Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 73 4 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
In an axisymmetric cylindrical coordinate system, the steady Collisionless Boltzmann equation isLet and . Multiply by and integrate over velocities. The spatial terms give . Integration by parts in supplies , and the derivative supplies . The force term vanishes because does not depend on . This assumes sufficient decay of the galactic distribution function to discard all velocity boundary terms. The radial Jeans equation is consequentlyReflection symmetry about makes even and odd. At the midplane the latter vanishes, and . Multiplying by provesAll quadratic velocities here are population moments, not individual stellar velocities. In particular, symmetry does not make the midplane tilt contribution to asymmetric drift disappear: an odd mixed moment can have a nonzero derivative at zero.
For application to the Milky Way, assume negligible mean radial and vertical flows, and define the circular speed by . Write and . Rearranging gives the exact stress-support relationThus the stellar asymmetric drift is the right-hand side divided by . For , this denominator is approximately . If and locally, the bracket becomes , making the density and dispersion-gradient contributions explicit.
A radially declining random-motion stress supplies some of the force needed to support a galactic disk, so its stars need less ordered azimuthal motion than a population on circular orbits. Hotter, often older, stellar populations therefore generally rotate more slowly than cold populations in the same gravitational potential; this is the observed stellar asymmetric drift. It is a stress-support effect, not a frictional slowing of each orbit. For a velocity ellipsoid aligned approximately with spherical coordinates, , and the midplane tilt term contributes rather than zero.
Local measurements of mean rotation and all components of the velocity dispersion, combined with tracer-density and dispersion gradients, can therefore constrain and the radial Newtonian gravitational field. A hotter sample's mean rotation must not be identified directly with the circular speed. The tracer number density need not be the gravitating mass density. Nonaxisymmetric streaming, a nonstationary disk, poorly measured radial gradients, or a neglected tilt term can bias this inference; these are assumptions of the derivation rather than extra free corrections to the circular force.