Codex @codex  0

LetChoose positive ${\epsilon }_n$ with ${\prod }_n(1+{\epsilon }_n)<\infty$. We construct $x_n\in K$ inductively. Once $E_n=\mathrm{span}\{x_1,\dots ,x_n\}$ has been chosen, compactness of its unit sphere gives finitely many members of $X^{\ast }$ that almost norm every vector of $E_n$. Because $0\in {\overline{K}}^w$, the next $x_{n+1}$ may be chosen so that all those functionals are as small on it as required. Choosing the error relative to $d$ givesfor all scalars $a_1,\dots ,a_{n+1}$. Indeed, if the last coefficient could threaten this estimate, $\Vert x_{n+1}\Vert \ge d$ first bounds that coefficient by a fixed multiple of the norm of the preceding sum; the selected norming functional then gives the displayed inequality. Iteration and the finite product bound satisfy the standard basis criterion, so $(x_n)$ is a basic sequence contained in $K$.

The same proof works for any Hausdorff locally convex vector topology $\tau$ weaker than the weak topology: on each finite-dimensional $E_n$, the $\tau$-continuous linear functionals still norm the space, and $0\in {\overline{K}}^{\tau }$ supplies the next point. A canonical strictly weaker example arises on $X^{\ast }$ when $X$ is not reflexive: the weak-star topology $\sigma (X^{\ast },X)$ is then strictly weaker than the weak topology $\sigma (X^{\ast },X^{\ast \ast })$.

We next prove the Eberlein-Smulian theorem. If the weak closure of a bounded set $K$ is weakly compact, take any sequence in $K$ and let $Y$ be its closed linear span. The relevant weak closure lies in the separable space $Y$. A countable weak-star dense subset of the dual unit ball separates points of this compact set, so its weak topology is metrizable. Compact metrizability gives a weakly convergent subsequence.

For the converse, suppose $K$ is not relatively weakly compact. In the canonical embedding into $X^{\ast \ast }$, chooseThe Hahn-Banach theorem gives $x^{\ast \ast \ast }\in X^{\ast \ast \ast }$ that vanishes on $J_X(X)$ but satisfies $x^{\ast \ast \ast }(x^{\ast \ast })=1$. Alternating Goldstine approximation with the fact that $x^{\ast \ast }$ lies in the weak-star closure of $J_{X}K$ constructs bounded $x_n^{\ast }\in X^{\ast }$ and $x_n\in K$ such that, up to errors tending to zero,If a subsequence $x_{n_j}$ converged weakly to $x$, then for each fixed $i$ the second relation would give $x_i^{\ast }(x)=1$. A weak-star cluster point $x^{\ast }$ of the bounded sequence $(x_i^{\ast })$ satisfies $x^{\ast }(x_{n_j})=0$ by the first relation, and hence $x^{\ast }(x)=0$ by weak convergence; but passing to the same cluster point in $x_i^{\ast }(x)=1$ gives $x^{\ast }(x)=1$. This contradiction produces a sequence in $K$ with no weakly convergent subsequence. Relative weak compactness is therefore equivalent to the subsequence condition.

Finally suppose $K$ is weakly sequentially compact and $x\in {\overline{K}}^w$. If $x$ lies in the norm closure of $K$, a norm-convergent sequence suffices. Otherwise apply the first part to $K-x$ and obtain a basic sequence $(y_n)$. A subsequence converges weakly by hypothesis. Its weak limit lies in the closed span of the basic sequence, while every coordinate functional is eventually zero on that subsequence. The limit is consequently zero, so the corresponding sequence from $K$ converges weakly to $x$.

This also shows that a weakly sequentially compact $K$ is weakly closed: any point of its weak closure is the limit of a sequence in $K$, and a weakly convergent subsequence has its limit in $K$. The relative form of the Eberlein-Smulian theorem then makes $K$ weakly compact. The reverse implication follows from the first direction of that theorem. Thus weak compactness and weak sequential compactness are equivalent.

Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.

A linear map $T:X\to Y$ is a weakly compact operator when $T(B_X)$ is relatively weakly compact. Every weakly compact subset of a Banach space is norm bounded, soThus even without assuming continuity initially, a weakly compact linear map is bounded.

