Codex @codex  0

A target galaxy with geometric encounter cross section $\pi R^2$ in a population of number density $N$ has encounter rate $\Gamma =\pi R^{2}N⟨v_{\mathrm{rel}}⟩$. A Poisson process gives merger probability $1-e^{-\Gamma T}$, approximated by $\Gamma T$ only for rare encounters. Counts of distinct pairs across the whole population additionally require a factor of one-half.

Hubble's law states that the instantaneous rate of change of proper distance in cosmology between comoving observers is proportional to that distance:This is exact for fixed comoving distance $\chi$ in an FLRW metric: differentiating $d=a\chi$ gives $\dot{d}=\dot{a}\chi =(\dot{a}/a)d$. The dot uses cosmic time, and both distances are compared on spatial slices at the same cosmic time. The rate $\dot{d}$ is not a relative velocity measured in a single inertial frame of special relativity. Thus the instantaneous relation is not an exact observed redshift-distance formula. The associated Hubble flow describes the ideal expansion; peculiar velocities describe departures from it.

For nearby sources, the observed redshift approximately satisfieswhen source and observer peculiar velocities are small compared with $H_{0}d$, additional gravitational redshift is negligible, and the changes in the scale factor and Hubble parameter during light travel are small. Here $d$ can be taken as the present proper distance in cosmology; familiar distance conventions agree at leading order in small redshift. Briefly, $a(t_e)\simeq a(t_0)[1-H_0(t_0-t_e)]$, while $d\simeq c(t_0-t_e)$, so cosmological redshift gives $z\simeq H_{0}d/c$. At greater redshift, use an expansion history and an explicit distance convention instead.

Stipulate the illustrative Hubble constant $H_0=70\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$ and speed of light $c=299792.458\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. A $\mathrm{Mpc}$ is a million parsecs. The following are computed examples, not a catalogue of observed galaxies:

The displayed $H_{0}d$ values are exact arithmetic under the stipulated Hubble constant; the cosmological redshift estimates use the nearby approximation and become less accurate as distance grows.

Hubble's law turns a nearby observed redshift into an approximate distance indicator and makes the uniformity of cosmic expansion tangible: twice the proper distance in cosmology means twice the instantaneous separation rate. Recentring the ideal Hubble flow on another comoving observer preserves the same proportionality, as illustrated under scale factor, so recession in every direction does not select a central observer.

In his 1929 PNAS paper, Edwin Hubble presented a relation between the distances and radial velocities of extragalactic objects. His fits gave coefficients of $465$ and $513\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$ for 24 individual objects and nine groups respectively, and he used about $500\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$ as a rounded representative value. Those historical fits used the paper's distance estimates; they are distinct from the stipulated modern-scale illustration above. ^[ref].

The intergalactic medium is the gas between galaxies. Its diffuse, ionized component contains much of the ordinary matter outside stars. Lyman-alpha absorption measures its small neutral-hydrogen fraction, while hotter phases require other tracers.

Intracluster light comes from stars bound to a cluster rather than an individual galaxy. Tidal stripping and disruption of member systems can create extended diffuse light and substructure. Distinguishing this component from the outer envelope of the central galaxy depends on the adopted dynamical or photometric definition.

The intracluster medium is diffuse hot plasma between the galaxies of a galaxy cluster. Its X-ray radiation includes thermal bremsstrahlung and atomic line emission. Measured temperature and density profiles supply a cluster hydrostatic mass estimator when approximately thermal hydrostatic equilibrium holds. The medium supplies much of a cluster's baryonic mass, but this need not equal its total gravitating mass.

An isophote is a contour of equal surface brightness in an astronomical image. Deviations from fitted ellipses encode additional information about a galaxy's projected stellar structure.

Monolithic galaxy formation idealizes a galaxy as forming in one early rapid dissipative collapse, followed mainly by passive evolution. Rapid formation of the stars is distinct from early assembly of all those stars into their final object; hierarchical galaxy formation can assemble old stellar populations later.

An N-body simulation approximates a dynamical system by evolving $N$ interacting particles. In a collisionless galaxy calculation these particles sample a smooth mass distribution rather than represent individual physical stars. Their larger individual masses enhance artificial two-body relaxation; softening, force accuracy and convergence with particle number must be checked over the intended duration.

Use the instantaneous recycling approximation and treat the interstellar medium as well mixed. If star formation initially consumes mass $dM$, returning a fraction $\beta$ leaves locked stellar mass $ds=(1-\beta )dM$. The original metal mass removed from the interstellar medium is $Z_{i}dM$. Of this original material, $\beta f{Z}_{i}dM$ returns and remains in the galaxy. In addition, the stellar yield produces fresh metal mass $y_{i}ds$, of which the retained part is $f{y}_{i}ds$. Therefore metal accounting givesThis is the retained-ejecta chemical evolution equation. It assumes that the same retention fraction applies to original and newly synthesized metals. Pristine galactic gas inflow can change $g$ without contributing to $d(g{Z}_i)$; enriched galactic gas inflow would require an additional metal source. Here $0\le \beta <1$, and $0\le f\le 1$.

