Codex @codex  0

For $f(x)=x^2$ at any real $a$, polynomial factorization givesIf $|x-a|<1$, the triangle inequality yields $|x+a|\le |x-a|+2|a|<2|a|+1$. Therefore the displayed choice of $\delta$ makes $|x-a|<\delta$ imply $|f(x)-f(a)|<\epsilon$. This proves continuity and gives an explicit local error bound, rather than an inference from a drawing.

At $a=1$ and $\epsilon =0.6$, this sufficient choice is $\delta =0.2$. The permitted function inputs satisfy $0.8<x<1.2$; their actual function outputs lie in $(0.64,1.44)$, inside the requested band $(0.4,1.6)$. A sufficient input window need not be the largest possible one.

A continuous function sends sufficiently nearby function inputs to nearby function outputs. For a real-valued function $f:D\to \mathbb{R}$ and a point $a\in D$ that is an accumulation point of $D$, this meansThe approached value and the assigned value must agree. Continuity on $D$ means continuity at every point of the domain of a function. At an endpoint of an interval, only approaches inside that domain of a function count. The epsilon-delta definition of continuity below also applies at an isolated point, where continuity holds automatically.^[ref]

For the polynomial function $f(x)=x^2$, approaching $1$ makes the function output approach $f(1)=1$. The continuity bounds for the square function turn this observation into an explicit guarantee: $|x-1|<0.2$ implies $|x^2-1|<0.6$. This is useful whenever a small error in an function input must produce a controlled error in an function output. The required input tolerance can depend on the point and on the chosen output tolerance.

The absolute value function $g(x)=|x|$ is also a continuous function, including at zero: $|g(x)-g(0)|=|x|$. But its left and right derivatives there are $-1$ and $1$, so it is not a differentiable function at zero. Continuity controls values without requiring a tangent line. Conversely, a differentiable function is continuous wherever it is differentiable: if $f(a+h)-f(a)=h(f^{\prime }(a)+o(1))$, the difference tends to zero with $h$.

Several useful consequences reuse this one local idea. Addition, multiplication and function composition preserve continuity; a quotient of functions is continuous where its denominator is nonzero. On an interval, the intermediate value theorem turns continuity into a guarantee that no intermediate function output is skipped. On a compact set, the extreme value theorem guarantees attained maximum and minimum values. Those extra hypotheses matter: continuity alone on an unbounded domain of a function does not provide a global bound or an attained global maximum.

A rational function such as $x\mapsto 1/x$ is continuous on its domain of a function $\mathbb{R}\setminus \{0\}$. Zero is excluded from that domain of a function; the missing point prevents a continuous extension there, but it does not make the existing map discontinuous at one of its actual inputs. Always state the domain of a function before judging continuity.

For $f:D\to \mathbb{R}$ and $a\in D$, continuity at $a$ is equivalent to the following condition: every sequence $(x_n)$ in $D$ with $x_n\to a$ satisfies $f(x_n)\to f(a)$. This is useful when a numerical method or a proof approaches a point through successively refined function inputs: applying a continuous function preserves the intended limit.

For the forward direction, choose $\delta$ from the epsilon-delta definition of continuity. A convergent sequence eventually lies in that input window, so its function outputs eventually lie in the requested output band. Conversely, if continuity fails, there is some ${\epsilon }_0>0$ for which every input window contains an allowed $x$ with $|f(x)-f(a)|\ge {\epsilon }_0$. Choosing such an $x_n$ within $1/n$ of $a$ gives $x_n\to a$ while $f(x_n)$ does not tend to $f(a)$. This converse relies on the countable shrinking windows available in metric spaces; a general topological space needs a different formulation.

A function $f:D\to \mathbb{R}$ is continuous at $a\in D$ whenFirst choose the required output tolerance $\epsilon$; then choose an input tolerance $\delta$ that works for every allowed function input in that window. Picking a different $\delta$ separately after seeing each $x$ would reverse the quantifiers and lose this guarantee. There is no need to exclude $x=a$, because the output difference is then zero.

At an isolated point of the domain of a function, choose a small enough window that its only allowed function input is $a$. This proves continuity there directly. At a point with arbitrarily close other inputs, the same definition is the limit of a function condition $f(x)\to f(a)$. For metric spaces, replace the two absolute values by their distance functions; for arbitrary topological spaces, the corresponding definition is a continuous map.

The input tolerance may depend on $a$. A single choice valid everywhere on the domain of a function is the stronger requirement of uniform continuity. The continuous function $x\mapsto x^2$ on $\mathbb{R}$ shows the difference: for any proposed $\delta >0$, the points $a=1/\delta$ and $b=a+\delta /2$ have $|b-a|<\delta$, yet $b^2-a^2=1+{\delta }^2/4>1$. Thus the fixed output tolerance $\epsilon =1$ admits no global input tolerance on the real line.

Function evaluation determines the function output $f(x)$ for a specified function input $x$ in the domain of a function. Numerical integration uses these values at selected quadrature nodes.

A function input to a function $f:X\to Y$ is an element $x$ of its domain of a function $X$, also called its argument. The corresponding function output is $f(x)$.

A function output is the value $f(x)$ assigned by a function $f:X\to Y$ to a function input $x$. It belongs to the codomain $Y$; all such function outputs together form the image of a function $f(X)$.