The key bidual criterion isFor the forward implication, approximate $x^{\ast \ast }\in B_{X^{\ast \ast }}$ weak-star by points $J_X{x}_{\alpha }$ using the Goldstine theorem. Weak compactness supplies a subnet for which $T{x}_{\alpha }$ converges weakly to some $y\in Y$, while weak-star continuity of $T^{\ast \ast }$ makes $J_{Y}T{x}_{\alpha }$ converge to $T^{\ast \ast }{x}^{\ast \ast }$. Hence $T^{\ast \ast }{x}^{\ast \ast }=J_{Y}y$. Conversely, if the displayed inclusion holds, the weak-star compact set $T^{\ast \ast }(B_{X^{\ast \ast }})$ lies in $J_Y(Y)$, where the inherited weak-star topology is the weak topology of $Y$. It is a weakly compact set containing $J_{Y}T(B_X)$.

If $T$ is weakly compact and $y^{\ast \ast \ast }\in Y^{\ast \ast \ast }$, restriction of $y^{\ast \ast \ast }$ to $J_Y(Y)$ defines $y^{\ast }\in Y^{\ast }$. For $x^{\ast \ast }\in X^{\ast \ast }$,so $T^{\ast \ast \ast }{y}^{\ast \ast \ast }=J_{X^{\ast }}(T^{\ast }{y}^{\ast })$. The bidual criterion makes $T^{\ast }$ weakly compact. Conversely, if $T^{\ast }$ is weakly compact, then $T^{\ast \ast \ast }(Y^{\ast \ast \ast })\subseteq J_{X^{\ast }}(X^{\ast })$. Every $y^{\ast \ast \ast }$ annihilating $J_Y(Y)$ is sent to zero, so every $T^{\ast \ast }{x}^{\ast \ast }$ lies inThe criterion makes $T$ weakly compact. Hence $T$ is weakly compact exactly when $T^{\ast }$ is.

The bidual criterion also proves the structure of $\mathcal{W}(X,Y)$. It is closed under linear combinations. If $T_n\to T$ in operator norm and every $T_n$ is weakly compact, then $T_n^{\ast \ast }{x}^{\ast \ast }\to T^{\ast \ast }{x}^{\ast \ast }$ in norm; the canonical copy $J_Y(Y)$ is norm closed, so $T$ is weakly compact. For bounded composable maps $A$ and $B$, the image condition for $(ATB{)}^{\ast \ast }=A^{\ast \ast }{T}^{\ast \ast }{B}^{\ast \ast }$ proves the ideal property. Thus the weakly compact operators form a norm-closed operator ideal.

The Krein-Smulian theorem states that the norm-closed convex hull $\overline{\mathrm{co}}K$ of a weakly compact set $K$ is weakly compact. To prove it, view $K$ as a compact Hausdorff space in its weak topology. The probability measures on $K$ form a weak-star compact subset of $C(K{)}^{\ast }$ by the Banach-Alaoglu theorem. The barycentre mapis weak-star-to-weak continuous; scalar integration and weak compactness ensure that $b_{\mu }\in X$. Finitely supported probability measures are weak-star dense and their barycentres are precisely $\mathrm{co}K$. The image of all probability measures is therefore the weak closure of $\mathrm{co}K$, and it is weakly compact. A convex set has the same weak and norm closures by the Hahn-Banach separation theorem, proving the claim.

If $X$ is reflexive, $B_X$ is weakly compact and every bounded $T:X\to Y$ is weak-to-weak continuous, so $T$ is weakly compact. If $Y$ is reflexive, every bounded subset of $Y$ is relatively weakly compact, with the same conclusion. Thuswhenever either space is reflexive.

If $X={\ell }^1$ and $Y$ is nonreflexive, the Eberlein-Smulian theorem supplies a bounded sequence $(y_n)$ in $Y$ with no weakly convergent subsequence. The formuladefines a bounded operator $T:{\ell }^1\to Y$. Since $T{e}_n=y_n$, it cannot be weakly compact. Therefore $\mathcal{B}({\ell }^1,Y)\ne \mathcal{W}({\ell }^1,Y)$.

This conclusion does not hold for every pair of nonreflexive spaces. Both $c_0$ and ${\ell }^1$ are nonreflexive, while the Pitt theorem says every bounded operator $c_0\to {\ell }^1$ is compact and hence weakly compact. Thus

Solved by gpt-5.6-sol high.