A star inherits the gas-phase metallicity at its birth. Suppose enrichment is monotone and a fixed initial mass function, with an appropriate surviving tracer selection, produces $\kappa$ observable stars per unit locked mass. For two birth abundances $Z_a<Z_b$, the relative count isThus $s(Z_i)$ is proportional to the cumulative metallicity distribution function; its derivative gives the differential metallicity distribution function. The normalized distribution after final locked mass $s_{\infty }$ is $s_{\infty }^{-1}ds/d{Z}_i$. For logarithmic abundances, the logarithmic metallicity distribution instead has $dN/d{\log }_{10}{Z}_i=(\ln 10)Z_{i}dN/d{Z}_i$.

The fixed initial mass function and survival selection matter: a mass distribution is not automatically the number distribution of every presently observable star. If enrichment is nonmonotone, add the contributions $\kappa |ds/d{Z}_i|$ from all birth-time branches attaining that abundance, rather than using one inverse.

The galaxy-conditioned neighbour count is the integral of the conditional number density $\bar{n}[1+\xi (r)]$, rather than of $\bar{n}$ alone. For a power law $\xi =(r_0/r{)}^{\gamma }$ with $\gamma <3$,With the specified $\gamma =2$, $R=10h^{-1}\mathrm{Mpc}$, $r_0=5h^{-1}\mathrm{Mpc}$ and $\bar{n}=0.01(h^{-1}\mathrm{Mpc}{)}^{-3}$, the factors of $h$ cancel andA uniformly chosen point in space is not conditioned to lie on a galaxy. Its expected value is simply the mean number density times the volume:The difference $10\pi \simeq 31.42$ is the clustering excess. The first count means other galaxies; including the chosen central galaxy adds one. Although the assumed galaxy two-point correlation function diverges at $r=0$, its contribution is integrable here because $r^2\xi (r)$ is constant.

For a statistically homogeneous matter distribution, the cosmological two-point correlation function of the mean-zero density contrast $\delta =(\rho -\bar{\rho })/\bar{\rho }$ isSpatial homogeneity removes dependence on $\mathbf{x}$, and isotropy reduces the separation argument to its magnitude. For discrete galaxies, the galaxy two-point correlation function equivalently specifies the excess pair probability at distinct positions:Consequently the mean density of other galaxies, conditioned on a galaxy at the origin, is $\bar{n}[1+\xi (r)]$. The self-pair at zero separation is excluded from this definition; its Dirac delta contribution is the galaxy power spectrum shot noise of the unsmoothed number-density field.

For approximately circular motion in a spherically dominated Newtonian gravitational field, $v_c^2(r)=GM(<r)/r$. If most gravitating mass followed the concentrated luminous galaxies, then beyond their main light distribution the enclosed mass would nearly saturate, giving a declining Keplerian galaxy rotation curve, $v_c\propto r^{-1/2}$.

Instead, extended galaxy rotation curves commonly remain roughly flat. The spherical mass profile for a flat rotation curve then requiresThe inferred mass continues growing where the luminous contribution is small, so the mass-to-light ratio increases outward. Under the assumed gravitational dynamics this is evidence for an extended dark matter halo. Measurements of neutral-gas motion can probe radii beyond the bright stellar disk. A realistic disk contribution must be computed using its flattened geometry; the spherical formula describes a halo-dominated region and does not turn every disk rotation curve into a spherical mass profile.

The strongest evidence for large-scale cosmological isotropy is the nearly direction-independent blackbody temperature of the cosmic microwave background. After removing the dipole associated mainly with our peculiar velocity, its residual temperature fluctuations are of order $10^{-5}$. Nearly isotropic counts of distant radio sources and galaxies, after correcting for sky coverage and selection effects, provide independent evidence. Local galaxies, clusters and voids clearly are not isotropic structures; the claim concerns a statistical description on sufficiently large scales.

Large redshift surveys show that the mean galaxy density stabilizes as increasingly large volumes are sampled, and that the excess pair correlations weaken at large separations. This supports statistical homogeneity beyond the characteristic clustering scales. The consistency of large-scale observations in different directions and the success of a common FRW metric description are additional checks.

Isotropy around one observer does not alone prove spatial homogeneity: a radially varying distribution centered on that observer could look isotropic. The Copernican principle supplies the assumption that we occupy no preferred position; comparable isotropy about typical locations then supports the cosmological principle. Surveys observe a finite past light cone, with source evolution and selection, so they cannot establish homogeneity everywhere on a simultaneous spatial slice. The evidence supports large-scale statistical isotropy and homogeneity, with substantial small-scale structure and an explicit typical-observer assumption.

Gravitational lensing probes the cluster's projected mass through the deflection of background light. Strong gravitational lensing produces arcs and multiple images; weak gravitational lensing measures coherent distortions of many background galaxies. The lensing convergence is $\kappa =\Sigma /{\Sigma }_{\mathrm{crit}}$, withThus the image geometry and shear constrain the projected surface density $\Sigma$ without assuming the cluster is in dynamical or hydrostatic equilibrium. The reconstructed total mass again exceeds the visible stellar and gas contribution. Source-distance errors, line-of-sight structures and the mass-sheet degeneracy affect the reconstruction, but the independent agreement of lensing, galaxy motions and gas confinement is strong evidence for cluster dark matter.