Adopt the Boussinesq approximation, hydrostatic approximation, traditional approximation, and inviscid quasi-geostrophic approximation. Assume stable constant , nonzero Coriolis parameter , a beta plane, small Rossby number, of that small order, and small displacement of the background stratification. Vertical advection of the buoyancy perturbation is then higher order. Define the quasi-geostrophic streamfunction by
The buoyancy and vertical vorticity equations at the retained order are
Differentiate the first in . Since , its material-derivative term becomes . Elimination of gives diabatically forced quasi-geostrophic potential vorticity:
Thus it is the height gradient of heating, rather than heating alone, that produces potential vorticity at this order.
For the steady response linearized about rest, assume . The quasi-geostrophic potential-vorticity equation reduces to . Choosing the horizontally uniform pressure gauge so that in the east gives the steady quasi-geostrophic response to localized heating
Set
Using the error function to integrate the Gaussian function gives
These velocities vanish as . A depth-dependent but horizontally uniform addition to is dynamically irrelevant for the requested horizontal velocity. At , streamlines are contours of . For , flow approaches the heating region from the west on its northern side, turns southward, and returns westward on its southern side. The contours are open, not closed gyres: tends to a nonzero constant in the west.
For , and the forcing decreases potential vorticity; steady balance requires , giving southward flow. Below , and the meridional flow reverses. A constant heating rate independent of would have no such interior potential vorticity source.
For the nonlinear diagnostic quasi-geostrophic omega equation, write . Apply to buoyancy evolution and to vorticity evolution:
Subtracting eliminates the pressure tendency and yields
The beta term is linear and must remain when the nonlinear terms are neglected. For the steady weak-forcing solution, , so
This also follows immediately from the steady linear buoyancy equation. It satisfies at , decay at depth and horizontal infinity, and the linear quasi-geostrophic omega equation; with these homogeneous conditions the elliptic problem has no extra decaying homogeneous solution. The rigid-lid interpretation is an additional boundary approximation for this diagnostic response.
At , the displayed and provide the requested meridional/vertical arrows. For positive heating there is upwelling concentrated near , maximal in depth at , with northward flow below that depth and southward flow above. The vertical circulation tends to zero far from the forcing. A western zonal wake persists, but its meridional and vertical components vanish as . Horizontal ageostrophic flow supplies the divergence associated with the upwelling; the projected slice is not itself a two-dimensional incompressible flow and need not have closed streamlines.
Figure 1. Left: surface streamlines and velocity direction for positive . Right: meridional and vertical arrows at , with components separately scaled to show direction; dashed line marks the reversal depth . The vertical slice is a projection of three-dimensional flow.
The steady calculation fixes an interior circulation, not its attainability from every possible initial and boundary state. For example, a rigid lid with initially uniform boundary buoyancy conserves that buoyancy at linear order because . The formal steady profile instead generally has nonuniform . Such additional initial boundary data require a time-dependent adjustment and cannot simply be imposed on this particular steady solution. No boundary buoyancy data are supplied for the requested steady problem.
In the weak-forcing steady response about rest, diabatically forced quasi-geostrophic potential vorticity gives . For , an eastern zero-flow condition fixes the horizontal circulation through , up to a horizontally uniform pressure gauge. The thermodynamic equation gives . A western zonal wake can remain even though the heating and vertical velocity vanish there. This is a formal steady interior solution: specified initial boundary buoyancy can prevent it from being the attained steady state. For example, under a rigid lid where the heating vanishes, initially uniform boundary buoyancy remains uniform at linear order.