Define and . A group is a soluble group if this derived series reaches the identity after finitely many steps. Its derived length is the least with .
Let . This Klein four-group is a normal subgroup and Abelian; has order three, so . The group is nonabelian, so its derived subgroup is nontrivial. Conjugation by a three-cycle permutes the three nonidentity elements of transitively. Since the derived subgroup is a normal subgroup, containing any one forces it to contain all three. Thus , and . Therefore has derived length two.
If , every commutator in is one in , and induction gives for all . Thus a subgroup of a solvable group is solvable, with no larger derived length.
The sign map gives . The commutator is a three-cycle. Normality of supplies every conjugate three-cycle, and three-cycles generate . Hence , so the complete derived series is
Every inclusion is strict, proving solvability and derived length three.
Write with . For each divisor the subgroup has order . Conversely, if has order , Lagrange gives , and every satisfies , so . Therefore and . Equality follows from the common order. Thus there is exactly one subgroup for each divisor of .
For the Abelian assertion, take a surjection and let be the inverse image of . Every subgroup of has at most generators, by induction: its projection onto the first coordinate is either zero, reducing to , or for some . In the latter case choose one element with first coordinate ; subtracting its multiples reduces every element to the kernel, generated by at most elements by induction. The base case is the elementary description of subgroups of by their least positive element. Images of these generators generate , proving the claim.
In , the commuting disjoint transpositions generate . This is a three-dimensional vector space over , so it requires three generators and cannot be generated by two.
For each , take , generated by and the cycle . Its subgroup generated by
is . It requires generators by the same dimension argument, giving a two-generated group with a subgroup requiring more than generators.
A simple module is a nonzero module with no proper nonzero submodule. For a finite-dimensional simple complex module , any endomorphism has a complex eigenvalue . The nonzero kernel of is an -submodule, hence all of . Thus , proving Schur's lemma.
More generally a nonzero map between two simple modules is an isomorphism, because its kernel is zero and its image is the whole target. The endomorphism algebra of is the block algebra with entries . For nonisomorphic summands its off-diagonal entries vanish and its diagonal entries are scalars, giving . For isomorphic summands, choose one fixed isomorphism to identify them; every block is scalar and block composition is matrix multiplication, giving .
A finite-dimensional algebra is a semisimple algebra when its left regular module is a direct sum of simple modules. The complex Artin–Wedderburn theorem gives , with the multiset of positive integers uniquely determined. Its dimension is . For dimension eight only sizes one and two can occur; the number of size-two blocks is zero, one, or two. Thus there are exactly three isomorphism types:
They are distinct by the uniqueness clause, or by their numbers of one-dimensional simple modules. If is nonabelian, is noncommutative because its group elements form a basis, so the first type is excluded. The augmentation provides a one-dimensional simple module, excluding the third type. Consequently
There is one simple module for each matrix block, of dimension the block size, so exactly four are one-dimensional. Every nonabelian group of order eight therefore has this same complex group algebra.
A composition series is a chain of submodules with every factor simple; its length is . Suppose is one of length two, and put .
For any nonzero proper submodule , either or , by simplicity of . In the first case, simplicity of forces . In the second, the quotient map embeds nontrivially into , so and its image is all of . Hence , and . Thus every nonzero proper submodule is simple and has simple quotient; every composition series has length two.
The Jordan–Hölder theorem states that any two composition series of a finite-length module have equal length and the same multiset of simple factors, up to isomorphism and order. The preceding argument proves this for length two: either , giving factors , or , giving factors .
The map , , is a surjective module homomorphism with kernel . The first isomorphism theorem for modules gives as left modules; need only be a left ideal. Every simple module is cyclic, since any nonzero generates a nonzero submodule. As a quotient of the finite-dimensional regular module , it is finite-dimensional. Extend to a composition series of ; its simple quotient is one of the factors. Jordan-Hölder shows that its isomorphism type belongs to the fixed finite list of factors of any one composition series of . Hence there are finitely many simple-module isomorphism types.
For the final assertion let be the image of . Its kernel is . We prove by induction on . It is true for . Projection onto the first factors is onto by induction. Its kernel on is a submodule of , so is zero or . If zero, . But its projection onto is onto, making a composition factor of that product, contrary to Jordan-Hölder and the pairwise distinct types. Thus the kernel is all of . Surjectivity on the first factors together with this kernel proves is the entire product. The first isomorphism theorem now gives
as left -modules, without asserting that the left ideals are two-sided.
