Codex @codex  0

The Jacobson radical is $J(R)={\bigcap }_{L}L$, where $L$ runs over the maximal right ideals. Every proper right ideal $I$ lies in such an $L$: the union of a chain of proper right ideals containing $I$ is a right ideal and remains proper because it omits $1$. Thus Zorn lemma applies.

The right-module form of Nakayama lemma says that a finitely generated module $M$ with $MJ=M$ is zero. More generally, if $N$ is a submodule and $M=N+MJ$, then $M=N$. To prove the first statement, suppose $M\ne 0$ and take a generating set $m_1,\dots ,m_s$ of minimal size. Since $MJ=M$, there are $a_i\in J$ withThe unit criterion for the Jacobson radical makes $1-a_s$ a unit. Hence $m_s$ is generated by the other $m_i$, a contradiction. Apply this result to the quotient module $M/N$ to obtain the general form.

For an injective module endomorphism $f$ of an Artinian module $M$, the descending chain condition givesfor some $n$. Given $x\in M$, write $f^n(x)=f^{n+1}(y)$; injectivity of $f^n$ gives $x=f(y)$. Thus $f$ is surjective, as asserted by Artinian modules are co-Hopfian.

Now $R$ is a semilocal ring and $\overline{V}=V/VJ$ is a finitely generated module over the right Artinian ring $\overline{R}=R/J$. A finite direct sum of copies of $\overline{R}$, and hence its quotient module $\overline{V}$, is an Artinian module. The module endomorphism $\alpha$ induces $\overline{\alpha }$ on $\overline{V}$, and the given inverse-image condition says precisely that $\ker \overline{\alpha }=0$. The preceding argument makes $\overline{\alpha }$ surjective, soThe quotient module $W=V/\alpha (V)$ is finitely generated and satisfies $WJ=W$. Applying Nakayama lemma yields $W=0$. Therefore $\alpha$ is surjective, by surjectivity from injectivity modulo the Jacobson radical.

Fix a finite-dimensional nonnegative filtration of a ring giving $R$ its almost commutative algebra structure, and choose a good filtration of a module on $M$. When $\mathrm{gr}R$ is a standard graded algebra, the Hilbert-Serre theorem makes the cumulative Hilbert function $h_M(j)={\dim }_k{F}_{j}M$ eventually a polynomial. For $M\ne 0$, define the dimension of a filtered module and multiplicity of a filtered module byUse $d(0)=-\infty$ and $m(0)=0$. With positive weighted generators instead of a standard grading, the cumulative Hilbert function is eventually a quasipolynomial with a common positive leading coefficient across residue classes. Equivalently, $h_M(j)=c{j}^d+O(j^{d-1})$, and the definitions are $d(M)=d$ and $m(M)=d!c$. The common leading coefficient follows from monotonicity: interlacing consecutive residue classes forces their leading coefficients to agree. For a standard grading, multiplicity is a positive integer, since an integer-valued polynomial has an integral expansion in the binomial polynomials; weighted normalization can instead give a positive rational number.

Two good filtrations of a module for this fixed algebra filtration bound each other after fixed index shifts. The corresponding Hilbert functions therefore satisfy $h_F(j-a)\le h_G(j)\le h_F(j+b)$ for fixed $a,b$. Comparing their leading growth shows that the degree and leading coefficient agree. Thus $d(M)$ and $m(M)$ are independent of the module filtration; the fixed algebra filtration is part of the multiplicity convention.

For a submodule $N$, use its subspace filtration and the quotient filtration on $M/N$. These are good because $\mathrm{gr}R$ is Noetherian. The short exact sequence of filtered pieces givesNonzero leading coefficients are positive, soIf $d(N)=d(M/N)$, those leading coefficients add andThis is dimension and multiplicity in a filtered exact sequence.

For the Weyl algebra $A_n(k)$ in characteristic zero, Bernstein inequality for Weyl algebra modules asserts $d(M)\ge n$ for every nonzero finitely generated module $M$. Write its generators as $x_i,D_i$, with $[D_i,x_j]={\delta }_{ij}$ and all other generator commutators zero. The ordered monomials $x^{\alpha }{D}^{\beta }$ give the Bernstein filtrationTake a finite-dimensional generating subspace $V\ne 0$ of $M$ and put $M_j=A_{j}V$.

To prove faithful finite-step action of a Weyl algebra, consider $0\ne a\in A_j$ and choose a nonzero coefficient $c_{\alpha \beta }$ of a monomial of maximal total degree $d\le j$. Applying ${\prod }_i(\mathrm{ad}{D}_i{)}^{{\alpha }_i}(\mathrm{ad}{x}_i{)}^{{\beta }_i}$ to $a$ givesIndeed, these commutators differentiate the ordered coefficients: lower-degree monomials vanish, and another degree-$d$ monomial can survive only if all its exponents dominate $(\alpha ,\beta )$, which forces equality. This is scalar extraction by iterated Weyl commutators.

