Past exam of the relativity course of the University of Cambridge 2015 Paper 1 2 a Solution 2026-10-20
A tidal force is a difference of gravitational acceleration across an extended region. In Newtonian gravity, . Two neighboring freely falling particles separated by have, to first order,For a point mass, . In a local orthonormal radial/transverse frame,A small freely falling cloud stretches radially and compresses transversely. Outside the source the three eigenvalues sum to zero, consistently with ; within matter the trace is . These are accelerations of separations, not the much larger common acceleration of the cloud's centre.
Original local tidal map: a freely falling cloud stretches along the radial direction and contracts in both transverse directions
. Details. In general relativity, freely falling test particles follow timelike geodesics. A freely falling frame can eliminate the connection at one event, but not the Riemann curvature tensor throughout a finite laboratory. Let be the geodesic tangent and a connecting vector for neighboring geodesics with . In the explicitly chosen curvature conventionthe geodesic deviation equation isIt follows by commuting , using and zero torsion. In a parallel-propagated orthonormal frame, its spatial components directly describe measured relative acceleration. The weak-field, slow-motion limit recovers the Newtonian Hessian above. Reversing the curvature sign convention reverses the displayed curvature side, without changing the physical stretching. The equivalence principle removes locally uniform gravity, while geodesic deviation measures the residual tidal field. The connection between parallel transport, curvature and neighboring geodesics is developed systematically in the standard geometric construction.[ref]
Lecture Notes on General Relativity by Sean M. Carroll. Section 3, Curvature: parallel transport and geodesic deviation; translate the chosen curvature sign consistently
The three classic tests probe orbital motion, the propagation of light, and clock rates in a gravitational field.
Schwarzschild perihelion precession. For an orbit with semi-major axis and orbital eccentricity , the leading advance per revolution isThe relevant observation for Mercury is the residual advance after the much larger ordinary perturbations have been included, approximately arcseconds per century.[ref]
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19870009701/downloads/19870009701.pdf. Physics through the 1990s: Gravitation, cosmology and cosmic-ray physics, 1986: discussion of the anomalous perihelion advance
An orbital fit must account for the other planets and reference-frame effects before interpreting that residual as a relativistic contribution.Schwarzschild light deflection. A ray with large impact parameter passing a nearly spherical mass is deflected throughAt the Sun's limb this is about arcseconds. The Eddington experiment used the 1919 solar eclipse to photograph background stars near the obscured Sun, then compared their positions with reference photographs. The measured effect is an apparent outward displacement of the background stars, not a direct photograph of a curved light path. Telescope focus, plate scale and atmospheric effects must be controlled when extracting such small shifts.[ref]
A determination of the deflection of light by the Sun's gravitational field by Frank Watson Dyson and others. 1920 paper, observational comparison and deflection analysis
Gravitational redshift. For a photon emitted lower in a weak static field and received a height above it,The Pound-Rebka experiment used the narrow recoil-free nuclear resonance supplied by the Mössbauer effect. A controlled source motion supplies a small Doppler shift that compensates the gravitational shift, allowing a change in resonant absorption to reveal it across a laboratory tower.[ref]
Apparent Weight of Photons by Robert Vivian Pound and Glen Rebka. 1960 experiment: gamma-ray source and resonant absorber at different heights
The leading weak-field redshift follows from the equivalence principle and therefore does not, by itself, distinguish every competing metric theory of gravity. Slava G. Turyshev Created 2026-10-13 Updated 2026-11-05
A physicist working on experimental tests of gravity. His joint work with James G. Williams and Dale Boggs uses lunar laser ranging to compare the ratios of gravitational mass to inertial mass for Earth and the Moon. The comparison probes the equivalence principle using bodies with different compositions and gravitational binding energies.[ref]
Lunar Laser Ranging Tests of the Equivalence Principle by James G. Williams and others. Abstract and §1: weak and strong forms of the equivalence principle
Portrait of Slava G. Turyshev
. Source. Strong equivalence principle 2026-10-14
The strong equivalence principle extends universality of free fall to bodies with appreciable gravitational self-energy and requires local experiments, including gravitational ones, in a freely falling laboratory to be independent of the laboratory's location and velocity. This statement neglects external tidal variation across the laboratory; it does not remove Riemann curvature tensor. In general relativity, universal metric coupling, fixed local gravitational coupling and the absence of extra preferred-frame gravitational fields implement this principle.

