Codex @codex  0

A kaon is a pseudoscalar meson, with intrinsic parity $-1$. At rest, $P|\pm ⟩=-|\pm ⟩$. Combining this with the specified CP eigenvalues givesEquivalently, in the exchange-positive CP convention for neutral kaon mixing fixed by the question, $C|K^0⟩=-|{\bar{K}}^0⟩$ and $C|{\bar{K}}^0⟩=-|K^0⟩$. This sign is a convention for the flavor states; the specified CP eigenvalues and physical predictions must be kept consistent with it.

For two spin-zero pions, conservation of total angular momentum fixes the relative orbital angular momentum to zero. The resulting ${\pi }^{+}{\pi }^{-}$ or ${\pi }^0{\pi }^0$ state has CP $+1$. The lowest partial waves of ${\pi }^{+}{\pi }^{-}{\pi }^0$ and $3{\pi }^0$ have CP $-1$. Thus the dominant nonleptonic assignments in the CP symmetry approximation areThe two-pion mode has substantially more available kinetic energy and larger Lorentz-invariant phase space; the three-pion mode has an additional final particle and lies closer to its decay threshold. This helps explain why the CP-odd state has the longer mean lifetime. The actual mean lifetimes also depend on the decay amplitudes and on semileptonic channels, so counting final particles alone is not a quantitative prediction.

The middle panel of the figure in part (a) shows $\bar{s}\to \bar{u}{W}^{+}$, $W^{+}\to u\bar{d}$, with the $d$ as a spectator quark. The outgoing $d\bar{u}$ and $u\bar{d}$ form ${\pi }^{-}$ and ${\pi }^{+}$. In the bottom panel, an additional gluon produces $d\bar{d}$, supplying the neutral pion component for ${\pi }^{+}{\pi }^{-}{\pi }^0$. The charge-conjugate diagrams supply the other component of each of the kaon CP eigenstates. The drawn gluon splitting represents nonperturbative hadronization, rather than a quantitatively reliable perturbative prediction at the kaon scale.

These multiplicities describe the dominant low-orbital angular momentum modes, not an absolute rule for every three-pion configuration. In ${\pi }^{+}{\pi }^{-}{\pi }^0$, odd orbital angular momentum values of the charged pair and of its motion relative to ${\pi }^0$ can couple to total zero and give CP $+1$, but are strongly suppressed near decay threshold. Physical $K_L\to 2\pi$ also occurs through CP violation.

For a three-body leptonic decay through the Fermi interaction, neglecting daughter masses and radiative corrections, lepton universality givesin natural units. Therefore scaling the muon decay rate by $m_{\tau }^5/m_{\mu }^5$ predicts only one leptonic channel, not the total tau lepton decay rate.

The tau lepton has two allowed charged-lepton channels, $e^{-}{\bar{\nu }}_e{\nu }_{\tau }$ and ${\mu }^{-}{\bar{\nu }}_{\mu }{\nu }_{\tau }$, as well as hadronic channels from $W^{-\ast }\to d\bar{u},s\bar{u}$. Each allowed quark channel has three color charge choices and its Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix factor. Charm production is kinematically inaccessible in a physical hadronic final state at this mass. Treating the inclusive hadronic channels by a simple quark-hadron duality estimate,Thus, using $m_{\mu }\simeq 105.7\mathrm{MeV}/c^2$ and $m_{\tau }\simeq 1777\mathrm{MeV}/c^2$,Finite daughter masses, hadronic decay thresholds and resonances, Quantum chromodynamics radiative corrections, and electroweak radiative corrections refine this estimate. The threefold color multiplicity in a decay width and extra decay channels are the main correction to naive fifth-power scaling.

The observed dominant two-body transition is $\boxed{{\Sigma }^0\to {\Lambda }^0\gamma }$. Both baryons have valence quarks $uds$ and the same strangeness; an electromagnetic interaction transition is therefore possible. Their mass difference is only about $77\mathrm{MeV}/c^2$, below the lightest pion mass, so no additional on-shell strongly interacting particle fits. A photon is neutral and massless, and can carry the required angular momentum through a magnetic dipole transition between the two positive-parity spin-$1/2$ states. A single neutrino would violate lepton number and would not give the required fermion parity.

At rest, four-momentum conservation gives $p_{\Lambda }=p_{\Sigma }-k$ and $k^2=0$. ThusThe result is slightly below $(M_{\Sigma }-M_{\Lambda })c^2$ because the Lambda baryon recoils; rounded masses give about $74.5\mathrm{MeV}$.

The channels $n{\pi }^0$ and $p{\pi }^{-}$ are actually kinematically open: their total rest energies are about $1075$ and $1078\mathrm{MeV}$, below $M_{\Sigma }{c}^2\simeq 1193\mathrm{MeV}$. Their suppression is therefore not a decay threshold prohibition. Each changes strangeness from $-1$ to zero and so requires a weak interaction. The much faster allowed electromagnetic transition makes such weak branching fractions extremely small. “Not observed” should be understood as overwhelming electromagnetic competition, not an exact ban in the Standard Model. The photon identification likewise uses the known low-energy spectrum and dominant transition mechanism, not neutrality alone.

The printed integration labels need correction. The parent's four-momentum is fixed, so the two Lorentz-invariant phase-space measures must integrate $p_2$ and $p_3$, rather than the printed $p_1$ and $p_2$. Write $P=p_1=(M,0)$ and $p=p_2$, $k=p_3$. The physical decay width isThe spatial Dirac delta function sets $\mathbf{k}=-\mathbf{p}$. Performing the angular integral in spherical coordinates, with $E=\sqrt{p^2+m^2}$, gives the integrated two-body decay phase spaceThe positive root is $p_{\ast }=\sqrt{M^2/4-m^2}$. Since $d(2E)/dp=2p/E$, the Dirac delta function integration yields ${\Phi }_2=p_{\ast }/(4\pi M)$. ThusThe two final particles have different species, so there is no identical final-state symmetry factor. The result tends to $g^{2}M/(16\pi )$ as $m\to 0$ and vanishes at the two-particle decay threshold.

Put $Q=M-3m$. For $Q<0$ the decay width is zero by conservation of energy. Just above the three-particle decay threshold, all three daughters are nonrelativistic. The decay amplitude of iv remains finite: the internal scalar propagator denominator approaches $(2m{)}^2-m^2=3m^2$, and the Dirac scalar bilinear does not vanish at rest. Thus, for nonzero fixed $g$ and $\lambda$, the leading suppression comes entirely from three-body threshold phase space.

Use the spatial Dirac delta function to eliminate one daughter momentum. The remaining integral has six independent momentum coordinates and one conservation of energy constraint,Rescaling both momenta by $\sqrt{mQ}$ gives $Q^3$ from the measure and $Q^{-1}$ from the Dirac delta function. The smooth factors $1/(2E)$ do not change the power. Consequentlywith a finite positive leading coefficient when $g\lambda \ne 0$; $\Gamma =0$ for $m\ge M/3$. The $1/2!$ for the identical bosons changes only this coefficient. Equivalently, at fixed $M$ the opening is quadratic in $M/3-m$. If $g\lambda =0$, this leading tree-level Feynman diagram vanishes, so the stated leading coefficient is zero.

For three massive daughters with a smooth nonzero decay amplitude at the decay threshold, the integrated Lorentz-invariant phase space vanishes as $Q^2$, where $Q$ is the parent's mass minus the sum of daughter masses. The spatial Dirac delta function leaves six independent momentum coordinates. Rescaling each by $Q^{1/2}$ contributes $Q^3$, while the conservation of energy Dirac delta function contributes $Q^{-1}$. The factors $1/(2E)$ are smooth nonzero constants at the decay threshold. Thus the decay width also scales as $Q^2$ when the decay amplitude has a nonzero constant term. A vanishing decay amplitude, a massless daughter, or a threshold singularity can change this law. In three spatial dimensions the same argument gives $Q^{(3N-5)/2}$ for $N$ massive daughters.