Cross-helicity conservation law Created 2026-09-28 Updated 2026-10-05
Let be the cross-helicity density. The ideal magnetohydrodynamic induction equation implies . Dotting the momentum equation with eliminates the Lorentz force density, since it is perpendicular to the magnetic field. The material derivative of is therefore
Using for specific enthalpy and specific entropy , together with Gauss's law for magnetism, converts this to
The source vanishes when magnetic field lines lie in constant-specific entropy surfaces, in particular in a homentropic flow. Integrating over a volume conserves its total cross-helicity only if the boundary flux also vanishes. This local law is derived in Ogilvie's astrophysical fluid dynamics notes.
For smooth ideal magnetohydrodynamics of constant mass density, define . Taking the dot product of the Elsässer variable equation with gives
Therefore each integral is constant when its outward boundary flux vanishes, for example when both velocity and magnetic field are tangent to the fixed boundary, or for periodic boundary conditions. The kinetic energy plus magnetic energy is , while the cross-helicity is .
In a homentropic flow, the cross-helicity conservation law gives
Consequently cross-helicity density is conserved along each trajectory exactly when the right-hand side vanishes. In a steady state, mass conservation gives , so the criterion becomes
The absence of an entropy source in a conservation law does not alone make its density an advected scalar: compression and transport along the magnetic field still change that density.
In the ideal, leading anisotropic system, there are five separately conserved quadratic cascade quantities: the two oppositely propagating Alfvén populations, the two slow-wave populations, and the entropy fluctuation. With the amplitudes of part (b), one convenient normalization is
where . Constant background factors convert the velocity variances into modal energies and the entropy variance into an entropy-related free-energy contribution. These are the five quadratic cascade invariants of anisotropic magnetohydrodynamic turbulence.
To verify conservation rather than just count polarizations, the perpendicular Elsässer variables obey
Dot each equation with and integrate. The propagation and nonlinear terms become surface fluxes of , and the pressure term becomes a surface flux because the corresponding field is solenoidal. For periodic boundaries, or boundaries with vanishing invariant flux, all these terms vanish and . Their sum is proportional to perpendicular kinetic plus magnetic energy, while their difference is proportional to perpendicular cross-helicity; the two Elsässer energy invariants contain both pieces of information.
Likewise the slow-mode equations give
Here is divergence-free and differentiates along the divergence-free vector , so both integrals are boundary fluxes. Finally gives . This proves all five quadratic conservation laws under the same boundary assumptions.
The two Alfvén cascades interact dynamically: each population strains the other and is needed for its nonlinear transfer between scales. Their integrated invariants are nevertheless conserved separately, so this interaction does not transfer one population's invariant into the other. The slow and entropy cascades are driven by the Alfvénic mixing and field-line motion, with no feedback on the perpendicular cascade at the retained order. Their injection rates set independent fluxes; those fluxes need not be equal, even when the resulting perpendicular spectra share the scaling.
The count is a count of independent quadratic modal cascade channels. Ideal passive advection also preserves higher moments, such as for arbitrary smooth , and analogous integrals for the slow characteristic scalars. These are not additional quadratic modal energies. Forcing and dissipative terms make the corresponding invariants source-and-sink balances; a stationary inertial range conserves their flux through scales rather than their total content in a continually forced domain.
Write for the material derivative and for the cross-helicity density, so . The ideal magnetohydrodynamic induction equation of ideal magnetohydrodynamics, with , gives
The dot product of the Euler momentum equation with the magnetic field has no Lorentz force contribution, because . Consequently,
Here is the specific enthalpy, the temperature, and the specific entropy; is the internal energy per unit mass. The first law of thermodynamics in this convention is , so . Substitution, followed by , yields the cross-helicity conservation law
The vector triple product identity puts this in the equivalent form
For the fixed volume, the divergence theorem gives the exact cross-helicity balance
Thus cross-helicity is constant when the net source equals the outward flux. Simple sufficient hypotheses are throughout the volume and on its boundary. The first condition includes a homentropic flow; the second prevents both relevant boundary fluxes. Periodic boundary conditions, or sufficiently rapid decay at infinity, provide alternatives. These statements concern smooth ideal magnetohydrodynamics: material specific entropy conservation alone, , does not eliminate spatial specific entropy gradients along the magnetic field lines.
Let the constant mass density be and put , the Alfvén velocity. Since both the velocity and the magnetic field have zero divergence, the magnetic tension and magnetic pressure decomposition of the Lorentz force gives
The Newtonian gravitational potential remains in ; uniform mass density does not justify dropping a prescribed gravitational acceleration. Adding and subtracting the two equations proves the Elsässer variable equations
Here ; each Elsässer variable is transported by the other.
Define . Taking the dot product with gives the Elsässer energy invariant balance
The divergence theorem proves whenever the net boundary flux vanishes. In particular, makes , so both fluxes vanish pointwise. Periodic boundary conditions or decay at infinity are also sufficient. These boundary conditions matter: fixed volume alone gives no conservation.
The kinetic energy plus magnetic energy is
Expanding and using the cross-helicity definition yields
Both energy and cross-helicity therefore follow from the two Elsässer energy invariants. The quantity here is exactly the requested kinetic energy plus magnetic energy, without an additional gravitational term.
Let be the material derivative, and write for specific enthalpy. The ideal magnetohydrodynamic induction equation and Gauss's law for magnetism give
Dotting the momentum equation with eliminates the Lorentz force density. Therefore the cross-helicity density satisfies
The first law of thermodynamics gives for specific entropy , without requiring uniform entropy. Consequently
Since , the first term on the right is a divergence. This proves the cross-helicity conservation law, with flux
For the perfect gas used here, .
The calculation in part (a) leaves the cross-helicity conservation law source
At positive temperature, this vanishes exactly when the magnetic field is tangent to constant-specific entropy surfaces: . A homentropic flow is a sufficient special case; uniform entropy throughout space is not necessary. Mere advection of specific entropy, , constrains its variation along the velocity rather than along the magnetic field, so it does not by itself eliminate this source. To conserve total cross-helicity in a volume, the net boundary flux must also vanish.
If is parallel to , write . Then
and the flux from part a reduces to
where is the gravitational Bernoulli function. If it is constant along field lines, , then
The source also vanishes because the flow is homentropic. Hence , and every fixed volume satisfies
Thus the cross-helicity is conserved even for this time-dependent aligned flow.