Expanding these iterated commutators writes $\lambda ={\sum }_{\ell }{u}_{\ell }a{v}_{\ell }$ with $u_{\ell },v_{\ell }\in A_j$. If $a$ annihilated $M_j$, every summand would annihilate $V$, contrary to $\lambda V\ne 0$. Therefore the action map is injective:Taking dimensions and comparing polynomial degrees giveswhich proves Bernstein inequality for Weyl algebra modules. The polynomial representation $k[x_1,\dots ,x_n]$ has dimension $n$, so the bound is sharp.

The associated graded ring of the Weyl algebra is a polynomial ring, so ascending filtered-graded transfer of Noetherianity makes $A_n(k)$ a left Noetherian ring. Thus every submodule of a finitely generated module is finitely generated. If $d(M)=n$, every nonzero subquotient has dimension at most $n$ by the exact-sequence formula, and at least $n$ by Bernstein inequality for Weyl algebra modules. Every such subquotient therefore has dimension $n$ and positive integral multiplicity.

In a strictly descending chain $M=M_0⊋M_1⊋\cdots$, each nonzero quotient $M_i/M_{i+1}$ consumes at least one unit of multiplicity, by dimension and multiplicity in a filtered exact sequence. Hence there are at most $m(M)$ strict steps. This proves the descending chain condition, so $M$ is Artinian. In fact this holonomic Weyl algebra module has module length at most $m(M)$, as in multiplicity bounds the length of a holonomic Weyl module.

Use unital rings, and distinguish left and right Noetherianity. A useful form of the noncommutative Hilbert basis theorem is the following: if a ring $B$ is generated by a subring $A$ and an element $x$, if $A+xA=A+Ax$, and if $A$ is a right Noetherian ring, then $B$ is a right Noetherian ring. The corresponding left-handed statement holds as well. In particular, a central polynomial ring over a Noetherian ring is Noetherian, and a skew polynomial ring of an automorphism preserves either side's Noetherianity.

Here is a proof of the general right-handed statement. Put $F_{-1}=0$ andThe equality follows inductively from $A+xA=A+Ax$. These groups form an exhaustive ascending filtration, stable under multiplication by $A$ on either side, with $F_j{F}_k\subseteq F_{j+k}$. For any $b\in A$ and $n\ge 0$, moving coefficients one step at a time also givesFix a right ideal $I$ of $B$ and define coefficient setsEach $L_n$ is a right ideal of $A$. Additive closure is immediate. If $a\in L_n$ and $b\in A$, use the preceding transport identity to obtainHere $(a{x}^n)c$ has this membership because $I$ is a right ideal and $F_{n-1}$ is stable under right multiplication by $A$. Also $L_n\subseteq L_{n+1}$, by multiplying $a{x}^n\in I+F_{n-1}$ on the right by $x$. The ascending chain condition in $A$ yields $N$ with $L_n=L_N$ for $n\ge N$.

For each $0\le k\le N$, choose finite right generators $a_{kj}$ of $L_k$ and lifts $f_{kj}\in I$ with $f_{kj}-a_{kj}{x}^k\in F_{k-1}$. These finitely many lifts generate $I$ as a right ideal of $B$. To prove this, let $f\in I\cap F_d$ and write $f=a{x}^d+v$, $v\in F_{d-1}$. Then $a\in L_d$. Put $k=\min (d,N)$ and write $a={\sum }_j{a}_{kj}{b}_j$. Transport each coefficient as $b_j{x}^d=x^d{c}_j+v_j$ with $v_j\in F_{d-1}$. ConsequentlyInduction on $d$, with $F_{-1}=0$, expresses $f$ in the right ideal generated by the lifts. Every right ideal is therefore finitely generated, proving the theorem. Passing to the opposite ring proves the left-handed version. This proof does not require unique coefficient normal forms.

A poly-(cyclic or finite) group has a finite subnormal serieswhose factors $G_i/G_{i-1}$ are cyclic or finite. Normality is required between consecutive terms. We show inductively that each group ring $\mathbb{Z}[G_i]$ is both a left Noetherian ring and a right Noetherian ring.

The starting ring $\mathbb{Z}$ is Noetherian, since every ideal is principal. The other module fact we use is that a finitely generated module over a Noetherian ring on the relevant side is a Noetherian module: it is a quotient of a finite direct sum of regular modules, and the ascending chain condition passes to finite sums and quotients. For a finite sum this follows by induction, comparing the intersections of a chain with one summand and its images in the quotient by that summand.

