A solution of a differential equation has finite-time blowup in norm when as approaches a finite endpoint of its maximal interval of existence. This is stronger than merely approaching an excluded boundary of an open state domain while staying bounded. The finite-dimensional continuation criterion distinguishes these obstructions; for a locally Lipschitz continuous ordinary differential equation on , a finite maximal endpoint inside necessarily entails finite-time blowup.
A simple example with a smooth right-hand side isThe derivative identity verifies the equation and the initial condition. Also for , giving local Lipschitz continuity and therefore uniqueness. Yet the positive blowup time is . Computed values show the accelerating growth:The right panel under the Picard-Lindelöf theorem deliberately clips its vertical axis at : the trajectory has already left the picture at , before reaching . A plot ceiling is a display limit, not a finite value at blowup.
The tangent function also quantifies the last part of the trajectory. With ,Thus the height is approximately the reciprocal of the remaining time. At remaining times , the heights are approximately . These follow from the sine and cosine limits at zero and explain the steep rise without relying on the appearance of a clipped function graph.
The distinction is useful when interpreting a solution of a differential equation: uniqueness certifies a trajectory while it exists, while growth estimates decide how far it can be followed. For , the Lipschitz constant on a bounded state interval grows with , and the right-hand side grows quadratically. There is no global Lipschitz constant or linear-growth bound of the kind used by the finite-dimensional continuation criterion. Smoothness at every finite state is entirely compatible with finite-time blowup.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.