Since , shifting an index yields the summation by parts identity
The sum on the last line is empty when , so the identity also covers that case.
The series with a bounded monotone multiplier converges. Here is a proof that also permits conditional convergence. Choose with . The Cauchy sequence criterion for the convergent series ensures that, for any and sufficiently large , all the partial tails satisfy . Apply summation by parts to these partial tails:
Since the multiplier is a monotone sequence, . Consequently
Taking proves that the weighted partial sums form a Cauchy sequence, and hence converge. This is a special case of bounded-variation multipliers of a convergent series.
The series also converges. The multiplier need only be monotone eventually, since a finite initial segment cannot affect convergence. For ,
Thus decreases for ; it is bounded and tends to , because . Apply the proved multiplier result to the tail beginning at . The fact that the first few values are not monotone causes no difficulty.
A complex power series with radius of convergence converges absolutely at every with and diverges at every with . This makes no general assertion at : boundary points must be examined separately. The series always converges at . If , no nonzero point lies in the convergence disk; if , the series converges absolutely throughout the complex plane.
If is the zero polynomial, every coefficient vanishes, so . Otherwise let be its degree and its leading coefficient. Since ,
The ratio test therefore proves absolute convergence when . For , the terms do not tend to zero, so the series diverges. Thus the polynomial-coefficient power series has for every nonzero polynomial. In fact, it also diverges at every , because does not tend to zero, whether or .
Denote the four displayed matrices, from left to right, by . An orthogonal matrix has an orthonormal set of columns, equivalently . Direct column dot products give for . The first column of has squared Euclidean norm , so the third matrix is the unique nonorthogonal matrix.
For , the determinant is . A nonidentity orthogonal transformation of with determinant is a rotation: it has a fixed axis and restricts to a plane rotation on its orthogonal complement. Consequently is the rotation.
For , calculation gives
A plane reflection fixes its entire plane, and therefore has eigenvalue . Since is invertible, is not a plane reflection. Thus is the combination of a rotation and a reflection. More explicitly, is an eigenvector with eigenvalue . On the perpendicular plane, is a rotation with , because . This gives a three-dimensional improper orthogonal transformation.
For , set . Then
This reflection matrix reverses the normal and fixes every vector perpendicular to . Therefore is reflection in the plane . In particular, and . Finally represents none of the three listed orthogonal transformations, since each preserves the Euclidean norm.

There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.