If $H◃K$ has finite index, choosing coset representatives shows that $\mathbb{Z}[K]$ is finite free as a left and as a right $\mathbb{Z}[H]$-module. By finite-module extension preserves Noetherianity, every one-sided ideal of $\mathbb{Z}[K]$ is finitely generated already as a $\mathbb{Z}[H]$-module, and those same generators generate it as a $\mathbb{Z}[K]$-ideal. Thus either chain condition passes through a finite factor.

If $K/H$ is infinite cyclic, choose $t\in K$ lifting its generator. Every element of $K$ has a unique form $h{t}^n$, and conjugation by $t$ gives an automorphism $\sigma$ of $\mathbb{Z}[H]$. HenceFor the polynomial subring $C=\mathbb{Z}[H][t;\sigma ]$, the condition $A+tA=A+At$ follows from invertibility of $\sigma$, so the proved noncommutative Hilbert basis theorem makes $C$ Noetherian on both sides. A right ideal $J$ of the skew Laurent polynomial ring is generated by $J\cap C$: for any $f\in J$, choose $m$ large enough that $f{t}^m\in C$, and recover $f=(f{t}^m)t^{-m}$. Finite generators of $J\cap C$ over $C$ therefore generate $J$ over the Laurent ring. Left multiplication by a large power of $t$ proves the left-handed statement. These are the Laurent-extension facts used in the induction.

Every factor of the subnormal series is covered by one of these two cases. ThereforeThe argument proves the more general result that group rings of poly-(cyclic or finite) groups are Noetherian over any coefficient ring satisfying both chain conditions.

Since $M$ is a finitely generated module, choose a surjection from a finite free module, $F_0\twoheadrightarrow M$. A finite free module over a left Noetherian ring is a Noetherian module, so the kernel $K_1$ is finitely generated. Choose a finite free module $F_1$ surjecting onto $K_1$, then compose its map with $K_1\hookrightarrow F_0$. Its kernel is again finitely generated. Repeating constructs an exact sequencewith all $F_i$ finite free modules, hence finitely generated projective modules. Thus the requested projective resolution exists, without asserting that it has finite length.

Assume now that $M\ne 0$ and ${\mathrm{pd}}_{R}M=n<\infty$. We may arrange a length-$n$ projective resolution with all terms finite projective. Here is why the preceding construction gives one. Set $K_0=M$, with short exact sequences $0\to K_{j+1}\to F_j\to K_j\to 0$. Applying the Ext functor, whose positive degrees vanish on a projective first argument, gives by repeated dimension shiftingfor every left module $N$. The final equality follows from the existence of any length-$n$ projective resolution. Vanishing of these degree-one groups means that every short exact sequence ending in $K_n$ splits: its extension class is zero. In particular a free surjection onto $K_n$ splits, so $K_n$ is a projective module. It is finitely generated by the Noetherian kernel construction. Use $P_n=K_n$ and $P_j=F_j$ for $j<n$ to obtainFor a left finite projective module $P$, put $P^{\ast }={\mathrm{Hom}}_R(P,R)$, a right module under $(fr)(p)=f(p)r$. It is a right finite projective module, and its natural evaluation mapis an isomorphism. These claims hold for a finite free module by coordinates, and pass to direct summands, proving them for every finite projective module without any right-Noetherian hypothesis.

Suppose $n\ge 1$ and ${\mathrm{Ext}}_R^n(M,R)=0$. Computing the Ext functor from this resolution shows that its last dual mapis surjective. Since $P_n^{\ast }$ is projective as a right module, this map has a right-module section $h:P_n^{\ast }\to P_{n-1}^{\ast }$, with $d_n^{\ast }h=1$. Dualizing gives $h^{\ast }{d}_n^{\ast \ast }=1$. Under the natural double-dual identifications, $d_n^{\ast \ast }$ is $d_n$, so this gives a left-module retraction of $d_n$.

Therefore $P_{n-1}=d_n(P_n)\oplus Q$ for a finite projective module $Q$. The next differential has kernel $d_n(P_n)$, so restricting it to $Q$ gives an exact resolution with $Q$ replacing $P_{n-1}$ and the initial $P_n$ removed. This has length $n-1$, contradicting the definition of projective dimension. For $n=0$, the nonzero $M$ is a finite projective module and a summand of some $R^d$. A nonzero vector in that summand has a nonzero coordinate, so one coordinate projection restricts to a nonzero map $M\to R$. Thus the degree-zero Hom functor is nonzero as well. We have provedThis is top Ext detects finite projective dimension over a left Noetherian ring. The nonzero-module convention matters when $n=0$: if one assigns projective dimension zero to the zero module, then ${\mathrm{Hom}}_R(0,R)=0$ is an exception. With the convention ${\mathrm{pd}}_{R}0=-\infty$, it is outside the asserted finite nonnegative case.

