Charles Glover Barkla's 1911 paper describes irradiating a target with an X-ray tube and observing secondary X-rays using an electroscope. For soft Characteristic X-rays from tin, he used a soft primary beam and placed the electroscope close to the target to limit loss in air. Successive aluminium absorbers changed the gas-ionization signal. Thick absorbers suppressed the soft component; a carbon radiator supplied a comparison for the surviving scattered component. Subtracting this estimated contribution left approximately equal fractional losses through successive sheets, evidence for a nearly homogeneous component. Changing primary-beam hardness could suppress excitation of the more penetrating characteristic component.[ref]
An electroscope reads loss of stored electric charge; ionization in its detecting gas enables discharge. An ionization chamber with an electrometer instead measures the collected electric charge or electric current. These are integrating readouts: neither directly assigns an energy to each arriving photon. The diagram separates these functions without claiming a surviving apparatus drawing.
Figure 1.
Excite the target, filter its secondary X-rays, measure gas ionization
. Original functional schematic, not a reconstruction of Barkla's apparatus. The side-view geometry separates the incident beam from the secondary path. The historical readout was an electroscope; the inset explains the related ionization chamber principle. Absorber insertion and the carbon comparison test a mixture of Characteristic X-rays and scattered primary radiation. Arrow widths represent no measured wave intensity. Details.
The K and L components were distinguished by their penetrating power and dependence on the emitting chemical element. Barkla's Nobel lecture, delivered on 3 June 1920 for the 1917 prize, explains that absorber-defined K radiation had seemed homogeneous, whereas later diffraction experiments resolved neighbouring spectral lines in both K and L groups. Absorber tests therefore distinguished groups without resolving every line.[ref]
Henry Gwyn Jeffreys Moseley subsequently related the frequencies of corresponding spectral lines to atomic number. The approximate relation , with series-dependent constants , is Moseley's law; its discovery should be distinguished from Barkla's identification of characteristic secondary radiation.[ref]
A continuous incident frequency spectrum can contribute a continuous scattered background alongside discrete Characteristic X-rays. Here “scattered” identifies a production process, not a universal spectral shape: scattering of a narrow incident line need not make a continuum. In particular, the characteristic component is photon emission after vacancy creation, rather than simply the primary beam redirected. Source hardness, target substitution and absorber thickness probe different parts of that distinction. A surviving signal alone establishes neither an additional electron shell nor a fully resolved spectral line.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.