Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 9 4 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The function is locally integrable in , so it defines a distribution. The claimed distributional identity means that for every ,Choose a ball containing the support and remove . On the punctured region . Green's second identity givesThe outer boundary contributes zero. On the inner boundary, the outward normal for the punctured region is , so , fixing the sign.
The first term is ; the second equals . Local integrability allows the left side to converge to its full-space integral. Therefore . In this sign convention, is the fundamental solution of the Laplace equation for the operator .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 7 2 a Solution 2026-10-07
Use the conventional Laplace operator . The fundamental solution of the Laplace equation in two dimensions is , with . To check its sign, integrate the outward normal derivative around a circle: . Applying integration by parts against a smooth compactly supported test function and shrinking the circle gives the distributional identity.
The printed stream function has . For each multi-index with , transfer derivatives to the compactly supported function:The logarithmic singularity is locally integrable. On a bounded region in , the convolution uses one fixed bounded region in the integration variable; splitting off a small disk around the singularity proves continuity of these derivatives. Thus , and convolution of the distributional identity givesThe asserted plus sign is false for the printed kernel and the conventional Laplacian. Any nonzero smooth compactly supported is a counterexample. To obtain , replace the kernel's minus sign by a plus sign, or explicitly adopt the negative Laplace operator. Below, retain the printed kernel and velocity convention. With that convention, , so is the negative of conventional scalar vorticity. This sign does not change the transport or flow arguments.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 5 2 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
The interior elliptic regularity assertion for the Laplace equation is that a harmonic function is smooth, in fact real analytic, throughout . No boundary regularity of its unspecified boundary values is implied.
First let and . On a ball compactly contained in , differentiating its spherical average and applying the divergence theorem expresses that derivative as a constant factor times , which is zero. The spherical average tends to at the center as . This proves the mean value property for harmonic functions.
Choose a radially symmetric smooth mollifier , supported in , with integral one. By integrating the spherical mean value property,whenever . For fixed the right side is a smooth convolution, since all derivatives can be placed on . Thus is smooth. The same argument proves the Weyl lemma for a distributionally harmonic : first mollify , apply the fixed-radius identity, and let the mollification radius tend to zero in distributions to obtain the same smooth representative.
To prove real analytic regularity, differentiating the fixed-radius convolution gives the interior derivative estimate for a harmonic functionfor any harmonic . All derivatives of are harmonic. On nested balls between and , apply this estimate times, decreasing the radius by each time. For ,The inequality follows by integrating below the sum defining . Apply the one-dimensional Taylor theorem along each segment, expanding directional derivatives by the multinomial formula. The remainder is bounded by , so it tends to zero for sufficiently small . This gives a locally convergent multivariate Taylor series. A harmonic function is real analytic in the interior.
The usual inhomogeneous elliptic regularity statement also follows: if and is smooth, take a cutoff equal to one near a given point and set , where is a fundamental solution of the Laplace equation with . Moving every derivative to the compactly supported smooth function shows is smooth. Locally is harmonic, so is smooth there too.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 ii Paper 2 30E Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
Write . Since ,A Schwartz function is bounded and uniformly continuous. Given a tolerance, first choose so the tail integral of is small. On , uniform continuity makes the difference uniformly small for every when is small. On the tail it is bounded by . This proves uniform convergence, without assuming , and is the approximate identity argument.
For the radial regularization of the three-dimensional fundamental solution of the Laplace equation, direct differentiation givesThe radial integral is . This even approximate identity therefore gives for .
The function is locally integrable and determines a tempered distribution. We have , and is integrable near zero and infinity for a Schwartz test function. Integration by parts and the dominated convergence theorem giveThus , proving that is a fundamental solution of a linear differential operator. In this last part the test-function space is ; the printed in the three-dimensional integral is understood with .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 iii Paper 107 2 c Solution 2026-09-28
For , the radial functionis harmonic on , vanishes on the unit sphere, and is positive in the domain. It therefore violates the weak maximum principle for elliptic operators. In two dimensions the corresponding counterexample is , since the fundamental solution of the Laplace equation changes from a power to a logarithm.