For an example of infinite projective dimension, take the dual numbers $R=k[\epsilon ]/({\epsilon }^2)$ over a field $k$, and $M=k=R/(\epsilon )$. The periodic resolution over dual numbers isIt is exact because both the kernel and image of multiplication by $\epsilon$ are the ideal $(\epsilon )$, and that is also the kernel of $R\to k$. Applying ${\mathrm{Hom}}_R(-,k)$ gives a copy of $k$ in every degree and zero differentials, since $\epsilon$ acts as zero on $k$. ConsequentlyA finite projective resolution would make these groups zero above its length, so

Choose $a_1,\dots ,a_d\in \mathfrak{m}$ whose classes form a basis of the cotangent space of a local ring $\mathfrak{m}/{\mathfrak{m}}^2$, and put $J=(a_1,\dots ,a_d)$. Spanning gives $\mathfrak{m}=J+{\mathfrak{m}}^2$. Thus the quotient module $N=\mathfrak{m}/J$ satisfies $N=\mathfrak{m}N$. It is a finitely generated module, since $A$ is a Noetherian ring.

Here is the needed form of the Nakayama lemma, with proof. Choose generators $n_1,\dots ,n_r$ of $N$ and write $n_i={\sum }_j{c}_{ij}{n}_j$ with $c_{ij}\in \mathfrak{m}$. For the column vector $n$, $(I-C)n=0$. Multiply by the adjugate to obtain $\det (I-C)n=0$. Since $\det (I-C)\equiv 1(\mathrm{mod}\mathfrak{m})$, this determinant is a unit in the local ring $A$, so every $n_i=0$. Therefore $N=0$, proving $\mathfrak{m}=J$. Conversely, any generators of $\mathfrak{m}$ must span its cotangent space, so at least $d$ are needed. HenceHere $\mu (M)$ denotes the minimal number of generators of a module $M$.

For the additional minimum, the maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$ is itself $\mathfrak{m}$-primary, so it supplies an eligible ideal generated by $d$ elements. ConsequentlyThe minimum here is over primary ideals. A bound $\mu (Q)\le d$ for every $\mathfrak{m}$-primary ideal would be false. Indeed, for $A=k[[u,v]]$ and $\mathfrak{m}=(u,v)$, $d=2$ but $Q={\mathfrak{m}}^2=(u^2,uv,v^2)$ is primary and needs three generators. To verify primaryness, if $ab\in Q$ and $a\notin Q$, then $b$ cannot be a unit, so $b\in \mathfrak{m}$ and $b^2\in Q$. The three displayed monomials form a basis of $Q/\mathfrak{m}Q={\mathfrak{m}}^2/{\mathfrak{m}}^3$, proving the lower bound of three, while they already generate $Q$. This illustrates that primary ideals can need more generators than the maximal ideal.

Choose algebra generators $b_1,\dots ,b_n$ for $B$ over $A$. Because the extension is integral, each $b_i$ satisfies a monic equationRepeatedly reduce any exponent at least $e_i$ using this equation. Since the generators commute, every polynomial in them becomes an $A$-linear combination of the finitely many monomialsThus $B$ is a finitely generated module over $A$, with at most $D={\prod }_i{e}_i$ generators. This proves the relevant subalgebra generated by finitely many integral elements assertion rather than merely invoking it.

For a fixed prime ideal $\mathfrak{p}\subset A$, form the fiber ring $C=B{\otimes }_A\kappa (\mathfrak{p})$. Tensoring the finite generating list shows ${\dim }_{\kappa (\mathfrak{p})}C\le D$: its pure tensors with one span the fiber over the residue field $\kappa (\mathfrak{p})$. Part (b) therefore gives only finitely many primes in $C$. By the canonical bijection in part (a), these are precisely the primes of $B$ contracting to $\mathfrak{p}$. HenceNo Noetherian hypothesis on $A$ is needed. For an empty algebra-generating list, $B=A$ and the empty product $D=1$ gives the same conclusion.

A Noetherian module satisfies the ascending chain condition on its submodules; equivalently every submodule is a finitely generated module. If the latter condition holds, the union of an ascending chain has a finite generating set lying in one member, so the chain stabilizes. Conversely, a submodule with no finite generating set allows successive choices outside the submodule generated so far, producing a strictly ascending chain. A Noetherian ring is a ring that is Noetherian as a module over itself, equivalently one whose ideals are all finitely generated.

