Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 1 32C a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
In canonical coordinates, Hamilton's equations areA function is an integral of motion if it is constant along every Hamiltonian flow, equivalentlyfor a time-independent . The system is an integrable Hamiltonian system when it has first integrals whose differentials are linearly independent almost everywhere and which are in mutual Poisson involution: for all .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 1 31E v Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 1 31E iv Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
For , eliminating time gives the separable differential equationand henceDefine the possible limit at for a trajectory starting off the boundary lines byThe set is empty because , so there is no finite accumulation point. Since on and outside , the complete classification off the boundary lines isFor the solution has forward finite-time blow-up, and for it has backward finite-time blow-up, explaining the other empty entries under the usual infinite-time definitions.
It remains to treat . Here and . If , both limit sets equal . If , thenThis includes all boundary cases in both and the initial point.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 1 31E iii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Away from , the sign of is fixed within each of the three invariant strips, so is strictly monotone. On , the equation is , whose nonconstant solutions are exponential and hence not periodic. Therefore the monotone coordinate excludes periodic orbits, and there are
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 1 31E ii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
At an equilibrium point, and . If , the only equilibria areTheir Jacobian matrix isAt its eigenvalues are , and at they are . Hence for , is an unstable node and is a stable node; for , both points are saddles.
If , every point on each line and is an equilibrium. The line is transversely repelling because the nonzero eigenvalue is , while is transversely attracting because the nonzero eigenvalue is ; the tangential eigenvalue is zero on both nonisolated equilibrium lines.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 1 31E i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
The vector field is unchanged by reflection in the -axis, ; more generally, linearity of the second equation gives the scaling symmetry . It is also reversible under reflection in the -axis:When , is constant, so arbitrary translations are additional symmetries.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 1 30K c iii Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 1 30K c ii Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 1 30K c i Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 1 30K b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
The process is adapted to its natural filtration. At each fixed time it has finite support and is therefore integrable. Conditional on ,Conditional on ,The Markov property now givesso is a martingale.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 1 30K a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 1 29J e Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Using the estimator from part (b) and the spectral decomposition of ,ThusUnder the stated separation of scales, the shrinkage factor is approximately one for and approximately zero for . The principal-component shrinkage by ridge regression formula therefore reduces approximately tothe orthogonal projection of onto the span of the normalized sample principal components with greatest variance.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 1 29J d Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Since and ,ThereforePut . By part (c), the are normalized sample principal components forming an orthonormal set, andThis is the orthogonal projection onto a finite-dimensional subspace spanned by the , so is the unique closest point in that subspace to .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 1 29J c Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Because every column of has sample mean zero, every column of also has sample mean zero. The spectral theorem for real symmetric matrices givesHence for the sample covariance is , while the sample variance of isThus the are pairwise uncorrelated sample principal components, ordered by decreasing sample variance.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 1 29J b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Differentiating the ridge regression objective givesFor every nonzero ,so is positive definite and hence invertible. The strictly convex objective therefore has the unique closed-form ridge regression estimator
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 1 29J a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
The Gaussian likelihood is proportional toso maximum likelihood estimation is equivalent to ordinary least squares. If and has rank , then is invertible and the normal equations giveIf , then and . A least-squares minimizer always exists, but it is not unique: by rank-deficient ordinary least squares, the complete set isan affine subspace of dimension . Thus there are uncountably infinitely many likelihood maximizers. In the generic full-row-rank case their dimension is .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 1 28K d Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Let be an invariant distribution for the continuous-time Markov chain. Using , its stationarity equation becomesThus the measure with weights is invariant for the irreducible positive-recurrent jump chain. Its invariant distribution is unique, so . Normalization gives the invariant-measure transfer between a jump chain and a CTMC formulaThe denominator is finite and nonzero because . Thus is a probability distribution and is positive recurrent.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 1 28K c ii Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 1 28K c i Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 1 28K b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
A continuous-time Markov chain is irreducible if every state can reach every other state with positive probability. A state is recurrent if, after leaving , the chain returns to with probability one; an irreducible chain is recurrent if one, and hence every, state is recurrent. A recurrent state is positive recurrent if its expected continuous first return time is finite, and an irreducible chain is positive recurrent when all its states are.
There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.