Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 73 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let , , and define the quasi-geostrophic streamfunction by . Use horizontal scale , vertical scale , velocity scale and advective time . The required quasi-geostrophic approximation has small Rossby number , , and Burger number . Hydrostatic, thin-layer scaling has ; density variations are small compared with , as required by the Boussinesq approximation. The leading horizontal flow is nondivergent, with vertical velocity . Retain forcing of the same slow order as density advection, ; stronger forcing need not preserve this balanced scaling.
Leading geostrophic balance and the hydrostatic approximation giveWrite . The density equation becomesTaking the curl of the horizontal momentum equations at the next order and using continuity gives the stretching equationSubstitute the expression for . Vertical differentiation commutes with the geostrophic material derivative acting on here: the extra Jacobian is . Since depends only on height, this yields the diabatically forced quasi-geostrophic potential vorticity equationThe minus sign is appropriate to the specified density forcing; a positive upward buoyancy forcing is and gives .
Now take constant and linearize about rest. Put and . The forced equation isFor the harmonic heating response of quasi-geostrophic flow, represent the two traveling Fourier components with frequencies and :Each component of the forcing has amplitude , soEquivalently its vertical structure obeysThese are the time-periodic forced responses; unspecified initial data may add free Rossby waves. Selecting no incoming waves describes forcing switched on causally and then its persistent harmonic part.
For , the eastward component always has . Let . The growing exponential would introduce an unbounded velocity and pressure disturbance at infinity, so discard it. The bottom condition then givesIf , this expression has the regular limit , rather than a physical singularity.
For , the westward component also has positive . Choose and use the same decaying expression with minus subscripts, including the same coincident-exponent limit. Thus both components are vertically evanescent above the heating.
For , putBoth homogeneous solutions are bounded, so boundedness is insufficient. A free Rossby wave with phase hasThe radiation condition demands energy propagation away from the heating, upward into . For that selects positive , hence in the westward component. The resulting solution isIt satisfies and, away from the decaying forcing, . Its far-field amplitude does not decay in this nondissipative model: continuous forcing supplies an outgoing wave train. Thus the low-frequency westward component propagates vertically while the eastward component remains evanescent.
At the threshold , the westward vertical wavenumber is zero. Excluding the linearly growing homogeneous solution and retaining the bottom condition gives . This bounded limiting response tends to a constant and has zero vertical group velocity; demanding both bottom zero and decay to zero at infinity would overdetermine this threshold problem. For , the branch labels and propagation inequality must be reconsidered; the comparison stated here assumes the usual positive beta-plane gradient.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 333 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Adopt the Boussinesq approximation, hydrostatic approximation, traditional approximation, and inviscid quasi-geostrophic approximation. Assume stable constant , nonzero Coriolis parameter , a beta plane, small Rossby number, of that small order, and small displacement of the background stratification. Vertical advection of the buoyancy perturbation is then higher order. Define the quasi-geostrophic streamfunction byThe buoyancy and vertical vorticity equations at the retained order areDifferentiate the first in . Since , its material-derivative term becomes . Elimination of gives diabatically forced quasi-geostrophic potential vorticity:Thus it is the height gradient of heating, rather than heating alone, that produces potential vorticity at this order.
For the steady response linearized about rest, assume . The quasi-geostrophic potential-vorticity equation reduces to . Choosing the horizontally uniform pressure gauge so that in the east gives the steady quasi-geostrophic response to localized heatingSetUsing the error function to integrate the Gaussian function givesThese velocities vanish as . A depth-dependent but horizontally uniform addition to is dynamically irrelevant for the requested horizontal velocity. At , streamlines are contours of . For , flow approaches the heating region from the west on its northern side, turns southward, and returns westward on its southern side. The contours are open, not closed gyres: tends to a nonzero constant in the west.
For , and the forcing decreases potential vorticity; steady balance requires , giving southward flow. Below , and the meridional flow reverses. A constant heating rate independent of would have no such interior potential vorticity source.
For the nonlinear diagnostic quasi-geostrophic omega equation, write . Apply to buoyancy evolution and to vorticity evolution:Subtracting eliminates the pressure tendency and yieldsThe beta term is linear and must remain when the nonlinear terms are neglected. For the steady weak-forcing solution, , soThis also follows immediately from the steady linear buoyancy equation. It satisfies at , decay at depth and horizontal infinity, and the linear quasi-geostrophic omega equation; with these homogeneous conditions the elliptic problem has no extra decaying homogeneous solution. The rigid-lid interpretation is an additional boundary approximation for this diagnostic response.
At , the displayed and provide the requested meridional/vertical arrows. For positive heating there is upwelling concentrated near , maximal in depth at , with northward flow below that depth and southward flow above. The vertical circulation tends to zero far from the forcing. A western zonal wake persists, but its meridional and vertical components vanish as . Horizontal ageostrophic flow supplies the divergence associated with the upwelling; the projected slice is not itself a two-dimensional incompressible flow and need not have closed streamlines.
Thermally driven circulation and its boundary layers
. Left: surface streamlines and velocity direction for positive . Right: meridional and vertical arrows at , with components separately scaled to show direction; dashed line marks the reversal depth . The vertical slice is a projection of three-dimensional flow. Details.The steady calculation fixes an interior circulation, not its attainability from every possible initial and boundary state. For example, a rigid lid with initially uniform boundary buoyancy conserves that buoyancy at linear order because . The formal steady profile instead generally has nonuniform . Such additional initial boundary data require a time-dependent adjustment and cannot simply be imposed on this particular steady solution. No boundary buoyancy data are supplied for the requested steady problem.
Steady quasi-geostrophic response to localized heating Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-14
In the weak-forcing steady response about rest, diabatically forced quasi-geostrophic potential vorticity gives . For , an eastern zero-flow condition fixes the horizontal circulation through , up to a horizontally uniform pressure gauge. The thermodynamic equation gives . A western zonal wake can remain even though the heating and vertical velocity vanish there. This is a formal steady interior solution: specified initial boundary buoyancy can prevent it from being the attained steady state. For example, under a rigid lid where the heating vanishes, initially uniform boundary buoyancy remains uniform at linear order.