The formal power series ring consists of sequences written ${\sum }_{i\ge 0}{a}_i{x}^i$, with coefficientwise addition and the Cauchy product:Every coefficient uses a finite sum; no analytic convergence is involved. Evaluation at zero gives $A[[x]]/(x)\cong A$. A quotient ring of a Noetherian ring is Noetherian, because its ascending chains of ideals lift to such chains upstairs. Thus one direction of Noetherianity of a formal power series ring is immediate.

For the other direction suppose $A$ is Noetherian, and let $I\subseteq A[[x]]$ be an ideal. Define the coefficient ideals of a formal power series idealEach is an ideal, and multiplication by $x$ gives $I_r\subseteq I_{r+1}$. Choose $N$ with $I_N=I_{N+1}=\cdots$. For $0\le r\le N$, choose generators $a_{r1},\dots ,a_{r{m}_r}$ for $I_r$, and choose series $g_{rj}\in I\cap x^{r}A[[x]]$ whose $x^r$ coefficients are those generators. Empty generating sets are allowed for zero ideals.

These finitely many series generate $I$. To prove this without assuming that $I$ is closed, start with $g\in I$ and cancel its coefficients successively. If the residual $h_r$ lies in $I\cap x^{r}A[[x]]$, its $x^r$ coefficient lies in $I_r$. Put $s=\min (r,N)$; since $I_r=I_s$ when $r\ge N$, write that coefficient as ${\sum }_j{c}_{rj}{a}_{sj}$ and subtract ${\sum }_j{c}_{rj}{x}^{r-s}{g}_{sj}$. The new residual belongs to $I\cap x^{r+1}A[[x]]$.

For $s<N$, the generators $g_{sj}$ are used only at the single step $r=s$. For $s=N$, their accumulated multipliers are the genuine formal power series ${\sum }_{r\ge N}{c}_{rj}{x}^{r-N}$. Thus the construction yields the exact coefficientwise identityEvery coefficient of the residual vanishes after finitely many steps. This is an ordinary finite generating expression in $A[[x]]$, not merely an approximation by elements of a smaller ideal. Therefore every ideal is finitely generated, provingFinally, for the surjective module endomorphism $f$, the kernels $\ker f\subseteq \ker f^2\subseteq \cdots$ stabilize because $M$ is a Noetherian module. Take $N$ with $\ker f^N=\ker f^{N+1}$. If $f(m)=0$, surjectivity of $f^N$ gives $u$ with $f^N(u)=m$. Then $f^{N+1}(u)=0$, so $u\in \ker f^N$ and $m=0$. Hence $f$ is injective as well as surjective; its inverse is automatically $A$-linear. This proves $f$ is an isomorphism, the statement that Noetherian modules are Hopfian.

Choose a surjection $P_0=A^{r_0}\twoheadrightarrow M$. Since $A$ is a Noetherian ring, a finite free module is a Noetherian module, and its kernel $K_1$ is a finitely generated module. Choose a finite free surjection $P_1\twoheadrightarrow K_1$ and repeat. This constructs a resolution by finitely generated free moduleswhose terms are, in particular, finitely generated projective modules. It may be infinite; the request is finite generation of every term, not finite length.

Now suppose the nonzero finitely generated module $M$ has finite projective dimension $n$. For $n\ge 1$, its $n$th syzygy $K_n$ in this free resolution is projective. Indeed, dimension shifting along the successive kernel sequences givesfor every module $N$. The vanishing follows by computing the latter Ext functor from any length-$n$ projective resolution. Vanishing of ${\mathrm{Ext}}^1(K_n,-)$ makes every short exact sequence ending in $K_n$ split: apply the long exact sequence of Ext groups to a free surjection onto $K_n$ to lift its identity. Thus $K_n$ is a projective module. It is finitely generated by the preceding construction. Truncating giveswith every term finite projective.

Apply the Hom functor ${\mathrm{Hom}}_A(-,A)$ and write $P_i^{\ast }={\mathrm{Hom}}_A(P_i,A)$. At the top degree,If this group were zero, $d_n^{\ast }$ would be surjective. The dual module of a finite projective module is finite projective, so this surjection has a section $s:P_n^{\ast }\to P_{n-1}^{\ast }$. Finite projective modules identify with their double dual modules: the evaluation map is an isomorphism for a finite free module and passes to its direct summands. Dualizing $d_n^{\ast }s=\mathrm{id}$ therefore gives $s^{\ast }{d}_n={\mathrm{id}}_{P_n}$. Hence $d_n$ splits, and $P_{n-1}/d_n(P_n)$ is projective. Replacing the last two terms by this quotient shortens the projective resolution to length $n-1$, contradicting minimality. This proves top Ext detects finite projective dimension:For $n=0$, $M$ is a nonzero finite projective module and embeds as a summand of $A^r$. Some coordinate projection restricts nontrivially to $M$, proving ${\mathrm{Hom}}_A(M,A)\ne 0$ as required.

For infinite projective dimension, take the dual-number algebra $A=k[\epsilon ]/({\epsilon }^2)$ and $M=k=A/(\epsilon )$. Multiplication by $\epsilon$ has image and kernel both equal to $(\epsilon )$, giving the periodic resolution over dual numbersApplying ${\mathrm{Hom}}_A(-,k)$ makes every differential zero, so ${\mathrm{Ext}}_A^i(k,k)\cong k$ for every $i\ge 0$. A finite projective resolution would force all sufficiently high Ext functors to vanish. Thus ${\mathrm{pd}}_{k[\epsilon ]/({\epsilon }^2)}k=\infty$.

The finite-generation hypothesis is essential if the middle sentence's “a module” is interpreted as an unrestricted new module. A concrete vanishing top Ext without finite generation occurs for $A=k[[t]]$ and $K=A[1/t]=k((t))$. This Noetherian ring has the exact free presentationInjectivity of $d$ follows by examining the largest index of a finitely supported input, since $t$ is a non-zero-divisor. For exactness in the middle, use the relations to move a finite sum to its largest index $N$; its remaining coefficient is ${\sum }_{i=0}^N{a}_i{t}^{N-i}$, which is zero precisely when its image in $K$ is zero. The map onto $K$ is surjective because every Laurent series has a lower bound on its exponents.

Applying ${\mathrm{Hom}}_A(-,A)$ gives on products the map $(b_i)\mapsto (b_i-t{b}_{i+1})$. It is surjective: for any $(c_i)$, set $b_i={\sum }_{j\ge 0}{t}^j{c}_{i+j}$. These are well-defined formal power series, because each coefficient receives only finitely many contributions, and $b_i-t{b}_{i+1}=c_i$. Consequently ${\mathrm{Ext}}_A^1(K,A)=0$. But ${\mathrm{Hom}}_A(K,A)=0$: the image of every $t^{-i}$ must lie in ${\bigcap }_{r\ge 0}{t}^{r}A=0$, since it is divisible by every power of $t$. A nonzero projective module is a summand of a free module and therefore has a nonzero coordinate map to $A$. Thus $K$ is not projective, while its displayed resolution has length one. In particular,The nonvanishing conclusion proved above retains the finitely generated $M$ introduced at the start of the question.

For each $s\in S\setminus T$, maximality implies a nontrivial relationHere $a_s\ne 0$, since otherwise this would contradict the linear independence in a module of $T$. Thus $a_{s}s\in N$. Take $r={\prod }_{s\in S\setminus T}{a}_s$, with empty product equal to one. Because $R$ is an integral domain, $r\ne 0$. Every $s\in S\setminus T$ satisfies $rs\in N$, and this is also true for $s\in T$. Expressing any element of the finitely generated module as an $R$-linear combination of $S$ now gives $rM\subseteq N$. This is clearing denominators relative to an independent module subset; it does not require $R$ to be a field.

Put $K=\mathrm{Frac}(A)$ and let $B$ be the integral closure of $A$ in $L$. We first establish the elementary integral extension machinery, and then use the trace pairing to put $B$ inside a finite $A$-module.

An integral element $x$ satisfies a monic polynomial over the base ring. If its equation has degree $r$, the powers $1,x,\dots ,x^{r-1}$ generate $A[x]$ as an $A$-module. More generally, adjoining finitely many integral elements gives a finitely generated module: reduce the exponent of each generator using its monic equation. Conversely, if an $A$-submodule $M$ of an extension algebra contains $1$, is finitely generated, and is stable under multiplication by $x$, choose generators $m_j$ and write $x{m}_j={\sum }_i{a}_{ij}{m}_i$. Multiplying $(xI-(a_{ij}))$ by its adjugate shows that its monic determinant annihilates every $m_j$, hence annihilates $1$. This finite-module criterion for integrality is the determinant trick.

If $x,y$ are integral elements, the finite $A$-module $A[x,y]$ is stable under $x+y$, $xy$ and $-x$. The criterion proves that these are integral elements. Thus the integral closure really is a subring. It also proves integral dependence is transitive: if $x$ is integral over an integral $A$-algebra $C$, take the finitely many coefficients of its equation, form their finite $A$-subalgebra $C_0$, and observe that $C_0[x]$ is finite over $C_0$ and therefore finite over $A$. The criterion applies to $x$. In particular, an algebra generated by finitely many integral elements is a finite integral extension, even though an arbitrary integral extension need not be finite.

Choose a $K$-basis $v_1,\dots ,v_d$ of $L$. Each basis element is algebraic over $K$. Ifchoose a nonzero $a_i\in A$ clearing all coefficient denominators. Then $e_i=a_i{v}_i$ satisfies a monic equation with coefficients $a_i^j{c}_{ij}\in A$. Hence all $e_i$ belong to $B$ and still form a $K$-basis. This is integral field basis by denominator clearing.

We next prove the trace of an integral element over a normal domain property. For $z\in B$, its images under all $K$-embeddings of $L$ into an algebraic closure are integral elements over $A$, because each satisfies the same monic equation. Their sum is integral by the subring property just proved. Since $L/K$ is a separable field extension, that sum is the field trace ${\mathrm{Tr}}_{L/K}(z)$ and lies in $K$. The normality assumption means that $A$ is a normal domain, equivalently an integrally closed domain, soThe same conclusion applies to $z{e}_i$, since $B$ is a ring.

The trace pairing of a finite separable field extension is nondegenerate. One can see this directly using the allowed Galois theory: for a primitive element $u$, the embedding matrix of $1,u,\dots ,u^{d-1}$ is a Vandermonde matrix in the distinct conjugates of $u$. Its determinant is nonzero, and the trace Gram matrix is its transpose times itself. Nondegeneracy is unchanged by a change of basis.

Let $M={\sum }_{i}A{e}_i$. Its trace-dual lattice isNondegeneracy supplies a trace-dual $K$-basis $e_1^{\ast },\dots ,e_d^{\ast }$, with $\mathrm{Tr}(e_i{e}_j^{\ast })={\delta }_{ij}$. The coefficient formula givesEquivalently, the matrix $T=(\mathrm{Tr}(e_i{e}_j))$ has entries in $A$ and nonzero determinant $D$; if $b={\sum }_i{c}_i{e}_i\in B$, then $Tc\in A^d$ and the adjugate formula gives $Dc\in A^d$. Thus $B\subseteq D^{-1}M$ as well. Both descriptions exhibit a finite free ambient $A$-module.

A finite $A$-module is a Noetherian module when $A$ is a Noetherian ring, and every submodule of a Noetherian module is finitely generated. Since $B$ is an $A$-submodule of $M^{\vee }$, we obtainThis proves finiteness of integral closure in a finite separable extension. The hypotheses have distinct roles: separability makes the trace pairing nonsingular, normality puts integral traces back in $A$, and Noetherianity makes the contained submodule finite. Also $\mathrm{Frac}(B)=L$, since the integral basis elements span $L$ over $K$, and $B$ is itself Noetherian because its ideals are $A$-submodules of a finite $A$-module.

Work with the usual commutative unital Noetherian ring convention. First prove that every submodule of $R^d$ is a finitely generated module. For $d=1$, a submodule is an ideal, hence finitely generated by Noetherianity. For the induction step, project a submodule $N\subseteq R^d$ onto its last coordinate. Its image is a finitely generated ideal; choose lifts in $N$ of its generators. The projection kernel lies in $R^{d-1}$ and is finitely generated by induction. The kernel generators together with the chosen lifts generate $N$, since subtracting a combination of the lifts leaves an element of the kernel.

Now choose a surjection $R^d\to M$ from a finite generating set of the module $M$. For any submodule $U\subseteq M$, its inverse image in $R^d$ is finitely generated by the result just proved. The images of those generators generate $U$.

Every submodule of $M$ is finitely generated. In particular $M$ is a Noetherian module: the union of an ascending chain is a submodule, and its finite generators all belong to a single member of the chain, forcing eventual stabilization.

The Laurent polynomial ring is a localization of a ring:The Hilbert basis theorem makes $k[X_1,X_2]$ a Noetherian ring, and Localization of a Noetherian ring preserves this property. Thus $\boxed{R\text{ is Noetherian}}$.

For separating finite Laurent support by an integer weight, take a nonzero Laurent polynomial $r$ and let $F\subset {\mathbb{Z}}^2$ be its finite set of exponent pairs with nonzero coefficients. Choose an integer $N$ such thatwhere the maximum is zero if $F$ has only one member. Set $(a_1,a_2)=(1,N)$. If $m_1+N{m}_2=m_1^{\prime }+N{m}_2^{\prime }$, thenso $m_2=m_2^{\prime }$ and then $m_1=m_1^{\prime }$. Consequently all powers of $T$ in ${\theta }_{(1,N)}(r)$ are distinct. The linear independence of the Laurent monomials prevents cancellation, givingThe choice depends on the finite support of $r$; a single fixed substitution need not detect every nonzero element.

For Noetherianity of subalgebras of a one-variable Laurent polynomial ring, let $A$ be a unital $k$-subalgebra of $k[T,T^{-1}]$. If $A=k$, it is already a Noetherian ring. Otherwise we find a nonconstant $f\in A$ and an ambient ring $B$ containing $A$ such that $B$ is a finitely generated module over $k[f]$.

If $A\subseteq k[T]$, choose a nonconstant polynomial $f=a_d{T}^d+\cdots +a_0$ in $A$, where $a_d\ne 0$. Then $T$ is an integral element over $k[f]$, since it satisfies the monic polynomial equationThus $B=k[T]$ is a finitely generated module over $k[f]$, generated by $1,T,\dots ,T^{d-1}$. The case $A\subseteq k[T^{-1}]$ is identical after replacing $T$ by $T^{-1}$.

In the remaining case $A$ is contained in neither of these two polynomial rings. There is an element with a positive exponent and an element with a negative exponent. If either already has both, use it as $f$. Otherwise their sum has both, since the positive powers of the first and the negative powers of the second cannot cancel. We obtainMultiplying this identity by $T^p$ gives a polynomial equation for $T$ with leading coefficient $a_q$:Dividing by $a_q$ makes it monic. Similarly, multiplication by $T^{-q}$ gives a monic equation for $T^{-1}$ after division by $a_{-p}$. Both generators are therefore integral elements over $k[f]$, so $B=k[T,T^{-1}]$ is a finitely generated module over $k[f]$.

In all three cases $k[f]$ is a Noetherian ring, as a quotient of a one-variable polynomial ring. The subalgebra $A\subseteq B$ is also a $k[f]$-submodule, so it is a Noetherian module. Every ideal of $A$ is a $k[f]$-submodule of $A$ and is therefore finitely generated over $k[f]$, hence over $A$. This proves

For the final request, take the following subalgebra of the two-variable Laurent polynomial ring:Let $J=X_{1}k[X_1,X_2]$, an ideal of $A$. We haveas $k$-vector spaces. In particular, the classes of $X_1{X}_2^j$, for $j\ge 0$, are linearly independent. If $J$ had finitely many generators as an $A$-module, their classes would span $J/J^2$ over $A/J=k$, contradicting its infinite dimension. Hence $J$ is not finitely generated and $A$ is not a Noetherian ring. This illustrates why the preceding result is special to one Laurent variable.

The Weak Hilbert Nullstellensatz states that if $k$ is an algebraically closed field, every maximal ideal of $k[Y_1,\dots ,Y_s]$ isEquivalently, every proper ideal has a common zero. We prove the more general field statement, the Zariski lemma: a field finitely generated as a $k$-algebra is a finite field extension of $k$.

Write such a field as $L=k[b_1,\dots ,b_s]$. Choose a maximal set of algebraically independent elements $t_1,\dots ,t_r$ among these generators and denote the remaining generators by $c_1,\dots ,c_h$. Each $c_j$ is an algebraic element over $K=k(t_1,\dots ,t_r)$, so $L/K$ is a finite field extension. Clearing the denominators in their monic equations, choose a nonzero $d\in k[t_1,\dots ,t_r]$ such that each $c_j$ is an integral element overBecause $L$ is a field and $d^{-1}\in L$, we have $L=D[c_1,\dots ,c_h]$. Thus $L$ is an integral extension of $D$.

A subring over which a field is integral must itself be a field. Indeed, for $0\ne a\in D$, an integral equation for $a^{-1}$ multiplied by $a^{m-1}$ expresses $a^{-1}$ as an element of $D$. But if $r>0$, the ring $D$ is not a field: choose an irreducible polynomial $q(t_1)\in k[t_1]$ which does not divide $d$. There are infinitely many monic irreducible polynomials in $k[t_1]$, by the usual product-plus-one argument, whereas only finitely many can divide the nonzero $d$. The prime ideal $(q)$ stays proper after inverting $d$, so $q$ has no inverse in $D$. Therefore $r=0$, proving that $L/k$ is a finite field extension, and in particular an algebraic field extension.

Apply the Zariski lemma to the residue field $k[Y_1,\dots ,Y_s]/\mathfrak{m}$ of a maximal ideal. When $k$ is an algebraically closed field, this field is $k$ itself. The images $a_i$ of $Y_i$ then give $\mathfrak{m}=(Y_1-a_1,\dots ,Y_s-a_s)$, proving the Weak Hilbert Nullstellensatz.