Write . A rotationally symmetric fundamental solution of the Laplace equation is harmonic for . The Laplace equation in polar coordinates reduces to , so . Integrate over a disk of radius around the source. The divergence theorem givesTaking therefore givesChanging the reference length inside the logarithm merely adds a constant. Notice the sign convention: the potential equation in this question is , whereas this Green function satisfies . Thus the point-source potential used below is .
For the two insulating walls, successive Euclidean reflections in and generate sources of strength at for every integer . Only lies inside the physical strip. This is the Neumann image lattice for a point source in a strip. SetThe raw sum of logarithmic potentials diverges by additive constants. A well-defined potential is obtained by pairing opposite images and subtracting their constant reference terms:Each paired summand is on compact subsets away from the source. The series therefore has local uniform convergence, as do the required derivative series. It givesIn the corresponding -derivative, the images pair as and at , and as and at . Their opposite horizontal separations make the derivatives cancel. Thus both homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions hold. The constructed solution is even in ; without a condition at infinity the side conditions alone would allow further homogeneous harmonic functions.
For fixed , uniform convergence on permits integration term by term. The th term has integralHere is the ordinary real inverse trigonometric function, taking values in . Summing from to makes a telescoping series:The source flux splits equally between the upper and lower parts of the strip. The next two parts give the single-wall constructions that underlie the image lattice.
For , the fundamental solution of the Laplace equation in three dimensions isIts sign follows from the flux: on a small sphere of radius , its outward radial derivative is , with total flux one.
Let and put the image point at . The method of images gives the Dirichlet Green function inside a sphere:The image lies outside the ball, so its potential is harmonic inside. On , the identity makes the two terms cancel. The original source retains unit strength. For a source at the centre, take the limit:
Use the sign convention in which a fundamental solution of the Laplace equation satisfiesin the sense of distributions. It is a harmonic function away from the source. Writing , the radial equation is , so . The divergence theorem on a small circle about the source fixes its total flux:ConsequentlyThe arbitrary constant is a harmonic function. For the alternative convention , the logarithm has the opposite sign; subsequent Green's function formulas must use that convention consistently.
The three-dimensional fundamental solution of the Laplace equation, with , isIt is harmonic away from the source, and its gradient has total outward flux one through a small source-centred sphere.
For , place the image at , outside the unit ball. On , expansion of squared distances gives . The method of images therefore gives the Dirichlet Green function inside a sphereThe boundary value is zero by the distance identity, and the image term is harmonic throughout the physical ball. Thus there. At the central source, take the finite limit of the weighted image term:
A fundamental solution of the Laplace equation satisfies in the sense of distributions, without a boundary condition. Choose it rotationally symmetric about the source. Away from the source, with , the radial Laplace equation is , giving .
Integrating over a small disc around the source and using the divergence theorem fixes the normalization:ThereforeThe additive constant is arbitrary; adding other entire harmonic functions is also possible if rotational symmetry is not imposed. The positive sign here follows from the convention .
For the rotationally invariant free-space fundamental solution of the Laplace equation, put . Away from the source, the radial Laplacian gives , hence . Integrate its Poisson equation over a disk of radius about the source. The divergence theorem gives , soA fixed reference length can be inserted inside the logarithm and absorbed into . The resulting electric field decays like .
Strictly, the stated pointwise decay as alone does not justify “most general”: one can also add the harmonic function , whose gradient has that decay for every fixed . This is the same growth issue as a zero-boundary harmonic function with pointwise vertical decay. The displayed answer is the usual isotropic free-space choice; requiring the field to vanish uniformly in every direction at spatial infinity removes these extra harmonic additions. An additive constant remains undetermined.