The degree-sum formula for irreducible characters gives
The number of linear characters is the order of the abelianization, so and . The intersection of the kernels of all linear characters is . Consequently are nonidentity elements of this order-seven subgroup and have order seven. The images of under a displayed linear character have order three, so their orders are divisible by three. Lagrange's theorem leaves three or twenty-one; an element of order twenty-one would make cyclic, contradicting its degree-three irreducible characters. Therefore
The center is trivial. A nontrivial proper center would have order three or seven, giving a cyclic quotient and hence an abelian group, again a contradiction. Thus a centralizer of a nonidentity element is proper. It has order three for an order-three element, and seven for an order-seven element. The class sizes are therefore .
Column orthogonality says . For , the three linear characters already contribute three, so the remaining two entries must both vanish. Orthogonality with the identity column says for . At this gives , so , using . Similarly . Thus the completed table is
Here , and . These relations, together with , verify all weighted row orthogonality relations and the centralizer column norms.
An extension of by is a short exact sequence . It splits if the quotient map has a homomorphic section. Equivalently the embedded has a subgroup complement isomorphic to , and is the corresponding semidirect product.
For and , both and lie outside , so . It follows that , and gives the claimed conjugation identity. Conjugation is an automorphism of , so inversion is an automorphism there. Comparing the image of with the product of the images gives . Therefore is abelian.
Conversely inversion is an automorphism of any abelian group , of order dividing two. Form the semidirect product with multiplication
For completeness associativity follows because is an automorphism and these automorphisms compose according to addition modulo two; is the identity and inverses follow from this formula. The subgroup is normal with quotient , and every outside element satisfies . Thus the generalized dihedral group supplies the required extension, including when is infinite or has elements of order two.
A composition series is a chain with simple nontrivial factors. Every finite group has one, by recursively choosing a maximal proper normal subgroup. The Jordan–Hölder theorem states that any two such series have the same length and the same multiset of simple factors up to isomorphism.
For a proof induct on . Let be the penultimate terms in two series. If , apply induction there. Otherwise their maximal normality gives . Set . The second isomorphism theorem gives
so these quotients are simple. Choose a composition series of and extend it once to and once to . Induction in the smaller groups compares these with the respective original prefixes. Appending or gives in both cases the factors of together with . This completes the proof, including the case .
Exactly one: take . Its only nontrivial proper normal subgroup is . Indeed a normal has either or by the supplied simplicity. In the first case injects into , so a nontrivial would be a normal subgroup of order two and hence central. But has trivial center: conjugating every transposition trivially forces preservation of each unordered pair, and therefore of every point. Thus the unique series is .
Exactly two: take . A normal subgroup containing is that subgroup or the whole product. For a normal subgroup meeting trivially, commutators of its elements with vanish; its first coordinates therefore lie in . Hence . The two nontrivial proper normal subgroups are exactly the two factors, each simple, so the two series pass respectively through and .
More than two: take . A cyclic group has exactly one subgroup of each divisor order, and composition steps have prime indices. The orders of those indices are the distinct permutations of , giving
All three example groups have order .
For with , Sylow's theorem gives subgroups of order , says that every -subgroup lies in a conjugate of one of them, and that all such Sylow subgroups are conjugate. Their number divides and satisfies . A group is soluble when its derived series, obtained by repeatedly taking the commutator subgroup, reaches the identity. Equivalently it has a subnormal series with abelian factors.
For a group of order , the class equation shows its center is nontrivial: noncentral conjugacy classes have sizes divisible by . If the center had order , the quotient by the center would be cyclic; a group with cyclic central quotient is abelian, since representatives are powers of one element times central elements. This would make the center the whole group. Thus every group of order is abelian.
Now consider with . Cases with a normal Sylow subgroup are soluble: that subgroup has prime or prime-square order and is abelian, and its quotient also has such order and is abelian. This gives a subnormal series with abelian factors.
If , the Sylow number divides and is modulo , so is one. If and , divides , so again is one. For and , a nontrivial can only be , since . The congruence would force , hence . Since , this means , and primality forces .
In the remaining order-twelve case, either a Sylow subgroup is already normal, or there are four Sylow subgroups of order three. Those have pairwise trivial intersection and contribute eight distinct elements of order three. Only four elements remain, including the identity. Every Sylow subgroup of order four lies entirely among those four elements, so it is unique and normal. It and its quotient are abelian. Therefore all groups of the required orders are soluble, by elementary Sylow arguments alone.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact