For , first select an ordered list of distinct entries. There are lists. Pair consecutive entries to obtain
Each product of disjoint transpositions is counted times: each pair has two orientations, and the pairs can be ordered in ways. There is no other duplication, by uniqueness of the disjoint cycle decomposition. Therefore
If , there are no such permutations. For , .
Let the lengths in the disjoint cycle decomposition of be , with fixed points contributing length one. Disjoint cycles commute, and if and only if every cycle raised to is the identity, equivalently divides for every . Hence the order of a group element is
In particular, the identity has order one.
Conjugating a cycle simply relabels its entries. With permutations composed from right to left,
This follows by applying each side to and to points outside the displayed cycle. Consequently conjugation preserves the lengths in the disjoint cycle decomposition, including fixed points, and therefore preserves cycle type.
Conversely, suppose two permutations have the same cycle type. Pair their cycles of equal length, including their one-cycles. Define a bijection by mapping the entries of each cycle of the first permutation, in their cyclic order, to the entries of the paired cycle of the second. Because the cycles partition , these assignments combine into a permutation. The displayed identity then conjugates the first permutation to the second. Thus they are conjugate group elements exactly when their cycle types agree.
Put . Repeated application of part (iv), or mathematical induction on , gives
Part (ii) therefore implies that is an infinite set. If is nonempty, choose . We claim its left coset is wholly outside . If for some , then and closure under products and inverses would give , a contradiction.
Thus . Part (i) makes infinite, so the complement is infinite. If there is no such , the complement is empty. This proves the complement of a finite union of finite-index subgroups property:
Define a map between sets of left cosets by
It is well defined: replacing by for changes neither component. It is injective because
The Cartesian product on the right has at most elements. Therefore
This proves the basic bound for a finite intersection of finite-index subgroups.
Every left coset with is also a left coset of in . Moreover equality of two such cosets means the same thing in and in :
Thus the map from the set of left cosets of in to the set of left cosets of in , taking to itself, is injective. Consequently the index of a subgroup satisfies
These are sets of cosets; no normal subgroup assumption is needed.
Suppose were finite, say . There are at most left cosets, each with elements by part (i), and they partition . Hence would be a finite set with at most elements. This contradicts the assumption that is an infinite group. Therefore .
For every , left multiplication gives a bijection
whose inverse is . Hence every left coset has the same cardinality as . If is an infinite set, every left coset is infinite; if is a finite set, every left coset is finite. These are the only possibilities.
Neither nor is divisible by a prime number, so both lie outside . On the other hand, . If an integer has , part (a)(i) supplies a prime number dividing the positive integer ; the same divides , so . These cases exhaust , proving
The set is nonempty because . By the well-ordering principle for the natural numbers, it has a least element . In particular and divides .
If were not a prime number, it would have a positive integer divisor with . Since divides and divides , divisibility is transitive and divides . This would put in , contradicting the minimality of . Hence .
Yes: use the non-abelian group from part (a). Every element is for a strictly upper triangular matrix with . In the finite field , the binomial theorem for commuting matrices gives
Thus . This constant identity-valued map is a group homomorphism, since . Part (a)(iv) already proves that is not an abelian group. Here is neither injective nor surjective, consistently with the preceding part.
If is a surjective group homomorphism, then , which is an abelian group by the preceding part.
If is an injective group homomorphism, then for all ,
because lie in the abelian group . Injectivity gives . Hence .
Assume is a group homomorphism. For any , expanding and cancelling the initial and final gives the useful identity
We also need a consequence of compatibility with conjugation. Calculate the cube of in two ways:
Cancelling shows . Thus the square of every element of commutes with every element of the image of a group homomorphism .
Now take any . In particular . Applying (1) to and then using this commutation gives
This proves the abelian image of a cubing homomorphism property. Since the image of a group homomorphism is a subgroup, .
Use the symmetric group , composing permutations from right to left. Set and . Each is a transposition, so and , whereas has order of a group element three. Consequently
Thus the cubing map on is not a group homomorphism.
If is an abelian group, its elements commute, so for all ,
Thus . Also , as required.
Take and . Their matrix products are
They differ in the entry because whereas . Therefore , and .
The identity is the identity matrix
Left or right matrix multiplication by it preserves every entry, as is also immediate from the product formula above.
Parametrize the matrices by
Direct matrix multiplication gives
This proves closure. The identity matrix is , and the formula
gives both a left and a right inverse, as substitution in the product formula verifies. Thus each element is an invertible matrix, and the subgroup test shows that is a subgroup of . It is the unitriangular group and has elements.
In the finite field , perform ordinary addition and multiplication and then take the remainder modulo . The tables are
The nonzero elements have multiplicative inverses and .
Yes. Consider the following matrices:
Each has only row nonzero and has th diagonal entry , so part (c)(ii) proves that it is a diagonalisable matrix. The collection is a spanning set, because it contains every and
Thus it spans the matrix unit basis. A spanning set of vectors in an -dimensional vector space is a basis. Alternatively, in a vanishing linear combination of , each off-diagonal entry first forces its own coefficient to be zero, and then each diagonal entry forces the remaining coefficient to be zero.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact