that . Contract with the prescribed unit vector twice:
This has the spectrum of a scalar matrix plus a rank-one projector. In the direction , the outer product acts as the identity; on the plane perpendicular to , it acts as zero. Therefore
Any nonzero multiple of is a parallel eigenvector, and any nonzero vector in the perpendicular plane is a transverse eigenvector. The transverse eigenvalue has multiplicity two; an orthonormal basis of that plane completes a set of principal axes.
First prove the convolution theorem with the stated negative-exponential Fourier transform. Assuming absolute integrability sufficient for Fubini's theorem, change variables :
For the differential equation, integration by parts gives
The boundary terms vanish by the assumed decay of . As with the convolution step, the transforms can first be justified for integrable functions and derivatives; the resulting kernel gives the desired decaying response. Thus
The convolution theorem and Fourier inversion theorem imply .
For the inverse transform of , use
The poles are at . For , close the inverse-transform contour above; the residues of there are and . The inverse-transform factor makes the answer times their sum. For , close below, enclosing no poles. The large arcs vanish: the complete rational factor is and the exponential is bounded on the appropriate semicircle. Therefore the causal Green function of an overdamped oscillator is
It is continuous, with and , so . The response can also be written .
For the bilateral exponential forcing, split the real integral at zero:
Consequently
For negative time the lower half-plane contains only . The residue of there is . Clockwise closure makes the inverse transform times that residue. For positive time the three upper residues, at respectively, are
Multiplication of their sum by gives the bilateral exponential forcing of an overdamped oscillator:
Both expressions have . This verifies the matching that prevents an extra Dirac delta function at zero. Direct substitution gives the forcing on either side, and all terms decay at their corresponding infinities. A causal Green function does not imply zero response before when the forcing has already been acting at negative times. The assumptions avoid repeated poles; their limiting cases would contain polynomial times exponential terms.
For a positively oriented simple closed contour , with no pole on and with holomorphic inside except at finitely many poles, the residue theorem states
For a more general closed contour, each residue is multiplied by its winding number about the pole.
The powers must be defined using the same branch of the complex logarithm as the numerator. A branch suitable for both requested calculations is
The branch cut is a ray just below the positive real axis, and . Since , the displayed choice of is possible. It includes the required upper half-plane and the sector used below. The origin remains an excluded branch point.
In , all zeros of are
Each is a simple pole, since . Its residue is
The strict inequality matters if a root lies on the negative real axis, which is outside the specified region.
To evaluate the two improper integrals, write them as for the logarithmic numerator and for numerator one, and set , . Use a counterclockwise annular sector with and . It encloses precisely . The outward positive-axis segment contributes in the limit. On the inward segment , the logarithm is and , so that segment contributes .
The small arc is , and the large arc is ; both vanish. These estimates follow from the arc lengths and . The real integrals also converge absolutely at both endpoints for . The residue theorem now gives
After division by , the real and imaginary parts are
Since , . Hence the logarithmic beta integral from a sector contour yields
For the sector angle exceeds . This is why choosing the principal complex logarithm on the whole sector would be invalid; the displaced cut above handles that range as well as .

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact