Eisenstein criterion Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
For a primitive polynomialif a prime does not divide , divides every for , and has , then is irreducible. If , reduction modulo forces both and to be positive-degree monomials. Their constant terms are consequently divisible by , making , a contradiction. Gauss lemma for polynomials transfers the result between and .
The polynomial ring is a unique factorization domain by Gauss lemma for polynomials, but its ideal is not principal. Any generator would divide both 2 and , hence be a unit: a divisor of 2 has degree zero, and a constant dividing is . Yet evaluation at zero followed by reduction modulo 2 annihilates the ideal and not 1. It embeds in the principal ideal domain , illustrating that the property need not pass to a subring.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 ib Paper 3 11C i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 ib Paper 4 2C Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ib Paper 2 2G Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ib Paper 4 2G Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 13 1 iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Take the three-dimensional affine quadric coneThe polynomial is an irreducible polynomial: as a polynomial in over , it is primitive because and are coprime elements of a unique factorization domain, and it is a linear irreducible polynomial over . Gauss lemma for polynomials then applies. Thus is an irreducible variety that is an affine variety, of algebraic dimension by the principal hypersurface dimension lemma in affine space .
The coordinate rings of and are respectively and . Both are affine planes, hence irreducible closed subsets of algebraic dimension . Their intersection is precisely the origin. ThereforeThe origin is the singular point of an algebraic variety of this three-dimensional affine quadric cone. The example shows why a smoothness of an algebraic variety hypothesis matters in intersection dimension estimates.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 ib Paper 3 11E a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
An algebraic integer is a complex number satisfying a monic polynomial with integer coefficients. Let be the monic minimal polynomial of . It is irreducible over . If is a monic polynomial vanishing at , then divides over . Gauss lemma for polynomials implies that monic rational factors of a monic integer polynomial have integer coefficients. Thus , and its irreducibility over implies irreducibility in .
For with , division by the monic works in , giving with . Since , minimality forces . Conversely each multiple of vanishes at . ThereforeWriting , division by expresses every element uniquely as with integer coefficients. A relation among these powers would be a nonzero vanishing polynomial of degree less than . Hence form a basis of the free module over .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 ib Paper 4 2E Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
Eisenstein's criterion. Let be a nonconstant primitive polynomial. If a prime number satisfies , for , and , then is an irreducible polynomial over .
To prove the Eisenstein criterion, suppose a nontrivial factorization exists over . Gauss lemma for polynomials gives with of positive degree. Their leading coefficients are not divisible by , because their product is . Reduction modulo therefore preserves both degrees, andSince the only irreducible factor of the right side is , both reduced factors are nonzero monomials of positive degree. Their constant coefficients are consequently divisible by . This would make , a contradiction.
For the requested polynomial, shift the variable by one. The binomial theorem givesIt is monic, all coefficients below the leading one are divisible by , and the constant coefficient is , not divisible by . The Eisenstein criterion proves irreducibility of this shifted polynomial. The substitution is an automorphism of , with inverse , so it preserves nontrivial factorizations. HenceThis is the cyclotomic polynomial for a prime index.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 ib Paper 2 2E a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-05
A unique factorization domain is an integral domain in which every nonzero nonunit is a finite product of irreducible elements, uniquely up to reordering and multiplication of factors by a unit in a ring. A principal ideal domain is an integral domain in which every ideal is generated by one element.
Gauss lemma for polynomials says that over a unique factorization domain , the product of two primitive polynomials is primitive, and the polynomial content satisfies up to a unit. In particular a primitive polynomial of positive degree is irreducible over exactly when it is irreducible over the fraction field of . Consequently a polynomial ring over a unique factorization domain is itself a unique factorization domain.
The Eisenstein criterion says that if has and there is a prime element with , for every , and , then is irreducible over the fraction field. If is primitive, it is also irreducible in . Over one may take to be an ordinary prime number. The primitivity qualification prevents a nonunit constant content from being overlooked.
The defining distinction is unique irreducible factorization versus generation of every ideal by one element.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 ib Paper 2 2E b ii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-05
For the same pair, . Since is a unique factorization domain, Gauss lemma for polynomials proves that is a unique factorization domain.
