Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ib Paper 1 19C Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Put and . The Markov property and first-step conditioning give . Consider a finite history ending at state and having positive conditional probability given . The chance of eventual absorption at zero after that history is : the future depends only on the present state, and if zero has already been reached, absorption keeps the chain there. If the next state is , this chance is . Bayes' rule therefore givesThis depends on the history only through , proving the conditional Markov property. The conditional transition matrix isIts row sums are one by harmonicity of , and . State is never visited under the conditioning and is naturally removed; any row assigned there on an enlarged formal state space is immaterial, since conditioning starting at is undefined. State zero stays absorbing. For a random initial law , its conditional law is . This is the Doob h-transform with the absorption probability as harmonic function.
For the simple symmetric walk, solves the linear harmonic recurrence and its boundary values. ThusIn particular, the conditioned chain moves downward with probability one from .
Let be the first hit of in the original walk and let . Its absorption time has finite expectation: from any transient state a run of at most downward steps hits zero with probability at least , giving a geometric tail bound by blocks. First-step conditioning then givesEquivalently, . The cubic polynomialhas exactly these second differences and boundary values. It is the unique solution, since the difference of any two solutions is a linear sequence vanishing at both endpoints. Conditional on , is the first time in zero, so division by provesThis is the duration of gambler's ruin conditioned on a chosen boundary.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ib Paper 1 18C iii Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ib Paper 1 18C ii Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ib Paper 1 18C i Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ib Paper 1 17D iii Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ib Paper 1 17D ii Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ib Paper 1 17D i Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ib Paper 1 16E Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
A steady localized electric current density satisfies , from charge conservation or the divergence of Ampère's equation. Choose an enclosing region whose boundary lies outside its support; extending the integration region does not change the source integrals. The divergence theorem applied componentwise givesTheir boundary fluxes vanish, proving the localized steady-current moment identitiesFor discontinuous but localized currents the same argument uses the distributional steady conservation law and an outer enclosing surface.
The magnetic vector potential is a vector field with , consistent with . It is defined up to . The steady Maxwell equation givesIn the Coulomb gauge , the equation is , whose decaying Green-function solution is the one supplied in the source.
Let and expand its kernel uniformly over the bounded source region:The first term integrates to zero. Put , an antisymmetric tensor by the earlier identity. Define the magnetic dipole moment , so . ConsequentlyorThe displayed dipole term has size . If , it vanishes and a higher multipole determines the leading magnetic field instead.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ib Paper 1 15B Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
For a stationary spherically symmetric state, set . The Schrödinger equation becomesA bound state must have , while the well's lower bound gives for a nonzero square-integrable eigenstate. Define and . Regularity at the origin requires , so the interior cosine solution is excluded; square integrability at infinity excludes the growing exterior exponential. Matching and at therefore givesThe limit at the origin is the finite value . Continuity of is equivalent here to continuity of at the finite potential jump. If desired, the normalized state hasThe equation for implicitly determines the energy, with .
Write and . The matching condition is . The first possible solution has . If , every permitted interior has nonnegative cotangent and cannot match a negative exterior logarithmic derivative. If , at the sum is positive; it is negative either at when , or at when . Continuity supplies a first bound-state solution. Thus at least one spherically symmetric bound state exists exactly whenAt equality the limiting energy is zero and the exterior wave is proportional to , whose norm diverges. Hence the inequality is strict. Deeper wells can support additional radial states; their negative-energy matching solutions have the same displayed form. This is the spherically symmetric bound state of a finite well.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ib Paper 1 14D i Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ib Paper 1 13F Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Integrate the entire function around the positively oriented sector boundary: the real segment , the arc for , and the radial segment back to zero. Cauchy integral theorem givesThe last term follows from and ; its minus sign is the return orientation.
On the arc, . The supplied sine bound gives throughout this sector, soThe Gaussian integral then yields . Taking real and imaginary parts proves both Fresnel integrals:The contour estimate proves existence of the improper oscillatory integrals as well as their values; absolute convergence is neither asserted nor required.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ib Paper 1 12A iii Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ib Paper 1 12A ii Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ib Paper 1 12A i Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ib Paper 1 11H Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Differentiability at means there is a linear map such thatThis is the Fréchet derivative definition; the same linear approximation must work in every direction, not merely along coordinate axes.
The chain rule says that if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at andFor its proof, put , , and . Since a linear map between these finite-dimensional normed spaces is bounded, . Differentiability of gives with . ThereforeIf , take ; otherwise . This proves the required full linear approximation.
For the Euclidean norm, at every the ordinary one-coordinate differentiation givesAt the origin its difference quotient in direction is , whose right and left limits are and . Thus none of its coordinate partial derivatives exists at the origin.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ib Paper 1 10G iii Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ib Paper 1 10G ii Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ib Paper 1 10G i Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ia Paper 5 9 b Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ia Paper 5 9 a Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.