A stationary distribution is a nonnegative row vector with and . The balance equations give
The first yields . Substitution into the middle pair yields and ; the fourth equation is then satisfied. Normalization gives , hence
All states communicate, so this is the unique stationary distribution. The self-loop at state 1 additionally makes this finite Markov chain aperiodic, although aperiodicity is not required for the balance calculation.
Two states lie in the same communicating class when each is reachable from the other by transitions of positive probability. Inspecting the directed transitions gives three classes:
State 1 has no incoming transition from another state and can leave, so its singleton class is open and transient. More explicitly, the probability of returning to 1 after time zero is only , since a departure can never be reversed.
States communicate: and are positive-probability paths. The class is open because, for example, and leave it; no transition from the class returns to it. Every state of is transient. One can see eventual exit directly: from each of its four states there is a positive-probability path of at most three steps to 8; the minimum of these four path probabilities is positive, so survival through repeated three-step blocks has a geometrically decreasing upper bound.
Finally shows that communicates, and every outgoing transition stays inside it. It is a closed finite irreducible class, so all its states are positive recurrent. Therefore the first two classes are open and transient; the last is closed and recurrent.
The stream function gives and . Its scalar vorticity is
For this does not vanish on any nonempty open region of the plane. A holomorphic complex potential of a two-dimensional potential flow would produce an irrotational flow there. Equivalently, its imaginary part would be a harmonic function, whereas . Thus no complex potential exists on any nonempty open region for this flow; vanishing vorticity only along the vertical line does not provide a two-dimensional domain.
The complex potential of a two-dimensional potential flow is , so
For , a nonzero level is
Thus the streamlines are circles tangent to the horizontal axis at the excluded singular origin, with centers on the vertical axis. Each circle has the origin removed. The zero level is the horizontal axis without the origin, whose positive and negative rays are separate streamlines. Since is nonzero away from the origin, no other stagnation points intervene. For the flow vanishes everywhere off the origin, so the circle description is replaced by the degenerate zero-velocity field.
Figure 1.
Streamlines of a planar doublet
. Circles tangent at the excluded origin and the two zero-level horizontal rays; the drawing uses positive doublet strength. Details.
For a twice continuously differentiable stream function, equality of mixed derivatives gives
This is the incompressible flow condition in two dimensions. A streamline is a curve whose tangent at each regular point is parallel to the instantaneous velocity field. Parameterize it by . The chain rule yields
Therefore the stream function is constant on each streamline. This proof includes arbitrary regular parametrizations; at a stagnation point the velocity vanishes and the usual tangent direction is not determined.
The constraint set is compact, so the continuous objective attains a maximum and minimum. The two constraint gradients are nonzero and supported on separate coordinates, so they are linearly independent everywhere on it. The Lagrange multiplier equations are
Both positive and negative values occur. At a maximizing or minimizing point the objective is therefore nonzero, so , , and both are nonzero. The equations imply , , and . The constraints then give , .
Consequently, writing , the complete list of extrema is
For an independent global check, Cauchy-Schwarz inequality gives , with equality exactly at the displayed points.
The rows of the Jacobian matrix are . Rank means precisely that these gradients are linearly independent. The Lagrange multiplier condition is that real numbers exist with
Geometrically, is perpendicular to the tangent space of the constraint level set, whose tangent vectors form . The full-rank hypothesis ensures this level set is a smooth local constraint manifold.
False. In , take
Then and are connected. Nevertheless is disconnected: and are disjoint nonempty relatively open sets partitioning . For instance, intersecting with and produces this separation. The endpoint missing from is supplied by , so the union becomes connected without forcing itself to be connected.
False. Take and . Both complements are disconnected: their negative and positive halves form a separation. But
is path-connected, hence connected. To see path connectedness directly, move any nonzero point radially to its normalization on the unit circle; join the two normalized points by a circular arc; then reverse the radial path for the second point. Every segment of this path avoids the origin. Thus disconnected coordinate complements do not force a disconnected complement of their product.
True. Suppose were a separation into nonempty relatively open sets. Intersecting with gives a separation unless all of the connected set lies on one side; similarly all of lies on one side. A point of forces both to lie on the same side. The other side would then be empty, a contradiction. Hence is connected.
A sequence converges to when
The phrase convergent sequence requires the limit to belong to the stated metric space; convergence in a larger ambient space alone does not suffice.
In a metric space, a Cauchy sequence has arbitrarily small distances between all sufficiently late terms:
This condition compares terms to each other and does not assume that a limit exists in the space.
A real measurable function is Lebesgue integrable precisely when the integral of its absolute value is finite. For every integer , on one has and . Consequently
The intervals have disjoint interiors. Countable additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral, or the monotone convergence theorem applied to their finite unions, gives
The harmonic series diverges, so the function is not Lebesgue integrable. Cancellation between adjacent oscillations cannot give absolute integrability.
The Gaussian function is continuous and hence Lebesgue measurable. For , , and therefore
The right side has finite Lebesgue integral: its first term has integral 4 and the second is Lebesgue integrable by hypothesis. The comparison principle for the Lebesgue integral says that a measurable nonnegative function dominated by an integrable function has finite integral. Consequently the Gaussian function is Lebesgue integrable.
Since is an -vector subspace of the finite-dimensional vector space , it has a finite -basis . Any finite -spanning set for also spans over , so choose a finite -basis of .
Every can be expanded first in the and then in the , showing that the products span over . If with , independence of the over gives for every ; independence of the then gives every . The products form an -basis, proving the tower law for field extensions:
A field extension is finite when , regarded as a vector space over , has finite dimension. Its degree of a field extension is
Thus a finite basis means that every is uniquely expressible as with coefficients .
There are six statistical degrees of freedom, so the supplied 1% critical value is . Since , reject independence at the 1% significance level. The data give strong evidence of an association between the two consumption classifications in this group of participants.
Pearson's statistic is
For independent observations under the independence null hypothesis, its large-sample null distribution is approximately with statistical degrees of freedom. The fitted row and column probabilities account for the reduction in statistical degrees of freedom. All expected counts exceed five, so the usual approximation has adequate expected cell sizes here. Reject independence when the statistic exceeds the corresponding upper-tail critical value.
Under independence, the cell probability is the product of its row and column probabilities. Estimate these by the sample proportions. If are row and column totals and is the grand total, the fitted expected count is
Here the row totals are , the column totals , and . For example , rounding to 82.73 as printed. The other entries follow identically.
Applying the chain rule to both inverse identities gives
For the unnumbered calculation, the requested point is . The Jacobian there is
To apply its inverse to , solve , . Subtraction gives , and hence
For precision, the displayed example maps bijectively onto , rather than the entire positive quadrant. Indeed writing , the equations are with . This left side decreases continuously from to zero, giving exactly one if and only if , after which is unique. Its Jacobian never vanishes, so the inverse is differentiable on . The requested point lies in , making the calculation well-defined.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact