Topics (384k) Articles (398k) Users (410) Discussions (242) Comments (383) Files (13k) New article
Past exam of the algebraic Geometry course of the University of Oxford 2011 2 d Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Let and let be the homogeneous coordinate ring of a nonempty projective variety. Its Hilbert function is . For all sufficiently large integers , this function agrees with a polynomial , the Hilbert polynomial.
The dimension is the largest length of a strict chain of nonempty irreducible closed subvarieties of . Equivalently . The degree of the embedded variety is the integer specified by the leading termGeometrically it is the number of intersection points with a general linear subspace of codimension , counted with intersection multiplicities. The polynomial's degree is the dimension ; the variety's degree is the leading coefficient multiplied by . Keeping those two meanings separate is important in the next computation.
Past exam of the algebraic Geometry course of the University of Oxford 2011 2 c Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Choose projective embeddings and . Define their product as the Segre image of the set of pairs , with its induced variety structure.
It is closed in the Segre variety. To see this directly, for every homogeneous impose the equations on every column, and for every homogeneous impose on every row. For a rank-one matrix , the column equations are . A nonzero therefore forces . The row equations similarly force . Thus these homogeneous equations together with the minors cut out exactly , proving it is projective.
On a chart where , the projections have formulasThese homogeneous coordinate tuples are nonzero on the chart and agree on overlaps, so both projections are morphisms.
Given morphisms and , define . Locally write their coordinates as and . Then has coordinates , which are regular with a nonzero coordinate near each point. Hence is a morphism andThe two projections determine the underlying pair uniquely, so this morphism is unique. This is the product universal property, and it makes the construction independent up to canonical isomorphism of the chosen embeddings.
Past exam of the algebraic Geometry course of the University of Oxford 2011 2 b Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
The Segre embedding isRescaling the two representatives multiplies every target coordinate by the same scalar, and at least one product is nonzero, so the map is well defined. In affine source charts its coordinate ratios are regular products, so it is a morphism.
Arrange target coordinates into a matrix . Every image matrix has rank one and satisfies all homogeneous equationsConversely, a nonzero matrix satisfying these equations has rank one. Choose and set , . The minors imply . Thereforea projective variety. The two projective factors are uniquely recoverable from a nonzero column and row. This also shows injectivity and supplies the local inverse formulas used in the next part.
Past exam of the algebraic Geometry course of the University of Oxford 2011 2 a Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
A projective variety is a Zariski-closed subset of projective space , equivalently the common zero set of homogeneous polynomials. Homogeneity makes their vanishing independent of the nonzero scalar used to represent a projective point.
A morphism is a map locally given by regular coordinate functions in affine charts. Equivalently, near each point of a projective source embedded in , a morphism to can be writtenusing homogeneous polynomials of a common degree that are not all zero on that neighbourhood. The expressions must agree on overlaps, and for a specified target variety their values must lie in it. A single global tuple is a sufficient description when available, but is not part of the general definition.
Past exam of the algebraic Geometry course of the University of Oxford 2011 1 e Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
The parametrization lands on the curve because . Its pullback has imageEvery monomial in this subalgebra has exponent for nonnegative integers . No such exponent is one, so no linear combination of these monomials is . Thus is not surjective and is not an isomorphism.
It is nevertheless bijective on points. Away from the origin, and gives and using ; the origin comes only from . The rational inverse cannot extend regularly at the origin: if with , then has a nonzero degree-one term, whereas has none.This distinguishes a set-theoretic bijection from an isomorphism of varieties in every characteristic.
Cusp parametrizations reveal which rational coordinates fail to be regular
. The left curve uses x=t cubed and y=t to the fourth; recovering t fails regularly at its origin. The right curve uses x=t cubed and y=t squared; the open subset used later omits the parameter values zero and one, marked with hollow circles. Details. Past exam of the algebraic Geometry course of the University of Oxford 2011 1 d Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Here subvariety means a closed affine subvariety. Suppose first that is onto, and write , . Put and . Choose with and let have components .
Let the components of be polynomial functions on . For each target coordinate , the element has zero pullback, hence belongs to . It vanishes on , giving . Both maps have polynomial components, so is an isomorphism onto the closed subvariety .
Conversely, if is an isomorphism onto a closed subvariety, restriction is surjective, and the pullback of that isomorphism is an isomorphism. Their composition is , provingThe word closed matters: an isomorphism onto a merely locally closed subset need not induce a surjective coordinate-ring map. For example induces .
Past exam of the algebraic Geometry course of the University of Oxford 2011 1 c Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Part (b) immediately gives . For the reverse inclusion, let . The case is immediate, so assume . Noetherianity gives finite generators .
Use the Rabinowitsch trick: in the polynomial ring with one auxiliary variable, formApply the assumed maximal-ideal description to polynomial rings, including this ring in variables. If were proper, it would lie in the maximal ideal of some point . Then and , impossible because vanishes on . Therefore is the whole ring, and there is an identitySubstitute in the localization . The last term vanishes; clearing the finitely many powers of from the remaining denominators yields for some . Thus andThis proves the strong Hilbert Nullstellensatz from the polynomial-ring weak form by converting nonvanishing into an extra equation.
Past exam of the algebraic Geometry course of the University of Oxford 2011 1 b Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
The radical of an ideal isThe ideal is radical if . Its zero set is , an affine variety by definition.
Past exam of the algebraic Geometry course of the University of Oxford 2011 1 a Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
An affine variety in is the common zero set of a collection of polynomials in , with its Zariski topology. We use the convention of this question that such a variety need not be irreducible. Its vanishing ideal and coordinate ring areThe quotient identifies polynomials that give the same function on , so its elements are exactly polynomial functions on .
For affine embeddings and , a morphism of affine varieties is a map with and image in . Pullback of polynomial functions defines the contravariant homomorphismIt is well defined because any polynomial vanishing on pulls back to zero on , and it preserves addition, multiplication, one, and the constants in .
Past exam of the algebra course of the University of Oxford 2011 6 b Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
Over , the first nonzero column of an invertible matrix has choices and the second has choices. The surjective determinant homomorphism onto has kernel . ThusIt acts on the nine one-dimensional subspaces of , namely the projective line , by fractional linear transformations. Any element acting trivially fixes , which forces it to be scalar. A scalar matrix in has ; in characteristic two this implies . Thus the action is faithful.
The action is transitive: any nonzero vector can be completed to a determinant-one basis, so any line can be reached. The stabilizer of isOn finite points this is . Squaring permutes the seven nonzero field elements, so these are exactly the affine maps . In particular translations act transitively on all eight finite points. Thus the full action is doubly transitive. The point stabilizer has order , and all point stabilizers are conjugate.
Past exam of the algebra course of the University of Oxford 2011 6 a Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
The identity column gives the group order as the sum of squared irreducible character degrees:By column orthogonality, the squared norm of a column is the corresponding centralizer order. In source order these orders and the resulting conjugacy class sizes areFor example the fourth column has squared norm , while the seventh has squared norm .
An element's order divides its centralizer order. Cauchy's theorem for finite groups provides an involution, and only has an even centralizer order. Hence that entire class consists of involutions. The last three classes consist of elements of order seven. In the possibilities are three and nine. The three real numbers are roots of , which has no rational root and is irreducible over . A real character value at an element of order three belongs to . Therefore the irrational real entries in rule out order three there. Cubing any of these order-nine elements produces an element of order three, which must belong to the sole remaining class . ThusThe three deductions below give nine Sylow subgroups for with pairwise trivial intersections. Their conjugation action is transitive. Fix one, . If , put . The product is a -subgroup, so maximality of gives . Trivial intersection then gives . Thus the orbit of under has size eight, exhausting the other eight points. The point stabilizer is therefore transitive on the remaining points: the action is doubly transitive.
For a doubly transitive action, its permutation character has the form with irreducible. Here , and the unique degree-eight row is . Therefore the numbers of fixed points are the entries ofEvery nonidentity element consequently fixes at most two points. This also shows that the action is faithful.
Past exam of the algebra course of the University of Oxford 2011 4 b Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
The quaternion group of order eight has a unique involution, which generates its center of a group. A nontrivial intersection is a nontrivial finite -group, so by Cauchy's theorem for finite groups it contains an involution. This must be both the unique involution of and the unique involution of . Thus .
It follows that . But is a normal Sylow subgroup of its normalizer, so it is that normalizer's unique Sylow subgroup. Hence . Distinct Sylow subgroups therefore intersect trivially. From the preceding result,Of , only is congruent to modulo . Therefore , so is normal in .
Past exam of the algebra course of the University of Oxford 2011 4 a Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
If with , a Sylow subgroup for has order . Let be two such subgroups. The action of by left translation on has orbits of powers of , while is prime to . There is a fixed coset , giving ; equality follows from their orders. Thus all Sylow -subgroups are conjugate.
Let now act by conjugation on their set. If it fixes , then , so is a subgroup of -power order and must equal ; hence . The unique fixed point is itself and all other orbits have size divisible by . Consequently .
For the strengthened conclusion, the stabilizer of is . The product is a subgroup of -power order, so . If distinct Sylow subgroups meet trivially, then . Every other orbit therefore has the full size , givingConjugacy also gives , a divisor of .
Past exam of the algebra course of the University of Oxford 2011 3 d Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
A two-dimensional indecomposable module over is exactly for some . Write its operator as with and . On restriction of scalars,For this is the zero operator on a two-dimensional space, which splits as two one-dimensional submodules. For , its nilpotent part is nonzero of square zero, so it is one Jordan block and is indecomposable. Therefore the full list isDifferent give nonisomorphic -modules; the restricted -modules for and are isomorphic.
Past exam of the algebra course of the University of Oxford 2011 3 b Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-31
The universal property of the polynomial ring gives the unique complex algebra homomorphismDistinct monomials are linearly independent, so is injective. Restriction of scalars defines for and ; its module axioms follow from those of the original action and the algebra homomorphism. In particular acts as the square of the operator defining the action.
Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project
Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
Intro to OurBigBook
. Source. We have two killer features:
- topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculusArticles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
- a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
- a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.Figure 1. Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page. View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivativeVideo 2. OurBigBook Web topics demo. Source. - local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
- to OurBigBook.com to get awesome multi-user features like topics and likes
- as HTML files to a static website, which you can host yourself for free on many external providers like GitHub Pages, and remain in full control
Figure 2. You can publish local OurBigBook lightweight markup files to either OurBigBook.com or as a static website.Figure 3. Visual Studio Code extension installation.Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally. Video 3. Edit locally and publish demo. Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension. - Infinitely deep tables of contents:
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact






