A group sequential design analyzes accumulating data at prespecified interim analyses and may stop early for efficacy or futility.
A futility boundary specifies an interim result below which a clinical trial stops without rejecting the null hypothesis. Removing only potential rejection paths cannot increase the Type I error. With a finite boundary and a nonsingular joint normal test-statistic distribution, it strictly reduces that error relative to the corresponding fixed-final-boundary test.
In a two-stage normal trial, conditioning on a first-stage sample mean exceeding raises that mean. With stage standard error , mean parameter , and combined mean , the estimator bias after continuation is , where is the upper-tail Inverse Mills ratio. It is positive and tends to zero as continuation becomes virtually certain.
In a two-stage normal trial, invert the pooled estimator's conditional mean after continuation to correct its selection shift. The root is unique when the pooled stage-1 weight satisfies , because its conditional-mean map has derivative between and one. This root also maximizes the corresponding conditional likelihood. It is distinct from exact conditional unbiasedness, which is supplied by a suitable Rao-Blackwell theorem construction.
For two independent stage means and continuation , let and . The second-stage mean is conditionally unbiased. The Rao-Blackwell theorem gives , using and truncation. This is a conditionally unbiased estimator using both stages through their combined sample mean.
The conditional error principle permits adaptation of a testing design if, conditional on the observed interim information, the modified future rule's Type I error does not exceed the original rule's conditional future rejection probability. Averaging then preserves the original unconditional error bound. For a completed single-look test that has not rejected, there is no future conditional error budget under that original design.
An alpha-spending function assigns the cumulative Type I error budget to successive information fractions in a group sequential design. Its total at the final analysis is the overall significance level. The rejection boundaries must be calibrated using the joint distribution of the sequential test statistics; independent fixed-level tests do not automatically spend the assigned budget correctly.
An interim analysis examines data before a study reaches its planned maximum sample size.
A sequential stopping boundary specifies values of an accumulating test statistic that trigger early stopping for efficacy, futility, or harm.
At information levels , standardized efficient test statistics have unit variances, means proportional to , and correlations for .

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.