The order of a group element is the least positive integer with , or infinity if none exists. In a finite group, some two powers among coincide; cancellation then gives a positive power equal to , so exists. The generated cyclic group consists of the distinct elements and has size .
We now prove the needed divisibility directly by cosets. Multiplication by bijects with the left coset , so every left coset has elements. If and intersect, write with . Then , which implies . Thus distinct left cosets are disjoint, and every element of belongs to its own left coset. The finite set is partitioned into, say, such cosets. Hence and
This supplies the counting argument underlying Lagrange's theorem, rather than appealing to it or to an unproved orbit formula.
A divisor of need not occur as an element order. Use , of order eight, and . Every element has square equal to the identity, so there is no element of order four. Thus the proposed converse is false, even for an abelian group.
For the direct product of groups , let generate the factors. The least for which is the least common multiple of . If are coprime, this is , the size of the whole product, so generates every element. Conversely, for any pair its order is and divides . If , that bound is , so no element can generate the product. Therefore
This is the cyclicity of a product of two finite cyclic groups; the general pair-order criterion is the order of a direct-product element.
Use suffix notation, with repeated indices summed from one to three. The cross product, divergence, and curl have components , , and . Here is the Levi-Civita symbol.
The product rule gives
Using the cyclic identity in the first term and in the second identifies these terms as and . Therefore
For the second identity, contract two Levi-Civita symbols, using :
The four component expressions translate into
Both derivations require only continuously differentiable vector fields; no additional divergence-free assumptions are used.
A group isomorphism is a bijection satisfying for all . It sends the identity to the identity and satisfies . Applying its inverse shows that it preserves the order of a group element exactly.
The cyclic group has an element of order eight. Every element of the direct product of groups has fourth power equal to the identity, and a generator of the first factor paired with the identity of the second has order four. Every nonidentity element of has order two. Thus their maximum element orders are respectively , which an isomorphism would preserve. The three groups are pairwise nonisomorphic.
For a fourth example take the dihedral group of symmetries of a square. It consists of four rotations and four reflections, so has order eight. With a quarter-turn and a reflection, , showing . This group is nonabelian, whereas all three displayed direct products of groups are abelian groups. Since a group isomorphism preserves commutativity, the square's dihedral group is isomorphic to none of them. Its order is eight regardless of whether a notation convention calls it or .
Let be a permutation of the finite set. Starting from , repeatedly apply . Some iterate repeats; because is invertible, the first repeat closes the sequence at . More explicitly, if with , applying gives . If is the least positive return time, the elements are distinct and form one permutation cycle. If the set is not exhausted, start again at an unused element. Two such sets cannot overlap: an overlap lets an inverse iterate express either starting point as an iterate of the other, making the sets identical. Thus this process partitions the set into disjoint permutation cycles. On each part its cycle acts exactly as and the other cycles fix the elements. Their product therefore equals . This proves existence of the cycle decomposition of a permutation, including one-cycles for fixed points.
Use the composition convention that the rightmost permutation acts first. For the specified product, the images are
Hence
The order of a group element here is the least positive exponent making every cycle return to the identity. It must be divisible by each cycle length, and any common multiple does make every cycle return. The least common multiple of is six.
For a Cartesian second-rank tensor, write
The first term is a symmetric second-rank tensor and the second is an antisymmetric second-rank tensor. Taking the trace of the symmetric term and subtracting it gives the scalar, symmetric-traceless and axial tensor decomposition:
Here and . To check reconstruction of the antisymmetric part, contract the Levi-Civita symbols:
Thus , and the displayed contractions also prove uniqueness. The vector associated with the antisymmetric part is an axial vector under reflections, and an ordinary vector under proper rotations.
For the specified isotropic tensor law, contract the Kronecker deltas first:
Write , where and is symmetric and traceless. Transposition preserves its scalar and symmetric-traceless parts and reverses its antisymmetric part. Therefore
Uniqueness of the decomposition gives the isotropic elasticity on tensor components relations. Provided their respective coefficients are nonzero, the requested inverses are
If one coefficient vanishes, that strain component has zero stress response: the corresponding stress component must be zero for a solution to exist, and that strain component is not uniquely recoverable. Isotropy by itself does not guarantee invertibility.
If is symmetric then , hence and the stress is symmetric. Equivalently, direct transposition gives . Restricting to this symmetric-strain case gives
This final two-parameter expression uses the symmetry assumption from the preceding request. For a general nonsymmetric array, the transpose term cannot be absorbed into the same coefficient: it acts with on the symmetric-traceless part and with on the antisymmetric part. The stated coefficient is the coefficient of itself; if one instead writes the conventional elastic law with multiplying the strain, that shear-modulus convention is half this coefficient.
The divergence of a cross product identity and the stated static field equations give
For an outward-oriented closed surface, the divergence theorem therefore gives the flux of the specified Poynting vector normalization:
No open-surface conclusion follows from this equation without including its closing pieces.
For the particular fields, direct calculation gives
The fields also have , , and , consistently with the required equations. Close the outward spherical patch by the two planar half-disks on and , forming the quarter unit ball . Its total closed flux is
where in this integral is cylindrical radius. The face has outward normal and zero flux because there. The face has outward normal , so its flux is
Subtracting these planar contributions from the closed flux gives the requested open-patch answer
As a direct check, on the unit sphere the outward normal is and . With spherical angles , , its surface integral is . The curved patch's vanishing flux is a cancellation, not an inference that its flux density vanishes everywhere.
For a nonnegative integer-valued random variable, its expected value is , allowing the value . Since , rearranging nonnegative summands gives the tail-sum formula for expectation:
No integrability assumption is needed for the rearrangement. The same formula holds for an extended nonnegative integer-valued variable by the monotone convergence theorem, using .
For the first ascent in independent continuous observations, continuity makes ties probability zero. By order symmetry of independent random variables, the first observations have each of their strict orderings with equal probability. For , means exactly that the first observations are decreasing, so
Subtracting consecutive tails gives
with probability zero for . The events decrease to ; continuity of probability under decreasing intersections gives . Finally,
The first observation cannot itself end the run; this is why the tail includes the separate term .
Write . The chain rule gives and . Consequently the coefficients of and cancel, while that of is . The transformed partial differential equation is . Integrating once in each variable gives the most general twice differentiable solution,
where are arbitrary twice differentiable functions. The change of variables is invertible because its Jacobian determinant is .
On , the value condition gives . Differentiating it yields . The derivative condition gives . Subtraction therefore gives and . The constants in and cancel in their sum, leaving
Indeed , , , so the original operator gives , and the two initial-line conditions hold.

There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.