To prove that is not a principal ideal domain, consider the ideal . A generator would divide 2 and . Divisibility of 2 forces to be a nonzero constant integer; divisibility of then forces that integer to divide its coefficient 1, so . This would make . But evaluation at followed by reduction modulo 2 maps every element of to zero and maps 1 to one. Hence , a contradiction. This is the integer polynomial ring is not a principal ideal domain example, with both clauses satisfied by a single inclusion.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ib Paper 3 11G a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Gauss lemma for polynomials says that the product of two primitive polynomials in is primitive. Equivalently, a primitive polynomial in is reducible over exactly when it is reducible over .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ib Paper 3 11G b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Eisenstein criterion states that ifhas a prime number such that , for every , and , then is irreducible over .
After dividing out the polynomial content, suppose for contradiction that the resulting primitive polynomial factors as with positive-degree , using Gauss lemma for polynomials. Reduction modulo gives , so in the polynomial ring both and are monomials. Because both factors have positive degree, their constant coefficients are divisible by . Their product is then divisible by , a contradiction.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 ii Paper 3 18F Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Let be a splitting field of over . Its formal derivative isThe assumption on the characteristic of says that in . Any root of is nonzero, and hence . Thus and have no common root, so is a separable polynomial. Since it has degree and splits over , it has exactly distinct roots. This is the separability of roots of unity.
Fix a primitive root of unity . Define the th cyclotomic polynomial byIt is monic and has degree given by the Euler totient function . Partitioning all th roots of unity according to their exact multiplicative order gives the cyclotomic factorizationWe now prove by mathematical induction that . The base case is . If the result holds for every proper divisor of , thenis monic and belongs to . Polynomial division of by the monic integer polynomial produces a quotient and remainder in . The factorization over says that the remainder is zero and the quotient is , proving the claim.
It remains to prove irreducibility of cyclotomic polynomials. Let be a monic irreducible polynomial dividing , let be a root of , and write . We claim that is a root of for every prime number . Otherwise is a root of , so is a root of . Since is the minimal polynomial of over , Gauss lemma for polynomials givesAfter reduction of an integer polynomial modulo a prime, the Frobenius endomorphism givesChoose an irreducible factor of the nonconstant monic polynomial . Then , so . The cyclotomic factorization would then make divide over . This is impossible because its derivative is coprime to it when .
Thus for every prime . Iterating this fact over a prime factorization shows that whenever . These are all primitive th roots, soBecause divides , equality holds and . Hence every cyclotomic polynomial is irreducible over .
Finally, direct multiplication givesAlsoApplying the cyclotomic factorization to the two factors on the right givesand thereforeSince , cancellation yieldsThe thirtieth cyclotomic polynomial is irreducible over by the theorem just proved, so is irreducible.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ib Paper 2 9G Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Gauss lemma for polynomials states that the product of two primitive polynomials over a unique factorization domain is primitive. In particular, a primitive polynomial in is reducible over exactly when it is reducible over .
Eisenstein criterion says that a primitive polynomialis irreducible over if there is a prime such that , for every , and . To prove it, suppose with both factors of positive degree. After removing contents, Gauss's lemma lets us take primitive. Reduction modulo givesso both reduced factors are monomials of positive degree. Their constant terms are therefore divisible by , making divide , a contradiction.
An algebraic integer is a complex number satisfying a monic polynomial in . Let be one and let be its monic minimal polynomial. The usual proof using polynomial content shows that . The setis the kernel of the polynomial-evaluation ring homomorphism, hence an ideal. Every is divisible by in . Because is monic, polynomial division of by takes place in , and the remainder must vanish by minimality. Thereforewhere is monic and irreducible.
Fortranslation givesThis is Eisenstein at , so and therefore are irreducible over . HenceIrreducibility and Gauss's lemma also show that is a prime ideal of , soIt is not a field. The class of is nonzero but not a unit: reducing further modulo gives a nonzero quotientin which the image of is zero, whereas a unit must remain a unit under every unital quotient map. Thus