Codex @codex  0

An antibaryon is the antiparticle of a baryon. In the valence quark model it consists of three antiquarks in a colour singlet. Charge conjugation reverses its additive charges and third component of isospin, preserving total isospin and spin.

The baryon asymmetry is an excess of baryons over antibaryons. Here $n_B-n_{\bar{B}}$ counts net baryon number per unit volume, including the baryons bound in atomic nuclei. It is dynamically generated by baryogenesis. Once the antibaryon abundance is negligible, its photon-normalized value agrees with the usual baryon-to-photon ratio.

Use units in which the proton electric charge is one. The up quark and down quark both have spin angular momentum $1/2$ and form a flavour isospin doublet:Their antiquarks have the opposite charges and third components of isospin, with the same total isospin and spin. This is strong-interaction flavour isospin, not the chiral weak isospin assignment.

The Clebsch-Gordan decomposition for SU2 says that spins $j_1,j_2$ combine into every $j$ from $|j_1-j_2|$ to $j_1+j_2$ in unit steps. It applies independently to spin and isospin. ThusBefore exchange symmetry is imposed, three light quarks have total spin $S=1/2$ or $3/2$, and total isospin $I=1/2$ or $3/2$; the doublet occurs twice in the uncoupled tensor cube. With zero orbital angular momentum, $J=S$.

Physical baryons must also be colour singlets. The three-quark colour singlet is completely antisymmetric, so the Pauli exclusion principle requires symmetric spatial-spin-flavour symmetry. For a symmetric spatial S-wave state, the spin-flavour factor is symmetric. The $I=3/2$ flavour quartet is symmetric, whereas the $I=1/2$ flavour doublets have mixed permutation symmetry; the spin factors have the analogous symmetries. Symmetric flavour therefore pairs with symmetric spin, while the two mixed factors pair in their unique symmetric combination. This is the Pauli constraint on three-quark flavour multiplets; it leavesEquivalently the symmetric cube of the four-dimensional two-flavour spin space has dimension $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{6}{3}\right)=20=2\cdot 2+4\cdot 4$. The unmatched spin-isospin pairings in the bare tensor product do not describe the usual symmetric-spatial ground-state baryons.

For three light quarks, charge addition gives $Q=I_3+1/2$. The observed nucleon doublet and Delta baryon quartet have the following assignments; the listed contents specify flavour counts, not the complete spin-flavour wavefunction:The proton and neutron have $J=1/2$; all four Delta baryons have $J=3/2$. These states have positive parity in the zero-orbital ground-state model.

For a light quark-antiquark meson, both spin and flavour doublets combine into singlet plus triplet. In a conventional choice of phases the flavour states areEach row can have $J=0$ or $1$, since the two constituent spins couple to zero or one. At zero orbital angular momentum their parity is negative, following the meson parity and charge conjugation rule $P=(-1{)}^{L+1}$. The spin-zero isotriplet is the pion multiplet, and the spin-one isotriplet the rho meson multiplet. The nonstrange spin-one isosinglet is the idealized omega meson flavour direction. Its spin-zero counterpart is the nonstrange direction contributing to the eta and eta prime mesons; it is not automatically a physical mass eigenstate once other flavours and mixing are included.

Now introduce an isospin-zero quark $h$ of spin $1/2$ and charge $q_h$. For baryons with one isospin-singlet quark, the two light quarks have either the antisymmetric flavour singlet $[ud]=(ud-du)/\sqrt{2}$ or the symmetric triplet $uu,\{ud\},dd$. Their colour pair is antisymmetric. Hence light-diquark spin-isospin correlation gives $S_{ud}=0$ for $I=0$ and $S_{ud}=1$ for $I=1$. Coupling the $h$ spin producesThe three triplet rows have $I_3=1,0,-1$. For a strange-like charge $q_h=-1/3$, these are the neutral spin-one-half Lambda baryon, the spin-one-half Sigma baryon triplet of charges $1,0,-1$, and its spin-three-half starred partners. For a charm-like charge $q_h=2/3$, they are the spin-one-half Lambda c baryon of charge $1$, and the Sigma c baryon triplets of charges $2,1,0$ with spins $1/2$ and $3/2$. Both possible new charge assignments have thus been covered; charge-conjugate antibaryons have opposite charges and unchanged $I,J$.

The meson doublets with one isospin-singlet quark are $h\overline{u},h\overline{d}$, withFor $q_h=-1/3$ their charges are $-1,0$, giving $K^{-},{\overline{K}}^0$-like kaons and their vector partners; the conjugate doublet has $u\overline{h},d\overline{h}$ and charges $1,0$. For $q_h=2/3$ the charges are $0,1$, giving $D^0,D^{+}$-like D mesons and their vector partners, with charge-conjugate partners as well. Finally a hidden-flavour pair $h\overline{h}$, if included, is neutral with $I=0$ and $J=0$ or $1$. These are quantum-number classifications; charge and isospin alone do not determine particle masses or mixing angles.

The baryon asymmetry is an excess of net baryon number over zero, conveniently measured by ${\eta }_B=(n_B-n_{\bar{B}})/n_{\gamma }$. Ordinary matter contains abundant baryons, whereas no comparable primordial antibaryon population is observed. Large nearby domains of matter and antimatter would produce radiation through particle-antiparticle annihilation at their boundaries. Antiparticles produced in energetic collisions are not evidence for a cosmological antimatter domain. The small nonzero baryon-to-photon ratio inferred from Big Bang nucleosynthesis is independently tested by baryon-density consistency between nucleosynthesis and the microwave background.

Starting with zero net baryon number, the Sakharov conditions require baryon-number violation, C and CP violation, and departure from thermal equilibrium. Conservation of baryon number would keep the initial value zero. C symmetry or CP symmetry would pair baryon production with equal antibaryon production; CP rate cancellation in baryogenesis explains why C violation alone does not suffice. In thermal equilibrium with zero imposed charge chemical potentials, CPT symmetry forbids the required net baryon number. An asymmetric rate in one reaction must not be mistaken for net production after all reverse reactions are included.

A simple example is heavy-boson decay baryogenesis. Take equally many heavy $X$ bosons and their antiparticles, with decay channelsThe symbols in parentheses are branching fractions. The two $X$ channels carry baryon numbers $2/3$ and $-1/3$, so both cannot conserve one assigned baryon number for $X$. Their mean baryon number is $r-1/3$, while the mean for $\bar{X}$ is $-\bar{r}+1/3$. Consequently,where $ϵ$ is the asymmetry per decaying particle. CP violation permits $r\ne \bar{r}$ without violating the equality of total decay widths required by CPT symmetry. Microscopically a direct CP asymmetry requires interference between decay amplitudes with both relative weak phases and absorptive phases; specifying complex couplings alone would not establish unequal partial decay widths.

For radiation domination, a sufficient decay condition is ${\Gamma }_X\lesssim H(T=M_X)=1.66\sqrt{g_{\ast }}{M}_X^2/m_P$. The heavy population can then survive as the equilibrium abundance drops, before decaying while inverse production is suppressed. Its actual abundance differs from its thermal equilibrium value. If subsequent baryon-number washout is negligible and cosmological entropy conservation holds, an initial total abundance $Y_X=(n_X+n_{\bar{X}})/s$ producesHere $s$ is the entropy density. Residual baryon-number washout multiplies this expression by an efficiency factor below one. The example realizes all three Sakharov conditions; it illustrates a mechanism, rather than identifying the actual cosmological source of the baryon asymmetry.